Jump to content

Talk:King Kong (1976 film)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Docob5 (talk | contribs) at 03:47, 12 January 2013 (Source?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconFilm: British / American Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the British cinema task force.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
WikiProject iconHorror Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Source?

"King Kong's reputation has improved during the last few years, mainly because of the now-destroyed World Trade Center Twin Towers, which are prominently featured during the film's climax." -- that sounds a lot like some editor's opinion, it certainly isn't en par with what I hear/read whenever this movie comes up. Is there a source? -- Imladros (talk) 01:26, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I would be interested in reading the source if it exists...the "improved reptuation" could be a result from a number of factors; i.e., the 2005 version, ensemble cast (includes Bridges), WTC, the production itself. etc.Docob5 (talk) 03:47, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]