User talk:YuMaNuMa

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end.
Start a new talk topic.

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, then place {{Talkback|your username}} on my talk.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, then place {{Talkback|YuMaNuMa}} on your talk.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

Copyright

License was changed on the following videos by the youtube user, for quite a while now. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P5AyWe4_c_k http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SHHzLIeztuQ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hWnTVWpNQsk http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PoxRItIot5g (They were offered under the Creative commons license but were reverted back to the Standard Youtube License, even back then they weren't acknowledged properly, no link to the original youtube video) I, on behalf of the youtube user has authorised me to remove them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Loyalcityrailcustomer (talk • contribs) 08:34, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, thanks for pointing that out! I actually thought the user who used the video clips was the same Youtube user. YuMaNuMa (talk) 09:51, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sydney meetup

Hi, I got your name from this list, and thought you might be interested in a meetup in Sydney at the Alexandria Hotel tomorrow. I hope you can join us. Sorry for the late notice. --99of9 (talk) 11:11, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Amaze 4G

I did not reference T-Mobile as a source regarding whether or not the Amaze 4G has Gorilla Glass. I simply provided my correspondence with HTC on the T-Mobile forums. I had direct correspondence with HTC who indicated they did not use Gorilla Glass but would not reveal what glass they do use. Corning does not list the Amaze 4G and referred me to HTC. T-Mobile doesn't have a clue.

I spent a significant amount of time looking into the issue because I liked the device, other than its lack of Gorilla Glass.

I would sincerely appreciate it if you could reveal the sources you mention who say the Amaze 4G has Gorilla Glass as I would still be interested in buying the Amaze 4G if anyone can prove unequivocally that the Amaze 4G does indeed have a Gorilla Glass screen.

Thank you.

Retiredtandembmxr (talk) 19:07, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have found several sources citing that the HTC Amaze does have gorilla glass overlaid, I'm a little skeptical about the enquiry you had with t-mobile and I'm speculating that they may not be familiar with the terminology hence were afraid to provide a definite answer. Cornings on the other hand may not be regularly updating their websites, I reckon its better referencing sources that actually include the pertinent information or lack of rather than sources that don't mention anything at all. I could just be a careless mistake on Corning's end.

1 2 3 4 5 YuMaNuMa (talk) 22:34, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Amaze 4G

Hi,

Thanks again for your input.

I did want to reiterate that I never had a correspondence with, nor did I make an inquiry of T-Mobile regarding the glass used on the Amaze 4G. My correspondence was directly with the manufacturer HTC. I merely posted my correspondence with HTC on T-Mobile's support forum. HTC says they're using a cheaper substitute:

"In our commitment to quality, HTC pioneered the use of shatterproof glass in Smartphones. At the time, Corning was the only manufacturer and we used their product, Gorilla Glass. Since [then] many manufactures have developed and advanced shatterproof glass technology, allowing HTC to use the highest quality cutting edge shatterproof glass in our Smartphones while keeping costs low for our customers."

HTC made the same statement in response to inquiries made by other people on other forums, such as the xda-developer's forum. There are other other "fortified glass" products either on the market or in testing; Dragontrail is an example.

Again, if you can find out directly from HTC exactly what glass they do use it would be sincerely appreciated. I would be more than happy to buy this phone if I knew what glass it is so I can research it; it might be better than GG! But at these prices, buyers deserve to know exactly what they are buying.

