Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Microsoft Lync Server
- Microsoft Lync Server (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Product does not appear independently notable, unable to find significant, in depth coverage in reliable sources to support GNG. Nouniquenames 11:19, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Codename Lisa (talk) 18:31, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Codename Lisa (talk) 18:31, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Codename Lisa (talk) 18:31, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
- Comment: Hello. Article does show evidence of coverage in secondary sources. I think the community must decide whether there is significant coverage in secondary reliable sources. Maybe one or two of us can perform WP:BEFORE and see if it should be deleted. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 17:23, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
- Keep WP:BEFORE. E.g., try https://www.google.com/search?tbm=bks&hl=en&q=%22microsoft+lync+server%22 or http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=%22microsoft+lync+server%22&btnG=&as_sdt=1%2C5&as_sdtp=. —Ruud 13:34, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
- Keep, significant coverage in secondary sources. — Cirt (talk) 16:02, 15 December 2012 (UTC)