User talk:Denisarona

Archives

Welcome!

Hello, Denisarona, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Vejvančický (talk) 07:43, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer permission

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:28, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

John Carter (film)What is supposed to be done if the IP removes the content again? He's done it 3 times already; I think he should be taken to WP:ANI, though the problem is that the IP hasn't broken the WP:3RR or for that matter any particular rule. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 16:16, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]Alright, thanks for the tip. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 16:25, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]The IP guy did the same edit 5 times, and was half-way through a sixth time. I reported him to AIV; he's banned for a day. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 17:05, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]Ah, but you are resting too early. If you notice the edit history of the article, you will notice that tehre have been other (suspiciously similar) IP addresses carrying out the exact same review deleting. Right now it seems to be in control, though we cannot predict when they will start off again. Best to be on guard. Cheers :) ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 08:55, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]UCSCi have done some improvement on the page, but you deleted my changes. Some part of the voice are the result of a translation (not correct) . see for example campus or libraries.--79.30.163.138 (talk) 16:11, 10 March 2012 (UTC) I want only improve the voice that is full of grammar error and you delete my improvement....Why? --79.30.163.138 (talk) 16:13, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]Università Cattolicaif you want to keep the old version at least correct the errors!!!!!!!!--79.30.163.138 (talk) 16:17, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]See my response on your talk page. Denisarona (talk) 19:53, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]UCSCI rephrased some content (campus) and not deleted . There was some errors. I completely removed this (library):The library boasts of Milan in its library also numerous special funds. Among these funds are 73 tablets of the ancient Sumerian city of Ur, which date back to the Nineteen III. C. Between the third century. C. and VII d. C. you put a thousand papyri from Egypt. Dating back to the Middle Ages there is a real degree of 1387 which Wenceslaus of Bohemia, Nicolò Minority investment fund Castelnuovo Fogliani. Increasingly there is a Renaissance illuminated manuscript of the Ambrosian Processional 1492 with the text and music of the Litany triduane traditionally sung in procession for 3 days before the feast of the ascension. The family tree of Visconti is maintained within a public that prevents this rare incunabula chronic nature of historical facts and the creation of the world until 1942 and this document along with other incunabula comes from private collections in Milan as prestigiosie libraries Silvio Cipriani and Vincent Negri Oleggio. Another rare example is the Roman Missal printed Venice in 1488, which is written in Gothic characters solemn. From the rich collection of Sixteenth century, about 1800 volumes, there is the edition edited by Marsilio Ficino of Dialogue of Plato. Date back to 1800, the first editions of The Betrothed. Always the eighteenth century was a manuscript of Qur'an finely decorated in gold. Belong to the late nineteenth century first editions of some of Futurist works Filippo Tommaso Marinetti and Umberto Boccioni.As you can see is an automatic translation from wiki.it. It is full of errors and inconsistencies. But it is also a very important part. I tried to correct it, but i did not. Can you try to improve and correct it? and reinsert it only after the necessary changes. thanks and bye!--79.30.164.195 (talk) 20:02, 11 March 2012 (UTC) P.S. Can you check the page (grammar error) if you have times?--79.30.164.195 (talk) 20:33, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]ThanksCheers for removing that, it has at least made me smile after the rugby.Murry1975 (talk) 19:50, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]Maybe if we find an entire new set of forwards, well done England all the same, really have came on since they changed coach. Thanks again Denis, you saved me from being uncivil.Murry1975 (talk) 19:58, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]Solar Sports ClarificationSolar Sports is a Philippine Sports Cable Channel. Inclusion of PBS 47 containing Solar Sports is not official. It is a hoax already. Not vandalism for clarification. and definably not PBS in the US. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.202.9.242 (talk) 09:20, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply] I've responded on your talk page. Denisarona (talk) 09:24, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]Regarding the change of Retro ForceAs you may have been aware, I have tried to change the information about Retro Force as the one person known as TobiXY was trying to expose my past experiences about making the fan-arts and the videos that was not ment to be related to the subject on YouTube and on DeviantART. He has made a big deal about it ever since I've got rid of all my stuff so that way I could move on, can you see anything that the fanart information and personal YouTube stuff that has got to do anything with the game itself? If not, can you please delete the content that has got nothing to do with it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sammy2371 (talk • contribs) 07:28, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]I've responded on your talk page. Denisarona (talk) 07:34, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]Hello, me again, I'm feeling uncomfortable about the article of Retro Force, someone has been reverting the previous edit back to it's old source and I had to delete it again since when you have a look at the article. The fanarts and the videos are not relevent to the subject at all. It's supposed to be about reviews from an official magazine or a reviewing site, not about an individual's past experience. now i have a feeling this is done by the same person. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sammy2371 (talk • contribs) 21:53, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]See message on your talk page. Denisarona (talk) 08:17, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]Halo BurgerI'm trying to avert an edit war, but I need help with the Halo Burger article as I reached 3RR. Can you help? Steelbeard1 (talk) 21:02, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]I've responded on your talk page. Denisarona (talk) 13:14, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply] The person who started the edit war is still at it. Steelbeard1 (talk) 13:28, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]I left some advice about edit war noticeboard on your talk page. Denisarona (talk) 06:46, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]A bowl of strawberries for you!for Cleaning up vandalism from my page, this is a sock that comes up everyday with new accounts and admins playing "Whack a mole" with him, regards ÐℬigXЯaɣ 08:25, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]WikiProject ImmunologyI see you have edited some of the pages within the scope of immunology. Please have a look at the proposal for a WikiProject Immunology WP:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Immunology and give your opinion (support or oppose). Thank you for your attention. Kinkreet^{~♥moshi moshi♥~} 09:33, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]WikiThanksWikiThanks

