Jump to content

Talk:Copenhagen Airport

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 85.224.155.222 (talk) at 17:11, 1 February 2013 (Airlines and destinations). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconAviation: Airports Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
B checklist
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the airport project.
Note icon
This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.
WikiProject iconDenmark Start‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Airlines and destinations

does Air canada really fly to cph from montreal? No they do not— Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.224.155.202 (talk) 05:50, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am currently editing "Airlines and destinations" section. It takes some time and I am periodically saving. Please let me finish before making any changes to this section —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.55.40.1 (talkcontribs) 13:28 CET, 16 August 2007

On Kastrup's info boards, they say that "air Cairo" flies to CPH, but I do not know the details....

Couldn't you use the sandbox for experiments?! You don't actually have to do it like this, you know! The article is useless as it is know. 90.184.75.69 14:57, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry, I will use the sandbox from now on. Until I'm finished, can someone revert the page back until (before my editing) 09:49, 16 August 2007 212.55.40.1? I don't know how to do it.

By the way, could we move "airlines and destinations" to a subpage and transclude it into the main article? With all the schedule churn that happens, it is hard to watch the actual encyclopedic sections for changes. –Henning Makholm 04:39, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Whats up with the whole American Airlines thing? Stuff like that, needs a source.

good job!

i would like to applaud whoever edited the airlines and destinations section. it looks so goo. and its mushc simpler than the traditional version with the airline and destinations in peretheses and then remarks way to go! its very clear, and easy to read now. please feel free to edit many more of those im so happy! thank you thank you ~~slavemonkey~~ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.121.37.98 (talk) 04:07, August 27, 2007 (UTC)

Help!

After having finished editing airlines and destinations I now see the old version as mentioned in the above post, when visiting Copenhagen Airport. I look at "history" and see no change since my own. Is it a cookie problem or what? —Preceding unsigned comment added by KristofferOlsen (talkcontribs) 09:23, August 29, 2007 (UTC)

Ok

After going through "history" again, I see someone has reverted the page back. I'm at a loss. Except for ~~slavemonkey~~ (thanks for your nice comments, by the way) do the rest of you prefer the current (reverted) "Airlines and destinations" section or my modified one? —Preceding unsigned comment added by KristofferOlsen (talkcontribs) 11:32, August 29, 2007 (UTC)

EgyptAir

According to various airline industry websites, EgyptAir is set to start flights to Oslo and Copenhagen in September '09. http://www.travelmarket.dk/business/newselement.cfm?nid=14771. I've entered this piece of information on several occasions, but it seems to be deleted without explanation - PLEASE, instead of simply deleting the well-sourced route start, state your case and explain why you think it justifiable to delete the information. In essence, provide counter-proof! Best Sir Tanx (talk) 15:28, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

partially privatised?

In its current version, the article claims in the history section that:

  • 1925 – CPH opens for service on 20 April. One of the first private airports in the world, it opens with a grass runway.
  • 1991 – The airport is partially privatised.

So in 1925 it was private and then - some 66 years - later, it was partially privatized. To me that indicates that it was annexed by the government sometime between 1925 and 1991, but I can't find any sources for that happening. Or that it was private in 1925 ([1] only states it was 'civil' (as opposed to 'military' I assume)). I have - however - found this press release (from CPH but in Danish) mentioning that it was privatized in 1990 (no mention of partially however). Can anybody with more knowledge clarify the article? --Heb (talk) 15:05, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Airports?

Why on earth does it say Copenhagen Airports (plural) on the logo of Kastrup Airport? There is only one airport in Copenhagen!--Infestor (talk) 08:36, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sealand

It is spelled Zealand. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.184.14.161 (talk) 19:14, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]