Retiredtandembmxr (talk) 05:59, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeap, I will inquire with HTC today and will post their reply on this page but unfortunately neither can use it as source as there can be no original research on Wikipedia.YuMaNuMa (talk) 21:14, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of CityRail

The article CityRail you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:CityRail for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Jezhotwells (talk) 11:53, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Excessive" use of images

I have recently added in, undoubtedly a lot of images which highlight the historic aspect of stations. I do not believe this is excessive at all, in that some station pages did not have any images at all (or the historic aspect) prior to today such as Lithgow Station. I understand that some station pages do not have enough prose, however your claim in my excessiveness of pictures cannot be substantiated given that there is not enough textual sources out there. You may want to know that I have contributed a slight amount of prose to the Waratah train page linking it with sources concerning the DVA and IDI, CCTV systems and signage information. You may also want to know what I am doing is not anything new. Looking at pages such as http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%96%B6%E5%9B%A305%E7%B3%BB%E9%9B%BB%E8%BB%8A shows the amount of indepth and breadth of information contained highlighting minute details such as exterior series differences. Therefore your claim of "not every aspect and detail deserves to be included photographically in the article" cannot be justified. Of course our trains are not as complex as Japanese ones, I believe there is a potential for some of the trains to contain more information. I believe that the amount of pictures may outbalance some station pages with minimum information, however are the only available primary evidence. I hope that you understand to see that my intentions are of good deed for posterity and are not meant to be excessive in nature. Thank you.--Wykymania (talk) 11:15, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits indisputably were done with good intention but with such an undeveloped and short prose the gallery images may, in an aesthetic aspect suit the talk page more than the article itself for the time being. With somewhat low level of activity on the article and talk pages, your images if posted on the talk page will not be archived anytime soon. I would imagine that you and I would agree that it's quite unfortunate that there is not enough reliable, non-forum sources to soundly develop the article but 3 rows of images in the gallery is not particularly needed in my opinion but of course this is opened for debate. Fear not, images are not deleted from Commons or Wikipedia if they are not used and many users do go on Commons and search for images given that it is correctly labelled and catergorised. YuMaNuMa ^{Talk Contributions} 11:49, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This method might be of use in some cases: {{Commonscat}} gives:

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Olympic Park railway station, Sydney.

Make a whole category of pictures on Commons, and add a direct link from the wikipedia article.--99of9 (talk) 12:58, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

YuMaNuMa, have you uploaded any of these pictures into the commons yet? Or have I ended up taking that task away from you by doing it myself? Because there are three left from two of the station articles you were complaining about, and I can still move them myself, or I can leave them to you. ----DanTD (talk) 12:01, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In the News

Oreet, cheers for reverting that edit. I'm on 2RR so need to be careful. Was going to strike out the nomination and just vote "HOAX" but you helped doktorb _words^deeds 10:44, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar thanks

Thank you ... I never know when people appreciate these things, usually. (That line specifically came from an old Roadrunner cartoon where Wile E. Coyote has this supercomputer he punches questions into for advice on catching the title character. At the end he's gotten a rock coming down off a cliff to him, so he punches that string in, whereupon the machine tells him to "go back and take your medicine". He does, and gets crushed. Afterwards we learn that Bugs Bunny was really operating the machine. Daniel Case (talk) 06:56, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Turns out it's "To Hare is Human". Daniel Case (talk) 07:00, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hehe, yeah I remember hearing the line a few times before but found it very appropriate yet funny given the situation the user was in and how he was persistently arguing invalid points for almost an half an hour about a 24 hour block; he was a first time IP user as well so his reputation was obviously of little importance to him - I would assume. YuMa NuMa ^Contrib 07:34, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 13

Hi. When you recently edited IPad (3rd generation), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page LTE (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, YuMaNuMa. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard.
Message added 22:59, 18 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Whenaxis talk · contribs | DR goes to Wikimania! 22:59, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You obviously can't read...

...If you could, you would stop trolling my talk page. This is your only warning, stop posting uncivil messages on my talk page. Acps110 ^{(talk • contribs)} 04:04, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And another thing, Wikipedia:Don't restore removed comments, so STOP! Acps110 ^{(talk • contribs)} 04:07, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Try to assume good faith next time, my comment had a good intention yet you chose to assume otherwise. YuMa NuMa ^Contrib 04:54, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Civility Barnstar
	For keepin' it kewl during a heated debate Zach Vega (talk) 04:56, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	We did it! Zach Vega (talk) 09:53, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Congratulations, YuMaNuMa, today you made your 1,000th edit to articles on English Wikipedia! Thanks for all your hard work on technology and Australia-related topics. You rock :) Maryana (WMF) (talk) 17:18, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Galaxy S II post

You were wrong to revert my post on the Samsung Galaxy S II. The information is now wrong.

