Talk:Pokémon X and Y

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pokémon X and Y article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find video game sources: "Pokémon X and Y" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk

Video games: Nintendo Stub‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game

Stub

This article has been rated as Stub-class on the project's quality scale.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Nintendo task force.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

X

Should a controversy section be added considering the recent news about kids stumbling upon hardcore porn when searching for the name? Or is that typical enough of titles with X in their name that there isn't a point? 70.73.185.165 (talk) 02:25, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unless this can be verified by reliable sources, we should not add this content to Wikipedia.—Ryulong (琉竜) 03:57, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen multiple reliable sources noting it, although I can't recall them now. I think the matter is whether it is appropriate as controversy. _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 15:23, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The answer to that question is probably no.—Ryulong (琉竜) 15:49, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, unless something significant comes out of this (calls to ban the game, Nintendo changes the name, a major search engine blocks all results to the game to avoid potential porn issues) I see no reason to add this.--174.93.160.57 (talk) 21:39, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

CoroCoro February Issue leaked

Why am I not surprised Japan... Should all magazines be released on 15th day of each month, because they were breaking it. The new Pokemon confirmed is named Ninfia (ニンフィア), another *SIGH* Eeveelution. So who wants to add this info in the 15 of February, where the magazine is officially released?Blackgaia02 (Talk if you're Worthy) (talk) 14:28, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Magazine leaks are not to be published on Wikipedia. The information will be added on the 15th (Friday) and we need to acknowledge the fact that magazine leaks are not reliable sources.—Ryulong (琉竜) 15:12, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also, Blackgaia02, you really need to stop inserting your emotions and opinions into things you post on talk pages. These are not meant to be discussions about the subject but means of improving the article.—Ryulong (琉竜) 15:17, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

New Eeveelution type?

Has the type and/or name of the new eeveelution come out? I thought I saw it somewhere but I could be mistaken.--Matt723star (talk) 20:50, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article mentions that it's "Sylveon"/"Nymphia" but Nintendo has not released its typing yet. Also, this is not a forum for discussing the subject of the article.—Ryulong (琉竜) 21:59, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

New Mew Form?

Both Bulbapedia and Serebii have shown a new generation 6 Mew/Mewtwo form... therefore I think its real and should be mentioned. What do you guys think? Mrmoustache14 (talk) 00:00, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wait I just found out the official Pokémon website: http://www.pokemon.co.jp/ex/xy/ Has confirmed the rumor as true so i'm adding it. Mrmoustache14 (talk) 00:02, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you calling it a rumor when it's an official statement from Nintendo?—Ryulong (琉竜) 00:20, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well It was a rumor among the internet for the past couple of days and it was declared offical until today. So I guess its more of a "past rumor" sinces its no longer one as of today. Mrmoustache14 (talk) 00:33, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]