User talk:Rjp422

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Rjp422. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Orange Suede Sofa (talk) 16:43, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 20

Hi. When you recently edited James Cantwell, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Marshfield and Marshfield High School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:05, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Christine Canavan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brockton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:50, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gloria Fox

Sure, go ahead and make the change, so long as you hang the references on it. You clearly understand what the problem with the previous version was; I didn't have the time (or the interest) to verify if the statement was true with that exception, or if perhaps there was something else you meant, and I particularly wanted to steer clear of putting something that might be untrue in a WP:BLP. I may take a look in at the article a time or two just to see if there's any rough edges that need polishing, but it's not something I expecting to be riding hard on. --Nat Gertler (talk)