In recognition of all the work you’ve done lately! 66.87.7.141 (talk) 23:19, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 05:49, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]Thank you.Thank you, for informing me on my mistake. I appreciate it. Next time, I'll keep your advice in mind. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ninmacer20 (talk • contribs) 15:08, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]Virginia!Virginia is classifed by the U.S Census as a South Atlantic State in the Southern United States! The Mid-Atlantic is an area wihtin the Northeastern part of the U.S Please stop chaing Virginia as located in the Mid-Atlantic! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Djjohnsonjr82 (talk • contribs) 17:59, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]You are incorrect - I did the opposite!! Get your facts correct before accusing someone. Denisarona (talk) 08:34, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]Tablighi JamaatHey there Denisarona, Shame we haven't met under better circumstances, but I thought I'd let you know I made a request to have the Tablighi Jamaat article temporarily semi-protected after even more section blanking from that IP, bumped up the warnings on the IP's talk page to Level 4 while I was at it too. In the mean time I'm going to keep an eye every now and then on the article to see if I can catch further vandalism and reverse it till it can be protected or they give up. Long story short, you're not alone :D Terkaal -- <Warning! Self-Confessed Newbie!> (talk) 07:44, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]Got a response on the request a few minutes ago advising that any further vandalisim by the IP should be reported to WP:AIAV for a user block rather than page protection. If you'd like to see the request and it's response, you can find it here I hope this will help out ^^ Terkaal -- <Warning! Self-Confessed Newbie!> (talk) 09:08, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]Thank you very much for your help - keep up the good work. Denisarona (talk) 15:26, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]Matthew Landy SteenAppreciate the link you did. I'm new at this. I'll be editing some Wiki articles and new articles AFC to get the penny nails right. Matthew Landy Steen stub biog Weathervane13 06:07, 23 April 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Weathervane13 (talk • contribs) You're welcome, anytime. Regards Denisarona (talk) 11:13, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]Reg. edits on Western OrissaHi Denisarona, I saw that you had removed the names of people citing the reason that no articles are present. Some of these people are highly recognized civilians by the Govt. of India. You might raise a concern about Avinash Patra, Sr., however he is a young person from Orissa who was invited to Prince William's wedding, certainly not an ordinary event. No articles are presently there but people in future may want to contribute towards it and this can be an anchor. Thanks. Karan1974 (talk) 09:18, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]I've responded on your talk page. Denisarona (talk) 13:25, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]brain cellHi -- since you reverted my edit, do you suppose you could explain your thinking at Talk:Brain cell#Copyvio? I don't doubt that you were acting in good faith, but it leaves me unsure how to resolve the problem. (My edit was not vandalism, but some weird stuff has been going on there, so I can see why you might be confused.) Regards, Looie496 (talk) 17:31, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]Thanks - I've responded on your talk page. Denisarona (talk) 05:39, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]Thanks!Thanks for your help on Dmytro Firtash. I just requested Indefinite semi-protection for this page at WP:RFPP. — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 18:40, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]Your correction of Monteverdi Palm Beach page is totally in errorThe data on the Monteverdi Palm Beach claiming two has been manufactured is FALSE. Only one was ever made. You do not admit this correction. Well then, if Wikipedia wants to remain credible the PRESENT page needs provide a source for the claim that two were made, but it doesn't. So Wikipedia is spreading false information. Shame. Since you admit the wrong data that two were made, how what source did you accept as correct? The source is Monterverdi Car Museum who provided the information only one was ever made. In addition, cross check against the German wikipedia and you will see that your correction is false. