Talk:Heavy metal in Muslim majority countries
![]() | Metal NA‑class | ||||||
|
Move the topics back
This is ridiculous, first you have to discuss the topics in their own talk page, contact the contributers of them, etc. You can't just do everything you feel like, first you tried to delete them all now you redirect them to here? Please stop. -- - K a s h Talk | email 21:19, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
MErge with Iranian metal
The content is already the same. The Iranian metal article has in fact little content and is presented without much context. It is more suitable to capture its information here. Spearhead 21:48, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
..Iranian countries?! you mean Islamic? I oppose. What do you mean "without much context"? It's a country's music scene. It doesn't need to be part of anything. It should be expanded instead of merged. -- - K a s h Talk | email 21:58, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
- I meant to say Iranian metal. Spearhead 07:10, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
They should definitely be merged. The scene itself is non-notable except that it is in an Islamic nation which presents its own problem. marnues 02:19, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
Merge. The movement is notable as a whole under the label of "in Islamic countries". +Johnson 07:43, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
Chill!
Hey Deizio, if you read this, I think this time it calls for it. Kush, please see WP:CHILL. +Johnson 07:45, 20 April 2006 (UTC)