Jump to content

User talk:Hto9950

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Irji2012 (talk | contribs) at 08:39, 14 December 2012. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Remember: Sign your posts with four tildes!

The introduction to my edits on Wikipedia.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of your recent edits to Angela and Friends did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. 2.216.191.10 (talk) 14:47, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did to Emergency with Angela Griffin, especially if it involves living persons. Thank you. 2.216.191.10 (talk) 15:00, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Mount Pleasant (TV series) with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Zad68 15:03, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Angela Griffin.  FrostedΔ14  15:05, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. GoodnightmushTalk 15:19, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Hto9950 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am very sorry for the actions that I done and I will never do it again.

Accept reason:

Unblocked per discussion below. Acroterion (talk) 17:53, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I'm willing to unblock, but you've been using the IP in the meantime to post warnings and play wiki-cop: I've blocked the IP to prevent that. You may not edit logged-out under any circumstances. That is a condition of unblocking, and you need to state clearly that you understand that and will not do it. "I am very sorry and will not do it again" is of concern when you're still editing while logged-out, which was part of the original problem with this account. I also strongly advise you to avoid the above-mentioned wiki-cop activities: some of your edits are concerning, and verge on the disruptive. I advise you to stick to content work for a long while, and to leave admin duties to administrators. Acroterion (talk) 16:06, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I fully understand that I will leave the wiki-cop actions to administrators and make more constructive edits, because I didn't even know that the wiki-cop activities were limited to administrators. I did actually know that playing wiki-cop whilst logged out would be disruptive editing. Hto9950 (talk) 17:38, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

They're not: I'm just concerned that you're pursuing an aggressive policy of enforcement without sufficient knowledge and experience to do so effectively, or to do so without discouraging new users. I'm going to unblock you, and I ask that you contact me if you are in doubt about something or have any questions. If you are concerned about this account's history, you may consider WP:CLEANSTART, but I ask that in that case you privately notify me of the account name (you can do so by email). Acroterion (talk) 17:52, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

STiki talkback

Hello, Hto9950. You have new messages at WT:STiki.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Inappropriate reverts

Please re-read the content you restored [1]: it's completely unacceptable for you to insist on restoring defamation: you clearly weren't reading the material. Again, please refrain from enforcement-type activities for the time being. This is a condition of your unblocking and I expect you to keep your promise. Acroterion (talk) 15:01, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

CVUA

We see that you need a little more understanding of Counter-Vandalism before you're granted the use of STiki. The Counter-Vandalism Unit Academy exists to help users, like yourself, understand the way to identify and handle Vandalism through one-on-one instruction. Perhaps you'd like to ask a question of our instructors, or perhaps Enroll in the Academy.

Dan653 (talk) 22:51, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jargon

HTO, I hope you will go back and remove the CONUS material for the various articles you edited. The particular term is WP:JARGON and not appropriate for general articles. Thanks so very much. --S. Rich (talk) 20:12, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the material off article Alaska. thanks! Hto9950 (talk) 16:27, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You are most certainly welcome. Again, thank you for helping make WP such a remarkable resource.--S. Rich (talk) 17:44, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the message: I have removed the abbreviation on the article Hawaii. Hto9950 (talk) 15:02, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: User:LOLYOUTROLLED

Re your message: I don't understand what you are trying to ask me. LOLYOUTROLLED (talk · contribs) has already been blocked and no further action is necessary at this time. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:14, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

thanks! Hto9950 (talk | contribs) 19:17, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

1RR

Can someone change my revert limitation from 3RR per every 24 hours to 1RR per 1 week on each article? I want to follow stricter revert limitations because I wish to focus more on editing and content work than just reverting edits? Thanks Hto9950 (talk | contribs) 20:54, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stay at the last clean version, as of 10:30, 22 November 2012. The anonymous IPs 81.182.80.131,188.36.195.210, 81.182.80.131 and 81.183.165.65 are confirmed by a SPI investigations to belong to the banned user Stubes99, see‎ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Stubes99/Archive#12_December_2012 Irji2012

If you reinstate his edits, remember that you "take complete responsibility for the content." (Wikipedia:Ban#Enforcement_by_reverting) (talk) 21:46, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]