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.232.65.115 (talk) 16:42, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]Incorrect - see my response on your talk page. Denisarona (talk) 12:52, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]Annals (Tacitus)Thank you. That user is rather persistent and will probably back. Also on Tacitus on Christ it was reverted. But then there are new users such as Saufenhei and Ginitto who show up on that page, just edit that page and no other and add information similar to that blocked user. Seems strange... but then this is Wikipedia. Cheers. History2007 (talk) 16:56, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]Forward and Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Forward_(generic_name_of_socialist_publications)Please see the AfD. You are continually trying to re-add a WP:POVFORK up for deletion to a disambiguation page, and you are acting in concert with IP vandals. This worries me. SkepticAnonymous (talk) 13:25, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]The article has not been deleted and, in fact, may not be deleted. What is your problem? Denisarona (talk) 15:15, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]I note that you have been blocked - that says it all!!! Denisarona (talk) 15:18, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]Decapitation article and Srebrenica massacreHi. I saw you reverted the changes made by the IP editor to the Decapitation article, in which mention of victims of the Srebrenica massacre having been beheaded was replaced by a general description of the incident (and its status as a war crime). But I was confused to see that you reinstated the material in question, reverting your own revert. Can you help me understand what was going on here? I don't want to get involved in an edit war, but to me it seems pretty "cut and dried" that the IP's changes simply do not belong in this particular article — and, indeed, some would say the removal of directly relevant material (along with appropriate references) might amount to vandalism. Just in case there is something else going on here that I'm failing to notice, I'd be grateful for your input. Thanks. — Richwales 15:55, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]I've responded on your talk page. Denisarona (talk) 06:03, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]Thanks. I understand your perspective. As for whether the IP editor's work is vandalism or a content dispute, I would say it is probably a misguided content dispute, and that his changes do need to be reverted (albeit with an explanation in each case). In addition to my explaining in my own edit summaries why I've reverted his changes, I've also commented both on the article's talk page and on the IP address's talk page (hopefully he will notice at least one of these things). If, despite all this, the IP doggedly sticks to his position (or perhaps even refuses to acknowledge any discussion on the matter at all) and continues to insist on making the same change, it will IMO definitely cross the line into disruptive editing — even if not strictly vandalism — and stronger measures may be necessary to put a stop to it — especially since there is an ArbCom ruling in effect (WP:ARBMAC) which covers disruptive editing on any topic related to the Balkans, anywhere in Wikipedia. I'm not really looking forward to having to escalate the process further; hopefully the IP has understood the point by now. — Richwales 06:38, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]I agree with you. Normally I tread warily when checking articles related to e.g. the Balkans or Islam, as there seems to be a tendency to initiate edit wars due to differing POVs. Anyway, thanks for your help & insight. Regards Denisarona (talk) 08:34, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]A kitten for you!You get a kitten for keeping my user talk page free of vandalism! Ipatrol (talk) 22:16, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply] Thank you - you're very welcome. Denisarona (talk) 06:16, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]GermansHi. I found an error in the article (see photo). Copernicus was not a German, he was from Poland. --Top811 my talk —Preceding undated comment added 15:59, 12 May 2012 (UTC).[reply]I can't see a photo of him in the above article. Denisarona (talk) 12:32, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]I wrote to you because I wanted to know if you think he was from Germany or from Poland. If you are painting something very sorry.Top811 my talkFrench peopleHi, the picture is representing the French Marie Sklodowska Curie (she is from Poland!!), who lives in France. Is not this a bug? What do you think? Top811 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 17:37, 13 May 2012 (UTC).[reply]The picture is of Marie Curie. She doen't live in France - she lived in France. It is not a bug. I think she was French-Polish because she was born in Poland and later became a French citizen. What is the problem? Denisarona (talk) 09:48, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]If they are mistakes (spelling and language) in my posts are very sorry. My native language is Polish, not English. Regards. Top811 (talk)