Jump to content

Wikipedia:HighBeam/Prior applications

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:HighBeam

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Critican.kane (talk | contribs) at 23:05, 3 May 2013 (→Renewal account). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Wikipedia:Highbeam/Nav

Sign up in Round 7 below.

This page is designed to manage the applications process for editors who want access to a free, full-access, 1-year HighBeam Research account. HighBeam has indicated that they will defer to the community's judgment about which editors will qualify for a free account. Because they do not have a strict limit on the number of free accounts they are willing to give us (they've initially authorized 1000), there is unlikely to be a problem of too many editors trying to get too few accounts. The criteria and an explanation of the application process are listed below.

Requirements
  • You do not have free online access to HighBeam through your local library or university
  • You have your preferences enabled to receive email messages on English Wikipedia; (see Special:Preferences)
  • You have an account that is a minimum of 1 year old
  • You have a minimum of 1000 edits to the encyclopedia
  • Ideally, you are active in content generation, research, and verification work.
  • Applications will not be given on a first-come first serve basis; in the unlikely event that there are more eligible editors than accounts, they will be assigned randomly
Expectations for use
  • All editors are encouraged to apply where they have a need for background reading, research, verification, or content writing
  • Editors should try out and use the HighBeam account during their free access period
  • Editors should always provide original citation information, in addition to linking a HighBeam article, per WP:V and WP:SAYWHEREYOUGOTIT
  • Editors should not provide bare links to non-free HighBeam pages
  • Editors should note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate
  • Your application suggests you've read this and will give it a fair shot :)

Example application

  1. [[User:Name]]. Active Wikimedia project(s). History of content, research, or verification work. Intentions for future research.
  2. User:Ocaasi. English Wikipedia. I write biographies about alternative medicine practitioners and Middle Eastern political activists. I intend to continue this work, specifically writing about Gabriel Cousens and the Egyptian presidential election, 2012. Ocaasi t | c 21:37, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Applications--April 9th round (delivered by the 16th)

These were sent out successfully April 16th. A minority of the codes failed to deliver because recipients' email addresses were not enabled. If you didn't get your code, drop a note on my talk page Ocaasi t | c 01:24, 28 April 2012 (UTC) [reply]

Feel free to add your name below, but no applications will be considered until Monday, April 2, 2012 at 10am Eastern Standard Time (EST). If there is a shortage, applications will be given on a random basis to all who meet the basic qualifications. Please tell your wiki-friends, WikiProjects, and other fora you frequent about this opportunity.

