User talk:Ricardo630

Welcome!

Hello, Ricardo630, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! D. J. Bracey (talk) 16:18, 27 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Additions to Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

Great shots that you've added to this article, thanks very much for doing so. Tijuana Brass^¡Épa!-E@ 08:03, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Placing this on my Talk page so that I can be unblocked (I was blocked erroneously) {{unblock|I've been Autoblocked. The block message was ''Autoblocked because your IP address has been recently used by "Debussy's defense team". The reason given for Debussy's defense team's block is: "sockpuppet".''}} Ricardo630 21:30, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Autoblock has been cleared. Guy 22:02, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The mission movie still Sao Miguel das Missoes.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:The mission movie still Sao Miguel das Missoes.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:42, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Marcopolo logo.gif

Thank you for uploading Image:Marcopolo logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:31, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Christ heals leper the testaments film lds.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Christ heals leper the testaments film lds.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --23:08, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:The mission iguassu falls.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:The mission iguassu falls.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:07, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Teixeirinha.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Teixeirinha.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 17:49, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of Utah companies

The article List of Utah companies has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not a directory

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. I42 (talk) 09:21, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of List of Utah companies

I have nominated List of Utah companies, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Utah companies. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. I42 (talk) 07:06, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sign of Christ's birth seen in americas.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sign of Christ's birth seen in americas.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 07:37, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Christ heals leper the testaments film lds.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Christ heals leper the testaments film lds.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 09:34, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:City of zarahemla the testaments film lds.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:City of zarahemla the testaments film lds.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:49, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Southwest Symphony Orchestra

The article Southwest Symphony Orchestra has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of how this might meet notability guidelines. Lacks citations to significant coverage in reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RadioFan (talk) 15:39, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Correio do Povo (Porto Alegre) 4,28,06.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Correio do Povo (Porto Alegre) 4,28,06.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:46, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Light of the World (music)

The article Light of the World (music) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable, tagged since Feb 2010

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Fayenatic (talk) 09:24, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Verifiability

Hello Ricardo. Today I patrolled Pala Velho, a new article you created on 30 July. I noticed the article was completely unreferenced. On Wikipedia, any information that is challenged, or likely to be challenged, must be attributed to a reliable, published source. Please do not create new articles and leave them without in-line citations to show the source of your information. Please see WP:REFBEGIN and WP:Verifiability for information about how, and why, we show the sources of information in Wikipedia articles. Happy editing! Dolphin (t) 06:44, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Verifying commercial use guidelines of File:Colorado City, AZ.jpg

Dear Ricardo,

I'm writing in regard to the usage guidelines of File:Colorado City, AZ.jpg I ask only because of the unclear guidelines I have read in the licenses displayed. It is my intention to use this image with altered color, contrast and brightness. Fundamentally, the photo remains intact for its use as an EP cover of a new heavy metal project in Brisbane, Australia

One of the guidelines states that bypassing the system and going straight to the author invalidates the license use (but doesn't break any laws or use guidelines with anyone or anything else) based on an agreement reached with said author, hence my inquiry. If you wish to speak off of Wikipedia regarding this matter, I can be contacted via e-mail at ross.chessher@gmail.com alternatively, I can be reached via the user signature listed below.

I look forward to hearing from you soon, Thank you in advance

Ross C xXSouthern SlayerXx (talk) 16:25, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of TimedText:Gaucho eu sou.ogg.en.srt

TimedText:Gaucho eu sou.ogg.en.srt, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/TimedText:Gaucho eu sou.ogg.en.srt and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of TimedText:Gaucho eu sou.ogg.en.srt during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:55, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]