Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Padmalakshmisx

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Nandhakishore (talk | contribs) at 05:07, 8 September 2012 (Undid revision 511331557 by Secret of success (talk), please stop edit warring, this case is still open). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Padmalakshmisx

Padmalakshmisx (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Padmalakshmisx/Archive.



28 August 2012

– This SPI case is open.

Suspected sockpuppets

Same range of articles, Cinema of Andhra Pradesh and specifically the Guinness record section in the article. Addresses users after they revert his edits with an odd heading and multiple question marks and paragraphs (1, 2 3, 4, previous sock) and blanks his own talk page after a welcome template is put up without a summary (5, previous sock). Also uses similar kinds of edit summaries which tend to be misleading (6, previous sock). Secret of success (talk) 14:43, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

the user secret of success again started storming telugu article (promoting himself as experienced editor) and abusive behaviour and edit warring, same range of articles and same edit behaviour Nandhakishore (talk) 04:54, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

  • These are quacking socks, but I have limited on-wiki time for a while, so I'm not going to block as I may not be able to provide any explanations if required. However, rather than a duck block, a sleeper check would be beneficial as there are serial accounts now. —SpacemanSpiff 10:02, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


  • I request a sock puppet test be conducted on User:Vensatry and User:Secret of success, as I suspect one of them has written on my talk page using an IP address in reply to my editing. See this diff 1
    they use the same title of storming telugu cinema

Please see the latest edits by User:Vensatry clicking here 1 which clearly shows that he has put information which is disputed for nuetrality clearly violates WP:NPOV. This information includes usage of phrasess like Tamil films dominate Telugu Films, they have overtaken Telugu films in the local market. Vensatry and Secret of success both from a Tamil land themselves; they are using their experience on wikipedia to compromise the Telugu cinema article.

The edit i made before Vensatry is this. In User:Vensatry's diff it also clearly shows that he has deleted well cited Guinness records and also tried to write two different records into one sentence trying to make reader not to differentiate them as two different records. He has not spoken anything on the talk page but reverted changes which had POV-statement and POV-section tags.

See my edits that I put immediately after him.

He has tried to accuse User:Dragon Booster who is also from Andhra Pradesh as sock puppet and that user came out clean similarly I request the investigators to investigate me thoroughly and if and when I come out clean I request some desciplinary action be taken against User:Vensatry and User:secret of success

12pavan34 (talk) 08:47, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I agree on the disciplinary action on the two users (Vensatry and Secret of Success) is definitely needed, they are conspiring on who ever edits Telugu cinema article, it is really frustrating, definitely there is no sock puppet among us. And also another quacking behaviour pattern that these two editors show is, they delete the conversations over constructive edits by other editors in their talk pages. I think this is a kind of meat puppetry by the two users. Nandhakishore (talk) 15:43, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Enough quacking. Could you show us some evidence for the allegations involving myself with the reporting User:DRAGON BOOSTER? We share a good rapport. It was you who tried to get him into trouble by impersonating him. —Vensatry (Ping me) 17:00, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Could you explain who were you referring to as sock here? —Vensatry (Ping me) 17:07, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[User:Nandhakishore] was reffering to me as sock as he believed me to be one as accused by you, you are the first one to accuse me to be a sock puppet click here, it has not been proven that I am a sock but still you call me a sock, seeing which [User:Nandhakishore] innocently believed me to be a sock. Now You have also accused [User:NandhaKishore] as a sock.

12pavan34 (talk) 05:27, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vensatry, If speaking in defence of one's own self when accused of sock puppetery is commented as QUACKING then I must say your calling it as quacking is not in good faith and you are simply trying not to give me a chance to explain. Remember, I am a suspect only and so are you a suspect.

You have addressed that you have not accused User:DRAGON BOOSTER as a sock puppet fine, but you have not addressed what I reported about your deleting of information from the Guinness Records section clearly visible in this diff and also about your adding information which clearly violates WP:NPOV

Why have you avoided addressing them ?

12pavan34 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 04:15, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi dear vensatry, why are u deleting my messages on your talk page, without giving proper explanations in reply, and who is impersonating whom, be clear in ur communications, Please note: this is for you and other user secret of success, just because u suspect some one is sock, blindly without checking my edit summaries and other constructively opinionated behavior, doeasnt make u a humble and good editor, you will be liable for disciplinary action by admins, if you ever try to use your experience on wikipedia for your point of view's, vandalism and conspiracy over other editors. Nandhakishore (talk) 03:53, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Enough of this. I believe we have wasted precious time just to listen to quacking. It is pertinent to refrain from responding to the messages of these socks, let them be. Secret of success (talk) 13:09, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


These investigations are of no use, the contributions will be any ways be made by several other editors who are not socks or may be a new sock group will develop, if not me, you just dont waste your time on this article.

Enough of your irresponsible accusations on other editors, you secret of success, kindly refrain from this, what kind of a experienced editors u are, creating conspiracy on fellow editors will make u viable for disciplinary action, definitely one of us will not proved as sock, then you will have to make apology Nandhakishore (talk) 13:50, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Padmalakshmisx&oldid=511331809"