User talk:Rafofcon

Notice

You and your aliases (User:Bobbydoop, User:205.188.116.135, and a number of AOL mirrors) have performed a number of edits that are clearly in bad faith, including many instances of misleading edit summaries, repeated reversions that remove good edits that are effectively blanking vandalism, and personal attacks. Combined with your obvious tendency to rotate IP's to skirt the 3RR rules, it is clear that you are what may be referred to as a problem user. For that reason, I'm blocking your user name and your known static IP's for one week. After consultation with other administrators, the duration of this block may be adjusted up or down as deemed appropriate. If you choose to evade your block, all of your changes will be reverted without prejudice, and your block will be extended, perhaps indefinitely. – Clockwork Soul 18:58, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

With the creation of the account User:Rafofcon, you are now circumventing your block. I am indefinitely blocking this sockpuppet account. Please, don't circumvent your block again, or you will likely find that others are far less lenient than I. – Clockwork Soul 02:07, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

that wasn't a sockpuppet.. you should research better. 64.12.117.6 04:15, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong person. I'm not Bobbydoop. I wonder how you came to the conclusion that I was Bobbydoop, seeing as how this is not an AOL IP address, I have not edited the Stony Brook University article for over a month, haven't even been on Wikipedia in a month, and have only made comments on the discussion section when I did return to Wikipedia.

Surely, my edits over a month ago does not warrant the block right now. For whichever reason, it seems like a pretext for censorship.

Not at all: it was just an error. I've unblocked you. You must understand that it is curious that your very first edit was to that page, and in strong support of somebody in the midst of an edit war. – Clockwork Soul 04:52, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I had edited without having created a user name about a month ago. I decided to chime in on the current discussion by creating a user name since it seems more legit that way. Curious reasoning, by the way. Your opinion supports another's, therefore, you must be that other person. Even if the reasoning was valid, this is not enough to support a block, as I understand Wikipedia policy.

Funny how I'm still blocked.

Signature

Just a friendly reminder to please sign your statements on talk pages by using the four-tildes: ~~~~. Text without a signature is difficult to differentiate from the writings of other authors, making it much harder to read. Cheers! – Clockwork Soul 14:25, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]