Jump to content

Talk:Booby

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Koavf (talk | contribs) at 19:31, 1 September 2012 (Substituting template per documentation, replaced: {{unsigned → {{subst:unsigned using AWB). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconBirds Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconBooby is part of WikiProject Birds, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative and easy-to-use ornithological resource. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Please do not substitute this template.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Birds To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

More outstanding tasks at the project's cleanup listing, Category:Birds articles needing attention, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds/Todo.

WikiProject iconSoftware: Computing Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.


Untitled

The content of this page is almost identical to Gannet - since the two are so closely related, I'd think one page for both would make better sense, with 'booby' being a redirect to 'gannet'. Anyone any comments? - MPF 21:27, 3 Feb 2004 (UTC)

no problem for me, they're often considered congeneric anyway

jimfbleak 06:05, 4 Feb 2004 (UTC) (Feb 2004) there was some suggestion of merging this article with 'Gannet'. They do overlap to a large extent. Are there any further suggestions regarding such a merge? Maias 01:40, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, what about merging both 'Booby' and 'Gannet' into 'Sulidae'? Maias 03:03, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If anyone has comments for or against, please discuss at Talk:Sulidae. Maias 03:46, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The 'Booby' is a unique bird separate from the 'Sulidae' and should have its own page. Plus "Boobies" are fun to play with. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.232.113.147 (talk) 03:44, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Salt

What is the origin of the statement "Salt on the booby's tail" Drutt (talk) 22:41, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Contradiction pointed out by unregistered editor

The article states: "Five of the six extant Sulidae species called boobies are in the genus Sula". However, an unregistered editor has correctly pointed out that there is an infobox that lists six species called "Booby", all of which appear to be in this genus. Could somebody with more knowledge of ornithology clear this up? Kansan (talk) 23:02, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Spanish slang term bubie

Three Spaniards from North and central Spain are currently looking nonplused at this screen trying to figure out what that word "bubie" means. The only similar thing we can think of which means "dunce" is bobo. We actually have un "pájaro bobo" ("stupid bird")- bubie does not exist.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Pal agerts (talkcontribs) July 4, 2012‎, 10:01 (UTC)

That's interesting - I was going to reply that maybe the reason you don't recognise the word is that the loan from Spanish dates from the 16th century, but now I'm wondering if this isn't some old vandalism of the page, and it's actually supposed to say bobo rather than bubie. I can find two sources for bobo([1] and [2]) but none for bubie. Thank you very much for making this correction! I'll fix it and add the sources, since the article is protected. --bonadea contributions talk 20:05, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]