  1. User:BarkingFish. English Wikipedia: 6928 edits, total globally: 10,514, administrator to tpi.wikipedia.org - Content contribution and correction in many areas, moving slowy into dealing with verifiability and correctness as well as building articles about Physiology, Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Trauma, as well as Pharmacology. Looking to continue this work for a long time, here and at simple.wikipedia also.  BarkingFish  00:26, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  2. user:Hgrosser English Wikipedia. 2300+ edits since Nov. 2005. Created the articles San Patricio Church massacre and Pussy Riot (the first on any wiki). — Hgrosser (talk) 06:16, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  3. User:Vejvančický. English Wikipedia. 4 years of experience, cca 24,000 edits, content related work (content creation, verification, referencing, deletion (mainly CAT:CSD), deletion discussions), WP:ADMIN, WP:CREDO. The access could be very useful for my work. Thanks for considering this application. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 13:41, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  4. User:Orangemike Admin on English-language Wikipedia; 8 years experience, 81,000+ edits, content-related work (creation, expansion, verification, article rescue) where access to Highbeam would be useful. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:35, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  5. User:Gobonobo. English Wikipedia. ~4 years experience, 40,000 edits, content-related work (creation, expansion, referencing). Intend to work on 20th century biographies and the backlog at Category:BLP articles lacking sources. --Gobōnobo + c 16:48, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  6. User:Racconish. English, French and Italian Wikipedias. 3 years experience, 19,000+ edits, content-related work (creation, expansion, verification, article rescue) where access to Highbeam would be useful.— Racconish Tk 17:56, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  7. User:Pharaoh of the Wizards English Wikipedia . 5 Years experience ,38000 + edits ,content-related work (content creation,expansion, verification, referencing) access to Highbeam will be very useful.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:21, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  8. User:Prioryman English Wikipedia. Between this and a former account, 8 years' experience and about 60,000 edits, primarily in content creation (see my userpage for various FAs, GAs, DYKs and other articles I've written). Prioryman (talk) 20:20, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  9. User:Wehwalt English Wikipedia. 5 years experience, almost 70,000 edits. Over 60 FAs in various fields, especially history, politics, and numismatics. Plan to keep working in those areas. See my userpage, although I don't update it much.--Wehwalt (talk) 20:24, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  10. User:Nikthestoned, English Wikipedia. ~2 years experience, >17,000 edits almost all in content creation / expansion; over 70 well sourced articles created. Nikthestoned 12:35, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  11. User:Dravecky, English-language Wikipedia, nearly 5 years experience and over 74,000 edits, am an admin but spend most of my time in content creation, especially broadcasting, Alabama and Texas history, and other areas that would benefit strongly from access to Highbeam's resources. - Dravecky (talk) 13:26, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  12. User:Resolute, English Wikipedia, 7 years experience and 37,000 edits. Like Dravecky, I am a content admin, with 50 good and featured articles to my credit. I tend to focus on ice hockey and Canadian history topics. Resolute 14:00, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  13. User:Djsasso, English Wikipedia and Simple English Wikipedia, 7+ years of experience and 90,000 edits. -DJSasso (talk) 14:20, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  14. User:MikeLynch, English and Sanskrit language Wikipedia, admin in both. ~2 years of experience and over 20,000 global edits. Active in content creation in English as well as Indian language Wikimedia projects. Lynch7 14:46, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  15. User:Vibhijain, English Wikipedia, 1 year of experience. 8500 local edits and 20,000 global edits. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 14:48, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  16. User:The ed17, English Wikipedia, 4 years of experience, 39,000 edits, administrator. I've written 20 FAs, all focused around 20th century naval history. I'm really interested in the newspaper archives offered by Highbeam (see South American dreadnought race for how I'd use them). Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 15:08, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  17. --Aschmidt (talk) 15:31, 15 March 2012 (UTC) German Wikipedia since 2005, some 13,000 edits there, editing articles mainly on law, economics, media, current affairs, free software. The newspaper and journal archive would be a great help both for improving and for writing new articles on my subjects. Thanks for considering my application.--Aschmidt (talk) 15:31, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Liesel (talk) 15:59, 15 March 2012 (UTC) german wikipedia since 2005, over 22000 edits in articles, themes: railroad, motorsport, geography[reply]
  19. --Nicola54 (talk) 16:06, 15 March 2012 (UTC) German Wikipedia since 2004, some 57.000 edits, editing articles mainly on history of sports and cycling. The archive would help me to find out more about biographies of veteran sports people and historical sports events.[reply]
  20. Polarlys German Wikipedia, active since 2004, 49000 edits, 31000 in articles, topics: medicine, scientists/biographies, regularly had no access especially to newspaper archives for essential biographic information. Thank you for consideration. --Polarlys (talk) 16:10, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Emeritus German Wikipedia, 8000 edits since 2009, topics: Pacific history and politics, indigenous peoples. --Emeritus (talk) 16:41, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  22. DerHexer, editor since 2005; sysop on German and English Wikipedia, steward on Meta Wiki; 250'000 edits; 900'000 sysop actions; one featured and one good article (dozens written with main topic antiquity), three featured pictures (thousands uploaded); after having finished my Master thesis in summer 2012 I will not anylonger have access to journal archives.
  23. SlimVirgin, English Wikipedia, editor since November 2004; 120,000 edits, around 42 percent to articles, mainly focusing on content review and creation, including 10 featured articles and one GA. I write a lot of current affairs pieces, so access to a good news database would be very useful. SlimVirgin (talk) 17:05, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  24. -- Achim Raschka (talk) 17:11, 15 March 2012 (UTC) - editor and author since 2003 in the German WP, lots of edits, ~100 good article (‘lesenswert’) and ~50 featured (‘exzellent’) ones in the German WP -- Achim Raschka (talk) 17:11, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  25. NiTenIchiRyu, German and English Wikipedia editor since 2004, about 35,000 edits in the German and 1500 in the English Wikipedia, topics: history, biographies, art. --NiTen (talk) 17:16, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Ruud Koot, content creator on the English (and occasionally Dutch) Wikipedia since 2005. Working in particular on topics related to (the history of) science.
  27. Astynax, English Wikipedia, editor since 2006; 8,000 edits, approximately 74 percent to articles which include raising 10 to FA and 13 to GA status. I assist on various topics where the ability to provide citations from a news database would be helpful. • Astynax talk 17:29, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Denis Barthel (talk) 18:55, 15 March 2012 (UTC), German Wikipedia (sometimes en), active since 2003, ~51.000 edits de, ~57.000 edits global, ~50 good and featured articles, topics: protozoology, botany, music (experimental, doom metal), quality TV.[reply]
  29. Zero0000 (talk), Editor since 2003 (over 15,000 edits), administrator since 2004. Mainly I edit historical articles related to the Middle East, with the particular emphasis of improving the quality of sources. Zerotalk 19:04, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Marcus Cyron, Editor since 2005, Administrator en de:WP and Commons, more than 165.000 Edits in all WMDE projects (about 145.000 in de:WP; more than 15.000 on Commons; Author of more than 5.000 articles on de:WP, more than 30 are featured or good (mostly about the Classical world and Winter sports). And thanks again for showing, that only en:WP is important for the movement. Marcus Cyron (talk) 19:10, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Binksternet, editing English Wikipedia for 4.6 years, top 300 users by edit count, with 2 FA, 35 GA and 134 DYK articles under my belt. I work primarily on article content, and I often find that Highbeam is holding a source that would greatly assist my work. Binksternet (talk) 19:27, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  32. tsor: user and administrator in de:WP, first edit July 2003, more than 81.000 edits. --Tsor (talk) 20:04, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Elitre (talk · contribs · count) requesting an account for my activity on it.wiki. > 20,000 edits there (> 6700 in ns0) in 5 years, major contributor of a FA (1, 2, article stats), user of "Progetto Cococo" (local WikiProject Copyright Cleanup), sysop, OTRS agent. No access to reference works except for my Credo Account: I am going to notify the Italian community the same way I did for the Credo accounts, enabling some Italian fellow to get theirs. ----Elitre (talk) 20:14, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Freimut Bahlo, editor since July 2007, 55,963 edits, Author of more than 2.000 articles on de:WP, part of the community Project jazz. 1 informative list (‘informative Liste’), 1 good article (‘lesenswert’) and 1 featured (‘exzellent’) in the German WP--Freimut Bahlo (talk) 20:20, 15 March 2012 (UTC) Anmeldezeitpunkt: 16. Juli 2007[reply]
  35. Redlinux editor since 2006; sysop on German Wikipedia and mentoring (with the largest number of mentees in de-wiki) (i.e. Adopt a User in en-wiki); cause I'm living in a rural area, I don't have access to journal archives. Most of my qualified articles [1] are on medical topics. Redlinux···→ 21:22, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  36. valepert (talk · contribs · count) requesting an account for my activity on it.wiki. sysop with > 88,000 edits in 6 years, user of "Progetto Cococo" (italian equivalent for WikiProject Copyright Cleanup), I have a Credo account. --valepert (talk) 21:24, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Sannita. Admin on Italian Wikipedia since 2007, 6+ years experience and 47k+ edits. I currently work mostly on biographies (both BLPs and BDPs), and accessing to Highbeam would be definitely useful. I already have a Credo account, which I use also to help other users. Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 21:27, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Toter Alter Mann − sysop on German Wikipedia, some 20k edits; mentor and active editor for three years now. Mainly biology, but also a lot of cleanup, research and verification in the social sciences. I am further participating at the German WP:REX (de:WP:BIBA). I have a Credo account which I mainly used for helping other people with their articles.--Toter Alter Mann (talk) 21:58, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Olei. German Wikipedia, active since 2005, ~24.000 edits de, ~40,000 edits global, topics: biology (insecta, lepidoptera) --Olei (talk) 22:00, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Muscari. German Wikipedia, active since 2007, ~38.000 edits de, topics: biology (botany, herpetology, entomology,...) --Muscari (talk) 22:07, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Asdalol. Editor since 2007 on It.wiki, more than 10.000 edits on ns0. Actually working on biographies, history of sports. I don't have access to a journal archive, the HighBeam account would be very useful. --Asdalol (talk) 22:17, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Nicolabel: sysop on Italian Wikipedia since 2011, user since 2005, ~12500 edits. Active mostly in cleanup/verification activities and geography, occasionally in other fields. I got a credo account in 2011. --Nicolabel (talk) 22:25, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  43. User:Etrusko25: Italian wikipedia, working mostly in ichthyology and fish biology. Etrusko25 (talk) 22:48, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  44. User:Vituzzu: sysop and bureaucrat on the Italian Wikipedia and steward ~63.000 edits global, my main interests are modern and contemporary history and information technology. --Vituzzu (talk) 23:46, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  45. User:Lucas: Italian Wikipedia. I am sysop on the Italian Wikipedia since 2006. I did more than 45.000 global edits. I am interested in psychology, communication, and modern history (expecially the biographies side). --Lucas (talk) 01:58, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Ansuman: English Wikipedia and Odia Wikipedia, Admin on Odia Wikipedia. 1+ year of experience and over 8500 global edits. Active in various Wikimedia Projects. -- ɑηsuмaη ʈ ᶏ ɭ Ϟ 06:00, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Agathoclea en & de-wiki, 20k+ edits, admin here. As my time is currently limited due to work commitments please disregard if oversubscribed. Agathoclea (talk) 08:12, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  48. WiseWoman: German Wikipedia, active since 2004, 2000+ edits; English Wikipedia active since 2004, 470+ edits; Swedish Wikipedia since 2007, 27 edits. I do mostly cleanup, but when I create articles they tend to be about women who are missing in the Wikipedia. It is often hard to come by information on them, so additional resources much appreciated. --WiseWoman (talk) 08:16, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Martin Bahmann (talk) German Wikipedia, active since 2004, ~33.000 edits de, 11 good and 7 featured articles, topics (mainly) history, especially local/roman/german history, biographies, plants, botany and - the "fun part" for me as contributor - cat breeds & veterinary medicine. Martin Bahmann (talk) 08:56, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  50. User:Demostene119: Italian Wikipedia 6.000+ edits from 2006, Credo Account, main interest in mineralogy, paleontology and modern and contemporary history.Demostene119 (talk) 09:21, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  51. User:Emha: Active in German Wikipedia since 2004 (>9.000 edits) and on Commons, I write about persons and geographical topics and do Quality assurance, where it is useful to lookup details -- Emha (talk) 10:26, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  52. User:Bramfab: Italian wikipedia, since 2006 and sysop, editing (40.000+) mostly in earth science, evolutionary biology, history of science and Italian history. I'm quite active on verification of correctness of dubious citation in articles --Bramfab (talk) 11:41, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  53. User:ca$e: active in German Wikipedia since 2005, >39.000 edits, ArbCom, coordination of work in areas of philosophy, religious studies, among other areas in humanities and social sciences. Ca$e (talk) 12:38, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  54. --Belladonna2 (talk) 12:45, 16 March 2012 (UTC):German Wikipedia, editing 8000 edits since 2007, mostly in botanical sciences, gender sciences, genetically modified organism and ecology.--Belladonna2 (talk) 12:45, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Philafrenzy (talk) 12:49, 16 March 2012 (UTC) Over 16000 edits English Wikipedia. Edit on philately, history, art, postal system. Hoping it will access local newspapers I usually can't view. Philafrenzy (talk) 12:49, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  56. theredmonkey: German Wikipedia editor since 2005; >4000 edits; editing and verification in social science --trm 15:51, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Secret account 15:55, 16 March 2012 (UTC) Member since 2005, over 35,000 edits in my former two accounts and this one, was a former administrator and I have several FAs to my credit. Highbeam will be extremely useful in my subject area, Baseball history, American football history and current hip hop articles. Secret account 15:55, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Andrea.gf Editor and former admin on italian wiki, active since 2005 with 7000+ edits, mainly content-related work (creation, expansion and verification) where access to Highbeam would be very useful. Andrea.gf (talk) 16:19, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Avraham. Active since late 2005. Wide area of edits (mathematics, religion, geopolitics, etc.). I often focus on updating and maintaining citations, so HighBeam access would be a fantastic resource. (Other info, FWIW: ENWP: Admin, crat, OS, CU; COM: Admin, OS; Meta: Admin, Steward) Thank you. -- Avi (talk) 17:46, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  60. InverseHypercube. Active on the English Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons since late 2010, with 8000+ edits on Wikipedia. I edit a wide variety of articles, but tend to focus on science, computers, history, and current events. I do have access to many sources through the University of British Columbia, so please prioritize others before me. However, HighBeam does seem to have valuable sources that I can't access, so I would appreciate the opportunity to use it if there are spots available. InverseHypercube (talk) 20:32, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Ziko, see my page on meta. Ziko (talk) 22:25, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Wildtierreservat, de.wp editor since 2008, ~6000 edits, ~50 articles. This would be a great help for my articles on writers. --Wildtierreservat (talk) 23:49, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Kmhkmh. I'm primarily active in en.wp (6000+ edits) and de.wp (25000+ edits) for more than 5 years now, mostly in the fields of math, sciences, history, biography, geography, movies, literature, food & drink. Since I'm not affiliated with an university anymore, I lack any sort of free journal access, hence highbeam might prove extremely valuable for me when writing new articles or improving/proofreading existing ones.--Kmhkmh (talk) 01:44, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Riggr Mortis. Editor on en.wp since 2006 (with prior User:Outriggr). Would edit more in arts and literature with improved (any) access to resources. Riggr Mortis (talk) 04:13, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Ureinwohner German Wikipedia, active since 2004, ~66.000 edits, focus on creating and expanding footballer biographies (UK, Australia, Africa), the newspaper archive would be really useful --Ureinwohner (talk) 08:49, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Rsrikanth05, Have an account since 2005, though active editing started in late 2008. As of today, I've got 12k edits on English. I've worked on a GA (Transport in India, and a DYK (Coimbatore bypass). I regularly hunt for refs to add to articles where they aren't present, or are needed. I plan to work on various Transport related articles in the future, and having this would be a great asset. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 10:52, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Mirgolth French Wikipedia. Active since 2005 (>20K edits), I write marine zoology articles. I'm currently writing on Anemonefishes and I intend to continue with major fishes families (Scaridae, Labridae, Chaetonidae, Pomacanthidae...). I'm mostly using public papers anly and access to Copeia and other zoology publications would help a lot. Mirgolth (talk) 13:43, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Cymbella French Wikipedia (and sometimes also other languages). Active since 2007, ~23.000 edits, eclectic contributions, namely botany, history of botany, disambiguation, spelling corrections. - Cymbella (talk) 13:54, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  69. User:MIRROR, active since 2006 on fr.wiki. 8k+ edits there, 14k+ global. i work (or intend to) on biology (mainly entomology, evolution mecanisms, LUCA…), particle physics and biographies linked to those fields - MIRROR (talk) 13:57, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Veneziano Italian Wikipedia. Editor since 2007, sysop since 2008, >20.000 edits focused in medical, psychological and scientific areas. I'm, and I will be, active in content verification issues in medical/psychological areas. Veneziano (talk) 14:24, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  71. GabrielF primarily en-Wiki. Editor since December 2004 with 8,000+ edits. In addition to article writing, I also help provide PDFs of scholarly and other articles at the resource exchange. GabrielF (talk) 17:34, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Cullen328 I have 16,000+ edits on English Wikipedia since 2009. I started working on biographies of California mountaineers and artists, and have gone on to write, expand and reference articles on a wide variety of topics. I am also an Online Ambassador assisting college students working on Wikipedia assignments. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 17:52, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Dank - around 50k edits, lots of reviewed content, frequent reviewer at WP:FAC. - Dank (push to talk) 19:24, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Miss Manzana: Spanish Wikipedia. Around 18 000 edits, administrator. More than 70 GAs and 11 FAs, regular GA and FA reviewer. User since 2010. мιѕѕ мαηzαηα (let's talk) 19:40, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  75. WhisperToMe - 8 years of experience on the English Wikipedia, with a large number of edits, active in article and content writing - I would find such access very useful WhisperToMe (talk) 19:41, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Andreateletrabajo. 2 years and admin in es:WP. More than 30 000 edits in several WM Projects. 1 GA, 70 articles and GA revewer. I write about biology, technology and others, and as admin I do extensive job of reversions, copyvio deletions, add contents, add sources, etc. My uni don't has access to HighBeam, so I think it can be very usefull for me. --Andreateletrabajo (talk) 20:02, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Daniel B - 6 years of experience on the Hebrew Wikipedia. Around 40K edits. Administrator and CheckUser. Write about mathematics, 2 FA. Daniel B (talk) 20:07, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Diego Moya. About 8 years editing English Wikipedia, creating missing articles and referencing stuff mainly in Computer Science. I could use access to the Journal of End User Computing and related topics to improve the Human–computer interaction articles. Diego (talk) 20:11, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Oyoyoy. Approx. 3yrs editing on Hebrew & English Wikipedia and related projects. Hundreds of articles added to Hebrew Wikipedia. I would love to have access to this database. Oyoyoy (talk) 20:26, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  80. SPat talk 20:29, 17 March 2012 (UTC) ~3 years editing on en and mr wikipedia. Added ~20 new article.[reply]
  81. עדירל (talk) 20:30, 17 March 2012 (UTC) I am active on Hebrew Wikipedia, use free Hebrew newspapers very often and would like to supplement from other sources.[reply]
  82. ליאור • Lior (talk) - An active editor in Wikipedia since 2004, mostly contributing to the Hebrew Wikipedia. I focus on Beta Israeli heritage as well as scientific articles, both of which necessitate access to hardly-accessible articles and books. A HighBeam account might prove useful for these. Thanks, ליאור • Lior (talk) 20:45, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Kiefer.Wolfowitz: 25 thousand edits since 2005, mostly in mathematics, statistics, computer science, United States history (especially politics), English-language and Spanish-language literature, contemporary Sweden.  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 20:49, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Mandarax. On English Wikipedia for 7 years, with over 200,000 edits. I include plentiful citations in the articles I write, and having this additional resource would be very useful. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 21:11, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Aircorn. Have been on the English Wikipedia for two years and have 11 000 edits. One of my main focuses is the GA process and having access to HighBeam will help me verify potentially "Good" articles. AIRcorn (talk) 23:28, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Aviados: A highly active editor in Hebrew Wikipedia for the past 4 years, with over 65K edits (most of which are in the main namespace). Administrator since 2009. Focus mainly in content writing, usually within the various fields of Jewish studies. Access to HighBeam would undoubtedly prove useful for my work. Aviados (talk) 23:47, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Simon Burchell: Been around since 2006, but not really active until 2008, with 29,000 edits. 4 FAs and a dozen or so GAs. I also sporadically spend time on the Spanish wikipedia. I'm constantly frustrated by paywalls, and any extra resource would be a great help. I'm particularly active in WikiProjects Mesoamerica and Guatemala with the addition of new material. I do a lot of article assessment on WikiProject Mythology, I also write up the odd British archaeological site. Simon Burchell (talk) 23:59, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Peteforsyth (talk · contribs) Active Wikipedia editor since 2006, primarily on topics relating to the U.S. state of Oregon. I do a good deal of new Wikipedia editor outreach and outreach to cultural institutions as well. Access to the Highbeam database would be tremendously useful -- I frequently run into Highbeam abstracts and am frustrated by the inability to access the full article. The donation is greatly appreciated!! -Pete (talk) 00:05, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Goodvac: English Wikipedia, active since late 2007, 10,000+ edits. Involved in content creation and at the resource exchange. Goodvac (talk) 00:06, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Brianboulton Active since September 2007, about 50,000 edits, 56 Featured Articles. Mainly music and opera, also literature, general biographies and polar exploration. Sometimes recent scholarly articles, newspaper reviews etc are hard to access, and this could be a considerable help. Brianboulton (talk) 00:49, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Smallman12q (talk · contribs): English wikipedia, active since 2009, ~10,000 edits. Involved in article creation and expansion. Smallman12q (talk) 01:01, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Peter.C (talk · contribs) English Wikipedia. I am a student and recently I have had no time to have to go bury through sources to go and find proper articles to help me develop emergency medicine articles. As a high school student I do not have access to many good sources for what I need. At the moment I have 5000+ edits. Peter.C • talk • contribs 01:10, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Cindamuse: Active on en.wp two+ years with over 20,000 edits. Involved in article creation, verification, referencing, and expansion. Access to HighBeam would be valuable in my work on Wikipedia. Thanks! Best regards, Cind.amuse (Cindy) 01:23, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  94. User:GorillaWarfare: Active on the English Wikipedia for over two years with almost 20,000 edits. I do a lot of maintenance work, but I find paid databases to be extremely useful when I do content work. I don't have access to HighBeam through my uni, so it would be quite nice! I don't work in any specific area, but I have two GAs, and am working on making one a FA. – GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:37, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Laser brain: English Wikipedia, active since 2008, 9,000+ edits. Active in Featured Article review process, and in article creation and expansion. --Laser brain (talk) 02:51, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Grapple X—active since October 2010 (~17 months), over 8,000 edits in this time. Active in content generation and improvement (60 GA-class articles, 1 FA, 1 FL at time of application). Would make use of newspaper archives mainly for the review history of film and television topics, though use of such a tool would probably light a fire under my ass to research more "important" topics as well. GRAPPLE X 02:55, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Wizardman - October since 2006 on English wikipedia, 100,000+ edits, several featured and good articles, Highbeam would be able to help me write more of them. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 03:18, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Carrite (talk) 03:42, 18 March 2012 (UTC) - I'm a content writer with about 30K edits and over 160 significant starts and can use the resource.[reply]
  99. Imzadi1979. Active in the U.S. Roads WikiProject on the English Wikipedia in addition to its sister projects with 10 FAs and 133 GAs in my almost 54,00 edits since October 2005. My intent is to continue to research the histories of various US highways and I could assist the rest of the project obtain articles. Imzadi 1979 → 04:22, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Johnbod, 10 FAs, 189 DYks & 99k edits on en:wp since 2006. Most on art & art history, so I would mostly be interested in journals like The Art Bulletin, which I'm delighted to see HighBeam carry. Johnbod (talk) 04:50, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Noleander 2 FAs; 4 GAs; 21,000 edits; 5+ years; primarily a content creator. --Noleander (talk) 04:58, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Carcharoth. 7+ years experience, c.60,000 edits (with c.15,000 article edits). Content-related work (creation, expansion, verification, article review processes) where access to Highbeam would be useful. Topics I have worked on and intend to work on in the future include the history of science, medicine and technology, and World War I. Carcharoth (talk) 05:01, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Orlady. American; editor in the English Wikipedia since 2004; active since 2006; currently administrator; well over 60,000 total edits. Most of my work is in creation and improvement of content in a diverse variety of topical areas, mostly related to current topics or the last couple of centuries -- roughly corresponding to the period covered by HighBeam archives. I don't have access to any university libraries and my access to paywall-protected Internet content is rather limited, but I am skilled at locating information on the free Internet. I have found archived articles from newspapers and magazines published in the last two centuries to be valuable resources for research, particularly in the subject areas of history, politics, biography, and business. Access to HighBeam resources would definitely increase the stature of the sources I use, as I would have less need to rely on articles from small-city local newspapers that happen to have been archived at Google Books. --Orlady (talk) 05:36, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Theleftorium - written 130+ GAs and 4 FAs, and made 30,000+ edits over the past 4 years. I'm an administrator but I mostly write articles. HighBeam would be very useful for me. Theleftorium (talk) 10:16, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Cwmhiraeth - I have been with the English Wikipedia since late 2010 and create articles on animals and plants. I often find myself frustrated by not being able to access articles from scientific journals. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:27, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Fæ - c.73,000 edits to the English Wikipedia over the last 2 years and 88,000+ globally with a further 21,000 by Faebot. I have been available as a direct contact on WP:REX for over a year (I would encourage more people to put their names there if they want to help with sourcing and verification) and regularly check things up for others using the British Library as I am the point of contact for the GLAM programme there (as well as other UK institutions). Oh, forgot to mention I'm an Admin on Wikipedia and an OTRS volunteer and sometimes checking sources is relevant for some issues that come in to Wikimedia by email. --Fæ (talk) 12:26, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  107. AshLin - I'm coordinator for WikiProject India. 22K edits, 4 GAS, 18 DYKs. I'm working on India-related articles on History, military history & biodiversity. My greatest need is quality refs in areas where Indo-Pak conflict issues arise. AshLin (talk) 13:37, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Moonriddengirl (talk) - Pushing five years on Wikipedia. 113,913 live and deleted edits combined. While I do create articles when I can (not often), I would primarily use the resource for copyright cleanup.
