User:Sherool

Phroziac
Userpage	Sandbox	Talk	Desk	Favorites	Refrigerants

This user is a member of the Association of Wikipedians Who Dislike Making Broad Judgments About the Worthiness of a General Category of Article, and Who Are in Favor of the Deletion of Some Particularly Bad Articles, but That Doesn't Mean They Are Deletionists AWWDMBJAWGCAWAIFDSPBATDMTAD Est omnino difficile iudicare inclusionis meritum cuiusdam rei in encyclopædia cum ratio sciendi quid populi referat incerta sit, sed nihilominus aliquid encyclopædiam dedecet It is generally difficult to judge the worthiness of a particular topic for inclusion in an encyclopedia considering that there is no certain way to know what interests people, but some topics nevertheless are not fit for an encyclopedia. This motto reflects the desire of these Wikipedians to be reluctant, but not entirely unwilling, to remove articles from Wikipedia.

Wikimood [purge] [edit] I am a proud Phyzechian wikipedian! File:One-ton weight.png This user has a ton of edits This user is an administrator on the English Wikipedia. en This user is a native speaker of English. This user is female. Template:User blank-10 The Award Eaten By A Bear is truly deserved by Phroziac for her great sense of humour and making me smile and laugh on countless occasions. --Wiki alf I am giving you this barnstar to let you know that I too feel your Wikistress. Take care, D. J. Bracey Barnstar of Diligence This The Barnstar of Diligence isn't just for the delete of vandalism from Belldandy's history but for all of your efforts in dealing with vandals, trolls, and other pests as well as regular mop duty. --Cool CatTalk|@ 22:36, 12 December 2005 (UTC) I hereby reward you this barnstar to cheer you up, and to spread the love! J.Spudeman 17:18, 21 January 2006 (UTC) I hereby award you these wings as they represent your character best, glad you are still with us. --Cool CatTalk|@ 16:13, 30 December 2005 (UTC) Heiki, hanging out on my bed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Me I'm a girl from Michigan, named Stephanie. I have a tendency of being interested in pretty much everything, which is how I came to be addicted to wikis. I've been a Wikipedian since June 2, 2005, and a Wikipedia administrator since September 6, 2005. Most of my contributions here are copyedits. I do a lot of janitorial work, such as deletions, vandalism reversion, and blocking. I've also been creating images, which I upload to Commons. I have founded a few other wikis, RC Wiki, LGBT info, and my personal wiki zOmg! I love this diff! [1] I use IRC, and can be found under this nickname on Freenode. mmmm tools[2]. My favorite vandals! (Note to vandals: Please do not add yourself to this list) Willy on Wheels, for funny sock names. (Willy (now with 10% more wheels!), Lucky 6.9 the newbie admin on WHEELS!, Wheel on Willys, Oven on Wheels, User:GAYNIGGER ON WHEELS, among others) Those vandals who use edit summaries of "vandalism". How convenient! ;) Purplefeltwilly on wheels, the HARRY POTTER VANDAL!!!! WTF? 22:22 < Redwolf24> Can go fornicate themselves with an iron stick 01:11 <+DrWorm> These wikipedos start attacking me (20:29:52) Pesto HaYachid: WHY THE FLYING FUCK DOES MY SCHOOL HAVE A PAGE AT WIKIPEDIA?! 10:40 < Alphax> stop raping traffic cones! 01:25/17 < silsor> gay men are gay If you continue to disrupt this wiki with sockpuppets, you will be permanently blocked from editing here. Angela 07:02, 16 Oct 2005 (UTC) I'm not disrupting it. You are. ⇒ JarlaxleArtemis 23:33, 16 Oct 2005 (UTC) Personal policies Besides WP:TRI, I have a few personal Wikipedia policies I follow. These are my own and I don't expect anyone else to use them, although it would be nice as I think they're a good idea. Primary & secondary school articles Primary and secondary schools which have achieved national or regional fame for any significant reason (e.g. former school of famous individual, site of newsworthy event, etc.) deserve their own articles. School articles which, on their face, fail to reach this bar should be merged (with retained redirect) into community articles (e.g. village, town, city, school district, township, county, etc.). (A subarticle may be used if the community article would be made too large otherwise, titled, e.g. "Schools of Broward County, Florida" or "High schools of Louisville, Kentucky"). Those articles which are so deficient that they not only do not meet the above criterion, but for which it is impossible to determine a community to merge them with, may be deleted. --resistance is futile-- Bands I hereby define a "notable musical group" as any group of performing musicians who (a) has published music reaching a significant audience (regional or larger), (b) has made a public performance before an noncaptive audience of at least 1,000 (school assembly performances do not count; neither do performances at athletic events unless televised outside the local viewing area of the performance), (c) has appeared on television (other than public access cable), (d) has won a contest or other award of a nontrivial nature, (e) is generally regarded as having pioneered or otherwise advanced a major genre of music, or (f) includes performers (or, in rare cases, composers) who are or were members of a different group meeting one or more of the foregoing criteria or who are otherwise famous (e.g. Keanu Reeves' band Dogstar). I will support deleting any article about a musical performing group where the article does not set forth how the group is notable by the above criteria. 11:43 < Ilyanep> Phroziac: noncaptive audience of at least 1,000 makes me think of a band tying up 1000 people and MAKING THEM LISTEN! Section blanking I am likely to interpret any edit (especially from an IP) that does not have an edit summary which removes an entire section (or more) of an article as revertible. My good faith doesn't go that far, I'm afraid. If you really intend to remove an entire section of an article, include an edit summary. You should be including edit summaries anyway, so this isn't really that onerous. I don't know if people do this by mistake or on purpose, but I think that large tracts of text should not be removed from Wikipedia without some sort of an explanation. Even "See talk page" is good enough for me. Use of admin powers Use talk pages. Block sparingly. Don't block without warning unless the situation really requires it. Use rollback for true vandalism only (e.g. blanking, spam, and nonsense). Don't use admin rights on articles you edit for content. Don't use admin rights against people you disagree with. Don't use admin rights in disputes that you are mediating, either. Always give good reasons with blocks, especially range blocks. This doesn't matter for obvious things, like "GAYNIGGER ON WHEELS". Blocks with bad reasons are subject to quick removal. Curps I think Curps' bot is useful. His disregard for the bot policy when creating it was a bad idea. But, he got away with it for long enough that he proved that it did more good than harm, so it doesn't really matter anymore. People should not violate WP:POINT by making a fuss over it. Insignificant edits I frown upon very insignificant edits, mostly disambiguations on talk pages, white space changes, stub sorting, and any changes that do not affect a page in any visible way. I would strongly prefer that people improve articles in useful ways, rather than make these types of edits. Less importantly, I would prefer that minor spelling corrections and other polishing of an article be done after an article is significantly written. Often, these types of changes won't even make it into the finished product, it's a little like polishing a car before re-painting it. It makes it look nicer for the moment, but it doesn't do anything in the long run. And yes, I realize that I have done this many times. But, I don't now. -- Feel free to edit my user page. Just don't vandalize it, ok? (You know who i'm talking about..)

