Jump to content

User talk:Uppland/Oldish

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Luxspes (talk | contribs) at 03:58, 30 April 2006 (UI Design: Edit then List vs List then Edit). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Thanks for your kind words. It's been fun to research some of these wonderful opera houses and to update and improve the list which appears on Wikipedia. I've tried to visit as many of them as possible over the years, and now have long-lost English friends living in Stockholm. So ne day, I'll make it... Vivaverdi 18:03, 27 December 2005 (UTC), Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA[reply]

Hi - thanks for the update on the university page, is less contentious now. --Oscarthecat 17:04, 2 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Haukur's RFA

Thanks for supporting my nomination till the end. I appreciated it. Keep saying intelligent things in the spelling debates! - Haukur Þorgeirsson 20:52, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Tups, it keeps getting better, thank you for drawing my attention to it [wipes tears from eyes]. Bishonen | talk 03:33, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Swedish Socialists

Thank you very much for the encouragement on my articles about Swedish socialists. What I’m doing with these guys is that I’m reading their autobiographies, one by one, and as I read I write new info for the wiki articles. I’m basically done with Ture Nerman, and right now I’m in the middle of Zeth Höglund’s 3 volume autobiography. After that I will read the 3 volume autobiography of Karl Kilbom and then the 2 volume autobiography of Fredrik Ström, and finally the much shorter autobiography of Anton Nilson. So these articles will grow. When I’m done with that, which of course will take a while, I have a newly published thick book on the early Swedish Communist Movement (Hemmabolsjevikerna) by historian Aleksander Kan, which will help fill in some stuff and maybe give a little more critical input on some of it. Bronks 14 November 2005.

  • Hello again. I just wanted to say that I’m basically done with the Zeth Höglund article, and have now started the process of expanding the Karl Kilbom article by reading Kilbom’s own autobiography. So that article will slowly grow, day by day, as I read. Bronks 21 December 2005.

changes to Malmö and Stockholm

Sorry, pressed enter too soon.

I do not mind the recent changed merging Malmö with Malmö Municipality, actually. So I vote to keep those changes. // Fred-Chess 07:05, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hej! Thank you for pointing out the move function. After a brief panic, I found my edits and have re-applied them. Tack så mycket. JMcC 14:05, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Norse mythology naming convention vote notice

A new proposal on the representation of Norse mythology names is now up for a vote. Some people object to it on the grounds that it would use non-English characters in some article titles. It would be interesting to hear your view since you've commented on related votes in the past. - Haukur Þorgeirsson 00:51, 19 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

EG Wrigley

I'm so sorry about the mistake, clicked the wrong button. I've restoerd the entry and removed the afd tag. -- ( drini's vandalproof page ) 06:49, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ma El Ainin move

Oh, I'm sorry. I did the same thing with another article just days ago, and was told about this. This time I checked the talk page (empty) and thought everything was okay, I forgot about the edit history. Thank's for letting me know, I'll (try to) put it up for a requested move. Arre 21:46, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Níðhöggr > Nidhogg?

There is currently a vote underway at Talk:Níðhöggr to move the page to a form without the diacritics and nominative case marker. Your opinion would be appreciated. - Haukur Þorgeirsson 19:24, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You've changed the citation style. There has been a big row recently about changing styles that made it to the village pump. It's not considered something that should be done without agreement amongst all editors of the article. My preference is Harvard style, but I didn't change the style for that reason.

Your style is non-standard. The normal citation styles are plain anonymous URL, as originally, Harvard, and footnote link. I think the footnote implementation is too flawed to use. If your citation was obvious, you would not have needed to use "see below".

Also, the reason that I duplicated the inline link is that I actually failed to spot the reference at all because it was too far from where it was needed (there are two facts). With your more bulky reference, the link the reference may be more obvious, but I still feel that the quote needs referencing separately from the MLK association as it is not obvious that both come from the same source.

