Jump to content

Talk:Economic policy of the Bill Clinton administration

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 74.65.96.248 (talk) at 02:20, 7 December 2012 (→Poor). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconBusiness Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconPolitics Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Housing bubble and Derivatives created under Clinton

Where is it mentioned that the Subprime bubble began under Clinton? It also helped fuel the gdp numbers.--76.92.122.151 (talk) 01:40, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism Section

Yeah, um... The third section in this part... I'd like to get to know these nameless "economists" that credit Clinton with the creation of NAFTA. Because, you know... I'm pretty sure that NAFTA was born under Reagan, crafted by Bush Senior, and all that was need was a signature by the time Clinton came to office. (Despite Bush desperately attempting to fast track it through at the end of his Presidency.)

Oh, and by "I'm pretty sure"....I mean it's historical fact. Those silly nameless economists. Abalu (talk) 08:47, 22 August 2009 (UTC)Abalu[reply]

Previous discussion without headers

Is it trut that Clinton utilized a variant of the American School of economics, because I heard that one of his plans was to simultanioussly fund and tax large corporations, and it was this brilliant stratagy of creating turning industry into a renewable tax resource that created the great surpluss during his administration.

Extensive Cleanup

Am going to work on cutting down the Policy sections of this article and combining them into one or two comprehensive sections. Currently, they read too much like some freshman econ major's term paper. Need to find some sources independent of the few used by the original author and try to limit the heavy usage of detailed econspeak. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.179.122.109 (talk) 19:06, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Clintonomics so creative and original not Encyclopedia material

I like the anti-NAFTA Dobbsian view point espoused. But it's not a encyclopedia it is an Op-Ed right??? No !!!! Please if your going to write an artical about a word that no one uses at the very least make it accurate and well written so that at least it could be combined w/ clinton economic policy. An other thing talking about how the only bills that could be considered were deregulation the president implements the law the legislature makes them so that was not Clintons policy alone with republicans controlling both houses Clinton tried to make the best of it (having sex with an intern ) . As far as Social Security there is nothing wrong with it the easy fix is raising the amount income which can be taxed programs cost money means testing is a good idea as well the idea.It is just a bad anti-clinton artical most likely by an Obama Maniac I voted for him I agree with him on everything but IRAQ but the supporters can be anti-democrats who are not Obama and for people who were not alway part of the party or were the DEMs and REPs are the same people it is annoying---- Nate Riley 02:16, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Um, yeah. I agree. Ish. Your diatribe really loses its coherency, however, about halfway through.

I'm not a fan of Clinton. Or Obama. Or Bush, Reagan, Carter, or many Presidents, really. I really do dislike Clinton, though. Special form of dislike for the man. Even so, I'm not at all impressed with this article. Really needs work, if it even deserves to be kept. 76.27.35.131 (talk) 03:52, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Piss Poor

This is written very poorly; amateur.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Economic_policy_of_the_Bill_Clinton_administration&oldid=526805873"