Jump to content

Evolutionary algorithm

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 66.237.172.226 (talk) at 19:01, 21 April 2006. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

An evolutionary algorithm (also EA, artificial evolution, AE) indicates a subset of evolutionary computation, which is a part of artificial intelligence. It is a generic term used to indicate any population-based metaheuristic optimization algorithm that uses mechanisms inspired by biological evolution, such as reproduction, mutation, recombination (see genetic operators), natural selection and survival of the fittest. Candidate solutions to the optimization problem play the role of individuals in a population, and the cost function determines the environment within which the solutions "live" (see also fitness function). Evolution of the population then takes place after the repeated application of the above operators.

Specific examples of EAs are given below. Most of these techniques are similar in spirit, but differ in the details of their implementation and the nature of the particular problem to which they have been applied.

  • Genetic algorithm - This is the most popular type of EA. One seeks the solution of a problem in the form of strings of numbers (traditionally binary, although the best representations are usually those that reflect something about the problem being solved - these are not normally binary), virtually always applying recombination operators in addition to selection and mutation;
  • Evolutionary programming - Like genetic programming, only the structure of the program is fixed and its numerical parameters are allowed to evolve;
  • Evolution strategy - Works with vectors of real numbers as representations of solutions, and typically uses self-adaptive mutation rates;
  • Genetic programming - Here the solutions are in the form of computer programs, and their fitness is determined by their ability to solve a computational problem.
  • Learning classifier system - Instead of a using fitness function, rule utility is decided by a reinforcement learning technique.

Because they do not make any assumption about the underlying fitness landscape, it is generally believed that evolutionary algorithms perform consistently well across all types of problems (see, however, the no-free-lunch theorem). This is evidenced by their success in fields as diverse as engineering, art, biology, economics, genetics, operations research, robotics, social sciences, physics, chemistry, and others.

Apart from their use as mathematical optimizers, evolutionary computation and algorithms have also been used as an experimental framework within which to validate theories about biological evolution and natural selection, particularly through work in the field of artificial life. Techniques from evolutionary algorithms applied to the modelling of biological evolution are generally limited to explorations of microevolutionary processes, however some computer simulations, such as Tierra and Avida, attempt to model macroevolutionary dynamics.

A limitation of evolutionary algorithms is their lack of a clear genotype-phenotype distinction. In nature, the fertilized egg cell undergoes a complex process known as embryogenesis to become a mature phenotype. This indirect encoding is believed to make the genetic search more robust (i.e. reduce the probability of fatal mutations), and also may improve the evolvability of the organism. Recent work in the field of artificial embryogeny, or artificial developmental systems, seeks to address these concerns.

Bibliography

  • Bäck, T. (1996), Evolutionary Algorithms in Theory and Practice: Evolution Strategies, Evolutionary Programming, Genetic Algorithms, Oxford Univ. Press.
  • Bäck, T., Fogel, D., Michalewicz, Z. (1997), Handbook of Evolutionary Computation, Oxford Univ. Press.
  • Eiben, A.E., Smith, J.E. (2003), Introduction to Evolutionary Computing, Springer.

See also

(since January 1, 2005 reorganized to become Special Interest Group for Genetic and Evolutionary Computation of the ACM)