--David Woolley 12:23, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The reason I changed it was simply that I didn't think that there would be any particular reason to emphasize exactly who made the claim, as long as it is sourced - it would been a different matter if we would have used a direct quote from MLK himself, or some other generally known person, rather than just a historian. In either case, saying that a journal has said something looks strange. It is, after all, the author of the article who makes the claim, not the journal itself or even its editors. Tupsharru 12:36, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The reason that I used the Journal was that I was basically working only with the provided references (albeit they weren't then in the References section). I thought of using the author, but I had no idea what their reputation was, but it was fairly clear that the journal had a reputation. I'd still say that the quoted part looks like it might come from a different source than the indirect speech part. The Harvard reference would have been (Kosek 2005). --David Woolley 13:39, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
If you look at the latest pair of edits you can possibly see why I wanted the citation to be close to the fact. Because the editor hasn't noticed the citation, they've added a new fact that is not consistent with even the freely available abstract of the citation, but, by your interpreation of the citation markup, all the facts in that sentence are covered by the one citation. Baiscally thay have said that the influence on MLK was indirect, but the cited abastract says that the influence was the result of his reading RG's book. (I haven't subscribed for the full text.)
Harvard style, or similar, would probably have helped, by making the citation more obvious, but we need to get agreement from the original contributor before making such a change. --David Woolley 18:02, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Preston Plucknett

"Sicilian Order of merit 1st class" to Tupsharru for his endeavours in Preston Plucknett


Congratulations to Tupsharru the winner of the esteemed Preston Plucknett award of 2005. I've decided to award you not only the "Sicilian Wikipedian Editors order of Merit", but on this occasion a prize of far greater worth and magnitude, "The Golden Goat of Sicily 1st class". My goat Sicilia has recently had kids, and you are awarded this one, a she-goat called Vestia, after my favourite saint. Very well done Giano



















Hello, I see you have met this user on List of North European Jews under their anon ip [1]. I believe this person was responsible for mass voting on Catholic and Jewish articles and numerous other disruptions dating back to March, see: Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Antidote, Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Antidote/Contribution table, Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Antidote/User comments, Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Antidote/Voting. I would appreciate if you could endorse the request for comment at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Antidote#Other users who endorse this summary, Regards, Arniep 15:58, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Politecnico

Hi, thanks for acting as a moderator of sort on the Politecnico di Milano article quarrel. I made a few changes, reverted back something on Orzetto's entry. I'd like you to proofread it, I think we are heading towards a NPOV article now. I still feel itchy about the politics part, would like to hear your opinion. Thanks anyway. --Raistlin 17:46, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

University of Bologna

Hi, for sure I will take some more pictures of Bologna included Collegio di Spagna and other University buildings, but I do not guarantee a timing. I will keep you informed... --Biopresto 07:42, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I look forward to that! Tupsharru 15:19, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Austrians

Thanks for the heads up - I didn't realize that the articles already existed - they were red links from List of Foreign Ministers of Austria-Hungary, and I've several times searched up Schwarzenberg, at least, to no good result. john k 22:11, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Watch

Hello, I wonder why you made a redirect from Wikipedia Watch? As Google Watch has a page why can't Wikipedia Watch have one? Donar Reiskoffer 08:13, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Politecnico

Again, please, chime in, or this will go on forever... we can't solve this dispute in 2. --Raistlin 22:24, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism?

Hello. When you wrote “You should be more careful about calling other people vandals when they obviously are not.” Did you mean to tell that to me, or was this aimed for Yopohari.

Bronks. 19 december 2005.

Thank you friend. Bronks. 19 december 2005.

I thought indentation and context made that clear, but I clarified it anyway. Tupsharru 20:34, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes, I thought so, but I wasn't 100% sure. Thank you. (Maybe you should post it on Yopohari's own talk page so he sees it.) Bronks. 19 december 2005.
The context is very simple: He can no german, but starts 1-sentence-"articles" in the german Wikipedia and wants someone should write really these articles. There are de:Wikipedia:Artikelwünsche and de:Wikipedia:Übersetzungswünsche for that purpose.
I can for example no Japan language so i write no "articles" in the Japanese Wikipedia. Some other examples: de:Benutzer:Duti99, de:Benutzer:Sarcelles, fr:Utilisateur:Sarcelles - all they are infinitely banned for the same reason. Yopohari 08:14, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Finnish Field Marshals