  109. Fang Aili talk - English Wikipedia since 2005, ~24K edits, I was one of the most active sysops for a time. I have done some content work, but these days I would mainly use the access to find sources for BLPs and other articles I ran into while doing cleanup. --Fang Aili talk 15:03, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Modernist – English Wikipedia since 2006, nearly 6 years, 72K+ edits, 9 FA, 3 GA, mostly content on the Visual arts and culture related articles. Modernist (talk) 15:54, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  111. FormerIP. 9,614 edits (plus one in just a second) and about 2,000 before that as an IP, over the last 4 years or so. I do regular content creation, particularly fixing unreferenced biographies (although there's less of that to do now) and preparing articles for WP:ITN, which can include adding a lot of background and fixing general problems as well as updating the news-y bit. On my to do list at the moment is improving some articles to do with linguistics and the Sex Pistols (as two separate topics, if you were wondering). FormerIP (talk) 15:56, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  112. User:Ceoil - En Wiki since 2006; 60k edits, 20 FAs and another 15 odd FAR saves. Mostly art history, but also lith and popular music. Spend a significant amount time each week tracking down sources, old books, journal articles etc. Ceoil (talk) 16:09, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Graham Colm– Coming up to 5 years with 14,967 edits and 4 FAs. I work mainly on virology articles and I'm a FAC delegate. Graham Colm (talk) 16:29, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Truthkeeper88 - En wikipedia with about 39,000 edits, 9 FAs and others in the works, mainly in the area of literature. I beg and borrow sources, and buy books, pay large library fines. Anything to help sources be more accessible would be welcome. Truthkeeper (talk) 16:54, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  115. Yngvadottir Primarily en.wikipedia - created one page on de.wikipedia but the comments on my German were scathing so I have returned to just gnoming on other Wikipedias ... Editor since July 2, 2008, 8,000+ edits, by my own count I've created 100 pages and I also do a lot of page expansions (including attempting to save articles at AfD). I'm extremely eclectic, except that I am not qualified to do much that's scientific/technical. I don't have access to any online archives through my local library and have no academic library affiliation, so I could really use help seeing newspaper articles. Yngvadottir (talk) 17:49, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  116. Factumquintus - Editor since 2004 and sysop since 2005 on German WP; mentor since 2009; ~24 500 edits de; ~32 000 edits global; topics: mostly biology -Factumquintus (talk) 18:30, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  117. User:Ermanon: Italian wikipedia, since 2006, editing (25000+) mostly in geography and administrative divisions. I'm active on edits verification and peer reviewing. --Ermanon (talk) 19:16, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  118. CheepnisAroma French wikipedia, with over 26,000 contributions. Very eclectic (history, geography, sciences, fixing links, disambiguation, spelling corrections). A HighBeam account would be more than useful for me. CheepnisAroma (talk) 19:32, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  119. User:Alpha Quadrant - Editor since 2010, 42,000 edits. I primarily work at Articles for Creation and I typically write articles on United States organizations related articles. Often times, articles in this area are behind paywalls. Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 20:02, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  120. User:Cheveri - Editor at es.wiki, where I am also an administrator. I usually review GA, and have also written four of them from the begining.I spend an important part of my time here on countervandalism duties, in addition to some improvements for already existing articles. Registered since 2005 and about 15000 edits. Cheveri (talk) 20:16, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  121. User:Shakehandsman - Editor on English Wikipedia since 2006, 10,000+ edits, most of which involved content creation or trying to add refs to existing content. I work on BLPs, crime articles, sports, politics, quite a variety of subjects really and access to Highbeam would allow me to get more work done. I intend to continue editing my content generation and referencing work well into the future.--Shakehandsman (talk) 21:10, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  122. User:Bay Area Native - I've been editing for 5 years, focused on current news events, including articles relating to the San Francisco Bay Area as well as current LGBT issues and notable media figures. My watchlist is extensive, monitoring vandalism-vulnerable articles on sensitive topics. Access to HighBeam would greatly enhance my refinement on the articles in my watchlist. Bay Area Native (talk) 21:34, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  123. User:Yomangani - I meet the criteria; if the accounts are to be "given on a random basis to all who meet the basic qualifications" if over-subscribed, I don't see any need to provide a candidate statement. Yomanganitalk 23:41, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  124. User:Pequod76 - I've been editing for almost 5 years, mostly on the Wikipedia in Italian. I focused on and added referenced contents to linguistics, ancient history, music and literature related articles, with almost 50.000 edits on it.wiki (my record there). Access to HighBeam would be good for my referenced editing. --Pequod76 (talk-ita.esp.eng) 01:22, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  125. User:Milowent - Active on Wikipedia for 2.5 years, over 10,000 edits. Active on Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron, also work on sourcing BLPs and founded Wikipedia:Unreferenced BLP Rescue. Plan on continuing same work, I do not have free or other access to Highbeam; I have cited highbeam before when people have helped me get a copy of an article for sourcing something.--Milowent • hasspoken 01:24, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  126. User:Andreasmperu - Active at es.wiki since 2008 (around 59.000 edits), also with more than 1.000 edits at enwiki. Andreasm just talk to me 02:29, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  127. User:Fixertool - Active at es.wiki since 2006 (around 13750 edits), mainly focused in literature and history. One good article.--Fixertool (talk) 08:19, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  128. Symposiarch (talk) 10:07, 19 March 2012 (UTC) mainly German Wikipedia, but also French + English WP, active since 2005, ~21,831 edits de, Total edits (including deleted): 8,778 @ fr, 2,671 @ en; no good and no featured articles, topics (mainly) history, especially local/german history, biographies, German wine, local plants, project Metz, african elections and politicians[reply]
  129. User:Ealdgyth. Active with medieval history, equine. 60,000+ edits, a number of FAs and GAs. Continuing work on improving coverage of medieval topics as well as horse subjects.
  130. Antandrus (talk). Active in many fields (music history, energy, geography, geology, and a few others); have written over 630 articles from scratch; approximately 100,000 edits; eight years of history; admin for seven. I've bumped into HighBeam's paywall many times, particularly while writing articles on the petroleum industry.
  131. User:Patrickneil Seven years of editing, 15,000+ edits, with 3 FAs and more GAs, mostly history, international relations, and geography topics. With HighBeam, its mostly tracking down newspaper articles from 10+ years ago, that have otherwise disappeared from the web.-- Patrick, oѺ∞ 17:39, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  132. User:Taty2007 - Active at es.wiki since 2008 with approximately 25.921 edits. I am an admim at es.wiki and have contributed in several good and feature articles, as well as creating articles related to art and history. I constantly search information in books and newspaper articles that require subscription such as Oxford databases and Access World News. As an active member of Wikipedia I will continue using these research tools and resources. Taty2007 (talk) 18:10, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  133. User:Gary King – Content contributor. Haven't been as active lately as I used to be, but still working on a few articles off-wiki. Gary King (talk · scripts) 19:13, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  134. User:Ravpapa seven years or so, thousands of edits, mostly in the areas of classical music and the Middle East.--Ravpapa (talk) 19:36, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  135. User:Julius1990. User on de.wiki since 2005 with 33.000+ edits. So far 15 articles that are rated excellent or good articles. My topics are art history, sports, cinema, latin america, history. Julius1990 (talk) 19:49, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  136. User:JayJasper. Wikipedia editor for over 5 yrs., with more than 25,000 edits. Fields of interest and editing activity include current events, politics, US history, law, literature, sports, music, among others. Experience with creation, expansion, research and sourcing of content.--JayJasper (talk) 20:25, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  137. User:GuillaumeTell. Based in England. Active on English Wikipedia since December 2005, over 13,000 edits (it could be a lot more, but I'm always pressing the Show Preview button), member of WikiProject Opera and WikiProject Shakespeare. Also interested in a wide range of other subjects, especially architecture and local history. Some experience in Peer Reviews and FAC, c3000 articles on my Watchlist. --GuillaumeTell 22:51, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  138. User:SarahStierch Wikimedia Foundation Community Fellow, active in WP:Feminism, Visual Arts, Women's History. I'm the Wikipedian in Residence at the Smithsonian Institution going on one year. Feel free to visit my userpage to review my resume and bio! I often run into HighBeam articles, especially about women artists, and I'd love to help improve coverage about those artists and other women with HighBeam. Sarah (talk) 23:07, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  139. User:Buckshot06 English, French wikipedias. I focus on military subjects that are not well covered by Wikipedia's systemic bias - thus Africa, Asia especially. I would very much like access to a HighBeam account to improve coverage and sourcing. Buckshot06 (talk) 00:40, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  140. Archeologo. User on Italian Wikipedia since 2006, 6+ years experience. I currently work mostly on archaeology and heritage pages, and accessing to Highbeam would be definitely useful. --Archeologo (talk) 02:02, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  141. User:Gadfium. Editor on English Wikipedia since 2004, admin since 2005, 90 thousand edits. Have created hundreds of articles, and frequently add references to other people's additions. I frequently find HighBeam a useful source of references, but am unable to read the full articles.-gadfium 03:37, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  142. Moroboshi (talk · contribs · count). Editor on it.wikipedia for over 5 years, with over 15k edit on ns0. Im mainly active on game and game publisher articles, mainly with translation from en.wiki, but I like to expand the articles and to add source when they are missing.--Moroboshi (talk) 06:44, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  143. User:Tom Morris. Admin on en.wikipedia and en.wikinews. I've written a number of DYKs and helped fact-check articles and check up on references on mostly academic topics, primarily philosophy and a few other humanities topics. It'd be useful to have HighBeam access for a variety of sources related to medical history, current affairs, humanities and so on in order to help write new DYKs, and to improve existing articles on topics of interest. —Tom Morris (talk) 10:54, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  144. User:Graham87. I've an admin who has been editing Wikipedia for seven years. I primarily write content about music (both classical and popular) and, more recently, about the Australian Paralympic movement. Because I use a screen reader, I find it difficult to access Google Books and the Google News Archive, so having a free high-quality corpus of full texts would be especially useful to me. Graham87 12:06, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  145. Qoan. Editor mainly on Spanish and Catalan wikipedia since 2006, I'm Patroller in ES-wiki. I've created hundreds of articles, mainly on Geography, History and Languages and I've contributed by increasing information and adding sources to thousands other articles on these fields. Access to high-quality reliable sources would be of inmeasurable value for me. Qoan (say it!) 13:56, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  146. User:Eclipsed - English Wikipedia. I contribute under a declared COI on various subjects. 6000+ edits, started in 2005. Intentions for improving articles. Eclipsed   (talk)   (COI Declaration)   13:59, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  147. User:Tchoř – active mainly on cs.wikipedia: 20 thousands edits since 2008. I believe I would use the access for verification, referencing and resolving content disputes.--Tchoř (talk) 16:11, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  148. User:Silver seren - English Wikipedia. I have a wide range of subjects I work on, 2 GAs, 42 DYKs, and 67 articles total, over 18,000 edits, and active since 2006. This will prove very useful in all of my source gathering for improving AfDs and writing articles in general. SilverserenC 16:35, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  149. User:John Broughton - English Wikipedia. I have more than 25,000 edits, active since August 2005. I'm the author of Wikipedia: The Missing Manual. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 17:27, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  150. User:We hope-Here 2+ years with 32,000+ edits. Editing a variety of topics, including bios and veterinary medicine. Was an avid user of Google News Archive for this until they abandoned the project and also cut the search capabilities of their database at the same time. We hope (talk) 17:33, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  151. User:Miyagawa - 3+ years, around 24,000 edits on the English language Wikipedia. 8 FLs, 39 GAs and 164 DYKs. Would be primarily looking to use the newspaper archives for content generation as I have access to some British newspaper archives through my library but it would be wonderful to have access to some of the American ones too. Miyagawa (talk) 18:46, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  152. User:ErrantX - ~2 years, 16,000 edits. My interests tend to be biographies, WW2 and current events, but I dabble all over. Archive access would provide a whole lot more source material for my article work :) --Errant (chat!) 19:06, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  153. User:Chrishmt0423 - English Wikipedia. 5+ years, 40,000+ edits. 51 FLs. I mainly edit NBA articles. Archive access would help to verify facts.—Chris!c/t 19:17, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  154. Valfontis (talk) Admin on English Wikipedia. Over 6 years experience and over 60,000 edits. e-mail is enabled. I create content, and do expansion, verification, rescue and clean up. I don't have access to HighBeam through my local library. Access to HighBeam would help me in my work--the snippet views often tantalize with hints of a subject's notability, but usually can't be used as reliable sources without checking the full article. I believe strongly in providing full citations and will adhere to the usage suggestions. Thanks for the opportunity! Valfontis (talk) 19:39, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  155. 28bytes (talk): Admin on English Wikipedia; editing since 2006, 18,000 edits so far. I've created just under 100 articles so far, with plans for many more. 28bytes (talk) 19:50, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  156. Mazbln (talk) - (Mainly) German Wikipedia, active since 2004, about 50,000 edits, admin. I would use the access for research in regard of the Balkan conflicts of the 90ies to verify articles and to solve edit wars. --Mazbln (talk) 19:55, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  157. User:Jrcla2. Over 5+ years as registered user, 91,000+ manual edits, 735 article creations, 97 DYK credits. I create new articles on historically and modern-day notable college basketball players. I frequently need archived articles to help beef up content but have trouble doing so, thus a HighBeam account would be tremendously helpful. Jrcla2 (talk) 20:01, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  158. User:The Rambling Man - Nearly 7 years here, 70,000+ edits, sysop, 'crat, featured list director, 50+ featured credits (FA + FL). This kind of freedom to access info would be invaluable on a daily basis. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:11, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  159. User:Dirtlawyer1. Over 41,000 manual edits to English Wikipedia in three years on Wikipedia. I work to improve college sports articles, including teams, athletes and coaches. Access to a HighBeam account would be extremely helpful for adding sourced footnotes for newspapers, magazines and other publications not availble through Google News Archive or not otherwise available online. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 20:13, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  160. User:Eagles247. English Wikipedia. Been an editor for almost three years with about 40,000 edits to mainly National Football League and college football-related articles. Eagles 24/7 (C) 20:45, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  161. User:Lemonade51 English Wikipedia. Have made over 3k edits since 2005 as I contributed subtly for the first few years. Help out referencing football articles and from time to time television programmes. A Highbeam account would be highly beneficial in finding articles published by newspapers pre-1998 on the internet in order to beef up content and double check information. -- Lemonade51 (talk) 21:01, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  162. User:Colin. Over 6 years on English Wikipedia with 10k+ edits. I create, edit and review mainly medical articles. Also some people-lists for which newspaper sources are very useful. Colin°Talk 21:03, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  163. User:wtshymanski. English Wikipedia, and some photos and diagrams on Commons; about 29000 edits in article space since 2005. I have been adding references and expanding text in articles relating to electrical engineering and history of electrotechnology.--Wtshymanski (talk) 21:06, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  164. User:César German Wikipedia. Nearly 70000 edits there in almost seven years. Hundreds of articles – mainly about people in film and television history, several German DYK credits, six good articles (however all from 2005/06). --César (talk) 21:38, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  165. User:Little Mountain 5. Over four years and 19,000 edits on the English Wikipedia, with quite a bit of content creation and expansion, verification, and referencing. I mainly work on Oregon and river related articles. I also have a Credo account. Thanks! LittleMountain5 22:18, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  166. Er Cicero: Italian Wikipedia. >14.000 global edits since September 2008, working mostly in Ancient Rome and occasionally in other fields. I got a credo account in 2011. Er Cicero (talk) 22:46, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  167. User:Cassianto - I have been an active editor on the English Wikipedia for two and a half years and have nearly 4,000 edits. I mainly edit biographies on those who were prominent within the English music hall and Edwardian theatre era, for which I have contributed on both GA's and FA's. -- Cassianto (talk) 22:54, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  168. User:JuneGloom07. I have been an editor on the English Wikipedia for five years, and have accumulated nearly 26,000 edits. I mainly edit articles on soap operas and fictional characters, though I do venture into film articles and BLPs. I have contributed to a number of DYK's, GA's and FL's. - JuneGloom Talk 23:29, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  169. User:Rikster2. Wikipedia editor since 2006. I work mostly on historical and current event articles about basketball and particularly college basketball. Very active editor for WP:College Basketball Rikster2 (talk) 00:38, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  170. Ian Rose. Wikipedia editor since 2005; 29,000 edits; 30 Featured Articles; FAC Delegate and Military History Wikiproject Coordinator. As writer, work mainly in military biographies but edits and reviews range across arts, technology and general history. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 00:57, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  171. Aushulz I have an account from 3 years and 7 months. I have 79107 contributions in Wikimedia projects, mainly it.wikipedia (62232), it.wiktionary (7318), commons (5697), en.wikipedia (2141) and it.wikibooks (1065). My fields of interest are science and technology, expecially chemistry, physics and engineering. I wrote new articles and I have modified old ones, adding contents, references, bibliography, and so on. I think can be very useful for my wikipedian activity have access to HighBeam search engine. --Aushulz (talk) 01:34, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  172. EncMstr has been editing enwiki for 6 year 7 months 5 days and 34,000+ edits. I frequently search for citations for existing content, as well as expanded content. Often I find content which is not supported and remove it if it seems like it cannot be found, or tag it if I think someone with other sources could find a citation. This looks like an amazing resource for such work, especially to help minimize our FUTON bias. —EncMstr (talk) 02:28, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  173. Paulmcdonald Approximately 5 years editing experience, 25,000+ edits. I look for citations on college football articles and articles about the state of Kansas.--Paul McDonald (talk) 03:43, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  174. User:Arxiloxos English Wikipedia, 3-1/2 years, 12,000 edits. I spend a lot of time looking for sources for both new and existing articles in a variety of areas, so full access to HighBeam would be very valuable. --Arxiloxos (talk) 04:57, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  175. User:Omgosh30. English Wikipedia for 2 years. I have made extensive improvements to Italian football articles, but access to HighBeam would provide me with the means to add further value to my work.  Omg †  osh  11:55, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  176. User:Paul MacDermott. English Wikipedia. 4 years experience, 41000 edits, content related work (creation, expansion, referencing). Topics include current events, media and biographies for which HighBeam access would be extremely useful. Paul MacDermott (talk) 12:42, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  177. User:Number 57. English Wikipedia, six years experience, c. 57,000 edits. My main area of work is election and referendum articles, and have now probably started around 2,000 articles on them. Having access to the Political Science journals on Highbeam would be a particularly useful source of information (Google searches for the relevant info relating to certain elections have often led me to Highbeam snippets, but without full access). Number 57 13:14, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  178. User:Waldir. Mainly active in English Wikipedia, but also in several other Wikimedia projects. Editor for over 7 years now, with 14,000 edits. Administrator. Heavily focused in content work (creation, expansion, referencing), in topics I come across due to my academic work or random interest. --Waldir talk 14:01, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  179. User:MSGrabia (de). German Wikipedia, 1,500+ edits (articles only) since 2005 in film and television. Articles, cleanup and helping others (including being an adopter in de.). I would use the access to research critical reception of movies. Find me at MSGrabia (de) (talk).
  180. User:Acdixon. English Wikipedia and Commons. Editor since September 2006, admin since February 2011. 17,000+ edits. Have contributed to numerous pieces of recognized content (FAs, GAs, DYKs, etc), mostly related to the state of Kentucky. Would like to have access to sources on more recent politicians, especially governors, in my quixotic pursuit of a Governors of Kentucky featured topic. Acdixon (talk · contribs) 14:19, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  181. User:Ktlynch Active since 2007 under a different account, this one since 2009, mostly English but also French. 10 GAs, in literature, film and general interest. Divide time between article writing and reviewing. Access to scholarly material would be very useful. --Ktlynch (talk) 14:36, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  182. de:Benutzerin:Liesbeth Lass for my account de:Benutzerin:Liesbeth (SUL was not possible any more). In de active since 2008, 11 000 edits. I was advised to aply after unsucessfully trying to verify de:William Pearson (Bariton) but found http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-4727890.html. I often work on biografies, obituaries would be helpfull. --Liesbeth Lass (talk) 15:06, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  183. User:Cmadler Active since 2005, 11,500 edits on English Wikipedia (plus a few thousand more on other projects, particularly Commons and English Wikisource). This access would be mostly useful for work on sports history articles (particularly college football and college basketball) as well as articles related to Michigan and Kentucky. cmadler (talk) 15:32, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  184. User:JoJan English, Dutch, French, German Wikipedia + Commons . 8 years experience , a total of more than 86,000 edits, content-related work, especially relating to Gastropoda (content creation, expansion, verification, referencing) access to Highbeam will be very useful to read more than the abstracts and look beyond the paywall of scientific journals. JoJan (talk) 16:08, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  185. User:Invertzoo, Active since 2007, primarily on the English Wikipdia, over 63,000 edits, 6 GAs,content-related work, especially relating to the Gastropoda and also more recently the Bivalvia. My work includes content creation, expansion, verification, and referencing. Access to Highbeam would be extremely useful, allowing me to read more than just the abstracts of papers, and to see beyond the paywall of scientific journals. Invertzoo (talk) 17:58, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  186. User:Shellnut, I am a former marine biologist and a new editor active since October 2011, on the English Wikipdia, over 2,800 edits in just 5 months, primarily related to the taxonomy of Gastropoda and the Bivalvia. My work includes content creation, expansion, verification, and referencing. Access to Highbeam would be extremely useful, allowing me to read more than just the abstracts of papers, and to see beyond the paywall of scientific journals which I no longer have access to in my career. Shellnut (talk) 18:41, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  187. User:Toohool, editor since 2006, ~2k edits. Active in developing articles on casinos and the gaming industry. Toohool (talk) 22:21, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  188. User:Trident13, based Wales, UK, 78,000+ edits, active 5years 11months. Active within WikiProject Wales, Motorcycles and Railways, and I am also active in writing numerous Biographies across numerous sectors, including business, actors, news readers and sports (in excess of 250). I am particularly interested in how access to HighBeam could improve the quality of biographocal articles. With media paywalls now becoming more prevelant, and often many key points of verification of fact and background reliant on old newspapers and magazine articles, and yet with many publications continually reducing the time of storage of old articles, I believe that this trial could be invaluable in improving biographical article quality. Rgds, - Trident13 (talk) 22:22, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  189. User:Edison Over 41,000 live edits over past 7 years on English Wikipedia. Admin since September 2007. Email is authenticated. A High Beam account would be useful when I am finding references to improve articles up for deletion, in answering questions at the Reference Desk, and in creating new articles based on threads at the Reference Desk, as well as in my new article patrol activities, where I often add the needed references. I've created 26 articles (including 3 "Did You Know" articles), in addition to redirects and disambiguation pages. Edison (talk) 23:08, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  190. User:DeFaultRyan. Active contributor to highway and college sports articles. I've done a lot of digging to come up with historical information about highways, but frequently run into dead-ends that might be unresolvable without a lengthy trip to a transportation office. Access to a research account such as Highbeam's could greatly streamline the process of verifying historical transport information when free sources don't exist. DeFaultRyan 02:19, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  191. User:VonTasha. French wikipedia. + 55K edits on fr.wiki; + 60K edits globally, in more than 6 years. Active in Botanic/Zoology project. I'd like to be able to read scientific publications beyond the abstract. VonTasha (talk) 04:48, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  192. User:Sylenius. French Wikipedia, 17k edits since 2006. Contributor in computer science (computer vision, image processing) and classical music/jazz and main contributor of several featured articles. I lost access to paid scientific publications/journals since out of academia and unikely to get another access anytime soon. Sylenius (talk) 08:34, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  193. User:Viriditas. User on English Wikipedia. Seven years, +107K edits with 44% in article space. Actively involved in verification and content creation. The only reason I'm requesting this is because I've tried to read and cite dozens of HighBeam articles within the last year, but I didn't have access. Viriditas (talk) 08:42, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  194. User:Cplakidas. Active on English Wikipedia, secondarily Greek and German ones, since 2005. Over 65,000 edits, of which 70% in article space, 3 FAs, over 50 GAs. Active in Byzantine, modern Greek, Ottoman, Arab and Persian history. Especially eager for journal access.Constantine ✍ 09:02, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  195. User:MathsPoetry. French Wikipedia, 15k edits since 2009. To be honest, most of them are orthographe corrections. Contributor in computer science, maths, and a bit of everything. Occasional edits on English, German, and Italian Wikipedia. MathsPoetry (talk) 10:40, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  196. User:Mike Coppolano French Wikipedia. Contributor in American literature. Mike Coppolano (talk) 11:53, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  197. User:Deuxtroy on French-language- Wikipedia; since 2006, via IP or user nickname, 3,000 edits under registered account, content-related work (creation, expansion, verification, article referencing and rescue) mainly (but non only) in economical fields. Could be useful when french references are not avalaible.
  198. User:Alexander Doria. French Wikipedia user with 9k edits since 2006. My contributions ranges mostly on classical music, greek philosophy (several featured articles), and politics. I refer frequently to online scientific articles, which I try to present in several projects (like this one). Alexander Doria (talk) 11:51, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  199. Cherubino (talk) user since 2004 and administrator since 2009 in de:WP, mainly interessted in history, 20.000 edits. --
  200. User:Ling.Nut3 see User:Ling.Nut & User:Ling.Nut2. User over five years, five FA articles, (Total edits including deleted: 36,045), recently returned to working on endangered languages but pop in from time to time to help out at WP:FAC etc. Ling.Nut3 (talk) 12:08, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  201. ClemRutterUser over eight years, nudging 12K edits on English WP, and 16K on Commons. Working on content on eighteenth century industry and cleaning up articles that lack references or logic!
  202. Agamitsudo, +30k edits on wp.fr since end of 2010. Interested in a HighBeam account to reference articles on wp.en. --Agamitsudo (talk) 13:15, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  203. DeejayK, English Wikipedia, over 10k edits since 2006. Active primarily with NFL Project — DeeJayK (talk) 14:28, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  204. Tom Reedy. Shakespeare and Early Modern lit and history, 4 1/2 years, 8,500+ edits. 47% content, 32% article talk, 10% WP/WP talk. Knowledgeable on WP policy, no blocks or topic bans. Every now and then I chime in on WP dispute board discussions or lend a disinterested hand to a contentious page. Tom Reedy (talk) 15:51, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  205. User:Parrot of Doom. Count me in. I've written or made a significant contribution toward 27 featured articles and 26 good articles, mostly on historical subjects. I can always use more source material. Parrot of Doom 18:48, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  206. User:Spinningspark. Strong content provider with a string of FAs and GAs to my name. Technology article bias often needs non-free content. Also intermittent sessions of article reviewing requires access for verification. SpinningSpark 20:34, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  207. User:MistyMorn. Eligible and would be grateful for the opportunity to access sources for content editing in fields such as classical music, literature, health research, etc. (no longer have free Highbeam access from work). —MistyMorn (talk) 23:04, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  208. User:Spanglej Around 12k edits (80% on article content) over three years on English Wikipedia, mostly on articles concerning contemporary poets, referencing uncited articles, developing biographical and critical sections. Span (talk) 23:41, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  209. Salsero35 French Wikipedia. Contributor in science. Salsero35 (talk) 23:48, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  210. User:Jklamo 5k edits on enwiki, 5k on cswiki. HighBeam access may be very useful mainly for my work on renewable energy and economy topics. --Jklamo (talk) 00:41, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  211. User:Orygun. English Wikipedia editor since Nov 07. Write article on wide range of history topics including places, events, and biographies; Oregon geography entries; and military-related subjects. Have contributed ~5K edits including 135 substantial articles.--Orygun (talk) 02:34, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  212. User:Bridies. I do content creation in -especially older- video game articles, where perhaps the only sources are old print magazines. I've used a HighBeam free trial in creating FAs and GAs and so would love full access. I've several years experience and several thousand edits. bridies (talk) 05:01, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  213. User:AroundTheGlobe - 9k+ edits on en.wiki (since 2006), 300+ images uploaded to Commons. 1 GA, 2 FL and 20 DYK contributions - I am hoping to contribute more FA/GA articles on Hinduism/Cricket/Aviation if I get more references. Around The Globeसत्यमेव जयते 05:20, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  214. User:DoriSmith. Wikipedian since 2005 with nearly 12K edits. I've wished I had this access numerous times as I've added references to articles, and I know it would really come in handy. Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 05:21, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  215. User:Ruigeroeland. Wikipedian since April 2006 with 118,965 edits on English wikipedia and 1000s of uploads on commons. I am mainly working on creating and improving Lepidoptera articles. I would like an account to be able to access the biology related journals they have available. Ruigeroeland (talk) 11:31, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  216. Lenka64. Czech Wikipedia, active since 2005, about 10,000 edits. Access could be useful for biografical references and cs-wikiquote.--Lenka64 (talk) 11:50, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  217. Canadian Paul 50k+ edits on the English Wikipedia across a wide variety of topics. Lost access to these kinds of resources after my master's and would love to have it again to help improve articles to GA status and beyond. Canadian Paul 15:08, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  218. Beyond My Ken here since 2005, close to 100k edits in total (see here), about 100 articles created, lots of gnomish work including improving refs Beyond My Ken (talk) 18:33, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  219. Alan Liefting. Been on English Wikipedia for eight years. Over 94,000 edits. I create and update environment and New Zealand related articles. See [2] for list of new articles (sort of). Am often frustrated with a lack of access to Highbeam pages. Main city library closed due to earthquake damage. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 19:46, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  220. User:Bigturtle. c389 articles started, and 10,290 edits credited, since December 2005. Likes looking at other people's citations to see if they work or not, and coming up with better ones if possible (sometimes). Specializes: As little as possible, but look for articles about the geography of northern Michigan and the history of Antarctica. Bigturtle (talk) 05:23, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  221. User:Bagumba. English Wikipedia. I have edited since 2008 with over 9,000 edits and 39 pages created. I am active in WikiProject National Basketball Association and WikiProject Baseball, and HighBeam access would aid in gathering sources beyond free online content for expansion and verification of existing articles and for creation of new articles. It's frustrating sometimes seeing relevant search results on Google but not having access to the paid content, especially older newspaper articles.—Bagumba (talk) 06:39, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  222. User:Melirius. Russian Wikipedia. 7000+ edits since 2005. The project about FRINGE theories in Russian Wikipedia permanently needs reliable sources. --Melirius (talk) 13:45, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  223. User:Shirt58. Works in en.wp.org mainly in the areas of literature, Australian history, invertebrate zoology, fine arts, classical and popular music, the various codes of football, biographies, cricket, law, and... pretty much everything else. 20 000 or so edits, 200 or so articles started, and references added to tidy many other articles. A lot of things I work on are behind pay-walls that would otherwise be accessible via HighBeam.--Shirt58 (talk) 14:23, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  224. User:Fetchcomms, enwp, six GAs, 29 DYKs, to-do list. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 17:14, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  225. Im interested in getting an highbeam account so i can continue my research into Tropical cyclones here on the EN WP.Jason Rees (talk) 18:39, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  226. User:Demiurge1000. English Wikiepdia editor since June 2010, with over 11,000 edits. I regularly need access to paywalled (or similar) articles to expand or verify items in historical or BLP topics. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 19:26, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  227. User:Teemeah. Hungarian Wikipedia and English Wikipedia. registered 7 years ago, have over 70 000 edits and 24 featured articles in huwiki, active patroller there, which envolves finding sources for unsourced/poorly sourced articles. Currently taking part in huwiki cleanup project that also involves research of good sources for unsourced articles. 小龙 (Timish) # xiǎolóng de xìnxiāng 21:06, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  228. User:Crazypaco. primarily English WIkipedia. 18,000+ edits and over 100 created articles since November 2006. Active in Wikiprojects for National Register of Historic Places, Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh, Universities, College Football, College Basketball, and the University of Pittsburgh. I engage in content-related work (creation, expansion, verification, article rescue) and citation additions to articles where access to Highbeam would be useful. CrazyPaco (talk) 00:03, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  229. User:Gede. I'm mainly active on French Wikipedia (where I'm a sysop), with more than 20 000 edits. I write articles in social sciences, where I often use academic references that are covered by Highbeam. --Gede (talk) 09:18, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  230. User:Cunard. English Wikipedia. Three Wikipedia:Good articles and 37 Wikipedia:Did you know articles. I have frequently come across subscription-needed Highbeam articles that could have aided me in my research. Cunard (talk) 10:51, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  231. User:RotT, about 12k+ edits, 2.5 years of editing, about 150 articles including 1 FA. User:RotT 11:58, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
