Talk:PmWiki

This article was nominated for deletion on August 3 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Articles about wiki engines ought to briefly describe system requirements, and perhaps note at least a few of its syntax features, if there are any relevant issues there. (for example: "uses syntax based on blahblah wiki"

agreed

AFD

After an AFD, the article was kept: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PmWiki. --5ko (talk) 00:03, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

MySQL?

I can't find anywhere how to enable MySQL storage for PmWiki. --210.213.194.226 (talk) 04:01, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is not yet (afaik) a general PageStore class that allows holding the data in MySQL databases, but there is the DataQuery plug-in that has possibly some of the functionality (created by an independent developer). --5ko (talk) 07:18, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Books LLC, Alphascript, Betascript, Fastbook Publishing ...

I've removed the following Books LLC and Alphascript references:

LLC Books, Free Wiki Software, ISBN 978-1156996164
Frederic P. Miller, Agnes F. Vandome, John McBrewster, History of wikis, ISBN 978-6130050306

See: User:Fences and windows/Unreliable sources and Amazon.com controversies#Sale of Wikipedia.27s material as books. °°Playmobilonhishorse (talk) 01:43, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pmwiki-32.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Pmwiki-32.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 10:39, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Needs a limitations section desperately

This article really needs a section covering the limitations and problems with PmWiki. It is a very poor wiki for use with large amounts of content (on a specific page or in total). This article gives the impression that PmWiki is on par with many more advanced wiki engines. --173.13.177.204 (talk) 20:04, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]