User talk:218.108.168.130
September 2012
Hello, I'm Mr.Goblins. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of facts, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view opiions. Your recent edit to Sami Brady and EJ DiMera: seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. Please check the WP:Help desk for further edits.--Mr.Goblins (talk) 23:20, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
- I know how Wikipedia is written. My edits have nothing to do with a violation of neutral point of view, but rather people's limited definition of the topic. See what I stated here. And I don't see how you were the one who reveted when this evidence shows that another editor did so...unless you are a sock. Otherwise, you were referring to this edit you undid at another article; that was not committed by me. But never the matter, I'll be taking this EJ and Sami issue to an appropriate noticeboard if I am reverted again by you or the "other user." 218.108.168.130 (talk) 02:24, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
- Actually, I watch everyone and I do use my laptop in different areas, but it doesn't mean sockpuppetry unless some does it with vandalism and just calm down about one edit, it really doesn't need the edit between coerce, shown for a long time, and rape. Although coerce is more accurate from the sources.--Mr.Goblins (talk) 03:16, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
- I already replied to you here. And, yes, you are WP:Sockpuppeting. And you don't know what the hell you are talking about. "Coerced" has not been there for a long time, and the sources do not say "coerced." 218.108.168.130 (talk) 03:25, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
- Actually, I watch everyone and I do use my laptop in different areas, but it doesn't mean sockpuppetry unless some does it with vandalism and just calm down about one edit, it really doesn't need the edit between coerce, shown for a long time, and rape. Although coerce is more accurate from the sources.--Mr.Goblins (talk) 03:16, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
- Apparently, different users in same county, but not sockpuppetry, and your method of changing from other articles is with different IP address with vandalism is sockpuppetry, don't make the issue out of a soap opera, and leave the facts we know your trying to help although their is enough evidence you believe it is an opinion you make to delete Islamophobia from different articles and it is not Nazism--GoShow (...............) 03:40, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
We have notified the solution and the users will agree with your good fait edit to halt any arguments but please try not to argue over a word, and we allowed you to keep the word, but try not to delete disambiguation or {{}} lists such as Islamophobia as it does pertain to the sources, otherwise, we appreciate your edits in good faith and conduct order for the free edits of Wikipedia, the case from GoShow and Drmies at the noticeboard--03:50, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
- You and Mr.Goblins are likely the same person. And I did not commit any vandalism; I told you that. IPs are shared by different users, and timing makes all the difference. And the facts about this soap opera incident are what I stated, like Drmies backed me on when reverting your likely sock. [1] And arguing over a word? Exactly what you are doing? Stay off my talk page. 218.108.168.130 (talk) 03:58, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |