User talk:Merenjith

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent edits do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the "sandbox" rather than in articles. SRM 2 HRM (talk) 10:58, 30 March 2013‎ (UTC)

Merenjith, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Merenjith! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:15, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

Hello, I'm Jayakrishnan.ks100. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Mammootty, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. JK (talk) 07:20, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You got it wrong. Read WP:BLP which states,

"Contentious material about living persons (or in some cases, recently deceased) that is unsourced or poorly sourced – whether the material :is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable – should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion."

Also read WP:burden.

JK (talk) 07:54, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Kathovo. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Mammootty with this edit without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Kathovo talk 12:39, 9 April 2013 (UTC) [reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Kunchacko Boban with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Kathovo talk 12:55, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Edit warring to remove tags without ensuring that all content is in fact sourced to reliable sources is not acceptable. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 13:50, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last and only warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Kunchacko Boban. ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀} 15:07, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]