  232. User:Patriarca12. Over 6,800 manual edits to English Wikipedia articles in five+ years on Wikipedia. Have worked to get numerous articles to both GA and FL in addition to 50+ DYKs. Access to a HighBeam account would be extremely helpful to help in the search for reliable sources not available through Google News Archive or other free internet sources. Patriarca12 (talk) 17:26, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  233. FT2. Editor since 2004, 13,000+ manual edits, over 120 authored articles including 4 or 5 GAs and some DYKs, hundreds of articles significantly edited. Constantly involved in the kinds of article work that requires access to media sources - old biographies and historical matters, checking articles are comprehensive, and verifying and determining what facts are supported by sources. Researching these often end up at old newspaper archive pages, often only visible on Highbeam or other restricted viewing, so access would be extremely beneficial. Examples: 1940s dancer Rose Marie Magrill, Diana's butler Paul Burrell, 1940s history of the synchrotron, the murder of Stephen Lawrence and the history of English murder law, the development of DDR4 SDRAM memory, the background and service history of BP's Deepwater Horizon, significant legal cases such as Berghuis v. Thompkins and Hepting vs. AT&T (more). Access would help and will be well used, suggested guidelines will be followed if granted :) FT2 (Talk | email) 02:01, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  234. Racso. Spanish Wikipedia. Sysop, bureaucrat. Bot operator. OTRS volunteer. About 14k edits. About 123 articles created. About 10 good articles redacted. Would use HighBeam access as an extra help when researching for developing articles (I think it could even encourage me to write about new topics). --Racso (talk) 02:09, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  235. User:Rich Farmbrough en: Wikipeida mainly. Admin and botmeister. >>10k edits Highbeam would be a useful resource for referencing. Rich Farmbrough, 06:56, 26 March 2012 (UTC).[reply]
  236. User:Jezhotwells. en: Wikipedia; some contributions to es: Wikipedia; over 55,000 edits; 3.5 years editing; Bristol, Theatre; Rivers; Spain. Regular GA reviewer (just under 600 reviews), contributor to FAC, 19 GAs, 2 FAs; original content creator for Bristol, Spain; Rivers, theatre and other associated subjects. Have library access to LexisNexis but Highbeam covers different newspapers and journals. Jezhotwells (talk) 15:54, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  237. User:Arnodino. French Wikipedia ([3]). First contributor on dinosaur project. Contributions since 2007. In search for scientific publications. Arnodino (talk) 18:00, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  238. User:Mwarf. French Wikipedia ([4]). Contributing since 2006. I'm interested in many topics (politics, history, music, computer science…). While searching for reliable sources to improve articles in these domains using search engines, I have come across HighBeam several times. An account would be very helpful to me in such cases. Mwarf (talk) 18:26, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  239. User:Delfort. +40.000 edits on it.wikipedia since 2006. HighBeam Research would very be useful to my work on verification and referencing biographies of sports people, historical sports events and history of sports. --Delfort (talk) 17:07, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  240. User:France3470. English Wikipedia. Editor since 2007; highly active since 2010. Have made 10,00+ edits primarily to mainspace; contributed 1 GA, and 5 DYKs as well as created 40+ others. I frequently expand and add citations to articles and can see HighBeam being very useful for this.France3470 (talk) 17:19, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  241. User:Meowy. English Wikipedia, for 6 years (since April 2006) and with over 7300 edits: 40% being content generation and 40% being content discussion. The majority of these were on articles related to the Near East and Caucasus regions. I would be especially interested in using HighBeam to access specialist journal content related to the art, architecture and history of the Near East / Middle East / Caucasus, in particular the medieval period. This would be used for both content writing and verification. Meowy 20:22, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  242. User:Wikisilki. Spanish Wikipedia. Around 30 000 edits since July 2008. I use to create or expand articles or biographies on art, literature and history issues, do sometimes reviews of GA and FA. I also have a Credo account. Thanks! wikisilki 01:02, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  243. User:Kafka Liz. Registered user since 2007; over 8,000 edits in that time, with a focus on visual arts and history. 4 FAs to date, and could really use better access to sources. Kafka Liz (talk) 01:57, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  244. Christian Stroppel German Wikipedia. Registerd since Jul 2007; 1,261 edits; 44.01% being content generation an 13.80% being content discussion. I studied psychology and want to read original studies.--Christian Stroppel (talk) 08:43, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  245. Ecemaml Spanish Wikipedia and Commons. Admin in both project. Almost 90,000 edits in the Spanish Wikipedia and significant contributions to, at least, five featured articles. --Ecemaml (talk) 09:22, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  246. User:Josh Parris. Active on en, increasingly active on simple. 70 en articles created, and I'm finding myself doing a lot of citation work recently. Planning on doing a lot more citations in BLPs I've created or become entangled with. Josh Parris 11:10, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  247. User:Coemgenus, active on English Wikipedia with about 26,000 edits in 7 years, including 10 FAs and 2 FLs. I mostly work in history and biography. --Coemgenus (talk) 11:57, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  248. User:Livitup Over 5k edits since 2005. I enjoy expanding stubs and wiki-gnoming, including {{refimprov}}ing, when possible. Very active with CSD, PROD, and AfD, where having access to high-quality sources would be a real benefit in getting things right. Livit⇑Eh?/What? 05:19, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  249. User:AndyTheGrump Eclectic editor on e.Wikipedia. 12,000+ edits, active since August 2010. I've often found myself wishing for a facility like this, and expect to make good use of it verifying sources, improving articles, and (when I finally think of a subject that hasn't already been written about) maybe even writing new ones. AndyTheGrump (talk) 21:41, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  250. User:Neatnik. 1,000+ edits on frwiki, 80% in the article namespace. Active since 2011. Mostly focused on music (artists biographies, record labels, etc). I'm creating/expanding and/or adding refs to those articles. I intend to continue and think an account would help. Presently I can't access Randy Newman's Playboy interview from 1987, for instance ([5]), or this article on Kranky Records ([6]), etc. Neatnik (talk) 08:18, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  251. User:Graeme Bartlett. Active since 2005 on en Wikipedia with over 40,000 edits. Created several hundred articles, and also frequently rescue from CSD by adding references. I will continue to write new content and rescue inadequately referenced material. HighBeam will greatly improve non-recent references. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:13, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  252. User:Antemister usually active in the German WP (about 9000 contribs), contributing to contemporary history and politics, expecially in the afro.asian region, a topic where access to such news media is really helpful--Antemister (talk) 07:38, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  253. User:Epipelagic English Wikipedia with 44,000 edits over 6 years, 64 DYKs, contributing mainly to marine life --Epipelagic (talk) 13:30, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  254. user:Viswaprabha Most @ Malayalam & Sanskrit Wikipedia and Wiktionary Since 2005. ViswaPrabha വിശ്വപ്രഭ (talk) 14:45, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  255. Dry Martini, 4500+ edits on it.wikipedia (active since April 2009), active in RC patrolling and welcoming new users. I would use the account to check information during patrolling, to get references for new articles (I also do that, yes ;-) ) and to retrieve references for the Reference recovery project on it.wiki. --Dry Martini (talk) 16:43, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  256. User:Cloudz679. English Wikipedia, 25,000+ edits over a period of more than five years. Lots of recent work on dead link cleanup. Main areas of contribution to articles with connections to association football and the Czech Republic. Although I do more fact-checking than content creation, I have created some DYK articles as well. Led a cleanup drive for FA-class articles at WikiProject Football recently, would love this opportunity to be able to do some more. Cloudz679 20:21, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  257. User:Literaturegeek. I have more than 23,000 edits to wikipedia; I mostly contribute to pharmacology and medical articles. I have worked and successfully brought 3 articles to Good Article status on wikipedia. My biggest hindrance to editing wikipedia is gaining access to full text papers/articles and I often am restricted to utilising abstracts. I was very excited to hear about this offer from HighBeam and I would be grateful to be given access to HighBeam for free.--Literaturegeek | T@1k? 21:15, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  258. WhatamIdoing (talk · contribs) >59,000 edits so far, and it seems that I've created 45 articles. My interests are mostly medicine-related, but I'm also interested in several odd articles like Rudeness and Cupcake, and I also participate at several noticeboards, including WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. WhatamIdoing (talk) 22:39, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  259. Zagalejo (talk · contribs) I've been here since 2005, and have made over 58,000 edits. I have hundreds of BLPs on my watchlist, so this will be helpful for fact-checking/maintenance. Zagalejo^^^ 02:33, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  260. Hildanknight (talk · contribs) I have written 9 GAs on Singapore-related topics and with HighBeam, would be able to write many more, to help counter systemic bias! --J.L.W.S. The Special One (talk) 14:18, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  261. GRuban (talk · contribs) - 7 years on EN, created dozens of articles, active on reliable sources noticeboard. --GRuban (talk) 18:17, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  262. Michig (talk · contribs) Administrator. Over seven years of editing, with more than 35,000 edits. More than 500 articles created, many more rescued and improved. Added sources to over 700 unsourced BLPs in the improvement drive (dealt with around 1,000 in total, each one requiring an evaluation of available coverage). Track record in searching for sources and using them effectively to improve the encyclopedia. Active at AfD where the ability to see the articles behind the Highbeam paywall would be a tremendous help. --Michig (talk) 20:31, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  263. Beeblebrox (talk · contribs) 57,000 edits, been doing too much admin work, looking to get back into improving content related to my adopted home state of Alaska and other areas I have an interest in. Wife doesn't want me spending any money on WP so this is the only way I'm getting behind the paywall. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:36, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  264. Collect (talk · contribs) Over 22,000 edits, with especial concern about claims made in biographies where sources are used which are not readily verifiable. Collect (talk) 20:46, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  265. Ponyo (talk · contribs) English Wikipedia admin with over 5 years experience and 38,000 edits. I mainly working on BLP articles and attempt to add better sourcing to biography articles. Access to the HighBeam database would be extremely useful with regard to my editing activities. --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 20:56, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  266. Eleassar (talk · contribs). English Wikipedia administrator, highly active in the Slovene Wikipedia and a participant of Deletion review debates in the Commons. More than 40,000 edits and over 7 years of editing in the English Wikipedia. Adding and verifying sources all the time, active in different areas, particularly medicine, Slovenia and biographies. The database would really simplify and help my work, because now I'm often dependent on excerpts and abstracts. --Eleassar my talk 21:00, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  267. Stuart.Jamieson (talk · contribs) Editor for 5 years, 3,000 edits primarily article expansion, subject researching and page creation. highbeam access would help with those cases where sources for expansion arent immediately available.. Stuart.Jamieson (talk) 21:06, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  268. Danhash (talk · contribs) – I have edited a wide variety of articles (~5000 edits) and intend to continue contributing, specifically in subjects such as software, multimedia technology, electronics, and psychological conditions. —danhash (talk) 21:09, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  269. Pyrrhus16 (talk · contribs) English Wikipedia. Over 3 years experience, 17,000+ edits, content-related work (creation, expansion, verification) on music and entertainment articles, where access to Highbeam would be useful. Pyrrhus16 21:13, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  270. Axl (talk · contribs) English Wikipedia. I have been editing for several years. I specialize in WikiProject Medicine. Axl ¤ [Talk] 21:18, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  271. Muboshgu (talk · contribs) English Wikipedia. Editing for at least six years, over 70,000 edits to date. I work on baseball, US history and politics mostly. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:24, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  272. MBisanz (talk · contribs) English Wikipedia. 100,000+ edits over 5+ years. I do architecture and education. I could use HighBeam access, but don't absolutely need it, so feel free to give others priority. MBisanz talk 21:52, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  273. User:Fredddie English Wikipedia. 7 years of experience, over 16,000 edits. I edit primarily highway articles, but I also dabble in Iowa-related articles. –Fredddie™ 22:36, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  274. User:Noetica Active on English Wikipedia since 2005. Edits around 10,000 (I go for quality, not quantity); main interests are in development of style guidelines and associated policy; content interests include classical music, philosophy, neuroscience, and linguistics. NoeticaTea? 22:41, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  275. Joe Decker (talk · contribs) 7 years, 24,000+ edits/sysop on ENWIKI. Primary content work is adding sources to unreferenced BLPs, have often had to glimpse what I can via Google snippets of highbeam research to do that work, this would be a real help. Not available to me through local sources. I do a fair bit (as editor and sysop both) at AfD, and there'd be cases where I could put this tool to good use there as well. --joe deckertalk to me 23:50, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  276. User:Yaksar. English Wikipedia since 2007, some work on Wikimedia commons. My main focus is on government articles, but I frequently work on food topics and other subjects. I've created articles like Hugo Rogers and James R. Whelan. Highbeam would help with many political articles, in addition to helping with sourcing for articles at AfD.--Yaksar (let's chat) 23:52, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  277. User:SkyMachine English Wikipedia. Had account ~3 years, active largely for the last year, 3100+ edits. Interested in science topics, origins, popular science publications, and literature. Having full text access to journal articles through Highbeam will be very helpful to my editing. SkyMachine (++) 00:16, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  278. User:BabelStone English Wikipedia, 3 years, 4,000 edits, 39 DYKs. BabelStone (talk) 00:26, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  279. CennoxX German Wikipedia since 2010, some 8.000 edits, editing mainly articles about movies and television.--CennoxX (talk) 00:51, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  280. Ezhuttukari Malayalam Wikipedia. Over 7000 edits In various subjects, mainly content generation. Sysop In Malayalam Wikipedia. These days, Physics and Electronics are mainly focused. --Ezhuttukari (talk) 01:47, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  281. Rajesh K Odayanchal : Malayalam Wikipedia. I have been editing in Malayalam Wikipedia for past 4 years, I engage in content-related work like creation, expansion, verification, article rescue etc and now mainly focused on the designing work for Wikimedia projects... I think that HighBeam access would help me a lot. Rajesh K Odayanchal (talk) 02:20, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  282. Kannan shanmugam : Malayalam Wikipedia. I have been editing in Malayalam Wikipedia for past 3 years, over 3000 edits and 1000 photographs. I think that HighBeam access would help me a lot.--Fotokannan (talk) 03:00, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  283. TheCatalyst31 English Wikipedia administrator, active since 2007, over 31,000 edits. I mostly work on geography (especially communities), highways, and historic places; I also try to find sources for AfD and unsourced articles. Most of my editing would be aided by access to local news articles, though since I have access to a different database right now, feel free to pass over me if there are too many applicants. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 03:30, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  284. 25or6to4 English Wikipedia. Main editing done on highways and historic places. Would use access to fill in gaps in the histories of highways and locations. 25or6to4 (talk) 04:12, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  285. User:Bruce1ee. Over 7 years on the English Wikipedia with over 40,000 edits; active on the DYK Project; 71 DYK creation/expansion credits, 8 GA promotion credits, many other content creations and expansions. I do not have access to HighBeam, and would use it to find reliable sources for music and literature related articles. —Bruce1eetalk 05:18, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  286. Aalfons German Wikipedia since 2007, 12k edits, some 50 new articles, 2 FAs, mostly working on biographies, verifications and help pages. Aalfons (talk) 05:28, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  287. User:Huntster. English Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons. Been here since 2004 with 27,000 edits. I anticipate using an account for research in astronomy topics. — Huntster (t @ c) 05:29, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  288. Dwaipayan. Nearly 7 years in English wikipedia with over 19,000 edits. Have been involved in 5 successful featured article candidacies, several good article nominees and reviews. Many other content creation including multiple new articles, mostly related to India. The HighBeam account will be instrumental in finding and citing reliable sources.--Dwaipayan (talk) 05:32, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  289. Rameshng. Actively involved in Wikipedia since 2008. Working mainly in the ml wikipedia, editing, creating articles related Indian Cinema, Culture, Transportation, Food. Over 15000 edits in home wiki and over 25K edits globally. Active in commons with more than 4000 media uploads. Heard about high beam and looks like I can get real good reference for making the articles richer. --Rameshng (talk) 06:34, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  290. Fram. Over 100,000 edits, created over 1,000 articles, mainly biographies of artists, early printers, and the like. Access to more and better reliable sources would be a huge bonus. Fram (talk) 06:41, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  291. Kropotkine_113 Active on fr.wikipedia.org for 6 years. 40.000+ edits, 300+ created articles. I work on artists biographies. I used to work on 18th-19th centuries scientists biographies but I stopped due to lack of reliable sources. Kropotkine 113 (talk) 07:31, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  292. AFBorchert Active on de.wikipedia.org for nearly 7 years, 22.000+ edits in all projects, c. 100 created articles including four with GA status at de-wp, mainly in the area of Irish history. --AFBorchert (talk) 07:51, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  293. Olaf Kosinsky German Wikipedia since 2009, 5k edits, also WikiCommons, mostly working on politics and history. --Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 08:11, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  294. Tschaensky German Wikipedia since 2005. More than 15.000 edits and over 1.000 articles created, mainly on winter sports. Over 1.300 photos for Commons. --Tschaensky (talk) 09:17, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  295. Symac french wikipedian since 2004, 20.000+ edits. Symac (talk) 09:41, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  296. Thomas7 German Wikipedia since 2004, works on Iran, Berlin, computer science, cryptography, meta. >25.000+ edits. ThomasPia (talk) 10:09, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  297. Kernel Saunters English Wikipedia and Commons. Have > 74,000 edits. Access would be extremely useful as it provides access to media sources that are hard to access by other means. Will prove invaluable in my editing of recent British history including obits Kernel Saunters (talk) 10:25, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  298. --Itu (talk) 10:28, 4 April 2012 (UTC) [7] Sources are essential[reply]
  299. User:Steven Zhang. 25k plus edits, mainly on en-wiki. Having access to this would help me expand articles I work on that lack referenced material available on the web, or content that has fallen offline (such as archived newspapers). Steven Zhang DR goes to Wikimania! 11:00, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  300. User: Netha Hussain : English Wikipedia, Malayalam Wikipedia and Commons Have 2000+ edits in all projects. Interested in editing articles related to medicine, surgery, pathology and pharmacology. --Netha Hussain (talk) 11:06, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  301. User:bwmoll3 English Wikipedia. 97000+ edits since Jan. 2006. History of the United States Air Force Bwmoll3 (talk) 11:32, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  302. User:Indif French WP. 14600+ edits since 2004. Interested in the history of the Maghreb. --Indif (talk) 12:32, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  303. User:Willking1979 English Wikipedian since 2008, 36,000+ live edits. Administrator, OTRS volunteer. Interested in Kentucky-related articles. Willking1979 (talk) 14:26, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  304. User:Dougweller English Wikipedia since April 2006, 77,000 edits, Administrator, OTRS volunteer, mainly working with articles to do with archaeology and history. I've trialled HighBeam and it's great, but the cost is too much for me to justify. Dougweller (talk) 14:39, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  305. Leaky Caldron English WP since 2006. 8300 edits. Interested in UK politics and local history where access to historical newspaper sources would be beneficial. Leaky Caldron 14:47, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  306. User:Carolmooredc English Wikipedia since 2006, 18,500+ edits. Political, law, civil liberties, foreign policy issues; GLAM work; Gender gap work; variety of biographies of living people. Also ongoing Outreach/Training (including WP:Workshop and WP:Workshop for Women) to improve education of users. Have used and appreciate Highbeam but cannot afford. CarolMooreDC 14:49, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  307. User:The-Pope. English wikipedia. >40,000 edits, lots of work on unreferenced biographies of living people and other biographies. Intend to continue to keep CAT:BLP low. The-Pope (talk) 15:30, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  308. User:Malik Shabazz. English Wikipedia. 60,000 edits since 2006. I write on a variety of subjects related to African Americans, Jews, and Israel-Palestine. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 15:53, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  309. User:Ronz. English Wikipedia. 64,000 edits since 2006. I edit a wide range of articles, focusing on changing promotional material into more encyclopedic content. --Ronz (talk) 16:21, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  310. User:Nihonjoe. English Wikipedia, around 100,000 edits, created over 600 articles, mostly Japan-related. I'd use the access to continue improving those articles as well as any others I came across. I should note that Japan-related articles are not the only ones I work on, just a primary focus. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 16:25, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  311. User:Nableezy. English Wikipedia, around 24K edits, created several articles. Interested in international relations and Islamic architecture. nableezy - 16:29, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  312. User:Morbidthoughts. Mostly to shore up RS for biographies with notability concerns. Morbidthoughts (talk) 17:17, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  313. User:Anthonyhcole English Wikipedia, 14K edits since 2006, created a few medical articles and patrol recent changes to medical articles. --Anthonyhcole (talk) 17:22, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  314. user:Raul654, english Wikipedia, around 60k edits last time I checked. I run the featured article process. I'm active in identifying and creating missing encyclopedia articles. (Wikipedia:ACF Regionals answers, Wikipedia:Stanford Archive answers,, etc) Raul654 (talk) 17:28, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  315. User:PKM English Wikipedia and Commons, 19K edits in WP and 8K in Commons since 2005, active on 16th-19th century people & artists, Pre-Raphaelites/Arts & Crafts Movement, textile arts, fashion. I frequently run into HighBeam articles that would be great sources for work I am doing. PKM (talk) 17:42, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  316. User:Youreallycan - I think the project would benefit if I had one of these accounts. At times I have worked a fair bit with adding and formating citations to uncited content, and an account would also allow me to access and investigate otherwise unaccessible externals used to support disputed content. - Youreallycan 18:01, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  317. User:Paelius — Polish Wikipedia, ca. 6K edits since 2005, created and verified Middle Ages' articles. Continue improving texts about medieval pagan and christian world. — User:Paelius 18:10, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  318. User:Redtigerxyz +30k edits, FA, GA and DYK creation (Hinduism and India), 5 + years--Redtigerxyz Talk 18:18, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  319. User:Volunteer Marek 31,445 edits and 257 articles created. (posted by Malik Shabazz per request)
  320. User:Writegeist, English Wikipedia 4 years, 3,000 edits. Interests: politics, war, automotive, journalistic/literary, historical, etc. Intend continuing in these and other areas. HB archive will be useful for expansion, verification etc. partic. in BLP-related work. Writegeist (talk) 19:14, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  321. User:Sctechlaw, been here several years, some years before that as an IP editor. Have 1500+ edits. I write mostly about law, technology, and art, with a smattering of everything else. I especially focus on sourcing content with citations. My stats Sctechlaw (talk) 19:19, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  322. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing). Editing since 2003, over 80K en-Wikipedia edits; occasional interwiki edits and collaborations.. Wikimedia-UK volunteer. GLAM ambassador, Wikiproject Microformats founder. MonmouthpediA contributor. Regularly add/ improve references using Reflinks, Zotero and other tools. Editing a wide-range of topics, including biographies of ornithologists and other naturalists and artists; artworks; local history. Project requirements noted and I'm happy to comply. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:21, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  323. User:OrenBochman. 2000+ edits on en.wikitionary now active on en.wikipedia meta and books. I am active in art, linguistics, open source. HB will be useful for sourcing. BO; talk 23:12, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  324. User:Figureskatingfan Over 16,000 edits on en.wikipedia since Feb. 2007. I am an active content editor dedicated to obscure articles that often require references from libraries and newspapers. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 23:45, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  325. User:Vsmith English Wikipedia since July 04 - admin since 05, over 100K edits. Focus on geology and geography articles. Live out in the boonies with no access to a good library. Vsmith (talk) 00:15, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  326. User:Kathodonnell. English Wikipedia. I work mostly on Australian music articles, some arts and articles on Australian women, plus a few other topics to a lesser degree - finding references and RS for some of the existing articles + writing new articles for those missing. thanks. Kathodonnell (talk) 01:26, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  327. User:Ganeshk. I have been editing since 2005, have 33000 edits. I also operate a bot, User:Ganeshbot that has created more than 22000 new articles. Could use the research access with Indian history and marine life topics. — Ganeshk (talk) 02:07, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  328. User:Mitchazenia - English Wikipedia admin - I've been editing since November 2005 with 37,000 edits. 14 featured articles, work would go towards my three main topics, roads, railroads and hurricanes. Mitch32(There is a destiny that makes us... family.) 02:51, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  329. jeremyb. English Wikipedia editor. I'll use this account to research the history of timezones and Time in Indiana. P.S. you should change the primary timezone to UTC (or WST) for the links in the "Process" section. You could also provide times in additional timezones or link to a converter with the UTC time prepopulated. Jeremyb (talk) 03:27, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  330. 99of9 English Wikipedia and Commons. Chemistry, physics, and mathematics. Australian geography, biology, history and news. --99of9 (talk) 05:06, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  331. SpeedyGonsales Croatian Wikipedia and Commons, over 21.000 edits. Access to quality resources is always helpful. SpeedyGonsales 05:27, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  332. NCurse work 06:05, 5 April 2012 (UTC) - Over 9000 edits in medical and scientific topics.[reply]
  333. JN466 06:25, 5 April 2012 (UTC) en:WP, de:WP, 45000+ edits; religions, current affairs[reply]
