User talk:Vanished user 231c
|
That Ole' Cheesy Dude (Talk to the hand!) 17:27, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:57, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
June 2011
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload new images. However, it appears that one or more of the images you have recently uploaded or added to an article may fail our non-free image policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted image of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our non-free image criteria. Please note that we take very seriously our criteria on non-free image uploads, and users who repeatedly upload or misuse non-free images may be blocked from editing. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media Copyright Questions page. ΔT The only constant 00:24, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
I didn't add them. I undid the additions of the image.
Orc (Middle-earth)
Hello, please let's discuss that certain paragraph on the origin of orcs at the article talk page. Regards, De728631 (talk) 19:12, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
Lex
Lex may be short for "Alexander", but "Alexander" is not the name that he goes by on the show. Only one person calls him "Alexander" and that was his mother. Since you only see her a couple of times throughout the series, he is primarily known as "Lex". More importantly, Michael Rosenbaum is credited as "Lex Luthor" and not "Alexander Luthor", thus even the creators do not consider his name to be "Alexander". BIGNOLE (Contact me) 15:43, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
His mother called him that, his clone called himself Alexander. Further, there are numerous examples of characters having longer full names but are only credited with the name they are refered to in the work.
- Those example articles should be corrected. Just because other articles are doing it doesn't mean that they are right. He is not credited as "Alexander Luthor". Just because a couple of people have used that name on the show in 10 years of airing doesn't mean that that is his name. You're trying to work from an in-universe perspective and you're not supposed to be. We operate from an out-of-universe perspective, which means that we do not retroactively change names just because there is some revelation about what his "birth name" is in that universe. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 16:24, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
Dexter's Kill List
Listen, I know you might have meant well, but what you did was not right. You can not, and you will not, delete an entire list, just because you messed up on editing it. Le Rusecue (talk) 05:50, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
I deleted the whole list after realizing the whole section is pointless OR and im deleting it again.
- Perhaps a little more discussion would be necessary, it's obviously quite a controversial delete. I was the original creator of the list itself, under Thecheesykid, and later advocated its removal because it is WP:OR, but I was countered by Hearfourmewesique and the result of the discussion was pretty inconclusive. However please don't edit war about it, discuss before reverting. Aranea Mortem (talk to me) 00:00, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
Aranea makes a point. However, I would like to note that, you only deleted it, AFTER YOU messed up the formatting. I'm reinserting the list, and then we can discuss if it should or shouldn't be removed. If we come to the conclusion it should be removed, then that's fine. Le Rusecue (talk) 02:39, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
The discussion section is a joke. This was not created by anyone but a fan with no third party sources. I got rid of it because its OR. No third party sources. Add the whole reason I got rid of it is not because I messed up the format, which I did, but because after reading it again, and seeing there was no third party source, that it was made by a fan I deleted it and will again
It is OR. There is no discussion when it comes to addint OR. It has no third party sources. Much of it is interpretation. It gives no indepth understanding of the character.
Season character summaries
Just a question, when adding information about the character based on what has happened during the season, how would one source that properly? Source the episode? --81.240.159.208 (talk) 20:45, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
In text citation naming the episode or follow the template given for the other references for citing an episode.
Dexter
Any particular reason to revert my edits? Hearfourmewesique (talk) 04:10, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hearfourmewesique (talk) 20:44, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Category:TransMetals II
Hello Unknown Sample, I just wanted to let you know I have removed the proposed deletion tag you left on Category:TransMetals II, because according to policy categories cannot be deleted under the proposed deletion process. I only did this to comply with policy and have no comment one way or the other on the merits of deletion. If you wish to pursue deletion of this category, please see Categories for discussion. —KuyaBriBriTalk 15:24, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Help request
{{tmbox
| type = style
| image = 
| text = An editor has been very uncivil on a page and when I asked him not to be as such he was uncivil. I would like arbitration or some kind of warning or something to be done. Or at the very least someone to talk to him about his actions.Odoital25 (talk) 00:05, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
please, let me explain, i saw The Dark Knight Rises to see Bane, until i was suprised to see Talia as the real main antagonist, and that Bane was the secondary 76.188.124.154 (talk) 03:35, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
How much of the plan to destroy Gotham was his and how much was hers is a matter of debate. All that can be conclusively said it that he is a main antagonist and she is a main atagonist.
Batman
There is no reason to be vague about it, his back was broken. It was not fractured, but it was broken. Per this website, even dislocations of vertebrae are considered "broken backs", as the spine is no longer intact. He doesn't have to be paralyzed (and he couldn't walk, stand or do anything until his back healed, as seen by him falling down in agony when he tried) to have a broken back. He can see feel and move his legs, he just cannot use them because his back is not intact. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 17:20, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
Broadway Bro Down
Please stop editing warring on the Broadway Bro Down article. The passage you insist on adding is not essential for a reader's understanding of the plot, and its addition to the sentence in question makes that sentence clunkier and read more poorly. A plot synopsis' function is to explain the plot to the reader. Individual gags, details, and other trivia not necessary for that function violate WP:TRIVIA, WP:INDISCRIMINATE and WP:TVPLOT, and your insistence that there is "nothing against adding it" is simply a form of tendentious editing, which can result in your being blocked from editing. Please stop disrupting the article. Thank you. Nightscream (talk) 02:02, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- Don't threaten with a block. That's just rude. Conidering how many times you have been blocked, don't go throwing that around. Tendentious? Seriously, that's overly dramatic and pretentious. There is nothing against adding it. It is only your opinion its trivial. The only point you have is clunky which I can easily edit that and am in the process of doing that. Leave me alone.
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt the aritcle by removing information from the article's plot synopsis or removing valid wikilinks from terms, you will be blocked from editing.
The episode did not indicate that South Park lacks a theater district. Not only has it been shown to have a theater that features prominently in the plots of a number of episodes, but Randy indicated that the town does not have a theater district like Broadway. Exposition that sets up the fact that he took Sharon to see the Denver production of Wicked a couple of dozen times before it left town, may clarify this to the reader, who may be left wondering how he took her to the show in the first place if South Park doesn't have a theater district. If you can falsify this, then do so. If you can't, and the only counterarguments you can offer is repeating the same fallacious mantra over and over, as you did previously with your "there is nothing against adding it" above, then stop causing trouble by editing out of what appears to be spite over the previous conflict above. Nightscream (talk) 19:58, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
You are so pretentious. Fallacious, tendentious, mantra? Seriously, none of those terms apply in this situation and saying them does not make you sound smart or noble or whatever you are going for by using them. There is no need to mention 23 times, or that he met the theatergoer at the bar. You comment on my edits, yet cannot take someone pointing out yours are unnecessary. Seriously, talking about adding trivial details.
And seriously, not responding over the lack of a signature is arrogant, conceited, and rude. The only point you have that my edits were wrong were my mischaracterization of South Park not having a theater district. Fine, that can be changed to a million other alternatives: not having Broadway caliber musicals, South Park lacking culture (to paraphrase Randy’s words). There is no need to mention the 23 times seeing Wicked, as its already established they went before, so when Sharon gives the extra tickets to Wicked, there is no contradiction. It doesn’t matter where during Wicked Randy was told about subtext, only that he heard it. A fan does not get any greater understanding of the plot by this detail. No one will care that he went 23, and your threatening again with a block. That’s bullying.