Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GJ 1062

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Articles for deletion

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by RJHall (talk | contribs) at 14:38, 9 August 2012 (→GJ 1062). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

GJ 1062

GJ 1062 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doens't meet WP:NASTRO. StringTheory11 (t • c) 23:39, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I will point out that it is a High proper-motion Star and at apmag 13 is easily visible to amateur telescopes. How close to the Sun does a star need to be to be notable? -- Kheider (talk) 11:50, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:55, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep We do not have to delete because of NASTRO, and this star does occur in several important lists due to it being close to the sun and having very high proper motion. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:09, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete – Even if the star is 25th on an obscure astronomy list, the article still needs to satisfy WP:GNG. At present it does not. There are more than a thousand stars within this distance, over 100,000 high proper motion stars, and vast numbers at magnitude 13 or brighter. If this is an important star, then there should be papers on it, but I'm not finding any. It's not exactly Kapteyn's star. Regards, RJH (talk) 14:32, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/GJ_1062&oldid=506565355"