Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors
Please submit error reports only for content that is currently or will imminently appear on the Main Page. For general discussion about the Main Page, kindly use its talk page. |
National variations of the English language have been extensively discussed previously:
|
To report an error in content currently or imminently on the Main Page, use the appropriate section below.
- Where is the error? An exact quotation of the text in question helps.
- Offer a correction if possible.
- References are helpful, especially when reporting an obscure factual or grammatical error.
- Time zones. The Main Page runs on Coordinated Universal Time (UTC, currently 06:19 on 21 December 2024) and is not adjusted to your local time zone.
- Can you resolve the problem yourself? If the error lies primarily in the content of an article linked from the Main Page, fix the problem there before reporting it here. Text on the Main Page generally defers to the articles with bolded links. Upcoming content on the Main Page is usually only protected from editing beginning 24 hours before its scheduled appearance. Before that period, you can be bold and fix any issues yourself.
- Do not use {{edit fully-protected}} on this page, which will not get a faster response. It is unnecessary, because this page is not protected, and causes display problems because this is not a talk page. (See the bottom of this revision for an example.)
- No chit-chat. Lengthy discussions should be moved to a suitable location elsewhere, such as the talk page of the relevant article or project.
- Respect other editors. Another user wrote the text you want changed, or reported an issue they see in something you wrote. Everyone's goal should be producing the best Main Page possible. The compressed time frame of the Main Page means sometimes action must be taken before there has been time for everyone to comment. Be civil to fellow users.
- Reports are removed when resolved. Once an error has been addressed or determined not to be an error, or the item has been rotated off the Main Page, the report will be removed from this page. Check the revision history for a record of any discussion or action taken; no archives are kept.
Errors in the summary of today's or tomorrow's featured article
Errors in In the news
Template:ITN-Update "At least 78 people are killed in a massacre in a village near Hama, Syria." should be revised to "at least 55" - this being the estimate currently quoted by the Syrian National Council[1]. LukeSurl t c 08:16, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
- According to the article you linked, the SNC are giving the figure of 78, while the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, a group in the UK, is using "at least 55". State Syrian media says 9. Don't know who we should go with, will leave it up to admin experienced with this sort of stuff. Jenks24 (talk) 15:56, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
- The words "at least" implies we're going with the lower estimate (the state media can generally be discounted as a reliable source). An alternative is to use non-specific language such as "many" or "dozens". LukeSurl t c 17:00, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
- The article now lists 78 as the upper bound of the estimates. LukeSurl t c 09:21, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
- Changed it to 55. --BorgQueen (talk) 09:39, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
- The article now lists 78 as the upper bound of the estimates. LukeSurl t c 09:21, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
- The words "at least" implies we're going with the lower estimate (the state media can generally be discounted as a reliable source). An alternative is to use non-specific language such as "many" or "dozens". LukeSurl t c 17:00, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
- Sharapova won the French Open days ago, so why so delayed? Also I suggest to add that she is one of only a few tennis players who won all five Grand Slams, or that she is now top-ranked. Regards.--GoPTCN 08:57, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
DYK queue status
Current time: 06:19, 21 December 2024 (UTC) Update frequency: once every 24 hours Last updated: 6 hours ago() |
Could "can't" in the bottom hook be exchanged for "cannot"? Makes more sense, and looks and sounds better.--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 18:45, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
Errors in today's or tomorrow's On this day...
'Englands Thirteen Colonies'
Should read Britain's Thirteen Colonies How is it possible on a site like wikipedia that supposedly intelligent Adult human beings STILL cant get the difference between England and the United Kingdom? If people cant be bothered to fact check FRONT PAGE pieces why bother with them at all? --Bigmeuprudeboy (talk) 08:19, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
- Agreed with the sentiment, if not that exact wording. Is no-one going to change this?--23230 talk 09:08, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
- Fixed. Jenks24 (talk) 09:24, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
- When the colonies were founded, it was still the Kingdom of England, so it's not entirely incorrect. —howcheng {chat} 16:24, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
- I considered that, but the phrase was "a declaration of independence for Britain's Thirteen Colonies", England would just be wrong in the contest of that date. If it was "a declaration of independence for the Thirteen Colonies founded by Britain in North America" your point would be more appropriate, but at the time of the declaration they weren't England's colonies, they were Britain's.--23230 talk 23:16, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
- When the colonies were founded, it was still the Kingdom of England, so it's not entirely incorrect. —howcheng {chat} 16:24, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
- Fixed. Jenks24 (talk) 09:24, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
Be sure to be bold guys. BallroomBlitzkriegBebop (talk) 13:59, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
- Pretty sure we can't edit things on the main page.--23230 talk 16:22, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
Errors in today's or tomorrow's featured picture
Reporters: please first correct today's or tomorrow's regular version.
Errors in the summary of Monday's featured list
Any other problems
Please report any other problems on General discussion part of Talk: Main Page.