  334. User:Lionelt. English Wikipedia. My primary topic areas are politics and Christianity. Creator of portal:Conservatism and founder of WP:WikiProject Conservatism. 17000 edits, 3 years experience.– Lionel (talk) 06:58, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  335. User:Nug. English Wikipedia. My interest is in the Baltic states, its history, culture and current affairs. Access to HighBeam would be fantastic as it has tons of stuff related to the Baltics, but have been unable to access it. Been editing since 2006, having over 16,000 edits and created over 90 articles. --Nug (talk) 08:33, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  336. User:Ynhockey. Active on the English Wikipedia since late 2004 (admin since 2008), with over 50,000 edits. Interest primary in Middle Eastern history and military history, but also computer science topics. Have written and intend to continue to write articles based on obscure topics with high-quality sources (so far mostly print), for which popular sources don't usually suffice. —Ynhockey (Talk) 10:01, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  337. User:The Four Deuces Editor since 2007 with 1000s of edits. Have created and edited articles primarily in political science, including biographies. Intend to use this resource to start biographies of individuals who are red-linked and expand stub biographies where little free on-line material is available. TFD (talk) 10:56, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  338. User:Itti Active on the de.Wikipedia since 2005 with 15000 edits. Interests: politics, art, historical, etc. HB archive will be useful for expansion, verification etc. --Itti (talk) 11:13, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  339. User:Djembayz. English Wikipedia since 2010, 4,300 edits. Write articles for WikiProject Ships; add citations, expand/format GLAM/Smithsonian articles, rural areas, 1930s; add categories on Commons. Have focused on pre-1923 sailing ships due to copyright restrictions; would like to move into some more current (and more widely read) topics.Djembayz (talk) 12:29, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  340. User:Touchatou Mainly French (also English) Wikipedia since Jan. 2009. Mainly academic articles on economics, sociology, demography, politics, history, statistics, mathematics, science and some weird topics. Avid user of academic articles. Touchatou (talk) 12:37, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  341. Morray Mainly on de, but also smaller contributions on different languages. Focused mainly on topics of natural sciences but also random other topics. --Morray (talk)
  342. Baba Tabita, bureaucrat at Swahili Wikipedia; 32,000+ edits since April 2006; content creation, expansion and referencing, esp. on biographies (20th century scientists, politicians and literary writers) and on Subsaharan African languages and literatures; access would be highly appreciated for both of these fields. --Baba Tabita (talk) 13:32, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  343. Floydian, English Wikipedia since 2003. Primarily focused on the history of civic infrastructure and geography, also dabbling into music, chemicals and medicine. - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ τ ¢ 13:44, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  344. User:WLU, English Wikipedia since 2006, 48,000 edits since then, I check sources, citegnome, expand content and dabble on noticeboards on a variety of content pages. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:simple/complex 14:11, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  345. KWa, mainly active on the German-language Wikipedia, had five featured articles on the German Wikipedia since 2005 and some 3.200 edits. Primarily focused on theatre and literature history and research, also working on music and architecture. --83.246.65.143 (talk) 14:14, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  346. QuasyBoy (talk · contribs), active on English Wikipedia since 2006, well over a thousand edits. I mostly create and edit entertainment articles. QuasyBoy 14:42, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  347. User:Petri Krohn, started editing in 2005, about 60,000 edits in all Wikimedia projects. -- Petri Krohn (talk) 15:44, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  348. User:Amartyabag, an editor in English Wikipedia since 2005 with 8000 edits. Primarily focused on creating content, referencing works related to Protected areas in India, Geography, etc. with top contributors in FA's like West Bengal, Kolkata, ex-FA's like Kaziranga National Park. Amartyabag TALK2ME 16:08, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  349. User:Guillaume2303, started 2007, 70,000+ edits on en.WP. Occasionally have the need for something in Highbeam, but if there are more editors wanting this resource than there are accounts available, don't include me in the random "lottery" :-) --Guillaume2303 (talk) 16:33, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  350. Postdlf (talk · contribs), active on English Wikipedia since 2003, over 69,000 edits. I have created many articles on animal species, some of which are rare/obscure/recently described and difficult to find free papers about online. I also have created a lot of articles on U.S. law and court cases, for which access to scholarly journal articles would be invaluable because very little is free online aside from the primary source materials and mainstream news. Other interests include biographies of artists and politicians. #postdlf (talk) 16:40, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  351. User:Tito Dutta Psychology, Indian history, biography related articles. If this Highbeam helps in research works that'll be great. They allow 7 days free trial in their site, but, I have not tried that. Have more than 5000 edits. --Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 16:46, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  352. User:MeegsC, English Wikipedia since 2007, 12,000+ edits, primarily in bird-related articles. This would be particularly useful for new article research and for improving referencing in existing articles; I spend a fair bit of time doing the latter for articles on the WP:BIRDS cleanup listing, but am unable to access some references due to expensive paywalls. MeegsC | Talk 17:05, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  353. User:Mojoworker English Wikipedia and Commons. Active since 2007 in a variety of topics mainly in WP:MILHIST. In serious need of something to suplement the Google News Archive which seems not to work as well as it used to.
  354. Seduisant. English Wikipedia, active since 2005. Contributions chiefly to articles about felids, and creation/maintenance of articles about little-known people, animals, and events. HighBeam would aid in sourcing these efforts. --Seduisant (talk) 17:19, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  355. Rufous-crowned Sparrow. English Wikipedia and a bit of Commons. 8000 edits since 2006 leading to 5 FAs, 3 FLs, 9 current GAs, and 13 DYKs. While at a university, it does not offer HighBeam and I don't have summer access to the subscriptions it does provide. Mostly bird articles, although I may be start on some of the more odd and ancient bony fishes soon. Rufous-crowned Sparrow (talk) 17:28, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  356. Pete Tillman. Active since 2008, currently among the 4000 most active editors. I would use the account for technical reports -- I contribute regularly to Geoscience , Atmospheric and Spacce Science articles. --Pete Tillman (talk) 18:43, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  357. User:Gsingh. Have 2500+ edits on the EN wikipedia, been an editor since 2005. Would use this for adding sources for articles about Punjab (India) Politics, Canadian Politics, and anything within the scope of WP:DENTISTRY. Gsingh (talk) 17:54, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  358. User:Gregbard English Wikipedia. 6 years contributing. 50000+ edits. I work mainly in the area of philosophy, and especially logic, both very underrepresented areas. I am not affiliated with any university currently. I rely mainly on my own personal library and online sources. I am very involved with the all aspects of WikiProject Philosophy.Greg Bard (talk) 18:08, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  359. User:David Eppstein. English Wikipedia, Admin. Over 56k edits, over 5 years experience. Primary areas of interest are mathematics, computer science, academic biography, and California geography. This access looks particularly useful for biography (e.g. newspaper obituary) and geography sourcing. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:15, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  360. User:Incnis Mrsi. English Wikipedia, 2,141 edits in the article space (to 1,655 distinct pages). Occasionally active in other Wikimedia projects (e.g. Commons and, formerly, Russian Wikipedia) with 15,000+ edits in total. 6 years experience. Crazed with improving the quality, not of some chosen set of articles, but of Wikipedia as a whole. I intend to use HighBeam for improving articles on science, information technology and occasionally other topics such as history. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 18:25, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  361. User:Goethean. I've been an editor of the English Wikipedia for eight years and nine months. I have made 34,109 edits (21,810 edits in article space) to 5,199 distinct pages. I am the creator of 109 new articles. HighBeam would be very helpful to me in improving articles on philosophy, religion, literature, politics. — goethean ॐ 18:45, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  362. User:Ben MacDui. Five plus years of editing, Five FAs, 8 FLS, 27 GAs, mostly interested in Scottish history and geography. English Wikipedia admin with c. 33,000 edits. Ben MacDui 19:01, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  363. User:Tryptofish. Editor on English Wikipedia since 2008, over 23,000 edits, very involved in content creation and sourcing. --Tryptofish (talk) 19:05, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  364. User:dger Wikipedian for over 3 years with over 10,000 edits on English wikipedia and over a 1000 uploads on Wikipedia commons. I work mainly on nature and science oriented articles. I would like an account to access biology related journals. Dger (talk) 20:06, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  365. User:Andrew Dalby. Editor on Latin, English and French Wikipedias since 2006, admin on Latin, about 110,000 edits in total. Creating and improving articles in biography, history (especially medieval and ancient), literature. Andrew Dalby 20:09, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  366. First Light Editor on English Wikipedia for four years, 18,000 edits, mostly content, 3 GAs, 25 DYKs. No local library (to speak of) or university access. First Light (talk) 20:14, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  367. Shannon1 Been editing since 2009 – 1 FA, 13 GAs, 21,000 edits, mostly in geography/civil engineering. I have an interest in journals/articles of that sort. Shannºn 20:16, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  368. Mr. Stradivarius. I have been editing Wikipedia actively since Octobter 2010, wtih 14,000+ edits. I am primarily interested in applied linguistics articles, and I also help out with general article improvement and sourcing. I would particularly like to have access to the linguistics resources that HighBeam offers. — Mr. Stradivarius ♫ 20:40, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  369. Asad112 Had an account with Wikipedia since 2006, been active since 2010. Would love the use of the tool to be able to consolidate research and sources. -asad (talk) 21:24, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  370. Jiujitsuguy. Active member since 2009 with over 4,000 edits. Created nine articles and expanded several stubs. I have an interest in military history with an emphasis on the Baltic and Middle East regions.--Jiujitsuguy (talk) 22:11, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  371. User:Maky. English Wikipedia, Commons. I write FA-quality articles about lemurs and related topics. I intend to continue researching and writing about lemurs, and possibly fossil primtes. – Maky « talk » 23:27, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  372. User:SatuSuro. Editing over 5 years, over 80k of edits, across diverse projects and subjects - very interested in checking for areas where extra ref sources can make the difference in the quality of the Wp en experience SatuSuro 23:54, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  373. mgiganteus1 (talk). Been an active editor for more than 6 years. 55k edits or so, including several hundred new article contributions. Main areas of interest are botany and zoology. mgiganteus1 (talk) 01:33, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  374. Wasted Time R. Have been an active editor for over 7 years, with 60,000 edits. Have 6 FA, 36 GA, and 48 DYK to my name, with many other article creations. Primary topics are politics, history, and music, but have touched other topics as well. I do heavy amounts of historical research and writing and have frequently run into source material within HighBeam, and having a full access account would be very, very useful. Wasted Time R (talk) 01:42, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  375. Glimmer721: Joined May 2010 and over 9,000 edits, contributed to 15 passed good articles so far, two books and 13 TV episodes. I believe I could use HighBeam to find sources and especially reviews of older novels and TV episodes, as my major contributions have often been limited to things that have been released recently. Glimmer721 talk 01:46, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  376. Maias. Active editor for 5+ years with c.45k edits and 1000+ new articles. Main interests: biology, history and biography. Maias (talk) 01:55, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  377. Arbitrarily0 - On the English Wikipedia I have been an active contributor since 2008, and an administrator since 2009. Some of my past and future research interests lie in physics and mechanical engineering. I am also active on Wikimedia Commons. Thanks for this opportunity, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 01:58, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  378. User:JoannaSerah: English Wikipedia. Joined March 3, 2006; over 13,000 edits. Primary focus is poetry/literature, politics and North & South Carolina. Have created a few articles, but mostly spend time expanding existing articles -- JoannaSerah (talk) 02:01, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  379. User:Supreme Deliciousness: English Wikipedia. Joined May 29, 2009; over 16,000 edits. Been active on the site since registration. Have created some articles. Mostly edit articles related to the Middle East and its history. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 02:50, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  380. Mr.Atoz English Wikipedia. Joined October 2007. Working on Georgia Hospitals Template and improving the Hospitals in Georgia List Mr.Atoz (talk) 03:34, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  381. User:Severo. English Wikipedia since July 2006, somewhere over 100,000 edits. I work on recent but pre-internet history of sports and in particular cycling. SeveroTC 05:33, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  382. User:Hallows AG English Wikipedia since July 2011. 13000 edits. I do vandalism work and additions to articles about countries.--Hallows Aktiengesellschaft (talk) 05:58, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  383. User:Centovalli German Wikipedia since 2010, with emphasis on motorcycles. --Centovalli (talk) 09:47, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  384. Joe Roe. Registered in 2005 but not really active editing until late 2010, just over 4000 edits. I mainly work on archaeology and indigenous rights articles but I've found since I graduated and lost access to my university's library and journal subscriptions it's been a lot harder to write new content. Hopefully this can fill the gap. joe•roet•c 09:51, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  385. User:Gripweed. Editor and administrator of the German speaking Wikipedia. More than 40.000 edits in 6 years. I'm interested in all kinds of articles. My emphasis now is the subject Outlaw motorcycle clubs, but I'm also interested in popular music and biographies of not-so-well-known persons. --Gripweed (talk) 10:49, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  386. User:Snowmanradio. I have been editing here for more than six years, and I have made more than 76,000 edits on the English Wikipedia and more than 48,000 edits on Commons. Snowman (talk) 11:57, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  387. User:Le_Deluge. 1994 edits in mainspace, 3973 in total since Jan 2009. I tend to flit around a bit, doing a lot of tidying work across the board; most of the articles I bump into on Highbeam relate to Scottish culture and history.Le Deluge (talk) 13:46, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  388. User:Density. German Wikipedia, more than 25.000 edits since 2005, with emphasis on classical music and natural sciences. --Density (talk) 15:47, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  389. Bronto, Slovak Wikipedia, more than 104.000 edits since 2004 16:03 6 April 2012 (UTC)
  390. User:Albacore. English Wikipedia. Over 5,000 edits, with 17 DYKs and eight featured lists. Would use to expand and reference sports stubs. Albacore (talk) 16:37, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  391. User:NSH001. very nearly 10k edits on en:wp, approaching 1k on other-langauge wikis, 7 DYKs so far. Heavily content-oriented, strong emphasis on quality over quantity. Wide range of topics but including biographies of scientists, Quakers and antiwar activists, middle east politics. NSH001 (talk) 17:04, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  392. user:Shrike English Wikipedia. 3200+ edits since May. 2006. Mainly interested in Middle east history.So I want to use the account to improve the references there. --Shrike (talk) 18:08, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  393. user:Rlbberlin German Wikipedia editor since 2006; >12.000 edits; editing art history --Rlbberlin (talk) 21:16, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  394. user:Vasiľ, Slovak Wikipedia, 5 years, more than 80 000 edits. Vasiľ (talk) 22:05, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  395. user:Nelliette, Slovak Wikipedia, 3 years, 10 373 edits.--Nelliette (talk) 23:19, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  396. User:Michael Fleischhacker, German Wikipedia, almost 2 years, 10,000+ edits, mainly Austrian-related topics, history, politics etc. --Michael Fleischhacker (talk) 23:49, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  397. User:Edinburgh Wanderer, English Wikipedia over 26,00 edits joined March 2008. Edits mainly in football, Scotland and theatre. Edinburgh Wanderer 00:12, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  398. user:14nu5, Slovak Wikipedia, 3 years, 8 200+ edits. I write articleas about ancient history (esp. ancient Egypt) and occulture. — 14nu5 (talk) 00:34, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  399. user:GFHandel. About 6,500 edits in almost 4.5 years (with 63% in article space). I've added about 100 articles to en.WP, and plan to add many more in the area of music. Having access to better research material will assist me greatly in that endeavour. GFHandel ♬  00:39, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  400. User:Donlammers. Not quite 11,000 edits in a bit over 2.5 years. I was going to skip this offer until I just ran into yet another case of Highbeam saving a dead link. Don Lammers (talk) 01:43, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  401. User:Vecrumba. EN wikipedia. Editing focused primarily on history, modern European geopolitics with focus on Eastern Europe and Russia; diaspora studies; miltary history; race and intelligence. 7+ years, 17,000+ edits. VєсrumЬа ►TALK 02:01, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  402. User:Juliancolton. enwiki and commons mainly. About 150,000 edits cross-wiki, written/contributed to something like 30 FAs and 100 GAs, been editing for four or five years now. Mostly intend to utilize newspaper archives for research in historic meteorological events. Juliancolton (talk) 03:09, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  403. Acroterion, 6 years, enwiki admin, more than 100,000 edits, 2 GAs, something over 1000 new articles. Concentration on architecture, historical structures, military architecture, protected natural and historical areas. Acroterion (talk) 03:18, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  404. User:Worm That Turned. enwiki admin, 4 years, 10k edits, 7 GAs. I've got my eye on a few series of articles, primarily food and drink, which I've already started working on and hope to progress this year. WormTT · (talk) 08:07, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  405. User:Colonel Warden Active content creator and improver for 5+ years now. Warden (talk) 10:47, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  406. User:Xavxav Registered in 2008 on the French Wikipedia but really active since december 2011 (this is why I have slightly less than 1000 edits, I hope I still can qualify). Interested in economics and sociology. Always keen on searching Google Books and Google Scholar for any additional sources to improve Wikipedia. Xavxav (talk) 13:25, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  407. R8R Gtrs English (in future possibly Russian) Wiki, ~2.5 years, focus on chemical elements articles (see fluorine for example--even this is not the end!), would appreciate the journal articles database access. Not much in quantity of edits (although I do have the required 1,000 in the article space alone), but they are often more productive than usual.--R8R Gtrs (talk) 13:36, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  408. User:MishaKeats Way, way, below the 1,000 edits, but thought I'd give it a shot anyway. Teaching and writing experience in politics and music. As I gradually learn to control my fear of HTML, I'll be able to increase my contribution rate.--Misha Atreides (talk) 15:06, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  409. User:Orderinchaos Admin on English Wikipedia, and have had my account for over 6 years. Have over 66,000 edits to the encyclopaedia including 34,366 edits to mainspace (according to X!'s Edit Counter), one FA and several GAs, and am active in content generation, research and content verification across a range of Australian topics including politics, history and demography. Many of the sources I need are simply not available through my limited student access. Orderinchaos 15:41, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  410. User:Kvng English Wikipedia. I work on technical articles, specifically audio, electrical engineering and networking. History includes adding and verification of references. --Kvng (talk) 17:00, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  411. Pburka English Wikipedia. ~7500 edits since 2005. Active in WP:UBLPR and creating WP:DCB article. Pburka (talk) 18:07, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  412. Orenburg1 English Wikipedia. ~8000 edits since 2009. Active on WP Sciuridae and copyediting/verification. WP email enabled. Do not have access to journal/scientific databases which would be very useful. Orenburg1 (talk) 21:30, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  413. Blue Elf Admin on Norwegian (bokmål) Wikipedia. Since 2005 52,000+ edits of which 44,000+ on no-wiki. Sports, geography, some music and history. Categorizing, correcting language, content verification. Blue Elf (talk) 21:51, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  414. User:Saedon English Wikipedia. I edit a lot of articles that deal with WP:FRINGE theories and many of these subjects are difficult to source. Note that this account is relatively new as I recently retired my main account User:Noformation which had upwards of 7000 edits and was registered (IIRC) in 2007. SÆdontalk 23:53, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  415. Toll Booth Willie English Wikipedia. About 2,300 edits, joined 2006. Main sphere of editing is the history of newspapers and newspaper companies in the USA, Canada, Spain and the Caribbean. Other topics I envision editing this year include local politics of New England, journalism in other Spanish-speaking areas, and 19th century baseball. Have access to Massachusetts newspaper archives but other states', plus business and trade journals, would be very useful. ``` t o l l ` b o o t h ` w i l l i e `` $1.25 PLEASE ``` 00:17, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  416. User:Yobol English Wikipedia. Active in medical articles. Yobol (talk) 00:21, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  417. User:Saehrimnir. I am mostly aktiv in German Wikipedia but likely to ramp up in the english as well in the near futur. I mostly work on science related Artikles but also scientist Biographies and science history were this would come quiet handy.--Saehrimnir (talk) 00:39, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  418. User:Lothar von Richthofen. English Wikipedia mostly, occasionally Commons, a smattering of edits at German Wikipedia. Over 10,000 edits at en-wp since March 2009. Lots of copyediting, some translation and content creation work in the area of military history and European topics. Content creation has been hindered thus far by limited access to sources; have plans to get Wikipedia:WikiProject Frisia on the map over the summer by improving articles up to GA or higher. This would help greatly with both. ~~ Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 00:50, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  419. User:Askedonty. French Wikipedia, here 1k restricting to articles. Write or translate history and describe systems. I'm interested into archives for both and cross-checking. -- Askedonty (talk) 02:54, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  420. User:Karl.brown. English wikipedia. about 1500 edits. some gnome stuff, category reorganization, and research on health, health systems, health informatics articles. --Karl.brown (talk) 04:02, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  421. User:Gnangarra 20k+ en edits since mid 2005, editted across a broad article subject matter including some FA's, primary use would be related BLP issues and as an reviewer of FAC to explore additional sourcing. Gnangarra 04:33, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  422. User:Estlandia mostly on English Wikipedia, 9000+ edits since October 2008, started 80 articles, content creation mostly on Russian history and politics, gnomish activities on world political parties.Estlandia (dialogue) 08:52, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  423. User:Matthiasb. German Wikipedia, some 40,000+ in article name space. Mostly edits on geography, natural disasters and In the news topics, many translations of NRHP articles. The account wold be used to improve articles on those topics. --Matthiasb (talk) 09:28, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  424. User:Acadēmica Orientālis. I registered as user:Miradre in October 2010 but had to create a new account in February 2012 due to losing my passwords due to hard drive failure. 2000+ edits since that date alone (content creation, expansion, verification) with emphasis on evolutionary psychology and China. I research and add numerous scholarly and other sources to Wikipedia so access to HighBeam would be useful. Acadēmica Orientālis (talk) 12:25, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  425. User:Philaweb. 18,000+ edits in 5+ years with 1,000+ articles created on the English Wikipedia. 8,000+ edits in 5+ years with 1,400+ articles created on the Danish Wikipedia. Content creation mainly in the context of WikiProject Latvia on both wikipedias. Would like to find sources that can enable expansion of created articles and new articles within the field of European geography and history-related articles. Talk/♥фĩłдωəß♥\Work 13:45, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  426. User:Neotarf. While I am a somewhat newer user than preferred, I am placing my request here in case there are extra subscriptions available. Like many newer users, I prefer creating new content to maintaining existing articles. My first article, although still in somewhat rough form, has already gotten 700-some hits in less than two months, and the topic has since been covered by the English-speaking mainstream media for the first time, in part, I believe, because of the extensive sourcing I did on the article. In the near future, I plan to write about several contemporary artists. My main interests are human rights, the Middle East, and Wikipedia article titling policy. I live in a region where the internet is heavily censored, and have no access to sources outside of the internet. Neotarf (talk) 16:45, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  427. User:Davewild approx 40,000 edits, admin from 2007, HighBeam would be very useful on the election and current affairs articles I usually edit/create. Davewild (talk) 18:29, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  428. User:Kyteto. Unrestricted access to this large archive would be greatly appreciated in my chosen field of interest, overhauling and refitting aircraft articles, in coordination with WP:Aircraft. Over the last four years I have worked extensively on many articles to improve content quality and especially verification, I feel I have made a real difference to 30-40 or so articles, which I have linked on my userpage for prosterity. I plan to be heavily editing more articles in the future, and another tool in my arsenal would enable my efforts to go further and add more to these articles. On countless research runs on different aviation matters I have encountered Highbeam articles, it would be far easier to use and incorperate them as sources if I could actually view the majority of the content instead of a restricted preview. Kyteto (talk) 18:32, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  429. User:Teslaton. Slovak Wikipedia, 4 years, 1000+ local/2000+ global edits. IT/electric.eng. In fact, more technical editing, than real copywriting, but yet access can be useful from time to time… --Teslaton (talk) 19:22, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  430. Adam Zábranský. Czech Wikipedia, almost 4 years, 13000+ edits. I'm content creator (13 GA), I write mostly about science, interesting people and Middle Eastern states. --Adam Zábranský (talk) 20:32, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  431. Jaan. English Wikipedia. 14,000 edits, mostly creating or editing content. Have created 66 articles. The main topics are and will be history and geography of Estonia and pop music of the 1960s. Jaan Pärn (talk) 20:50, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  432. January. Editor since 2009, 19,000 edits, 12 DYKs and 1 GA. January (talk) 21:27, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  433. Girlwithgreeneyes Editor since 2009. 2,900 edits. Girlwithgreeneyes (talk) 22:26, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  434. Berita German Wikipedia, active since 2008, > 3,000 edits.--Berita (talk) 22:33, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  435. L.tak English wikipedia (officially dutch wikipedia as home wikipedia, but not many edits there), with >5000 edits; editing since 2007 I believe. Various interests (dutch subjects; identity documents; treaties) and looking forward to using/evaluating this as a sourcing opportunity. L.tak (talk) 22:58, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  436. sephia karta | dimmi 00:03, 9 April 2012 (UTC) > 3000 edits, active since 2006, mostly with Wikipedia:WikiProject Abkhazia, mostly interested in news wires from the nineties & noughties.[reply]
  437. jc37 - En.Wikipedia administrator. Over 6 years, 30k+ edits. This would be helpful to check references. As for me, I have multiple interests (several noted at User:jc37/Userboxes). - jc37 00:29, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  438. Sasata – I meet the qualifications and do not have access through my university account. Sasata (talk) 02:21, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  439. User:Cloveapple. English Wikipedia. 3,500+ edits. There are some articles I'm having trouble referencing that this would be a help on. I've added references to some poorly referenced articles and helped to improve a few that were up for deletion. Cloveapple (talk) 02:58, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  440. User:TonyTheTiger. English Wikipedia. Nearly 200,000 edits. I write University of Michigan- and Chicago-related biographies often about athletes. I also write about a lot of sports teams for the University and City. I intend to do broad and general research largely focused on these areas. I also have lately begun writing old television epsisodes. I have a wide variety of other editorial interests but these are my focuses.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:11, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  441. User:Biosketch – English Wikipedia; 4,500+ edits; member of WikiProject Companies, where HighBeam articles are an exceedingly valuable resource; have created 40 articles, of which several were DYKs.—Biosketch (talk) 07:33, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  442. User:stone – English Wikipedia; Improved most of the GA chemical elements articles. (Chromium, Nickel, Potassium ....) --Stone (talk) 09:03, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  443. HaeB - Active since 2003 on the English Wikipedia (over 19000 live edits) and German Wikipedia (over 35000), frequently checking changes to articles on my watchlist, verifying and adding sources. Thanks! Regards, HaeB (talk) 09:10, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  444. Armbrust - Active since December 2008 on the English Wikipedia with over 100,000 edits. Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 10:58, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  445. User:Markus Schulenburg - English Wikipedia ~150 Edits and German Wikipedia ~10000 (home wiki), frequently checking changes to articles on my watchlist, verifying and adding sources. Thanks! Regards, --Markus S. (talk) 12:23, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  446. Regiomontanus (talk) German Wikipedia (sometimes en), active since 2004, ~31.000 edits de. Topics: biology, geology, archeology. Quality checks and improvement of various articles. --Regiomontanus (talk) 12:50, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  447. User:Viridiscalculus. Over 6000 edits in close to 2 1/2 years in the English Wikipedia, almost all of it related to the U.S. Roads WikiProject. I intend to use the service to research the history of highways in Maryland and other states, and help other editors who are doing the same.  VC  13:02, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  448. User:Nanobear. I've been active since late 2007, have performed over 12000 edits, created over 80 articles and authored 13 DYKs. I always do a lot of research for my content contributions, and I'm always in need of more sources. Nanobear (talk) 17:33, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  449. User:Duschgeldrache2. I'm writing mainly in German Wikipedia (sometimes also in Commmons) and I'm active there under this account since February 2007 with nearly 5000 edits, writing in different fields. Since 2010 I'm servicing the German Wikipedia's Faroe Islands portal. --Duschgeldrache2 (talk) 18:31, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  450. User:Taylornate. Active in Project Medicine. I mainly concentrate on articles related to plastic / reconstructive surgery and hand surgery.--Taylornate (talk) 18:51, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  451. Pmlineditor - Primarily Simple Wikipedia, 4 FAs and 7 GAs there plus 150+ created articles and 3 GAs here. Admin on four content projects. 3 years active with 30k+ edits. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 18:54, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  452. User:Puffin. Active on the English Wikipedia for over a year, 13,000+ edits, improved Djungarian hamster to GA standard and hoping to improve many rodent related articles in the future. Puffin Let's talk! 20:20, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  453. User:raeky Long time wikipedian with many edits. — raekyt 02:38, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Applicants for round 2, April 16th to May 1

