Talk:Take a penny, leave a penny

The tag says there are no references or sources. But how where would you get a reference or source for something you see everyday? If I took a photo and posted it, would that serve as a reference? Misterdoe 17:39, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

By all means do so, but I don't think that "counts" as a source. As you say, it isn't something that lends itself to citing sources, I think its appropriate to remove the tag.

All articles lend themselves to references. There is absolutely no article on Wikipedia that is exempt from being sourced. aliasd·U·T 08:39, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What you just said was "it's convenient to do it because the rules say you have to." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.73.70.113 (talk) 04:12, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:SKYISBLUE. We're talking about a wholly uncontroversial fact not in any reasonable doubt. Elmo iscariot (talk) 14:23, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Both of the sources are now dead or unaccessible links, thus necessitating a revival of the "needs citation" tag for the whole page. --Ferrariguy90 (talk) 20:50, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I found a Creative Commons-licensed picture on Flickr this morning that may be of use to WP. I'm not sure of the proper protocols for uploading pictures to WP, however. http://www.flickr.com/photos/scottfidd/233453727/ --Ferrariguy90 (talk) 17:01, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Today's removal/revert

Today, User:Kingboyk removed a lot of content, and User:Dismas re-added it, although I didn't personally agree with the removal of content, I respected the reasons for removal, now, in the interests of preventing (god forbid you two would) an edit war between high-profile deletionists and inclusionists, lets just fight it out below this line like normal wikipedians. aliasd·U·T 13:11, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]