Jump to content

Talk:Funny Games (2007 film)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lugnuts (talk | contribs) at 18:40, 20 August 2012 (Requested move: fix). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Move?

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was not moved.Juliancolton | Talk 01:36, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Funny Games (2008 film)Funny Games (2007 film)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Plot summary

Needs to be fuller. Is anyone able to oblige? --Legis (talk - contribs) 01:36, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've just reverted an edit from a user who keeps removing it, but doesn't state why. Lugnuts (talk) 08:16, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I notice that this plot summary is almost exactly word for word the same as the plot summary of the older Australian version of this film. Is that ok? Dylan (talk) 00:29, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
As they're in essence the same film, except for language, then yes. Lugnuts (talk) 07:28, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I was just not sure regarding Wikipedias plagiarism policy. Thanks Dylan (talk) 15:20, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Austrian, not Australian. I can't help but think some explanation of interpretation of this film may be helpful as it was so badly misunderstood. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.254.51.170 (talk) 08:18, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

Funny Games (2008 film)Funny Games (2007 film) – This request was first raised in 2009 (see above), however the policies at the time pointed towards the 2008 disambig, as this was the year of its first public release. However, since then consensus changed and the guidelines for naming conventions (films) and film release dates were brought into line, as the conflicted each other. Now the guidance states "first verifible release, including festivals". This change is now replicated in the category guidance. As this film first screened in 2007, the current title is incorrect. Lugnuts And the horse 18:39, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]