Jump to content

User talk:Uniqueuponhim

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Uniqueuponhim (talk | contribs) at 14:53, 19 May 2006 (Sawrry, this page is nawt aboat Australia). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Hello, Uniqueuponhim, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --best, kevin [kzollman][talk] 01:38, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Cashflowdiagram.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Cashflowdiagram.JPG. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:04, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

Sawrry, this page is nawt aboat Australia

I did not dispute that and I am getting a bit upset with that reversion, becuase it made comparsons the Britsh and American English, so I decided that it should be consistant, this is becuase UK/US centric notations, rferneces and comparisons are a pet peeve of mine on the English language edition of wikipedia (I'm an Australian wikipedian), are you saying that Australian English is non-sequitur becuase the two "main languages" in the English langauge edition of wikipedian are British and American English? Not very fair on us. Myrtone@Uniqueuponhim.com.au:-(

The reason that it is UK/US Centric is that the UK and US are virtually the only two contributors to Canadian English (along with France). The reason for this is that we were colonized by the British, and are right next to the Americans. Australia is literally on the opposite side of the globe, and Canadian and Australian dialects have evolved completely separately from one-another, each being influenced in its own way by British English.