Jump to content

Talk:Cracker Barrel

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 150.135.210.72 (talk) at 22:56, 11 January 2013 (Well done: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Featured articleCracker Barrel is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on January 11, 2013.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 30, 2012Peer reviewReviewed
February 5, 2012Good article nomineeListed
February 6, 2012Good article reassessmentKept
March 12, 2012Peer reviewReviewed
May 13, 2012Featured article candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured article

Query

Cracker Barrel has provided training and resources to minority employees What's a "minority employee"? --John (talk) 06:36, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've wikilinked the first instance of minority in the lede to Minority group. But as for the term "minority employee", that's an accurate term. I can't think of a way to reword it without the sentence becoming clunky. SilverserenC 09:50, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sequence

I gather from a glance at the FAC that sections were switched around; unfortunately we now have "In further attempts to rebuild its image,[49] the firm has provided a scholarship through the National Black MBA Association,[50] and job skills programs and sponsorships with 100 Black Men of America[49][51] and the Restaurant and Lodging Association.[52]" coming before the reader has read the accounts of the various controversies. This is less than optimal on a FA! --John (talk) 06:46, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch. The reorganization in the middle of FAC was something we didn't think to re-check over to make sure the switched wording was proper. I've now reworded the sentence, so I hope it reads better. SilverserenC 09:51, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well done

I find the topic not so interesting, but I read about a third of the article and scanned the rest because it is well-written and flows well. I learned things about the store that I did not know, and not just about the controversy, but about the store's roots, and the gas pumps. I thought I remembered they had gas pumps in the South, but someone said "no, they've never had them." I bet the newer stores in the West never had the pumps. And so, it was worth my time. One should be able to find well-written articles about any topic in an encyclopedia, good job. --150.135.210.72 (talk) 22:56, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]