Hi, I don't have a lot to say about myself, really. I was born in 1978, I'm from Sokndal, a small municipality in the county of Rogaland in Norway.

I am not very active on the Norwegian Wikipedias (Bokmål and Nynorsk). So far my only real contribution there is the article Arkadia - reisen til jordas indre (which is mostly a translation of Spartakus and the Sun Beneath the Sea) and some images.

Most of my contributions are in areas of science fiction, fantasy and things computer related, seeing as those are my main interests. I also find science and history interesting, but I'm more of a reader than a contributor in those areas.

Stuff I have created

Not counting redirects, images, talkpages etc.

As 213.225.64.72

• Transport pod
• Category:Farscape spacecraft
• Category:Bioship (had it speedily "renamed" later on)
• Lo'La
• Command carrier (Farscape)
• Frag Cannon (Farscape)
• Marauder (Farscape)
• Hetch (farscape) (later redirected to Farscape terminology)
• Defence screen (Farscape)

As 130.67.234.130

• Selto Durka
• David Wheeler (actor)

After registering

• Drowtales
• Rachel Gordon
• Template:US-writer-stub
• Category:US writer stubs
• Template:UK-writer-stub
• Category:UK writer stubs
• Yngve Hågensen
• Category:Bioships (as replacement for the singular form I created as anon)
• Category:Wikipedians by web browser
• Category:Opera users
• Brynjar Meling
• Template:Tfm
• Powermonger

By far the most of my edits are "janitorial" though, fixing broken links, sorting stubs and categories, the occasional wikifying of new articles, sorting and tagging images and things of that nature.

As of 22 March 2006 my edit count is over 10700, of which over 4300 are in the article space (mostly minor edits), and over 2500 in Image: space. Add to that over 3800 deleted edits (mostly tagging images as {{no source}} or {{no license}} if they are missing required info and such). You can get a detailed count, or check your own here.

Ongoing projects

Lately I've been working mostly on cleaning out Category:Free use images, there is a staggering amount of images in that category that either lack the source or the license information required to justify this label. A fair number are also plainly mislabeled as they include license info that prohobit commercial use and things like that. I'm also ocationaly tagging a few dozen untagged images over at Wikipedia:Untagged images or deleting orphanded fair use images, or unsourced and unlicensed images that have been tagged for more than 7 days and such.

I've also started Wikipedia:Image copyright issues for dummies as I was getting weary of writing the same lengty messages over and over trying to explain the basics of copyright to uploaders (things like "free for personal use" != "public domain" and what not). Haven't spent too much time polishing it yet though.

Useful/helpful pages in no particular order

Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Stub types

Use the most appropriate stub tag when possible.

Wikipedia:Image copyright tags / Wikipedia:Template messages/Image namespace

How to tag images you upload.

Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace

Template messages for warning users about various policy violations and simmilar.

Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not

Stuff you should not add/include in the Wikipedia.

Wikipedia:Avoiding common mistakes

Things to avoid.

Wikipedia:Naming conventions

How to properly name your articles.

Awards

Given by MegamanZero on 7 February 2006 The Barnstar of Diligence Award is given to those individuals who have a harmonic combination of extraordinary scrutiny, precision and community service.