User talk:TAzimi

Welcome!

Hello, TAzimi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- WikHead (talk) 00:59, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Herat Airport has been reverted.
Your edit here to Herat Airport was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.flickr.com/photos/isafmedia/sets/72157629311394721/with/6873712413/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 23:57, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Likewise this unexplained removal has been reverted. Please dont remove info and add synthesis/OR.Lihaas (talk) 04:34, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yu are repeatedly adding unsourced, unexplained OR. kindly discuss in talk.Lihaas (talk) 03:43, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! TAzimi, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. An awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! Rosiestep (talk) 05:10, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Truth and Justice (Afghanistan)

chance to work together...seeing as your Afghan, can you add the Afghani script translation for "Haq-wa-Edalat" to the lead of that page? then we can nom it for DYK wih a few more sourcesLihaas (talk) 08:46, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please fill out our brief Teahouse survey!

Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at Wikipedia:Teahouse would like your feedback! We have created a brief survey meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on Wikipedia. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you either received an invitation to visit the Teahouse, or edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests page.

Click here to be taken to the survey site.

The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!

Happy editing,

J-Mo, Teahouse host, 16:06, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Message sent with Global message delivery.

Not Lagoo sab

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

TAzimi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

There must be a mistake but the fact is I'm not Lagoo sab. I did in fact use Galaga1981 as my additional account when using my office computer. I didn't know that one cannot have 2 accounts. But please don't tie me to Lagoo sab. I don't see a reason why I'm blocked. Is there any problem with my edits? I should have been notified that someone mentioned my name. I kindly and respectfully ask to be unblocked please.--TAzimi (talk) 02:29, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Okay, after reviewing your contributions, I'll go out on a limb and unblock you. From your editing profile and your language, I am fairly confident you are not the same as the disruptive Afzalkhan123 (talk · contribs), the other account with which the checkuser linked you as "likely", and I don't see any immediately illegitimate deceptive use of your second, admitted account Galaga1981 (talk · contribs), although I'll ask you to discontinue using it from now on. Your edits seem to have been generally not unreasonable, although I've seen some signs of POV editing in a couple of edits; I must ask you to monitor your own editing for bias more consistently. I also notice that your initial edits did not really look like those of a brand-new user, so some suspicion of being a reincarnation of some other user remains. However, since I am not familiar enough with the field to recognize any particular disruptive or banned user in your edits, and the checkuser didn't link you with any others beyond the two mentioned above, I think unblocking is the right thing to do for now. My apologies for the quick block and the inconvenience, and thank you for your considerate and patient tone in your unblock request. Fut.Perf. ☼ 19:54, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Someone said that I also edit "exactly the same articles as Lagoo sab with exactly the same pov. (Pashtuns 60 % of Afghan population:[56][57], edit warring: [58]) I have called him by the name of LS several times, after which, at least in the form of TAzimi, he was not to be seen again at the article I had called on him. JCAla (talk) 11:38, 26 April 2012 (UTC)"

These are pretty lame because: (1) Just because Lagoo sab edited certain articles doesn't mean we all must stop visiting them; (2) I didn't claim Pashtuns 60 % [1]; (3) The removal of something from my talk page was and is not edit-warring [2]; (4) and I don't remember anyone calling me "LS", and I think it's very inappropriate to do that without confirming who the person is.--TAzimi (talk) 10:20, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have trouble understanding the intention behind this part "he was not to be seen again at the article I had called on him". That's to me interprets as that "I was ready to start edit-warring with him but he didn't return". Well, the fact is that in many occasions a person edits an article and never goes back to it.--TAzimi (talk) 10:25, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wait a moment, I'll check once more with the person who did the checkuser. I can certainly see that your English is a lot better than that of the other account I blocked. I'll be back with you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:40, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, apology accepted and I'll do what you advised. I had created a name in 2005 but can't remember or locate it, which I used for editing several Islamic and Afghanistan pages. I had made roughly 300 total edits but stopped somewhere around 2008 and also probably about 50 or so IP edits.--TAzimi (talk) 22:42, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've reblocked this account (I know you are the Lagoo sab). The standard offer still applies if you ever want to start doing things constructively, although I doubt you will seeing as you have a need to break every rule in the book even before you get caught every time. This is not a vendetta against Afghan national or Pashtun POV; it is a vendetta against someone who is a rulebreaker and incapable of doing what the community asks and demands of him. Magog the Ogre (talk) 01:54, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Good day sir. You didn't elaborate on "I know you are Lagoo sab", that's the same as accusing someone who often edits Angelina Jolie's page of being her. I never revealed to anyone my nationality or my ethnicity so what made you believe that I am an Afghan national or a Pashtun? At least you've made it clear that you have a personal "vendetta against someone" in partcular, which I find sort of disturbing because Wikipedia should only be for "educational purposes" and not a place for personal vendettas against people of certain race or origins.--TAzimi (talk) 14:40, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Again, I'm not Lagoo sab

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

TAzimi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

There must be a mistake but the fact remains that I'm not Lagoo sab, at least I know this for sure. I believe that because I've edited some of the pages that Lagoo sab had worked on makes me a possible suspect but that wouldn't necessarily make me him. The fact is that I had copied some of his work into other pages for personal convenience and someone began assuming that I must be him. One more time, I kindly and respectfully ask to be unblocked.--TAzimi (talk) 14:40, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=There must be a mistake but the fact remains that I'm not Lagoo sab, at least I know this for sure. I believe that because I've edited some of the pages that Lagoo sab had worked on makes me a possible suspect but that wouldn't necessarily make me him. The fact is that I had copied some of his work into other pages for personal convenience and someone began assuming that I must be him. One more time, I kindly and respectfully ask to be unblocked.--[[User:TAzimi|TAzimi]] ([[User talk:TAzimi#top|talk]]) 14:40, 29 April 2012 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=There must be a mistake but the fact remains that I'm not Lagoo sab, at least I know this for sure. I believe that because I've edited some of the pages that Lagoo sab had worked on makes me a possible suspect but that wouldn't necessarily make me him. The fact is that I had copied some of his work into other pages for personal convenience and someone began assuming that I must be him. One more time, I kindly and respectfully ask to be unblocked.--[[User:TAzimi|TAzimi]] ([[User talk:TAzimi#top|talk]]) 14:40, 29 April 2012 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=There must be a mistake but the fact remains that I'm not Lagoo sab, at least I know this for sure. I believe that because I've edited some of the pages that Lagoo sab had worked on makes me a possible suspect but that wouldn't necessarily make me him. The fact is that I had copied some of his work into other pages for personal convenience and someone began assuming that I must be him. One more time, I kindly and respectfully ask to be unblocked.--[[User:TAzimi|TAzimi]] ([[User talk:TAzimi#top|talk]]) 14:40, 29 April 2012 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}