Talk:Gravity (Lecrae album)

Gravity (Lecrae album) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: December 27, 2012.

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Christian music

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christian music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christian music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Christian musicWikipedia:WikiProject Christian musicTemplate:WikiProject Christian musicChristian music
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Hip-hop

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip-hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip-hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip-hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip-hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip-hopHip-hop
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

R&B and Soul Music

	R&B and Soul Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Gravity (Lecrae album) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 16 August 2012 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the first recordings of Gravity began in May 2012?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2012/August. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gravity (Lecrae album).

Wikipedia

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Gravity (Lecrae album)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Tomcat7 (talk · contribs) 12:51, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

I would split the lead into two sections, but that is optional

Done.--¿3family6 _contribs 15:13, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

", from the iTunes deluxe edition of the album peaked at" - comma not needed

Done.--¿3family6 _contribs 15:13, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why was the album nominated for Best Gospel Album, yet the genre does not seem to be well-presented on that album

There are a lot of comments on Rapzilla from people who wonder that too. Basically, it was put in that category because the Best Rock or Rap Gospel Album category was removed this year. Why the album wasn't put in Best Contemporary Christian Music or Best Rap Album, or both, I don't know. I'll put info in about the Best Rock or Rap Gospel Album category being removed.--¿3family6 _contribs 15:13, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In the infobox, next to Recorded, the m-dash should be an n-dash

Done.--¿3family6 _contribs 15:13, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Next to Producer, is it possible to pluralize the word?

No, unfortunately. I tried.--¿3family6 _contribs 15:13, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think the first paragraph of the Background section includes information that is not relevant to this album. Per Wikipedia:WikiProject_Albums/Album_article_style_guide#Background, that section should provide important information that influenced a particular album. Suggest trimming it down, removing all the chart positions and awards. The next paragraph is OK.

Done.--¿3family6 _contribs 15:13, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"chiefly The Watchmen, consisting of J.R., Alex Medina, and Wit,[21][24][26] and Heat Academy, which is under the direction of Street Symphony.[21]" - confusing sentence. Is the "and" ahead Wit necessary?

Clarified.--¿3family6 _contribs 15:13, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You link Tedashii twice in that section

Done.--¿3family6 _contribs 15:13, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Billboard included news about Gravity in its daily news show The Beat.[41]" - suggest, Billboard reported about Gravity in its daily news show The Beat

Done.--¿3family6 _contribs 15:13, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"This version includes 3 bonus songs featuring appearances from Suzy Rock" - 3 should be three

Done.--¿3family6 _contribs 15:13, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

""Mayday" featuring Big K.R.I.T. and Ashthon Jones," - add a comma after Mayday

Done.--¿3family6 _contribs 15:13, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"featuring Big K.R.I.T. and Ashthon Jones" - that is already stated

Removed.--¿3family6 _contribs 15:13, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quotation marks in quotation marks should be converted to apostrophes, like 'Lord Have Mercy'

Done.--¿3family6 _contribs 15:13, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"cover as a combination of the covers of" - suggest "of the ones of"

Done.--¿3family6 _contribs 15:13, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"and compared the promotional art to the promotional art" - ditto

Done.--¿3family6 _contribs 15:13, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

References could use some clean-up. Accessdates, publishers are missing, Web notation not needed, Ref 6 one period too much, Ref 65 consists of a bare url
Two dead links: [1]--Tomcat (7) 12:02, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reference issues fixed.--¿3family6 _contribs 16:15, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll get to work right away.--¿3family6 _contribs 14:36, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]