Talk:Employment-to-population ratio

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Law Start‑class Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Should this article use full-time equivalent or just % of population with a job ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jcbastiani (talk • contribs) 08:29, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Request for permission

Please do not delete this article, I have requested permission to the ILO to be able to reproduce the following: [1]. Thank you very much.--Jorditxei 11:14, 19 July 2007 (UTC) Bearian 19:33, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this within the law project~? I see no direct relation with law. Andries (talk) 10:06, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

what is the difference between and employment-to-population ratio? Andries (talk) 11:03, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Could somebody update the statistics? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.151.119.162 (talk) 15:19, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I guess there's something messed up here, the employment-to-population ratio must be a kind of , not only to the population stastics, but the rate of employment can also be calculated based on any population, such as the employment rate of the graduates of Tsinghua University. So it is the employment-to-population ratio could be merged into employment rate, instead of merging in the way presently suggested.--WWbread （Open Your Mouth?） 14:45, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Something VERY wrong with the data on America. Does not match the US government's own data AT ALL. See US Dept of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics Data 76.119.69.205 (talk) 22:37, 10 March 2011 (UTC) => This is not wrong OECD stat is 16 to 64 population, US government report the ratio with population 16 and over. => There is no good source for the post 2005 data. The data after that is suspect, as it doesn't mach trends show in the government data. The US government's data shows as 4 point drop from 2005 to 2012 and has 2010 about equal to 2012, but thee table looks like it increased.[reply]

I suggest linking this article as a sub-heading to "Employment Rate" but keeping it as a separate topic for detailed analysis. As an economist I find the discussion of employment-to-population ratio an important topic in its own right. 199.8.26.10 (talk) 18:18, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unsupported/incorrect 2012 data

The data for the United States in 2012 does not appear to be supported by the provided sources; the data itself appears highly suspect. 173.160.38.222 (talk) 19:07, 24 September 2012 (UTC) Josh[reply]