Hi, in reference to what you wrote on my talk page: I completely agree with you. I don't have the expertise or the energy to correct the matter myself, so please go ahead :) But please note that the anon user you mentioned is in fact a cache server for an ISP, so probably there's no single person to blame. Wempain 01:06, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed your message on the talk page from september and responded. --Cool CatTalk|@ 16:09, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Coat of arms of Swedish provinces

Riksarkivet has recently explained they have copyirhgt of the coat of arms (e.g. here). I've created some of my owns, (See sv:Landskapsvapen) and intend to upload them to replace the current. Just checking if you have any objections? / Fred-Chess 11:11, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No, of course not, no objections. Tupsharru 11:21, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I've started with a few (Jämtland, Närke, Dalarna), but I'm not in a hurry to finish it. I might take it up on the Swedish Wikipedians Notice Board, if we ever get it running again. / Fred-Chess 12:06, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]


Medici articles

I've added to temporary stubs with minor info for my two Medice articles. Could you put them to the proper non temporary location ?

thanks. Igor Zeiger 15:15, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry I can't, as I am not an admin, but if you wait a few days it will be done by one. Tupsharru 17:37, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I am newbie here and don't know all the rules and regulations. Igor Zeiger 18:04, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

HELP

can you give tips of how to be an admin.--Cao An Min 22:17, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Need Dual Categories

Effective social network analysis of interdisciplinary studies requires having key contributors tagged in multiple categorines.

For Example: Oceanography & Oceanographer
RJBurkhart 00:03, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of academics

link

I figured that a debate of that sort had to have occurred at Wikipedia already, but was not able to find it before your pointer given above. This is an interesting topic to me. I will go view what has been said.

P.MacUidhir (t) (c) 20:55, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Infobox Biography

Template:Infobox Biography has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for deletion#Template:Infobox Biography. Thank you. DreamGuy 07:21, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rankingcruft

I do not assume that "the rankingcruft" is necessarily contributed by Harvard students, and I certainly do not believe that "all" the Harvard students hanging around here share that fetish. Boosterism is, of course, a problem with all of the articles about major universities (and some not-so-major ones). I admit to some curiosity about the identity of the editors who do this. My own wild guess is that they are either high school seniors who have recently been admitted to the university, or freshmen who are still impressed by their own accomplishment (and, yes, it is an accomplishment) in getting in. These are folks who have recently been quaffing deep drafts of Roger Tory Peterson's Field Guide to the Colleges, U. S. News and College Report, and glossy promotional brochures from the admissions office of the last six campuses they've toured. Their bloodstream contains near-toxic levels of rankingcruft. A few nearly-flunked midterms, and being shot down a few times by would-be romantic companions who, having themselves been admitted to the same school, do not find it impressive, has a detoxifying effect. See my sardonic take on the phenomenon. Dpbsmith (talk) 20:12, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war at WP:AUTO

There's currently an edit war going on at WP:AUTO, with Democritus trying to insert the language he proposed in the Deborah McGuinness case, despite a lack of consensus for it. We've started a section to discuss his language on the talk page. Please contribute your opinion if you're interested. Thanks. -- BrianH123 04:30, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am particularly impressed by your important and eloquent comments about using non-English languages as references. I volunteer to check references in German and Dutch. Andries 22:21, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I replied at the VP. Tupsharru 23:06, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Barbara Shack 18:29, 17 January 2006 (UTC)Sorry, I made a mistake.[reply]