"JK Shin, the head of "Samsung Mobile Communications", announced in May 2011 that a Samsung Galaxy S III (Galaxy S3) is planned for release on 3 May 2012."

That did not happen. The 3 May release date is a recent development. I also believe it is greatly in the interest of Wikipedia readers to know that the specs have been revealed.

The information was correct when I edited it.

I do not care about the sources. Find better ones if you want. Those are just my favorite blogs. You should revert it back again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.231.138.110 (talk) 16:31, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

..And this is why we use just reputable sources, the phone will still be released on May 3 2012 according to Cnet and primary Samsung sources, also some mistakes were made by previous editors and I have fixed that. In addition to the unveiling of the Samsung Galaxy S 3, S-Cloud was rumour to also be released during that event. By the way, it's April 21 2012 in Australia so I have no idea what you're trying to convey by saying, "it did not happen", further clarification may be needed. Also whether they're are your favourite blogs or not is irrelevant, they are unreliable compared to other sources and should not be used to replace reliable sources, if the content is incorrect, fix that but sources should in this situation should be kept where it is unless you can specify a reason for them to be removed. In addition to that, posting dubious speculations about a device prior to its official release requires more than one sources as per Wikipedia policy and since you added that content, the burden is with YOU not me. Feel free to repost the content you posted before but add more reliable sources regardless of whether you 'like' those sources or not. YuMa NuMa ^Contrib 02:26, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your free 1-year HighBeam Research account is ready

Good news! You are approved for access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research.

Account activation codes have been emailed.
To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1
The 1-year, free period begins once you enter the code.
If you need assistance, email "help at highbeam dot com", and include "HighBeam/Wikipedia" in the subject line. Or go to WP:HighBeam/Support, or ask User:Ocaasi. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:HighBeam/Citations.
HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
Show off your HighBeam access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/highbeam_userbox}} on your userpage
When the 1-year period is up, check the applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi^{t | c} 04:50, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You've Got Mail

Hello, YuMaNuMa. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.— Zach Vega (talk to me) 06:34, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

YuMaNuMa, you are invited!

I noticed you have contributed to WikiProject Universities and that you are interested in world issues, so I was wondering if you might be interested in this new WikiProject about a university in Serbia:

You're invited to be a part of Wikipedia:WikiProject University of Belgrade, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to the University of Belgrade. To accept this invitation, click here! Articles related to other universities in Belgrade, Serbia and Southeast Europe may be discussed as well. This helps share information and foster knowledge about higher education in the region.

Nest

I changed the picture of Nest to one that I took. How would you like it if I altered with something you spent a lot of time on? Not good? Don't touch my stuff anymore. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Steveketchup (talk • contribs) 04:26, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The reasons you have set forth suggest that you have ownership of the article. Such a claim is a violation of Wikipedia's policy and will be reported to the correct dispute board if you act in a similar manner again. I'll reiteriate this, you own none of the content on Wikipedia, none of the work here is yours, a basic knowledge of law will provide you with a basic understanding of what CC 3.0 means, in fact a knowledge about law is not require at all. Also, I wouldn't care if you reverted content that I have worked on for months given that you provide a valid reason because one who chose to work in a team environment such as Wikipedia should be able to admit to their mistakes and accept that what you have contribution may be improved on. YuMa NuMa ^Contrib 05:41, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The correct spelling is "smart aleck"

Thank you. Come again, teenager. I'm an athiest myself. Glad to know we agree on something. --68.45.180.34 (talk) 13:49, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that your judging me by my age displays your obvious blatant ignorance and your hypocrisy about "biased" editors on Wikipedia. YuMa NuMa ^Contrib 14:00, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What's "your"? --68.45.180.34 (talk) 14:00, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]