These were sent out successfully May 2. A minority of the codes failed to deliver because recipients' email addresses were not enabled. If you didn't get your code, drop a note on my talk page.Ocaasi t | c 16:07, 4 May 2012 (UTC) [reply]

  1. User:Tom harrison, editor since 2004, 43000 edits. Tom Harrison Talk 13:38, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  2. User:Armchair QB. Active on English Wikipedia since May 2009, editing football-related articles (NFL, college football, alternative professional leagues). Armchair QB (talk) 16:14, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  3. User:Nageh – Active on the English Wikipedia for more than 3 year with 4500+ edits. Content contributor to a variety of topics, though with a focus on engineering, mathematics, computer science, and geopolitics. Nageh (talk) 20:57, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  4. I'm about five weeks short of the 1-year requirement, so I'll quite understand if that automatically rules me out, but I have more than 9000 edits in the time I've been here. Access to Highbeam's journal articles would allow me to branch out from my mainly copyediting/gnomish tasks to creating and improving articles on folklore, literature, and social history. George Ponderevo (talk) 22:25, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  5. User:Nerêo - Active on the Spanish Wikipedia since April 11, 2006 with 51943 edits (52245 in all proyects + others users). I created 553 new articles in Spanish Wikipedia (History, Geography, ...)--Nerêo (talk) 23:24, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  6. User:Magister Mathematicae Active on spanish wikipedia, 7 year old contributor with +46000 edits on spanish wikipedia and +27000 edits on english wikipedia. Work on mathematics related articles. Magister Mathematicae (talk) 00:30, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  7. User:Jayjg. Long-time wikipedian, over 100,000 edits. 7 FAs, 8 GAs, many other articles created. Jayjg (talk) 01:51, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  8. User:Montgomery. User of es.Wikipedia since 2006 with up to 35000 edits. I used to verify and expand the content of new articles. Montgomery (talk) 11:01, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  9. User:Kismalac Active on spanish wikipedia, 3 year contributor with +3000 edits, mostly related to physics and mathematics. Kismalac (talk) 11:47, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  10. whpq (talk · contribs) Editor since December 2005, and over 40K edits. I am member of WikiProject Unreferenced articles, and previously worked on Unreferenced BLP Rescue reducing the backlog to zero. -- Whpq (talk) 14:56, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Padraic (talk · contribs) Editor since 2004, 10K global edits, do lots of work adding citations. --Padraic 17:04, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  12. YuMaNuMa (talk · contribs) Account created in December 2010, have been editing since June 2011, I have just under 2000 edits, a large portion of which are article edits. I frequently work on articles of a smaller size thus reliable sources do become quite scarce at times. YuMaNuMa Contrib 17:23, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Uranus95 (talk · contribs) German Wikipedia since 2004, 2000+ edits, i work on the economic history of the twenties and thirties
  14. Bob the WikipediaN (talk • contribs) Veteran editor, class 3 (over 16K edits). My home is in paleobiology, zoology, and mythology.
  15. Tomtomn00 (talk · contribs) English Wikipedia since 2010 (4000+ edits), German Wikipedia, French Wikipedia, Commons, Latvian Wikipedia. When I write articles (around 40-50 now) I always add sources to them, no matter what. I often add sources to unsourced articles, or improve the sources. ~ ⇒TomTomN00 @ 18:41, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 18:53, 11 April 2012 (UTC) - Editing since 2005 in English, Hebrew, Russian, Catalan and Esperanto. Also editing in Wikisource and Wiktionary. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 18:53, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  17. TXiKi - Editing Wikipedia since 2006. Mainly on Basque Wikipedia, but also on Catalan, Spanish, and English Wikipedias. Running interwiki bot (TXiKiBoT) since late 2006. TXiKi (talk) 20:15, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  18. thegreatdr (talk · contribs) English Wikipedia since 2006, (37,000+ edits). Been part of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Tropical cyclones for six years. Thegreatdr (talk) 20:17, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington (talk · contribs), enwp admin/editor since January 2006 with ~15000 edits.
  20. Hemanshu (talk · contribs) - Active editor since 2003, more than 10,000 edits to English wikipedia, started Gujarati & Marathi editions of Wikipedia. --Just my 2 cents -- Hemanshu (talk) 20:21, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  21. --Manjel (talk) 20:31, 11 April 2012 (UTC) German Wikipedia since 2008, more than 3,000 edits[reply]
  22. Philip Cross (talk) 21:31, 11 April 2012 (UTC) on English Wikipedia since October 2004, 48,000 edits, created about 160 articles, mainly work on biographies.[reply]
  23. DarTar. Editing since 2004 on enwiki, itwiki, frwiki, commons, meta, 4.8K global edits, WMF staff and co-editor of the Research Newsletter constantly hitting paywalls since I lost access via academic subscriptions.
  24. Pontificalibus I like to rescue articles tagged for deletion by finding sources, and also expand articles on 19th and early 20th corporations, amongst others, so I think this would be a useful asset for me --Pontificalibus (talk) 22:07, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Calliopejen1 Editor since 2005 (under User:Calliopejen), administrator since 2007, over 70,000 edits with current account. Interested in combatting systemic bias with coverage of topics traditionally of interest to women (e.g. fashion) and coverage of the developing world. Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:12, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  26. John Carter - longtime editor, about 150K total edits, although many of those are minor, interest in developing material on primarily the developing world, religion, and books, on the last particularly which sources available are and are not particularly good, and in what areas. John Carter (talk) 23:50, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  27. 23:52, 11 April 2012 (UTC) Editor since 2004, with an interest in naval history from the early 1900s (or any obscure naval topics). 29,525 edits on this account. Arbitrator emeritus (with all the nonsense that entails). Currently working for Wikimedia UK, organising training sessions for new Wikipedians - and participating in the World War 1 Editathon. My wife is also an administrator on Wikipedia. The Cavalry (Message me) 23:52, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  28. User:Julle About 15K global edits. Do write content, but would mainly use it to source and save notable and verifiable articles that risk deletion because said notability and verifiability haven't been proved. Mainly active on Swedish Wikipedia. /Julle (talk) 00:32, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Ezhiki (talk · contribs). Active since 2004; interested mainly in geography and political structure of Russia. Having access to English-language sources would be invaluable.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); April 12, 2012; 00:49 (UTC)
  30. User:Mrschimpf - Active since May 2005 on en.wiki with over 26,000 edits, would use resources mainly to prop up coverage of media subjects such as television and radio histories which are hard to trace without hours of library and microfilm access. Nate • (chatter) 05:09, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  31. User:Lihaas - First started sometime in 2008 with over 20,000 edits. Mostly work on election articles from around the world, particularly the small countries outside the anglosphere of USA, UK, Canada and Australia and expand stubs to actual content. (See Finnish parliamentary election, 2011 that we almost got to FA.) Also work on current events and expansions beyond stub creations and target DYK as a measure of a good new article. Ive made many articles that went on to global relevance like Tawakel Karman and Movement for Oneness and Jihad in West Africa.Lihaas (talk) 08:53, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  32. User:Dr. Blofeld - Would be useful for a wide range of articles.♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:17, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  33. User:Shivanarayana mostly active on italian wikipedia at present, in the past even on en.wiki with a former nick, mainly interested in history and science, worshiper of WP:CITE--Shivanarayana (talk) 21:20, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  34. User:Roscelese - registered since November 2005, 17K+ edits. My work on political and historical articles, particularly, would benefit from access to the database. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 23:12, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  35. User:RashersTierney - registered since 2007, 17K+ edits so far. Member of WikiProject Ireland (and a few others). Watch for new edits, mostly to ensure refs check out. Sorely miss my post-grad college access to similar databases for reference-checking on the project. RashersTierney (talk) 23:36, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Risker (talk) 03:23, 13 April 2012 (UTC) - Six years, 18K edits, will be useful for the content editing I plan to do in the next few months. Risker (talk) 03:23, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  37. User:Xezbeth - user since 2004, ~47k edits, mainly interested in using it for missing articles on individual species. —Xezbeth (talk) 10:06, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  38. User:Rannpháirtí anaithnid - Account since 2004, active since 2006, ~20k edits. Active in content development, particularly around WikiProject Ireland and in British/Irish areas in general. Verification and understanding of particularly complex and nuanced POV issues is a essential in the main area of my contributions. Access to a library of high-quality (and broad ranging) references such as HighBeam would be an enormous contribution to this area. I would be willing to act on behalf of others (i.e. respond to requests) in sourcing and verifying, if granted access. --RA (talk) 11:33, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  39. User:Hohenloh - 8,679 edits since June 2008 on English-language Wikipedia. Interested in using it for research for articles on general history, medical history, politics and the like. Hohenloh + 16:09, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  40. User:Ched Davis active since 2008, many areas including: history, military, philosophy, sports.
  41. User:North8000 5 yrs (3 years active) 20k edits. Diverse areas with some focus on technical, folk music, northern geographic/history, & Scouting. North8000 (talk) 20:50, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  42. User:Dream Focus I have been active on Wikipedia for 5 years, 8 months and 26 days. I have done a lot of searching for news articles for a rather large number of AFDs over the years, in order to find reliable sources providing the articles should not be deleted. This tool would help greatly. I have 17,803 edits. Dream Focus 20:51, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  43. User:Kgorman-ucb year and a half of activity or so, ~5000 edits. I have access to some other resources when I'm on campus, but not highbeam itself and it would be useful for some old media sources. Kevin (kgorman-ucb) (talk) 20:54, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  44. User:Jakew I've been active since 2003, and have made approx 15,000 edits. I maintain some difficult articles that require careful sourcing, and this would be invaluable. Jakew (talk) 20:56, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  45. User:Delicious carbuncle Beloved and respected editor with over 18K contributions since 2008. Main interest is BLP sourcing. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 21:22, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  46. User:Keilana I've been a Wikipedian since 2007 and have made more than 40,000 edits. I've worked all over the encyclopedia, but am currently working to improve the articles about the constellations. Having access to this service would be incredibly helpful in my research, because I could have access to academic articles for free, greatly expanding the scope of the articles I work on. Keilana|Parlez ici 21:25, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  47. PePeEfe active since 2008 on es.wiki with more than 8000 edits, mainly on palaeontology and geology. PePeEfe (talk) 21:39, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  48. User:Raintheone I registered in 2006, have 21000+ contributions and I have promoted articles via DYK and GAN. I concentrate on fictional characters and BLP articles - I have actively added real world content and exhaust every nook and cranny searching for sources. I think HighBeam would be an extremely useful tool and drive content building forward.Rain the 1 21:56, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  49. User:Salvador_alc Contributor in Spanish Wikipedia since March 2006 (~4500 edits). There, I edit articles about history and philosophy of religions. This tool would help me to create news articles and expand others, because the free sources online about this issues are poor. Salvador alc (talk) 22:12, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  50. User:Noon. Active since 2004, with more than 9,500 global contributions, mainly in the Hebrew Wikipedia, but also in the English Wikipedia and some others. 2 Featured articles in the Hebrew Wikipedia. HighBeam might be quite useful for me. Noon (talk) 22:20, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  51. User:Jasper Deng. Joined May 2008, active since early 2011. 19000+ edits here, with ~1200 on other Wikimedia wikis.--Jasper Deng (talk) 22:46, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  52. User:Despayre. Member of the Guild of Copy Editors. While working for the guild I spend a lot of time, not only making grammatical repairs, but also adding additional citations when I can, as well as confirming cites of more controversial material. If you are using X!'s edit counter, you can see that the majority of my edits (over 50%) have been to articles themselves, and that of all of those edits, only 1.3% of them have been reverted. As a history student, I take citation of source matters very seriously. There are several different areas on WP that I would like to spend more time on, but I do enjoy copyediting as it gives me a chance to see many new articles that I may not have normally encountered, and I enjoy making those articles better when I can, this resource should help tremendously. I also edit when I am away from my home PC and can provide you with proof if needed, I have hundreds of other edits that don't have my username attached as well.-- Despayre  tête-à-tête 22:53, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  53. User:Aymatth2. I start a lot of articles on a variety of subjects. I often can see the HighBeam article has content that would be useful, but cannot see the content. Aymatth2 (talk) 00:43, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  54. User:Shearonink 9800+ edits, editing since March 2010. I just found out about this opportunity. So many times I've gone to verify content or to do in-depth research and have been stymied because I don't have access to a content database like HighBeam. HighBeam would be a big help in both WP:AFC issues and with my own content creation. Shearonink (talk) 01:17, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  55. User:Bidgee editor since 2005 with 44,000+ edits, my article creation, expansion and improvement has been limited to the amount of free sources I can use and having an HighBeam account would help me to find more sources. Bidgee (talk) 03:25, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  56. User:O'Dea. Veteran Editor active since 2004 with over 11,300 edits. Very wide ranging scope of interests with strong emphasis on Ireland. Some inter-wiki activity in other language wikis, Commons, Wikisource, Wiktionary, and so on. Keen to get hands on quality research material. — O'Dea (talk) 04:02, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  57. de:User:Minderbinder. (Caution: the SUL account Minderbinder belongs to me everywhere but on en:WP, thus I am signing with my rarely used en:WP account here.) Editor on the German Wikipedia since 2005 with 47.000+ edits, also active on Commons. Writing mainly on history, architecture and art. Easy access to journal articles would help a a lot. --Minderbinder-de (talk) 06:52, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  58. User:Jeanne boleyn Editor with over 80,000 edits, active on English Wikipedia since April 2008. I have created and edited many articles on the Northern Ireland Troubles issues so having access to HighBeam articles would greatly assist me in my research and vastly improve the quality of the articles.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 07:38, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  59. User:Jan eissfeldt 16k+ edits since march 2004 on de/en/es.wp. main focus: theoretical philosophy, history of ideas & economics. highbeam would provide me with access to social science-related stuff, relevant for wikipedia-topic areas on my to-do in the field of history of social science, i can't access otherwise, regards --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 07:44, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  60. User:PamD, editor on English Wikipedia since 2006, 52,000 edits, mostly wikignoming like stub-sorting and disambiguation work; it would be useful to have access to resources to find refs for unreferenced stubs, check information, etc. PamD 07:57, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  61. User:-jkb-, editor since 2004 (diff. projects like cs:wp, different wikisources etc., today mainly de:wp), some 47 000 edits total, some 25 000 edits in de:wp; writing mostly in hisory, political developments etc., still researching in these areas and it would be a great help, see de:Benutzer:-jkb-, -jkb- 08:38, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  62. User:Johnuniq. Active at enwiki since December 2007 with 20,000 edits. Much weaker content creation than many others above, but this tool would be useful when adding refs to expand some of the stubs I encounter. Johnuniq (talk) 08:45, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  63. User:NapHit. Editor on English wikipedia since 2007, I have improved over 40 lists and articles to good and featured status. An account would enable me to do more research and improve some of these articles and help me expand other articles to good and featured status. NapHit (talk) 09:55, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  64. User:Jamietw. Editor on English Wikipedia with over 2,500 edits. I am frequently active in WP:AfC and WP:NPP I feel this tool would be helpful in verifying information and adding references to new pages which have been submitted but don't have them. I could also use it to expand shorter articles from stubs through the information I could obtain through the website. Thank you for considering my application, Jamietw (talk) 10:23, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  65. User:Millbart. Editor and sysop on German wikipedia with more than 30,000 edits in all namespaces. Main topics: Business and economics, social sciences in general. Access to the wide variety of journals will help me verify and expand existing content, especially where NPOV is critical. Millbart (talk) 11:00, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  66. User:Alelapenya. Editor on Spanish Wikipedia since 2009 with above 23 000 edits. I'm interessing in articles on History and Politics. Alelapenya (talk) 11:07, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  67. User:Lugnad. Editor on English Wikipedia since 2005 with 7,500+ edits. Mainly Irish & Maritime topics. I would find such a resource very useful. Lugnad (talk) 12:52, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  68. User:Night of the Big Wind. Editor on the English (about 15000 edits) and Dutch Wikipedia (about 24000 edits). Active from 2010/2011 (English WP) and 2006 (Dutch WP). Main focus now on Michelin starred restaurants and chefs, Irish traditional musicians and Ireland. Access to the wide variety of journals will help me verify and expand existing content. Night of the Big Wind talk 13:58, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  69. User:Alaney2k Editor since 2006 with several good and featured articles, 51,000 edits. While I have been primarily expanding the content of the ice hockey pages, I also edit topics related to Toronto and Canada, films and aviation. I would very much appreciate access to Highbeam to further my research for Wikipedia. ʘ alaney2k ʘ (talk) 14:31, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  70. User:Wsiegmund Active on English Wikipedia with almost 10,000 edits since 2005. I contribute mainly to biological and other science-related articles and expect to continue to do the same. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 15:06, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  71. User:Kablammo. 20,000+ edits over six years, majority to articles. Thanks for considering me. Kablammo (talk) 15:08, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  72. User:Billreid. Edit British medieval articles and main editor to 2 GA articles plus one currently under consideration. Nearly 6k edits. --Bill Reid | (talk) 15:25, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  73. User:Ankitbhatt. Have edited for a little over three years, and currently have over 8,000 edits. Major work has been devoted to content addition. Specialty is films. I have two good articles to my credit, one of which is currently being expanded to featured article status. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 16:42, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  74. User:SandyGeorgia. en.wiki. I missed the first round-- am I too late? I've been editing since 2006, have about 140,000 edits, and my focus is on editing medical articles, which typically requires access to full text of journal articles. Along with resigning as FAC delegate so I could focus more on medical articles, I also have recently relocated and have no access to a medical library or journal databases. I have also recently begun new page patrolling of medical articles, and while I often encounter what looks like copyvio, I'm unable to doublecheck journal articles. I'd appreciate being considered for this access. Thanks! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:02, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  75. User:Snappy. Editor since 2005 on English Wikipedia with over 60,000 edits, mainly on Irish politics and history. Access to HighBeam would be very useful for me. Snappy (talk) 17:09, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  76. User:Dennis Bratland. Mostly new articles related to WikiProject Motorcycling, also biographies like Thomas Krens, Thomas M. Messer, Edith Macefield. Frequently need access to Boston Globe and Chicago Tribune archives via HighBeam. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 17:54, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  77. User:Gilderien Highly active (>100 edits/month) Wikipedian, > 1 year tenure and verging on 3000 edits, would be useful in content work.--Gilderien Talk|Contribs 18:08, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  78. user:Fluffernutter. 4 years active, about 28k edits. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 18:38, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  79. User:Foxj - Wikipedian of almost six years, around 28,000 edits across a number of Wikimedia project sites. Co-author of several featured and "good" articles, as well as featured lists, pictures, sounds, portals and topics. — foxj 18:42, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  80. User:Wikiwind. Active on Serbian wikipedia with over 10.000 edits, mainly on politics, law, LGBT topics...--В и к и T 19:24, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  81. user:OohBunnies! - Been editing for two years, over 2,500 edits. I think access would help at AfC for expanding articles and also hopefully for topics I want to cover like UK literature. OohBunnies! Leave a message 21:16, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  82. User:Contains Mild Peril - had a Wikipedia account since 2007, >1,300 edits in a variety of subject areas: particularly interested in popular music articles and in adding citations demonstrating notability in articles which may be threatened with deletion. Contains Mild Peril (talk) 21:45, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  83. User:Shuki. WP for over six years and 10000 edits. Working mainly on creating and expanding articles in WP:Israel and WP:Judaism. --Shuki (talk) 01:05, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  84. User:Agadant. Active since 2006 with over 12,000 edits on musicians and related articles and on biographies. Have created 80 articles and added content with sourcing to many more. Have 2 GA articles. Agadant (talk) 02:35, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  85. User:Muhandes. Active on the English Wikimedia since 2007, more than 80,000 edits. Though most of my work is cleanup and anti-vandalism related, I have created about a hundred articles, mostly about lighthouses, including three GA articles and 38 DYK. I intend to work in the future on more lighthouse articles but also to contribute to Education in India articles and to popular music ones. --Muhandes (talk) 04:51, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  86. User:Rivertorch. Active account since 2006, >10k edits. This would be a help in content creation, including article expansion, and for improving refs in various places. Rivertorch (talk) 06:12, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  87. User:Karthikndr: I call myself as ciator, always filling the [citation needed] tag with some references. References is always what I work for! Active only since 2010, however with more than 14,000 edits. -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 06:46, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  88. User:Kondicherry: I edit BLPs and cities/states articles, sometimes references, finding references is difficult sometimes, this will help.
    I'd vouch for Kondicherry. Excellent editor from what I've seen. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 07:19, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  89. User:Sabbut: User since 2003, over 70,000 edits globally, almost all of them in Spanish Wikipedia. Most of my work is maintenance and cleanup, but from time to time I also create articles on mathematics, politics and other subjects. Sabbut (talk) 10:07, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  90. User:BengaliHindu: User since 2009, with nearly 3,000 edits and 80+ articles. -- BengaliHindu (talk) 11:19, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  91. User:PageantUpdate: Editor since 2006, well over 1000 edits, focussing mainly on beauty pageants. Not as active as I used to be but that's because I left uni & loss access to good research sites! Used to spend hours citing articles, would be nice to get back in the groove. PageantUpdater talk • contribs 12:53, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  92. User:Alpertron Editor since 2006, 11600+ edits in Spanish Wikipedia, I have written 4 AD and 2 GA from scratch. Alpertron (talk) 14:36, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  93. User:Black Kite Editor since 2006, 40000 edits, apart from creating content Highbeam is useful for finding sources relating to deletion issues in which I am active. Black Kite (talk) 14:59, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  94. User:Ulisse0 Long time wikipedian on it.wiki with many edits. --Ulisse0 (talk) 17:38, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  95. User:Dumelow - Editor since 2006, 14,000 or so edits. Active in article creation, mainly on military and engineering history - Dumelow (talk) 20:45, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  96. User:Raulshc - User since 2008 on eswiki, 8000+ edits in several wikimedia projects. Mostly of my work is related with mathematics and natural sciences. --Raulshc (talk) 22:46, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  97. User:SMcCandlish – On enwiki, over 6 years and 70K+ edits (25K+ mainspace). I edit principally historical/archaeological, anthropological/linguistics and zoological articles, so better journal access would be a huge boon. It's ongoing work. I write articles like William A. Spinks (historical sports research), and work on major articles like Albinism, felinology articles, etc., continually. I intend to do some major improvement to History of sport and Manx cat very soon (I've spent over $200 on research materials for the latter alone). I had access to journal archives and such through UNM until 2010, but no longer have access as an alumnus. PS: I actually waited until 16 April UTC. :-) — SMcCandlish   Talk⇒ ɖ∘¿¤þ   Contrib. 00:10, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  98. User:Chefallen - active since 2009, cuisine and food-related, Jewish history and religion. I would like to do a lot more research and update articles in these areas. --Chefallen (talk) 00:50, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Rosiestep (talk) 02:18, 16 April 2012 (UTC). Editor since 2007, sysop since 2009, OA since 2011, inaugural Teahouse host 2012. Over 400 DYK? entries; over 54,000 edits mainly in the areas of history, anthropology, geography. Thank you. --Rosiestep (talk) 02:18, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  100. User:WLRoss – Active on the English Wikipedia since 2006, 10,000+ edits. Created 14 articles. Primarily active in historical, military and Indigenous topics. Also active in BLPs and crime. Wayne (talk) 02:22, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Esceptic0 | ✉ ✍. 03:42, 16 April 2012 (UTC) Active on the spanish wikipedia and wikiquote, mainly. with apparently only 778 edits[reply]
  102. Critican.kane - since January 2011, active in german wikipedia (→ Critican.kane) with over 550 writen articles (no stubs, real articles), over 9,5k edits (over 85% article edits) - writen 4 little stubs in eng wikipedia (and over 300 edits) - over 1k edits in 98 wikiprojects (and 17 other stubs for Isidore Mankofsky :)); I intend to write Film articles, about american tv films and movies (also actors, directors, film editors, screewriters, producers and composers) -- Critican.kane (talk) 06:52, 16 April 2012 (UTC) -- Critican.kane (talk) 04:37, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Gaurav Pruthi - 1,800+ Edits , active since April 6th , 2011 , interested in Space Flight and history articles and have created a dozen of articles related to Satellites Click to See, craving for more. Gaurav Pruthi 06:59, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  104. User:AlanM1 - Editor since 2008-01-08. Only around 400 edits, but more active lately, and would like to be more active, still. I would be able to improve the quality of medical articles especially with cites from better-respected sources. — AlanM1 (talk) 11:19, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Alanscottwalker (talk) 12:07, 16 April 2012 (UTC) - I would use access for content creation and fact checking. I write in multiple content areas, including history, geography and others. Editor for several years over 6000 edits. Thanks. Alanscottwalker (talk) 12:07, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  106. ItsZippy - account since August 2009, admin since April 2012. Active in writing articles about philosophy and theology, which often require access to (sometimes difficult to access) academic work. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 16:24, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  107. User:Buster7 Editor since 04/08. 20000 edits. Have sandboxes filled with potential articles in need of fact checking. Thank you. ```Buster Seven Talk 16:29, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  108. User:Thehelpfulone. I've been around forever (well not really, but November 2007 is still quite a while!). 24k edits on English Wikipedia, active on Meta and various cross wiki work too. I'd like to increase my editing of articles and adding references/sources. Oh, and I've been a member of the cabal since November 2008. The Helpful One 18:36, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  109. User:Maclean25. Account created in ~2005, I have several thousand edits, and usually work on content creation. I'm willing to see what they have to offer. —maclean (talk) 19:27, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  110. User:Dsvyas. Primarily active on Gujarati Wikipedia since end of 2007 and have 10K+ edits. Also active on gu.wikisource (sysop on both, wiki as well as source). Mostly do content verification on gu.wiki, for which this access will help me greatly. DhavalTalk 20:46, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  111. User:Dweller. I thought I'd already requested this! Admin/crat/oversighter, account since 2005, c.40K edits. I think of myself primarily as a content contributer. Most of my work is on sport, but I spend a fair bit of time on BLP problems, wearing my oversighter hat. I have a bunch of featured material to my name and this would really help build on that. --Dweller (talk) 20:50, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  112. User:Fuhghettaboutit. Many thousands of edits; have been here since 2005; often do research for articles started by others and have written a number of featured and good articles.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:15, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  113. User:Keith D. Editor since September 2006, 127,000 edits. Mainly would use for verification work on English Wikipedia, though content expansion would be aided with access to sources. Keith D (talk) 00:48, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  114. User:EricSerge. Editor on English Wikipedia since 2007 but most active since 2009. Would utilize for verification work, expanding stubs, and utilize during the course of new content generation. EricSerge (talk) 01:12, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  115. User:Gaijin. Active on Spanish Wikipedia since 2005. More than 1000 articles written. Gaijin (talk) 04:44, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  116. Seraphimblade Talk to me Active on Wikipedia mostly with some work on Commons. Will be quite helpful, especially since I no longer have my previous college access. Seraphimblade Talk to me 07:25, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  117. User:RajeshPandey I am active on Nepali Wikipedia, ne:user:RajeshPandey, [meta.wikimedia.org] , I am active since 2006. I translate from English and Hindi to Nepali Nepal, I have about 6000+ edits. -RajeshPandey (talk) 09:13, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  118. User:Apwoolrich Active since 2004 mainly writing pages on the history and biography of Industrial Revolution technology. 1500+edits. Apwoolrich (talk) 09:30, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  119. User:Magalhães Active since 2005, with 60,000+ edits, mainly on Dutch wikipedia. I wrote 3000+ aricles about Philippine-related subjects and would use a Highbeam account for verification purposes and research for writing many articles more. Magalhães (talk) 09:41, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  120. User:Neitram - Active since 2004, 10,000+ edits, mainly on German Wikipedia as a content creator and verificator. --Neitram (talk) 10:11, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  121. User:Cerebellum - Active since 2007 on English Wikipedia, 7,000 edits, 2 GAs and over 100 articles created. I focus on military history and Christianity, my current projects are First Gospel of John and NATO logistics in the Afghan War. --Cerebellum (talk) 11:36, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  122. User:Ron Ritzman. Editor since 2005. 70,000 edits. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:06, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  123. User:Przemub. Polish Wikipedia. I write articles about history of computer science. Often free sources in the Internet aren't available, so access to HighBeam Research will be very useful for me. Przemub (talk) 15:04, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  124. User:Vipera. Editor since march 2006 on it.wiki, administrator since september 2009. I'm not focused on a main subject but i can say that my favourite fields are geography and history. --Vipera (talk) 16:27, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  125. User:Fr33kman Over 3000 edits to enwiki, global steward, editor on simplewiki. fr33kman 22:36, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  126. User:Malleus Fatuorum. Registered since 2006, more than 125,000 edits, over 30 FAs, and about 100 articles created from scratch. Malleus Fatuorum 23:10, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  127. User:Pap3rinik: user on Italian Wikipedia since 2005, sysop since 2006, 18k+ edits there. Mostly active in retro-patrolling, cleanup and verification activities on BLPs and other fields --Pap3rinik (talk) 07:50, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  128. User:Ganesh Paudel: user on Nepali Wikipedia since 2007, sysop since 2010, Bureaucrat since 2011, 12,000+ edits, above 1,000 articles created. Mostly active in New articles creating, retro-patrolling, cleanup and verification activities and other Bureaucratic activities. --Ganesh Paudel (talk) 08:26, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  129. User:Indian Chronicles : User since June 2006. 7000+ edits. Mostly interested in philosophy, religion and history related articles.--Indian Chronicles (talk) 08:52, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  130. User:Schlesinger: User since 2006 in de:wp, there about 20000 edits, interested in geography, geology and alpinism. --Schlesinger (talk) 09:04, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  131. User:Jenova20 - Editor for over a year and with 3000 edits. I like to work on LGBT and media themed stuff. Thanks Jenova20 10:59, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  132. User:Nbauman Over 4,000 edits since 2006. Write mostly about medicine. --Nbauman (talk) 14:57, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  133. User:Harkey Lodger Editor since 2006. I have made around 9,000 edits, mostly to geography, history and geology articles.--Harkey (talk) 17:55, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  134. User:Ariconte Editor since 2004 (under retired user name) since 2008 under Ariconte. Mostly fact checking and article enhancement. Recent articles would be a boon. 4000+ edits. Ariconte (talk) 20:34, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  135. User:Glane23 Editor since 2008. 39,000+ edits on enWiki, mostly cleanup, verification, addition of references to articles across the encyclopedia. Geoff Who, me? 22:24, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  136. User:Grandmaster. Editor since 2005. 18,743 edits on enWiki, mostly politics, culture and history. Grandmaster 22:43, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  137. User:Kevin Myers. I've been writing, creating, reviewing, and correcting history articles on the English Wikipedia since 2004, including Featured and Good articles. A HighBeam account would be a real boon. Thanks! —Kevin Myers 00:16, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  138. User:Bahudhara. Editor since 2010, 1,300 edits, mostly gnomish, but would like to contribute in more substantial way. Main interests: environment, geoscience, Australian biota, geography, history. I currently have no access to online academic resources, but am hopeful of initiating a GLAM project with local institutions. Bahudhara (talk) 00:19, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  139. User:Crisco 1492. Editor since 2005, 30k+ edits. 250-ish articles created, 1 FA and numerous GAs. Expect to use Highbeam for research on Indonesian subjects, where possible. I also tinker with Canadian and US subjects occasionally, so this may be useful. Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:54, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  140. User:Cardamon. Editor since August 2006. 2170 edits. About 17 articles created. Also add refs to existing articles. Cardamon (talk) 01:45, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  141. User:Dsp13. Not sure if I'm in time for this round. Editor since 2006, 50K edits, 600 or so articles created. Mostly write on history and other humanities subjects - and have often encountered potentially useful HighBeam material before.Dsp13 (talk) 09:47, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  142. User:Jackhynes. Editor since 2004, 6000+ edits, mostly to primate- and biology-related articles. Since leaving university, haven't had access to many scientific journals which my editing has suffered for. Jack (talk) 10:08, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  143. user:Thesteve. I've been editing wikipedia since 2002, and have well over 2000 edits. I rescue a fair number of articles, and an additional source of sources would be great. Lately I've been translating German articles that don't exist here, and they tend to need references.  The Steve  10:12, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  144. User:jeh. Seven years, only about 5000 edits, but I do try to reference things. Editing mostly in areas of older computer and electronics tech. Jeh (talk) 18:55, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  145. User:StAnselm. Five years, 47,000 edits, hundreds of new articles. This would be a big help. StAnselm (talk) 22:14, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  146. User:WaitingForConnection. Joined in September 2009, 13,000 edits to en.wiki. Primarily involved with football articles, and having dealt with a fair bit of link rot of otherwise excellent citations, I feel Highbeam will be useful in that regard. I also believe it would be a great asset on List of diets, which I intend to return to at some stage. —WFC— 23:22, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  147. User:Antonorsi. Barely a year, about +13,000 edits on Spanish Wikipedia. Editing mostly in areas about economics, references will help a lot. Antonorsi (talk) 01:58, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  148. User:Lambiam. Registered since 2006; 38,000 edits across projects, mostly on the English Wikipedia. Topics are all over the place, but I'm regularly frustrated because all relevant news sources I can find are behind a paywall.  --Lambiam 03:19, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  149. User:Kauffner 30,000 edits. Kauffner (talk) 09:27, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  150. User:Dipankan001 I also helped in promoting the news. This will be very easy and so that I can always cite HighBeam as a permanent resource. Dipankan (Have a chat?) 11:49, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  151. User:Toddst1 One of the 350 most active Wikipedians of all time and 25 most active administrators. Otherwise, quite the slacker. Toddst1 (talk) 13:53, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  152. User:Mabeenot. Editor since 2009 with 5,000 edits. I've worked on articles about historical publications, music recordings, railroads, and defunct educational institutions which could benefit from access to HighBeam's archives. -Mabeenot (talk) 16:25, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  153. User:Noopur28 Editor since 2011, 1,100+ edits, GLAM volunteer. Would really appreciate a Highbeam account because I specialize in Indian art and crafts and not many books, archives are available publicly even to read or glance thru. Thanks! Noopur28 (talk) 17:18, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    Just pointing out that user has mostly small edits and bot like assessments, and registered in December 2011, which is as good as 2012. --122.179.37.223 (talk) 14:01, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  154. User:DBigXray. Editor since 2011 with more than 14,000 edits-- ÐℬigXЯaɣ 22:33, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  155. User:Softlavender. English Wikipedia. Since 2007; 15,000 edits. I specialize in in-depth research, particularly via the internet, since I live in a remote area (Pacific island) with no decent library source. Special focus on biography, history, classical music, and the arts, especially the performing arts. Softlavender (talk) 03:43, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  156. User:Spartaz Editor since 2007 over 25,000 edits and very active at AFD where access to this would be extremely useful. Spartaz Humbug! 07:14, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  157. User:220 of Borg. Editing since September 11, 2009. However, only with a registered account since November 11, 2011 (2,116 edits). 11,912 edits as a static IP, and I believe Admin user:HJ Mitchell will vouch for my IP 'identity'. I wander around WP helping out in a wide variety of areas: updating articles(particularly BLPs), new page patrol, vandal fighting, welcoming new users. One area I used to do a lot was 'fixing' bare URLS and adding data to refs. I often came across High Beam and regretted that I couldnt afford an account with them. Please consider! - 220 of Borg 09:03, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  158. User:Smalljim. English Wikipedia. These are my more significant content contributions; I plan to continue working in similar areas, particularly those related to Devon & Cornwall. Access to current newspapers and magazines would also be useful in determining notability of borderline topics, where I also do some work: (WP:CSD, WP:AfD). Admin, over 29,000 edits, active since 2007.  —SMALLJIM  09:43, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  159. User:SP-KP. English Wikipedia. Editor for 5 years+, 30000+ edits. Active seeker-out-and-adder-of references to articles within scope of WP:BIRD amongst other things. SP-KP (talk) 11:23, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  160. User:Sodabottle Editor since 2009. 15,000 edits in en wiki and 50,000 in Tamil wikipedia (am an admin there). I create and expand WP India related articles.--Sodabottle (talk) 13:36, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  161. User:Ravichandar84 editor since September 2006 with over 42000 edits. I contribute mainly on history and culture of South India and use Google Books, archive.org and Project Gutenberg a lot. A Highbeam account might be of great advantage to me as some very useful books are not freely accessible on the internet.-RaviMy Tea Kadai 13:42, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  162. User:fedaro editor since february 2006 with over 1200 edits. I have mainly contributed photos in Commons, but I am determined to contribute more in terms of items.--Fedaro (talk) 20:54, 21 April 2012 (UTC) -[reply]
  163. User:Michael Hardy. English Wikipedia. A small number of edits to German Wikipedia and even one or two to French and Italian Wikipedias. More than 160,000 edits, beginning in 2002. Hundreds of new articles created. I will continued to edit English Wikipedia daily and sometimes create new articles. Michael Hardy (talk) 01:07, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  164. User:Krishnaprasaths Editor since 2011. 1,138 edits in Tamil wikipedia. I create and expand WP India related and sports articles. --krishna talk 05:56, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  165. User:Salix alba editor since 2005 with 15,000 edits mainly in mathematics where I occasionally come across journal articles it would be helpful to access. --Salix (talk): 06:11, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  166. User:Srithern Most @ Tamil Wikipedia Since 2009 with total edit-count: 3,017. --Srither (talk) 10:14, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  167. User:GreatOrangePumpkin, mainly editing in enwiki since 2009; 20,825 edits; mainly working on music-related articles.--GoPTCN 10:30, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  168. User:Malick78. Active on Wikipedia in English, Polish and Russian since 2007. Have created over 120 articles in English and made thousands of edits. I edit on a wide variety of subjects and am sure I'd find your service useful. Malick78 (talk) 17:03, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  169. User:Surya Prakash.S.A. Administrator in Tamil Wikipedia. Having File mover rights in Commons. Member in OTRS too. In Wikipedia Since 2010. -- SuryaPrakash  Talk... 12:54, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  170. User:RolandR Editor since December 2005, with 16,000+ edits. Particularly active in Middle East and politics articles; I frequently check and add references and citations, so would find this very useful. RolandR (talk) 18:37, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  171. User:House Editor in the spanish Wikidia since April 2007, with 6300+ edits. --House (talk) 15:39, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  172. User:Magnum2008 Editor on it.wiki since 2008, with more than 1900 edits, most on history and military subjects --Magnum2008 (talk) 08:51, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  173. User:The wub editor for 7 years, over 70,000 edits. Would mainly find it useful for referencing and rescuing articles from deletion. the wub "?!" 13:04, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  174. User:Dkriegls. Editor on English Wikipedia for 5 1/2 years, 15,000+ edits). I mostly work on biographies and cleaning up notable people. Would use source to find references for verification of notable people without biography pages and thus create their biography page.
  175. User:Mr little irish. I am short of the 1000 edits requirement, however I would like to start working on my content creation/addition work to broaden my horizons. MrLittleIrish (talk) © 13:23, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  176. user:shanmugamp7 4000 edits in Tamil wikipedia... mostly i create or expand India related articles in Tamil Wikipedia--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 17:28, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Round 3, open period, delivered weekly