How wise you are. Jason Gastrich (n.b.: don sunglasses before viewing user page) has been packing out the votes on a number of people of tremedous standing and unassailable notability who had (quite coincidentally) managed to avoid the notice of the community until he created an article on alumni of Louisiana Baptist University - one of those on the list - with a load of redlinks. And several of them turn out to have degrees from other schools on the list! Well well. And some of them run other schools on the list. Great fleas have little fleas upon their backs to bite 'em, And little fleas have lesser fleas, and so ad infinitum. So AfD is currently polluted by squads of fundamentalists with "PhDs" of the Andrex variety. I thought it was funny at the original AfD - now I realise it wasn't funny at all. - Just zis  Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 00:43, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I believe we should report Cwen affair on Wikipedia:Requests for CheckUser. The POV-pusher may got banned for persistant sockpuppetry. --Ghirla | talk 13:04, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree this should be done, if possible. I'm not sure the IPs have only been used by this person, but a large proportion of the edits come from two IPs, and I assume the same two IPs are behind all the registered usernames. I don't expect collateral damage to be significant in this case. Tupsharru 11:47, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tupsharru, I am Rabe! of German Wikipedia. I have meanwhile extended the German article de:Studentenmütze and added some Scandinavian information. It would be nice if you could check and verify. Do you understand Danish? I have some qustion regarding the Danish system but cannot understand the article da:Studenterhue quite well. I will help then to complement the English article by adding German information. Thanks for your help. Rabe! --84.170.221.178 17:29, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I will translate da:Studenterhue and work it into the English article in the next few days. You may also be interested in looking at Uplands nation, which I started work on a few days ago. It is the only Uppsala nation I have posted yet, but I have rough sketches for articles on a few more and will add them eventually. Tupsharru 17:57, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I will be interested in the translation of the Danish article because I am not sure about some words in the text. My Danish is poor and the translation of a friendly German user speaking Danish left some questions. So I did not understand what the studentereksamen was. And what the difference was between studentereksamen and the hf. My assumption was that studentereksamen was/is made at the end of class 9. I guess you will clarify that. Rabe! --84.170.219.66 16:21, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Tags--Thank you

You are correct about the blank pages; I jumped the gun without checking the history. Thank you for corrected that and correcting me. Regarding the other page (religious leader) I am of the firm belief that not every leader of every church, synagogue, mosque, or ashram is notable, but I will send it via AfD anyway. Avi 23:41, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The delightful Ril

He also seems to have taken the edit war over Authentic Matthew into its eighth month. I've been gathering some evidence, and at this point I'm fairly certain that -Ril- is actually user CheeseDreams, and is thus already hardbanned. I've presented my evidence at WP:RFAr. Have you had some dealings with CD, do think -Ril- might be a reincarnation? - SimonP 14:53, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

During his first few months here he mostly kept to himself, and did quite good work on Egyptian mythology related subjects. (Though some of these now seem to have been copyvios). In the six months since his last arbcom he seems to have done little more than try to stir up trouble. Consider in the last couple weeks his efforts have included the creation of User:-Ril-/Nudity, Wikipedia:Centralized_discussion/Verses_of_1_Kings_4_and_5, Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Clerks, and Wikipedia:Redirects_for_deletion/FARC. - SimonP 22:04, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy tagging

I removed speedy tags that you had added to Jim Black and Jason Bittner. Both had some reasonable claim to notability, but I decided to redirect the second one for the time being. I later saw that you went back and edited these articles, apparently agreeing with me that these articles are not speedy candidates. Please consider that a too hastily added speedy tag may actually lead to some perfectly decent article being deleted by a hurried admin. Unless the non-notability is really clear, it is better to use {{context}} or {{importance}} tags or to take it to AFD.

I apologize for the misunderstanding. I was working on a project of renaming and consolidating Category:Berklee College of Music alumni and correlating it with List of Prominent Alumni of Berklee College of Music. It's quite regular for names to be added to these lists who do not meet the notability criteria for musicians and ensembles. Going through these lists helped weed a few out. In my haste, I did not research these two enough. Thank you for pointing my error out to me. --malber 13:14, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jean-François Porchez

How is this guy notable? Please, argue your point. 10 million chinese could give a shit less about this guy. The article mearly states, "So and so got a degree, so and so is a type designer for xyz." Big effing deal. Not notable, period. I'm trying to cleanup, and go through articles that are non-encylopedic or non-notable. This certainly is one of those cases, so I will take it immediately to Afd. (Opes 20:24, 4 February 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Hilarious

Thanks for the laugh over at AFD =D ~ Cheers —This user has left wikipedia 18:40 2006-02-05

Gustav Düben = German Swedish

Oh, I beg your pardon! Thanks for the correction! Trisdee 06:10, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your note, and, no, I am not at all familiar with the Düben collection (hence the mistake). So you are not certain about his birthyear either...? Should we then put circa infront of his current birthyear?
Cheers. Trisdee 17:50, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, and is his name with an F or a V? I am guessing it's Gustaf in Swedish and Gustav in German...?
Trisdee 18:00, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please check your WP:NA entry

Greetings, editor! Your name appears on Wikipedia:List of non-admins with high edit counts. If you have not done so lately, please take a look at that page and check your listing to be sure that following the particulars are correct:

  1. If you are an admin, please remove your name from the list.
  2. If you are currently interested in being considered for adminship, please be sure your name is in bold; if you are opposed to being considered for adminship, please cross out your name (but do not delete it, as it will automatically be re-added in the next page update).
  3. Please check to see if you are in the right category for classification by number of edits.

Thank you, and have a wiki wiki day! BDAbramson T 02:26, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have been asked before and am still undecided about this, so for the moment I will do nothing about my entry on the list. I don't really care much if the classification by number of edits is correct. Tupsharru 10:46, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Collegio di Spagna

Hi, finally I took a walk in Bologna and shot some pictures of the Collegio. The building is not extremely beautiful from outside, and they do not let you in if you are not the president of Spain, taking picturse in a narrow street is always difficult, so the result is not impressive, however you can see some pictures [here]. Ciao! --Biopresto 22:22, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! It looks like a very nice historic building, and I think you are just spoiled from living in Bologna! The pictures are good, too. Tupsharru 10:42, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Filipino actor stubs

Hi Tupsharru. You contributed to the (withdrawn) AfD on Olivia Cenizal - thought you may (or may not) appreciate the heads up.

I've put a list of all the stubs I originally tried to batch nominate here, and I'll go through them systematically. Hopefully, this will be a better way of doing this. All the best, Proto||type 14:20, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kven

The multiuser in Kven article did not violate wikipolicies that warrant blocking. Sockpuppetry is strongly frowned upon, but not totally forbidden, see wikipedia:Sock puppetry. Of course, Checkuser request is a good idea, just in case, but blocking is not warranted so far. mikka (t) 20:31, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

People would be equally frustrated with a single account. mikka (t) 20:50, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wandering the frozen wastes of the Norra Ishavet Noticeboard

Hiya, Tups, I feel stupid here, but I can't find a good place on the Swedish W. Noticeboard to ask for input on Peer Review on my new article S. A. Andrée's Arctic balloon expedition of 1897. Perhaps it's not the done thing? Or more likely, I just don't know my way around, as so often. The thing is, it would be specially useful if a Swedish speaker or two checked the references, as they're mostly in Swedish. Realistically, at least the online ones. Bishonen | ノート 20:58, 12 March 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Drive for Swedish quality articles

Hello. This is in regards to the upcoming Wikipedia improvements Wikipedia:Pushing to 1.0 and Wikipedia:Stable versions, which have the intentions to provide stable versions of articles suitable for prints or publishing.

I've noticed you have written several articles about Swedish matters. If you feel some of these are decent enough to deserve recognition, you are encouraged to nominate them at Wikipedia:Swedish Wikipedians' notice board/Swedish quality articles. In the end, our articles should be comparable to what is expected from the Encyclopedia Britannica. If it currently isn't, but you feel you have spent a considerable amount of time on it, you are still encouraged to nominate it, so that your work will be recognized and others can continue to improve on it. Don't be shy! :-)

Fred-Chess 11:13, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GWU

Hello, I'm trying (again) to get The George Washington University moved to George Washington University. Since you weighed in on this when it came up last year, I thought you might like to weigh in again. john k 23:31, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fred M. Donner

