Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Austin Goh

Austin Goh

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This was previously deleted under both PROD and A7 as non-notable. Although I've turned up some sources (see this diff), I've yet to find anything that conclusively satisfies WP:GNG. Bringing it to AfD to get proper consensus for retention/deletion. Yunshui 雲‍水 13:57, 11 July 2012 (UTC) Yunshui 雲‍水 13:57, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No convincing claim to notability. It says Goh teaches people who, the article goes on to say, "Likely too new to be notable"? The existing sources do not stand up to GNG or RS. Creator has presented an WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS argument on my talk page. There's a borderline tone of Advertisement. The JPS^{talk to me} 16:43, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Respectful of policy guys, I realise some of the sources may sound like advertising and that's what I'm trying to avoid whilst still trying to provide sufficient evidence of his notability. Additionally I don't know any of his students who have achieved recognition. I am of the WT lineage (different from WC) Kittensfoot (talk) 21:41, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:08, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]