Talk:Hankel matrix
Appearance
Mathematics Stub‑class Low‑priority | ||||||||||
|
Hankel transform as presented in the text correct?
does the material presented in the section Hankel transform correct? I can make a simple example to violate it! For example, take b1=1, b2=1, b3=2 and you will have detB=1 but detC=-1! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.18.170.199 (talk) 09:46, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
formula is now correctBPets (talk) 04:34, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Please improve the section on system identification... it currently doesn't begin to suggest how one might actually do this.--Witbrock (talk) 18:15, 2 May 2013 (UTC)