Sorry for the delay on these. They'll be out by the week of Monday the 21st.

  1. user:Mizzou415 Editor for over 6 years with over 1500 edits. I mostly create and expand articles on college athletics and intend to continue to do so. - Mizzou415 (talk) 00:29, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  2. user:KSRolph Contributing and editing with a login just over a year, quite a number of edits, but especially helping students learn to contribute and continue to do so. I've brought in about 80 females, in an effort to improve the gender gap (keeping them going is another matter). I'm a anthropological linguist, and social science researcher, and would like to improve citation quality on many pages, especially where language, culture, religion, identity, and cultural geography are concerned. Thank you, KSRolph (talk) 05:35, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  3. User:GSorby Starting editing in January 2010, have over 7000 edits and I focus mostly on television programme articles and fictional characters including actors and actresses. I have also promoted a few articles to GA, two of which I created. I have also created a variety of pages (see Created section on my userpage). GeorgePing! 09:39, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  4. User:WilliamJE I have been on Wikipedia for over six years but most of my editing has been done over the last three. What I edit is mostly Golf, Aviation crashes, Politics , Actors, to name a few. I do alot of fact checking....William 20:30, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  5. es:User:GermanX. I have been on Wikipedia since 2005 with over 22000 edits. Usually I translate articles from English Wikipedia to Spanish Wikipedia. I have write or modified articles when necessary. I mostly work on information technology articles. GermanX (talk) 07:26, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  6. es:User:Héctor Guido Calvo Editor for over 4 years with over 14900 edits. I mostly create and expand articles on History and Cinema and intend to continue to do so. --Héctor Guido Calvo (talk) 12:44, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  7. User:Rangilo_Gujarati Started in February 2011. I edit English and Gujarati (gu) Wikipedia, also contribute images and other media files to Commons. Rangilo Gujarati (talk) 15:40, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  8. User:Wikipelli - Editor for 2+ years, 60,000+ edits, 16 articles, 2 GAs. I expand articles of all kinds, like to ref BLPs and other bios, Historic Places. I work with new editors who are interested in starting and developing articles. Wikipelli Talk 22:09, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  9. User:SL93 I have been editing since 2008 as Schuym1 (this is my second account which has previously been approved by the community) and on this account, I have over 20,000 edits. I create articles and expand articles on a variety of subjects. I don't stick to one area, but I normally focus on media such as books and films. SL93 (talk) 00:51, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  10. User:Ryan Vesey I have been editing since February 2011 with over 8000 edits. My primary contributions vary widely, from anti-vandalism and new page patrol to content creation. I believe a highbeam account would be the most useful in taking part in AFD discussions. I haven't been entirely active in that region lately, but will certainly increase my involvement when finals are done in 3 days. Ryan Vesey Review me! 13:51, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  11. pl:user:Plushy - Seasoned editor, admin on pl.wiki. I think that highbeam could be useful when finding reliable sources for some articles, I'll at least try to use it.Plushy (talk) 16:11, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  12. SkyBon >5000 edits on all accounts ([8] [9] [10]). Active Wikipedian since 2006. I participate in checking and verifying content, finding sources therefore I think HighBeam would be useful for me. SkyBon (talk) 20:02, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  13. User:Bgwhite 140,000 edits mostly over 2 1/2 years. I look at new biographies for references, copy editing and the like. Bgwhite (talk) 20:46, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  14. User:Drhoehl Editor for several years; 1800 edits +/-. I'm active in classical music and opera (member of both Wikiprojects) and do occasional cleanup work in articles about military history weapons. Drhoehl (talk
  15. User:Gen. Quon. Wikipedia:WikiProject The Office (US), Wikipedia:WikiProject The X-Files. I have been an active editor for over four years, but I have focused on the last couple of years on getting articles, most notably television episodes, up to good article status. I have a definite intention to continue on this work, specifically in raising many The X-Files and The Office articles up to good article status.--Gen. Quon (talk) 02:32, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  16. User:Vmenkov I have been contributing since 2006; 17,000 edits on en.wiki, 50,000 total over all Wikimedia projects. HighBeam would be a useful addition to Google Books and JSTOR. -- Vmenkov (talk) 04:54, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  17. User:WilliamThweatt Been editing WP since 2005. I'm active in editing/creating/expanding language articles and articles relating to Southeast Asia. I also often check and/or provide sources/citations for existing articles. This tool would be invaluable to me as many articles that I work on are relatively obscure and free online research material is hard to find. Thank You--William Thweatt Talk | Contribs 06:12, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  18. User:Yunshui I'm active on the English Wikipedia, with about 10,000 edits. I expend a fair number of those adding sources to undersourced articles (with no particular pattern or area of interest); when GoogleNews doesn't cut it, HighBeam would be a valuable resource. Yunshui 雲‍水 12:27, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  19. User:Strike Eagle Over 2400 edits in all wikis.I'm mostly active in editing Military related articles of India and others.StrikeEagle ✈ 08:51, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  20. User:Y2kcrazyjoker4 Active editor since 2006, over 35,000 edits within English Wikipedia, have gotten 3 articles to Featured Article status. I spend most of my time in the music and sports article space, and will aim to continue to do the same. Having a HighBeam account would definitely help me with geting a few articles that are on the GA/FA threshold promoted. Y2Kcrazyjoker4 (talk • contributions) 15:13, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  21. User:Harrias. Work primarily within WP:WikiProject Cricket, but also stray off into other areas. I've worked on one featured article, eighteen featured lists and eighteen good articles, generally biographies. Highbeam would be an invaluable resource, particularly for archived resources. Harrias talk 22:55, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  22. User:Zad68. Account since 2008, active in English Wikipedia, over 4,000 edits now. I've been getting into medical articles and am interested in adding content for biology articles. The timing on this offer couldn't be better matched to my current need for it. Zad68 (talk) 23:42, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  23. User:Hispalois. Mainly Spanish Wikipedia with occasional contributions in English and French wikipedias. Active since 2006, I have written articles about many different subjects: history, science, technology, biographies... Several of them were ranked GA or FA. I plan to keep on doing the same, and any additional source material is welcome.
  24. User:Moswento. I create articles on a variety of topics, including a number of recent DYK contributions. HighBeam would be invaluable as another source to draw on. Moswento talky 08:56, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  25. User:TransporterMan. Account since 2007, over 10,000 edits. I mainly do dispute resolution at WP:3O (where I'm the third most active contributor), at WP:DRN (where I'm the second most active contributor), and at WP:MEDCAB (where I'm one of the coordinators). HighBeam access would be useful in helping to solve disputes involving the reliability of sourcing by being able to look up sources being offered by the disputants and disputes involving absent or inadequate sourcing. Thanks, TransporterMan (TALK) 14:46, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  26. User:Panyd - User since 2007 with a long history of sourcing BLPs where possible. Also prolific in expanding articles for Wikiproject Paranormal. Highbeam would help greatly in both of these endeavours as well as with the occasional disputed DYK. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 17:16, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  27. User:Dfred - User since 2006, 3000+ edits primarily on EN and Commons. My main focus is content addition and citation of knotting articles. While I maintain a fairly extensive personal library and have ILL access for books at my local library, I do not have good access to journal articles. I look forward to exploring what is available on Highbeam. Thanks. --Dfred (talk) 23:12, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  28. User:Ruhrfisch - major contributor to 28 FAs and 4 FLs, over 45,000 edits, admin. Thanks, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 03:16, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  29. User:Finetooth - About 53,000 edits since 2007. Major contributor to 15 FAs, 2 FLs, more than 800 peer reviews. Finetooth (talk) 17:12, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Andrew Gray (talk) - User since 2004, 17 GAs and ~38,000 edits; newspaper access would be particularly useful. Andrew Gray (talk) 21:41, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Dan arndt (talk) - Editor for 5 and a half years, with over 21,000 edits. Major contributor to 5 FAs and 3FLs and numerous DYKs. Mainly Australian related articles (music, architecture, history, arts etc) - constiently finding references in HighBeam which I'm unable to access - would assist in better referencing of Wikipedia articles in the future. Dan arndt (talk) 04:14, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Matthewedwards (talk) Been an editor since 2007 and have 7362 (40.03%) edits to article space. Heavily contributed to 5 FAs, 20 FLs, and a number of other GAs, also carry out sporadic reviews at GAN and FLC. Having Highbeam access would allow me to provide better sources for the articles I write, primarily TV shows, niche sports, and local topics. Matthewedwards (talk · contribs) 06:16, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  33. User:Moeng - Editor since 2006, with 20.000+ edits, mainly on Danish Wikipedia and Commons - --Moeng (talk) 19:59, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  34. User:Ericoides. 15,000+ edits since 2006. Over 180 new articles created, some basic, some not at all bad. Would be a useful resource for more new articles. Thanks Ericoides (talk) 16:20, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  35. User:NTox. English Wikipedia. Currently working on a comprehensive FA with emphasis on scholarship. Plan to continue with featured/content work in the future. NTox · talk 02:15, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  36. User:Skater 5 DYK articles and working on my first GA. Around 6500 edits would love to have the extra search.--SKATER Is Back 05:25, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  37. User:Keristrasza. Active mainly with Wikipedia:WikiProject British crime. Over 2k edits. My usual MO is to create or significantly expand articles eg Murder of Teresa de Simone (GA), Death of Christopher Alder, Murder of Lynette White and Murder of Suzanne Capper (GA). Very often come across sources for these type of articles on HighBeam that I would like to have used were I an account holder. Keristrasza (talk) 18:26, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  38. User:trialsanderrors en.wiki admin, currently mostly interested in creating articles in conjunction with the Library of Congress and their Bain News Service images on Flickr. ~ trialsanderrors (talk) 21:19, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  39. User:Wiki Raja Editor for over 5 years with over 14,109 edits. I mostly create and expand articles and WikiProjects on cultures from South Asia and other areas. Wiki Raja த
  40. User:Kashmiri: Since 2006, over 1,000 edits to-date, mainly on English and Polish Wikis. Key contributions: medicine - neurodegenerative conditions (articles: spinal muscular atrophy, hereditary motor neuropathies, etc.), disease classification, adding/improving references; regional studies (Central and South Asia - culture and politics). Access to HighBeam would enable better referencing of medicine-related articles – many thanks! kashmiri (talk) 18:21, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  41. User:Stevertigo: Editor since 2002, ~50K edits over various Wikimedia projects (including IP edits), original Mediation committee member, active in content generation, research, dispute resolution. -Stevertigo (t | c) 22:24, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  42. User:Smerus: Editor for over 6 years, with several thousand edits on English Wikipedia. Creation and editing of articles mainly related to music, literature, history and countries of the former Soviet Union.--Smerus (talk) 09:40, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  43. User:Nishidani. 6 years editing, 25,000 edits. See my user page for contributions to article construction. My editing principle is, except where impossible, only use RS that come from academia, or major publishing houses, in book form or articles. I'm "retired" until my ban expires, or I do, early next month. Nishidani (talk) 13:01, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  44. User:Vensatry: Editor since 2010, with close to 18,000 edits, mainly on English Wikipedia and Commons. Have written 15 DYKs and significantly contributed to four GAs and one FL. Highbeam would be helpful for archived materials. —Vensatry (Ping me) 06:51, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  45. User:OhanaUnited - Admin here and bureaucrat at Wikispecies. 18,000+ edits in 6 years. Written 6 featured contents, 8 GAs, and 3 DYKs. OhanaUnitedTalk page 06:11, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

