Talk:List of hairdressers

Fashion Stub‑class Low‑importance

	Fashion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past.

This article was nominated for deletion on 3 October 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

(Comment)

I have removed the {{prod}} tag which proposed that this article be deleted, because I think that this article has merit and so should not be deleted from Wikipedia. I'm leaving this message here as notification. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to the article as that process is only to be used when there is no opposition. Warden (talk) 23:29, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Name change

People at this article's current AfD discussion have suggested that this article be renamed to List of hairdressers. Northamerica1000^(talk) 09:09, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As the issue is already under discussion there, a second discussion here would be redundant and confusing. Warden (talk) 10:04, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just a notification per the tag I placed on the article, to notify editors who may click through to this page but not view the AfD.

This wasn't intended to start a new discussion here. Perhaps the move tag isn't needed (I noticed your removal of it). Happy editing! Northamerica1000^(talk) 10:05, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have been WP:BOLD and following the AFD's resolution, have gone ahead and renamed, and also revised the list to bring it in line with other list articles. Sad to lose the references, but those should be in the individual articles to show why those individuals are notable. Mabalu (talk) 09:38, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]