Jump to content

Wild animal suffering

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ruairí Donnelly (talk | contribs) at 09:56, 2 March 2013. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This sandbox is in the article namespace. Either move this page into your userspace, or remove the {{User sandbox}} template.

Wild animal suffering (WAS) is a term usually used to describe suffering that happens due to natural processes, although the term could also be used for (“unnantural”) instances of wild animal suffering, such as when wild animals suffer due to human activity.

The issue has recently received much focus from academics, but is only currently starting to grow in blah activism (cite EAA)

Notable proponents

John Stewart Mill

In 1874 John Stewart Mill blah blah "On Nature":

"In sober truth, nearly all the things which men are hanged or imprisoned for doing to one another, are nature's every day performances. [..] The phrases which ascribe perfection to the course of nature can only be considered as the exaggerations of poetic or devotional feeling, not intended to stand the test of a sober examination. No one, either religious or irreligious, believes that the hurtful agencies of nature, considered as a whole, promote good purposes, in any other way than by inciting human rational creatures to rise up and struggle against them."

Yew-Kwang Ng

In 1995 economist Yew-Kwang Ng published a paper entitled "Towards welfare biology: Evolutionary economics of animal consciousness and suffering". In his paper Ng argues blah...

David Pearce

Blah

Brian Tomasik

In 2009 Brian Tomasik .... essays.... He also research, no. wild animals, etc etc more.

Dr. Oscar Horta

Mac Mahan

Ny times

(check oscar’s list)

antispeciesism

rejection of the appeal to nature