Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TungstenCarbide

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Anachronist (talk | contribs) at 17:02, 13 June 2012 (Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments: maybe so). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

TungstenCarbide

TungstenCarbide (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TungstenCarbide/Archive.

– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.

13 June 2012
Suspected sockpuppets

This is rather obvious. The reason for CheckUser is because this was a sleeper sock that just came to life. Jasper Deng (talk) 16:44, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

I blocked it as a WP:DUCK.

However, this report may be mis-filed. I see no evidence that this is a sock of TungstenCarbide. In fact, this sockpuppet was claiming to belong to TungstenCarbide by putting {{sockpuppet}} tags on other sock pages. See the contribution history. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:49, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On the other hand, I see the original Typoheaven account was blocked as a sockpuppet of TungstenCarbide even though this isn't mentioned anywhere in the archive. So maybe the sockpuppet was just being honest in the tagging. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:02, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]