User talk:76.102.49.177

October 2012

I noticed the message you recently left to Dopaa. Please remember not to bite the newcomers. If you see someone make a common mistake, try to politely point out what they did wrong and how to correct it. Thank you. -- Mufka ^(u) ^(t) ^(c) 20:23, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, that was quite a dopey vandal... -- Mufka ^(u) ^(t) ^(c) 20:27, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Nation Awakes Movie

Hello 76.102.49.177, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Nation Awakes Movie, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not blatantly vandalism or a hoax. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 22:16, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Bowling Dead

I'am contesting this deletion. Talk page has my input. Thank you. --Yek2iop (talk) 23:28, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012

Hello, I'm Mediran. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Real Love (Lady GaGa song) without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Mediran ^{talk to me!} 01:00, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 76..., I noticed that you redirected an article or two and were reverted. You might think about nominating them for deletion if your redirection is challenged again. I can nominate it for you, if you'd like (IPs technically can't create a new deletion nomination). Mark Arsten (talk) 01:13, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed the message you recently left to a newcomer. Please remember not to bite the newcomers. If you see someone make a common mistake, try to politely point out what they did wrong and how to correct it. Thank you. Mediran ^{talk to me!} 01:16, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:29, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. - Mark Arsten (talk) 01:36, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Now that's fair enough

Yup, your edits here removed obvious promo. Cheers Tonywalton ^Talk 00:19, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mortal Kombat Article

Hello friend, me I quiestion why you delete the information if I put on the MK article?, i want the article to be Good Article but i can't doing if you're erasing everything if I get, but if you have a good reason let me know and I will offer an apology. I wish you a Happy New Year.--TheJoker Was Here! 01:33, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Don't exaggerate. I removed text from the lede that gives a false impression about the scope of the article. 76.102.49.177 (talk) 02:06, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well you may be right but my native language is Spanish, and not what else could put to complete the article, but hey, you can help me, it would be easier if your native language is English. Greetings.--TheJoker Was Here! 02:11, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for looking after my talk page. Season's greetings. Jschnur (talk) 02:57, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diplomacy
	Explained politely what can be edited by who. Thank you. Plingtoys (talk) 03:39, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Thanks for helping out on explaining "Conflict of Interest". Happy New Year, and the best of luck to you. I'd consider making an account if I were you - you seem to be a valuable editor!

Bailmoney27 (talk) 06:04, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, 76.102.49.177. You have new messages at Bailmoney27's talk page.
Message added 07:02, 29 December 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Bailmoney27 (talk) 07:02, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

reporting at UAA

In future, if you encounter other users with promotional usernames/post ads on Wikipedia, you can report them at WP:UAA. :) Cheers, Hop n hop (on the arctic ice) 09:37, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I know, but it's usually not worth the trouble. In my experience, most either stop on their own or are discovered by admins. 76.102.49.177 (talk) 09:38, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.