Jump to content

User talk:88.251.95.84

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Kinu (talk | contribs) at 16:01, 5 September 2012 (Unblock declined.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


September 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kurdistan Workers' Party with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Rrburke (talk) 15:04, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Kurdistan Workers' Party with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. -- Rrburke (talk) 15:06, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Kurdistan Workers' Party. -- Rrburke (talk) 15:10, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Nyttend (talk) 15:22, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Where is the vandalism ????? Where ???

I wrote down the things that the pkk done. Vandalism ?? did i said " they are idiots" ? or "fuck them" ?

How can you detect any vandalism ? These are all truth, they are all took from the questioning of the pkk members caught by the official state; Turkey.

Do you think that yourself as a peace dove ?

You don't know anything about the world. Our people is been attacked here, everyday tens of people die with their attacks! We are a legal, democratic state of NATO! And they are Terrorists!!!!

And you think that i violate wikipedia ??

I want the people who searches pkk to know that who they are.

I don't even deleted the other informations following..... They are true too. But before people read the history of the group the have to know their today!

vandalism.... ?

huh!...


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

88.251.95.84 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I try to add true, useful and no harmed word information to the site, but people don't accept those lines as true for theirselves, delete it everytime.... Who can say that i do wrong. For who? For What? 88.251.95.84 (talk) 15:38, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This appears to be a clear case of edit warring, with violations of WP:NPOV thrown in for good measure. Seeing as how you kept doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result, the block is justified. Kinu t/c 16:01, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As I said, you were repeatedly edit warring, which is inappropriate regardless of whether you're right or wrong. What's more, you were rather blatantly violating our neutral point of view policy, as you were already told above: "They are not fighting for the right of the Kurdish People as they told, because the Kurds in Turkiye/Turkey don't respect, support and take side with the terrorist group" is not a neutral thing to say. Neutrality is accomplished by saying what they're doing without interjecting conclusions into the text, as you did. Finally, please note that you were repeatedly adding content without any sources whatsoever, and doing that so many times in short succession would have been enough to get you blocked, even if you weren't edit warring and if you were writing neutrally. Nyttend (talk) 15:39, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]