Talk:Yamato (fictional spacecraft)

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 9, 2008	Articles for deletion	Kept
September 11, 2008	Deletion review	Relisted
September 17, 2008	Articles for deletion	No consensus

Anime and manga Redirect‑class Low‑importance

	Anime and manga portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles
Redirect	This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A member of the Guild of Copy Editors, Stfg, reviewed a version of this article for copy editing on 25 August 2012. However, a major copy edit was inappropriate at that time because of the issues specified below, or the other tags now found on this article. Once these issues have been addressed, and any related tags have been cleared, please tag the article once again for {{copyedit}}. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English. Visit our project page if you are interested in joining!

Comment on 2nd AFD nomination

I'm kind of bothered that the 2nd AFD closed as "no concensus" when there was actual consensus to keep by the end of the discussion. The only "delete" votes were from editors who just pointed to policies or guidelines and never bothered to come back. But, whatever... what's done is done.--Nohansen (talk) 03:37, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Battleship yamato newtype.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Battleship yamato newtype.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 1 October 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:57, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GOCEreviewed

No sources, just one embedded link that leads to an empty page (and the URL suggests it would be a primary source); the AfD keep !votes mention a source, but it hasn't found its way into the article after 4 years. And it's almost all in-universe. --Stfg (talk) 10:56, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]