User talk:Frankieoceann
Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Materialscientist (talk) 11:16, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
July 2012
This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Hopsin. Wiki13 (talk) 12:11, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 12:14, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
ban
Frankieoceann (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=that guy told me stop or i would get banned, so i did and someone else banned me, i apologise for my behaviour and did not want to be blocked, i am happy to serve a more reasonable ban time if needed, but personally i think permban was unreasonable. [[User:Frankieoceann|Frankieoceann]] ([[User talk:Frankieoceann#top|talk]]) 12:26, 1 July 2012 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=that guy told me stop or i would get banned, so i did and someone else banned me, i apologise for my behaviour and did not want to be blocked, i am happy to serve a more reasonable ban time if needed, but personally i think permban was unreasonable. [[User:Frankieoceann|Frankieoceann]] ([[User talk:Frankieoceann#top|talk]]) 12:26, 1 July 2012 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=that guy told me stop or i would get banned, so i did and someone else banned me, i apologise for my behaviour and did not want to be blocked, i am happy to serve a more reasonable ban time if needed, but personally i think permban was unreasonable. [[User:Frankieoceann|Frankieoceann]] ([[User talk:Frankieoceann#top|talk]]) 12:26, 1 July 2012 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
In response to your feedback
Hi, I checked your talk page and see that your were just warned once for bad citations and then warned for blocking and then blocked for 5 minutes. It seems that your work has been unconstructive. why is that? Do you feel you shouldn't haven't been blocked at all? Please tell me on my talk page, I would love to help you out. Thanks!
Webclient101 (talk) 12:47, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
Webclient101 (talk)
I can't tell you on your talk page because im blocked...
i feel like i should get a shortened block time, instead of permanent.
- Yeah man, I agree. People on Wikipedia are mean. Applecidarisgood (talk) 13:07, 1 July 2012 (UTC)