Talk:Jörmungandr

This article has been or is the subject of broader naming disputes. Rather than starting a separate discussion here, please use the centralized page Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English) to discuss the issues involved.

remomved

I removed this from the article:

"According to another folktale, whenever fishermen, sea explorers or Viking raiding parties encountered the Serpent, Thor would come along to fight the great snake. It is possible that this particular myth arose because of thunderstorms at sea (the Norsemen believed that thunderstorms were caused by Thor riding across the sky in his goat-pulled chariot), where the ocean's waves ripped at ships like they were a gigantic snake. Ancient Norsemen spent a considerable amount of their time at sea, so many of their myths and legends revolve around such matters."

This is news to me. Anyone got a source? - Haukurth 14:16, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)

name

Per Wikipedia:Use English rules, this article should be moved to Midgard Serpent, which is the most common English term. DreamGuy 23:29, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Support. I'm fine with that, though "Midgardsormr" seems to get more Google hits. It's perhaps also worth noting that Britannica's article is at "Jörmungand".Oppose Changing my vote, Stefán and Matthew have a point. - Haukur Þorgeirsson 23:53, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose We should keep articles on deities at their names, also Britannica sets a nice example. Stefán Ingi 23:44, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It seems to me that 'Midgard Serpent' is a descriptive, rather than the creature's name. —Matthew Brown (T:C) 23:44, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Keep diacritics. ナイトスタリオン ✉ 08:28, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support, use common English name, commonly used as a proper name, more often with a capital S than not. If it were merely descriptive, you'd see more of other synonyms for serpent than you do. The other alternative would be Jormungand, much more common than Jörmungandr. Gene Nygaard 16:14, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Duja 13:08, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Interestingly "Midgardsormr" gets twice as many English Google hits as "Jormungand". Not that I go by Google hits. - Haukur Þorgeirsson 16:16, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Stefán. Tupsharru 13:43, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I am closing this vote as having no consensus and being part of the broader discussion on Latin-only/English page names versus diacritical/original-language page names on the page started on this: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English). This is not meant to endorse any point of view in this matter or to curtail active discussion. Please feel free to copy or reformulate any point made at the central page. I apologize for any inconvenience this causes, but is preferable to proliferating the discussion over many pages. JRM · Talk 01:23, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion seems to be dormant, but I would like to point out that Midgardsormr, in English Midgard-serpent is the name most often used in the norse Edda for this creature. In my opinion, it is not just the appropriate name for this article in English, but it is also the most common name for it in old Norse. (Barend 12:52, 2 May 2006 (UTC))[reply]