From the impression I got from reading over the AfD of Fred M. Donner, I take it you know more about this gentleman than the rest of us and/or you researched him for your AfD vote. Nonetheless, if you could add information to the article with citations (more than just the faculty page that is there), it would be of great value. Pepsidrinka 12:35, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I second this. Esquizombi 22:13, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I actually don't know more about him than what I found when researching my vote; it's all on the AfD page. Tupsharru 05:24, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your diligent research on the AfD for this article. It deserved discussion and however the consensus comes out, I'm glad we've been able to learn more about this person and his role in history. Best, Gwernol 14:10, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I took a look at your improved Sipido article (thanks for pointing me to it on my talk page). Its a great improvement - congratulations. I will look into the Brussel-Nord station. I know nothing about Belgian railways, and haven't found anything through Google yet, so this may take a while, but you've started me down the track (pun intended) and now I have to find what's at the other end :-) Best, Gwernol 15:21, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Upphovsrättscruft and thinskinned users

Tups, I've never heard of either of the users you mentioned, but taking such umbrage at the whole of en.wiki because of one brusque remark from one user seems excessive to me. As for the upphovsrättscruft, outstanding! :-D It'll be a while before I can actually upload the state funeral and the other one I've got in mind, but I'm pleasurably planning the captions as we speak. I don't believe the Impossible Man can mind, either, as they're for a pretty long section that has no images (well, it has one irrelevant one, that will of course go) and are highly relevant and enhancing of the points made in the text. And maybe I'll rm the balloon factory, even though it's kind of fun how idyllic it looks—are those Singer sewing machines? Thank you so much for ferreting out this valuable legal cruft! Bishonen talk 13:19, 26 March 2006 (UTC).[reply]


More than a thousand words

Tups, check out the new photographs in the last secion of S. A. Andrée's Arctic balloon expedition of 1897, are they eloquent or what? Especially the schoolgirls, IMO, where all the authoritarian institutions including the schools come together to dispense heritage from above. Thank you again! Bishonen talk 10:30, 29 March 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Sorry for all the trouble you've been having with that article. Thing is, the "repairs" were done by three different users and they probably weren't aware that someone else had already been there. Also, at least two of them are still fairly new to the pedia and probably brand-new to the project of trying to get links to direct to real articles (and if you've ever been to that page you'd know it's work akin to that of Sisyphus). So please be patient.

If I could make a suggestion for cases like the one you were dealing with, if there is no article written yet, and you do want to link it for "the future" (sort of) why not link to what the article may be called when it is written. This will create a red link and be a reminder that that particular article needs writing. Also, if you do that, it would be good if you add the red link to the disambig page as well. This would serve as a note to, admittedly sometimes overzealous, link repairmen that one of the existing options may not be all it's cracked up to be. ok? --Mmounties (Talk) 18:57, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

John Kenneth Galbraith

Hiya, I thought I should explain why a second article was started on this topic. This article concerns the multitude of articles whereas the main article deals with books only. I did some work on the John Kenneth Galbraith article making the partial bibliography into a complete one. During the course of this I posted on the talk page to see if people thought that we should cover/include the articles that JK Galbrath has written, as there are hundreds of these I thought it made sense to start a separate article and no one had responded on the talk page. Someone had previously redirected the article but changed their mind and asked me to revert it. Sjeraj 12:40, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Christian Essenes

I agree with your comments about blanking the page. After some googling, I find a number of Christian groups or churches using the Essene name, but no real commonality between them, and absolutely no sign of any coherent movement built around the name. Fan1967 18:38, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Nice images, shame about the text - it's the rehashed and corrected German - see what you can do to it. Giano | talk 17:16, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • The page is growing - could we have a few illustrated words on Swedish Neo-Renaissance buildings please? If you are stuck, I'm sure Bishonen is very rich and has a very palatial residence you could describe. Giano | talk 19:36, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oh, definitely, one of the justly famed 1940s Södermalm Neo-Renaissance walk-ups! The tastefully restrained size is a defining feature of this style. But it really deserves a FA of its own. Bishonen | talk 10:26, 17 April 2006 (UTC).[reply]
  • Now perhaps you understand why the suggestion to write Neo-Renaissance was a poisoned chalice. If you look at how true Renaissance buildings can differ country to country, then merge those styles together, then throw in some Baroque for interest - you see the problem. If you look at your picture, you have written "Florentine and Venetian" well those two terms are at odds to begin with compare Palazzo Pitti which is Florentine, with Ca' d'Oro which is Venetian, you will see the Venetian influences (in the central bay) of your building are in fact Gothic, and the roof hints at Baroque (see Linderhof) which is Neo-Baroque. However the Swedish building can still be described as Neo-Renaissance. somehow I suspect this has not made you any clearer. Well, it was your idea to write the page in the first place, so you only have yourself to blame. We will definitely add your picture to the page with a few words;-) Giano | talk 10:11, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • [2] It's no use you complaining that your screen is not big enough. You should have thought of that before you suggested I write the page. When it is finished there will be a lot more text and things will fit perfectly - I assure you. We have Dutch Renaissance to fit in yet, and quite a lot more of other stuff too, besides the Swedish including Anglo-Indian Neo-Renaissance - life just gets better my the moment! Giano | talk 21:55, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, but the article is getting better all the time. And it was a very needed article. How can we have an encyclopædia with an article on Bulbasaur but none on Neo-Renaissance? Tupsharru 04:35, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

