Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/💮

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mercurywoodrose (talk | contribs) at 03:46, 26 February 2013. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

💮 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completing nomination on behalf of User:JohnBlackburne, whose rationale (as per WT:AFD) is included verbatim below. On the merits, I have no opinion. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 13:53, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not a suitable topic for an encyclopaedia. Not notable: the ref is a list in which it's an entry, while googling turns up nothing (literally – zero results). Sole article in Category:Unicode_character, which suggests despite there being thousands of them there's no need for articles on characters. Transwiki to wiktionary if such characters have pages there.--JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 13:44, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. 16:48, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. 16:48, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:48, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]