User talk:Oilstone

Any line segment can be divided continuously ad infinitum. At all times, with each division, the length of each part shortens by a half, while at the same time, the number of parts multiplies by two. So, how can an infinite number of parts, no matter how small they are, make up a finite whole? Because for every division, not just some but all, the lengths of the parts are reducing as fast as the number of parts are increasing. This means that even as the number of divisions tends to infinity, the corresponding halving of each part keeps the original line segment's length intact. Oilstone (talk) 01:21, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Personal Attacks

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Outlines of Pyrrhonism. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 20:06, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to Outlines of Pyrrhonism. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 20:10, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to User:Jeff G.. — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 20:19, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Toddst1 (talk) 20:29, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Oilstone (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Accusing someone of making personal attacks without providing a justification for your accusation is also considered a form of personal attack. Furthermore, I only tried to empty the contents of my work and restore it to the state I found it. I did not create that page concerning "Outlines of Pyrrhonism", someone else did. Oilstone (talk)

Decline reason:

Yes you did create Outlines of Pyrrhonism, once on 18 February 2009, and again on 28 August 2012 - admins can see the full history of deleted pages. In each case you went on to blank it, which is taken as a request for deletion. And as for personal attacks, I don't see where you have been accused of any - you added the above "Personal attacks" heading yourself -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 21:11, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.