Jump to content

Talk:Copper Peak

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by John from Idegon (talk | contribs) at 02:05, 16 February 2013 (Assessment: Michigan: importance=Low; Skiing and Snowboarding: importance=Low; Sports: class=Stub, importance=Low; Event Venues: class=Stub, importance=Low; Michigan: importance=Mid; +National Register of Historic Places: attention=y, class=Stub, impor...). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class because it uses the [[Category:Michigan stub]] on the article page.

  • If you agree with this assessment, please remove this message.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WikiProject Michigan |class=stub |importance=Mid}}{{WikiProject National Register of Historic Places |attention=y |class=Stub |importance=Low |sporting venues=}} above to the appropriate class and removing the stub template from the article.

Issues

The article Copper Peak has several issues:

  • In the introduction you can find the following statement: It is expected to be reopened for competition in the next 2 or 3 years. The statement has to become removed because nobody still knows when it will be reopened. If you check history you will find out that this statement was inserted 2,5 years ago. So it must have been reopened now but it still has not happened and probably won't happen in near future. (By the way writing something like in the next 2 or 3 years without referring to a concrete date is always a problem because it won't be true anymore after some time if it won't get updated permanently. So a reader will have to check when this statement was inserted to find out at which date it is really going to happen.)
  • The section 'Renovation' is completely unsourced. In addition it needs an update because it was inserted in June 2012 and has not become updated yet. The word 'they' is used several times but it is not mentioned who 'they' are. --217.227.118.205 (talk) 01:11, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]