User talk:Steel
No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful) |
Archives |
---|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 |
ElPiloto
Can you take care of 189.241.179.214 (talk · contribs), this user admitted to be User:ElPilotoDi, and as you protected three pages against him in the past, it would be possible to block him? Thank you. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 01:24, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
- Done. – Steel 01:28, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
- Sorry for the incovenience but he returned as 189.241.160.86 (talk · contribs). This guy really doesn't understand. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 03:49, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
- It turns out the /16 range is basically used only by El Piloto, so I've blocked it. At the very least it will mean two weeks of respite from this whack-a-mole with different IPs. – Steel 14:29, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
- Sorry for the incovenience but he returned as 189.241.160.86 (talk · contribs). This guy really doesn't understand. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 03:49, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
Re: Basil L. Plumley page you protected
His death has been confirmed by the media - http://www.wtvm.com/story/19785743/2012/10/10/retired-csm-basil-plumley-dies-fort-benning-mourns-loss I would appreciate you updating the page with his death as I am not a wikipedia editor/user. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.118.249.198 (talk) 18:20, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for the link. I have updated the page accordingly. – Steel 18:34, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
- Only thing you can do is to lock pages. Because you are afraid of different opinion. There is a reason why Wiki is open for editing even by unregistered users. You know why? No, seems like you don't. Weak person. Cheers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.159.212.102 (talk) 07:46, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
12th man (football) - RFPP
Hi, re your decline of the RFPP - another bout overnight. It looks like a set of Aggies who either think the article is about the trademarked term or don't want to admit that the term was used in a similar context elsewhere. There's a couple of us have the article watchlisted but it's getting a bit monotonous :-) Semi protection would be a help but I accept it's only a slow burner. NtheP (talk) 10:14, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
- I don't know what an Aggie is but I've given the page a short protection. It would be good if you could drop a note on the talk page explaining your position, and the IPs can contribute to that if they so desire. – Steel 13:46, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
Solid-State Drives
Thank you for your work to ensure the integrity of this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.122.28.217 (talk) 13:51, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
Request for unprotection
Hi Steel,
I had posted here earlier requesting the unprotection of the Humanitarian Coalition Wiki page. I noticed you deleted this post, but your comment was unclear. Sorry to bother, just curious. I would really like to see this page unprotected ASAP
- REDIRECT HCIntern