Jump to content

Colin G. DeYoung

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Spielcat (talk | contribs) at 14:31, 31 July 2012 (Models of Personality). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Colin G. DeYoung, Ph.D., is a professor of psychology at the University of Minnesota (Minneapolis, Minnesota).[1] His research has made significant contributions in personality psychology and the growing field of personality neuroscience.[2]

Background

DeYoung earned his B.A. in History of Science at Harvard University in 1998. He obtained his M.A. and Ph.D. in Psychology in 2000 and 2005, respectively, at the University of Toronto.[1]

Research

DeYoung's research in personality psychology has examined the theoretical structure of personality and the biological basis of personality.

Models of Personality

In contemporary psychology, the most commonly accepted model of personality structure is the "Big Five" or "Five Factor Model."[3] [4] Recent research using factor analysis has suggested that the five domains of the Big Five have two higher-order factors, referred to as metatraits.[5][6] The two metatraits are Stability, which is composed of Big Five factors of Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, and Emotional Stability (the reverse of Neuroticism) and Plasticity, which includes the Big Five factors of Extraversion and Openness/Intellect (commonly referred to as Openness to Experience). Stability is defined by one’s maintenance of stability and hypothesized to be related to the neurotransmitter serotonin, while Plasticity is seen in one’s adaptability to novelty and hypothesized to be related to the neurotransmitter dopamine.[6][7] DeYoung has also proposed an expanded classification of the Big Five dividing each of the Big Five into two sub-dimensions. DeYoung, Quilty and Peterson (2007)[8] suggested the following aspects of the Big Five factors:

  • Neuroticism:
    • Volatility - irritability, anger, and difficulty controlling emotional impulses
    • Withdrawal - susceptibility to anxiety, worry, depression, and sadness
  • Agreeableness:
    • Compassion - empathetic emotional affiliation
    • Politeness - consideration and respect for others’ needs and desires
  • Conscientiousness:
    • Industriousness - working hard and avoiding distraction
    • Orderliness - organization and methodicalness
  • Extraversion:
    • Enthusiasm - positive emotion and sociability
    • Assertiveness - drive and dominance
  • Openness/Intellect:
    • Intellect - one’s ingenuity, ideas, and quickness
    • Openness - imagination, fantasy, and artistic and aesthetic interests

The classification system utilizing these ten aspects allows for nuanced discrimination within the Big Five, which can reveal subtleties in differences in personality domains otherwise undetected.

Biological Basis of Personality

DeYoung et al.’s (2010)[9] research indicates that the sizes of certain brain regions are related to four of the five different domains of the Five Factor Model. Openness/Intellect (Openness to Experience) was the only member of the Big Five lacking a significant relationship to brain structure volume, encouraging more specific research on this domain. The volume of the medial orbitofrontal cortex, which is responsible for coding reward values, was positively associated with Extraversion. Neuroticism was related to reduced dorsomedial prefrontal cortex and posterior hippocampus volume and increased mid-cingulate gyrus volume, which are areas sensitive to threat and punishment and associated with negative emotion and emotional dysregulation. Reduced posterior left superior temporal sulcus and increased posterior cingulate cortex and fusiform gyrus volume were associated with Agreeableness and have been shown to be involved in interpretation of others’ motives and beliefs. Increased volume in the middle frontal gyrus in the left lateral prefrontal cortex, an area responsible for maintaining and executing information and planned action, was positively correlated with Conscientiousness.

References

  1. ^ a b University of Minnesota Website
  2. ^ Colin DeYoung Homepage
  3. ^ Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216-1229.
  4. ^ Costa,P. T.,& McCrae,R. R. (1992). Four ways five factors are basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13,653–665.
  5. ^ Digman,J. M. (1997). Higher-order factors of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73,1246–1256.
  6. ^ a b DeYoung, C. G., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2002). Higher-order factors of the Big Five predict conformity: Are there neuroses of health? Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 533-552.
  7. ^ DeYoung, C. G., Hasher, L., Djikic, M., Criger, B., & Peterson, J. B. (2007). Morning people are stable people: Circadian rhythm and the higher-order factors of the Big Five. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 267-276.
  8. ^ DeYoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C., & Peterson, J. B. (2007b). Between facets and domains: 10 Aspects of the Big Five, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 880-896.
  9. ^ DeYoung, C. G., Hirsh, J. B., Shane, M. S., Papademetris, X., Rajeevan, N., & Gray, J. R. (2010). Testing predictions from personality neuroscience: Brain structure and the Big Five. Psychological Science, 21, 820–828.