deleting /merging remaining professor category pages

hello there. given how you voted on deleting Category:Professors in the autumn, i wondered if i couldn t ask for your vote in a nomination i ve just made to merge remaining professor category pages in appropriate pages with links to Category:Academics. Best regards, Mayumashu 16:15, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For your extraordinary service to the Wikipedia community

A Barnstar!
The Barnstar of Diligence

What a wonderful rescue you have effected, Tupsharru. Wikipedia owes you a great thanks. May this barnstar be a token of it. My hat is off to you. ++Lar: t/c 02:26, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]


I dont know why you are changeing the page I made

I dont know why you want to change it I have translated the words correctly and my article comes from the Swedish version of wiki if you are going to change my article then you might as well change that article. I am leaveing it as it is and if people want to change it then fine. (The Green Fish 03:27, 27 April 2006 (UTC))[reply]

unter null etc.

Hi, Tupsharro, thanks for writing =P
How did you find out about my unter null article? Well yuo see I'm quite new here and I'm not that good of fixing up facts and information about things, I'm just doing it the best I can. Where from can I get more ppl willing to revise the page with me? Btw, are you Swedish, and if so, is it allowed to write comments in Swedish on user talk pages, cause I'm from Sweden,,,thanx for all..peace Shandris 14:22, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I saw it on Special:Newpages (where you can see the newest pages coming in) and checked it at random, wondering what it was. Yes, I'm Swedish, but it is usually considered more polite to write in English even on user talkpages, as it enables other people to follow conversations on topics they may find interesting. Tupsharru 18:47, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

To reply or not to reply, that is the question...

Hi Tupsharru. Regarding your comment on the Village Pump "However, when Ryan Lanham asked about the motivation for the nomination on Redvers' talkpage, Redvers just archived the question and the rest of his talkpage the same day without a reply. This is not how I expect a Wikipedia administrator to behave.".

Please note:

  • the post from Mr Lanham was unsigned and I make it very clear at the top of the page that I won't reply to people who don't sign their posts. I even give instructions for how to sign posts.
  • the post from Mr Lanham was a personal attack, using words like "a sad little thing to do" and backing up his unpleasant and incivil attack in the AfD itself. I don't feel the need to reply to personal attacks as there is no reason to get into an edit war with someone. I'd rather rise above it.
  • the post had a nice splash of racism in it. 'Nuff said.

I note you don't take issue with Mr Lanham's attacks on me, preferring to tacitly approve of them when not in possession of the full facts and then not withdrawing your points when those facts were presented. This is not how I expect an otherwise respected Wikipedia editor to behave. ➨ ЯΞDVΞRS 11:58, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

UI Design: Edit then List vs List then Edit

Hi! Thanks for removing my article from speedy deletetionUI Design: Edit then List vs List then Edit I can see how it can be interpreted as how-to but it is not, the article is not about how to build UIs, is about how UIs are built. This is not a how to, I am not explaining how to build a UIs, I see that my page was moved to may "user space" I am not sure what does that mean... I would love to recieve some critique of my page to know how to improve it so that it can be considered a good article for the Wikipedia --Luxspes 03:58, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]