<--! AFTER #45... Please apply in round 4 below. Thanks!-->

Round 4: Delivery in late July

  1. user:72Dino Editor since 2006 with over 21,000 edits. Most of my work is adding content and references in a variety of areas. Would love to have additional resources. 72Dino (talk) 05:35, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  2. User:Targaryen (formerly SpeakFree). I am a Wikipedia editor with over 18,000 edits on the English Wikipedia, most of them in article space where I created about 200 articles, 5 of which were DYKs and one of which is a GA. I have been registered with this account since September 2010 (before that I edited anonymously and with some other accounts since 2006; these are now long inactive). I also wrote over a hundred articles on the Dutch Wikipedia. Having access to an extensive archive will be very useful in my endeavours. Targaryenspeak or forever remain silent 22:26, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  3. User:Gatoclass. Editor for six years, admin for four, about 60,000 edits and 300+ articles. Current focus is on maritime, industrial and military history, but I enjoy reading and writing about history in general, and indeed have an interest in most topics. Gatoclass (talk) 15:13, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  4. User:William S. Saturn. English Wikipedia since 2007, English Wikinews since 2008. Over 10,00 edits, one FA, several GAs on topics such as U.S. presidential election campaigns, Texas cities and geography, and biographies. I plan to continue that focus in future research.--William S. Saturn (talk) 21:46, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  5. User:No More Mr Nice Guy. English Wikipedia since late 2008. 4500+ edits. I edit mostly topics relating to the Middle East. No More Mr Nice Guy (talk) 19:09, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  6. User:AndrewN English WP since 2010. Active in IRC help channel. Would be nice to have one. AndrewN talk 18:48, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  7. User:Trevj. English Wikipedia. Active for 3 years, initially joined 2004. Member WikiProject Computing, WikiProject Bristol. Mainly editing science/technology/business topics, also some local history, current affairs, and anything else which takes my fancy. Generally use citation templates. Currently 3202 article space edits (40.77%), creator of 42 articles. Unaware of free online access to HighBeam at or through nearest library, although it operates restricted opening hours anyway (23 hours per week) eliminating this as a useful alternative. -- Trevj (talk) 11:48, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  8. User:Leech44. English WP since 2010. 11,000+ edits, with recognized content between FL, GA, and DYK, mostly on ice hockey related topics. I prefer to work on older players/events that don't have the wealth of online sources that their current counterparts do. The majority of my editing time comes during breaks at work so while I don't think I have access at my local library it does little good if I am incorrect. Having access to all of the archived information could be extremely useful.--Mo Rock...Monstrous (leech44) 21:22, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  9. User:Hobbes Goodyear. English Wikipedia. 2+ years, 2,000 edits. Primary areas are lesser-known popular music from past 40 years and participation in WP:Articles for deletion discussions. In both areas, Google News frequently turns up useful references from Highbeam that I can't currently access. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 03:00, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  10. User:Guy Macon. 6 years+, 6,000 edits+. Volunteer Mediator at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard, which involves a lot of citation checking. --Guy Macon (talk) 10:55, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  11. I focus on GA quality articles and access to Highbeam s very crucial in creating such articles. Currently I get access through friends but it would be very convenient for me to have access directly so that I can do my own research without troubling my friends. Kanatonian (talk) 21:24, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  12. User:Sp33dyphil. Have accumulated over 30,000 edits in 2 and a half years. I'm most competent with aviation, and military, articles. HighBeam would help me access archived aviation articles. --Sp33dyphil ©hatontributions 10:50, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Would make a useful supplement to JSTOR, most definitely. ResMar 20:00, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  14. English Wikipedia, editor since November 2007 with over 15,000 edits. I tend to create articles on whatever doesn't exist, takes my fancy, I often expand/improve historical and political articles. I'd like to continue doing the work I currently do, this would be a great resource in addition to Credo Reference. —James (Talk • Contribs) • 8:00pm • 10:00, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  15. User:Astronomyinertia. Editor since 2009, with nearly 4000 edits. I have started 70 articles including 7 DYKs. Interested in South Asia-related topics. ASTRONOMYINERTIA (TALK) 18:08, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  16. User:Designate. I've been around for a while and I'm interested in this. —Designate (talk) 21:42, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  17. I'm starting to believe that I need that access: within a week I had to ask somebody in IRC three times to check something for me. And I don't believe that this situation will change. mabdul 09:37, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Could use it, I think. Gigs (talk) 19:37, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  19. User:Lexein. English Wikipedia since 2006, >9k edits, 12 new articles, expanded >8 to DYK eligibility, broad range of article areas. I regularly expand references and rescue dead links; Highbeam access would help here. --Lexein (talk) 03:31, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  20. User:Smarojit. I have been an editor at the English Wikipedia since the past year with over 1700 edits. I have significantly contributed to four Good articles and intend to continue working on many more. For that I need access to several newspaper articles, which is extremely hard to get. Smarojit (talk) 11:02, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  21. User:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz. Long-term editor with nearly 50,000 edits, 85% in article space. Will use account for BLP verification and when resuming my personal project of adding critical reception sections (typically sourced from newspaper/magazine reviews) to book articles that are now mostly plot summaries. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 15:25, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  22. User:BPositive: Around 2k edits on Wikipedia. Co-ordinator of the WikiProject WP:INCOTM. Would be useful for some research work on this project. BPositive (talk) 17:34, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Dawnseeker2000. Active with WikiProject Earthquakes. Very active with constructing articles for old events and some new. Have been an active WP editor for a few years with 30,000 article space edits & expect to continue to add content with my main sources being the Los Angeles Times archives (they go back to 1881 via ProQuest) and research articles from Science and the bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. This opportunity would make another great source for articles. I am a DYK contributor and a few examples of these articles are 1979 Imperial Valley earthquake, 1663 Charlevoix earthquake, and 1932 Jalisco earthquake. Dawnseeker2000 21:56, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  24. User:Thibbs. Active on English Wikipedia since 2006 with over 10k edits, and a member of the reference library projects for multiple WikiProjects. I have recently become involved in the RS-location for WikiProject Video Games, and I think this would be helpful for verification purposes as well as for research. I am specifically interested in expanding Wikipedia's coverage of early 1990s video games. Thibbs (talk) 04:39, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  25. User:Dismas. Active on English Wikipedia since 2003 Has it really been that long!! with 61k total edits. 72% in article space. I bounce around as far as subject areas go and thus am not a formal member of any WikiProjects but I do frequent the Help Desk. When editors post there with requests for help adding refs or cleaning up articles, I try to get the article enough references to pass WP:GNG at least. Dismas|(talk) 07:17, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  26. User:Animeshkulkarni: Active on English Wikipedia since 2011 I am little short of 10K edits. I am active on WikiProject India with mostly in it's cinema task force. I plan to use this account to search information related to these projects, that is old to early 20th century or so which is not easily available through normal means. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 17:26, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  27. User:Torreslfchero: Active on wikipedia since 2010 with over 6000 edits. I am mostly active articles related to Bollywood and also a member of WikiProject India and also Indian cinema task force. I have also created film articles and for most of the articles its quite hard to find sources. Torreslfchero (talk) 17:40, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  28. User:Theirrulez: Editor since 2006, I have a global account with more than 1,900 edits on en.wiki, more than 10,000 on it.wiki, active on French and Spanish wikis too. I'm mostly active on military history, geography, architecture and civil engineering. --Theirrulez (talk) 05:44, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  29. User:Gungadin: Active on this account since Feb 2006 but was I have been editing since 2005 on an ip account. I have been a heavey contributer to TV related articles, including fictional characters and actors with 24,480 edits, and I would benefit greatly in editing by having access to Highbeam's archive.GunGagdinMoan 19:22, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  30. User:Tyrol5: Active on English Wikipedia since late 2008, during which time I've made just over 16,000 edits. I've written several GA's, mostly about human spaceflight and U.S. politics. HighBeam's archive looks to be an interesting resource and would certainly prove useful in providing context for a multitude of topics during the article creation process. Tyrol5 [Talk] 20:08, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  31. User:Bollyjeff: Editor for 2 years, with over 10,000 edits, mainly on English Wikipedia. I have been the major contributor on four GAs. Highbeam would be very helpful for sourcing articles on older subjects, before the internet age. BollyJeff | talk 17:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  32. User:Warofdreams. Editor since 2003, admin and bureaucrat since 2004, with more than 70,000 edits to the English Wikipedia, and a small number elsewhere. At present, I principally write about two areas: politics, and roller derby. I have largely exhausted the freely available sources in my primary areas of interest, and would use the access to add additional information, and additional/stronger references to articles. Warofdreams talk 07:28, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  33. User:GrapedApe 3+ year editor on en.wiki; +19k edits; creator of 290 articles; 4 Featured Lists; 5 Good articles; 15 DYks; Primarily editing college and university articles and sites of the National Register of Historic Places. Have exhausted google and googlenews archives, would love to try new database.--GrapedApe (talk) 12:16, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  34. User:Morning277. I am an active editor with over 5,000 edits. I have created dozens of articles and also involved in Wikipedia projects Law, Michigan, Zoos, and Cleanup All Contributions Are Indexed Here. I am also a regular contributor with AfD which is why I am requesting the use of High Beam. I would like additional access to sources to see if certain pages meet notability or if they should be deleted. I will use the High Beam account for AfD and also when creating new articles (to ensure that I use the best source to support content). --Morning277 (talk) 14:24, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  35. User:Martin1978 - German Wikipedia ~70000 (home wiki), frequently checking changes to articles on my watchlist, verifying and adding sources. Thanks! Regards, --Martin1978 (talk) 08:37, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  36. User:Arms & Hearts. Been around on English Wikipedia since 2006 and properly active since late 2008, currently just shy of 10,000 live edits. I mostly patrol the unpatrolled backlog and try to expand articles I find there, as well as creating articles on various topics that interest me. I'm increasingly finding that Google News turns up results that would be useful references if only I had access to them. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 01:34, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  37. User:Avicennasis. Active since early 2010, ~83,000 edits (mostly gnomish, but when I do add content I try to have tons of references.) Also somewhat active on IRC and with the WP:AFC project. Avicennasis @ 05:09, 15 Tamuz 5772 / 05:09, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  38. User:Gongshow. Editor since 2008 with ~20k edits, 3 GAs, and 17 DYKs. In my efforts to cite unsourced articles on notable topics - particularly those related to music, film and sports - having access to Highbeam's archive would be a tremendous asset.  Gongshow Talk 16:11, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  39. User:Mann_jess. Editor for over 3 years, and active the last 2. I contribute to many contentious topics (such as religion, medicine & science, etc) which often need high levels of high-quality sources. Google scholar is often great, as is PubMed, but this would be a fantastic addition for tracking down reliable sources. Thanks!   — Jess· Δ♥ 23:25, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  40. User:Intoronto1125 Need access to older sport articles that have been archived. Thanks! Intoronto1125TalkContributions 23:44, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  41. User:Farrtj - I have been on Wikipedia for over 6 years and have over 10,000 edits to my name. I contribute to a number of articles, but am especially active on Wikiproject Beer, where I am the top contributor. I have produced 8 good articles this year, with several more in the pipeline. I would like access to HighBeam in order to get access to content to contribute to Wikipedia. 20:12, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  42. User:Mailer diablo 27 DYKs, 1 GA, 3 FAs, over 50k edits since 2004. Would like to have a go at article writing again, and having access to a reference will be very useful to me. - Mailer Diablo 05:27, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  43. User:TheSoundAndTheFury Edited Wikipedia since 2010, nearly 3k edits. I write on contemporary China, finance, and other topics - sometimes contentious. Would be wonderful to have access to this source of information and really help the work I do here. TheSoundAndTheFury (talk) 20:35, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  44. User:Nemonoman Edited Wikipedia since 2005, more than 6000 edits. A major contributor to Good Articles Taj Mahal and Meher Baba, recently became a major contributor to Roller Derby which I hope to make a Good Article. I am particularly interested in Highbeam resources for recent news references about Meher Baba, and news concerning the controversy of Sufism Reoriented with local planning groups in Contra Costa county.--Nemonoman (talk) 14:14, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  45. User:Ruby2010 Edited Wikipedia since late 2008, with 3 FAs, 7 FLs, and 80+ GAs. Plan to add more content to episodes of The Office and Fringe as well as the season premiere of Rome. Ruby 2010/2013 04:57, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  46. User:Pgallert. >8,000 edits on en since 2008. I write about history and geography of Namibia, see here. --Pgallert (talk) 09:32, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No more in round 4 please. Please apply in round 5 below.

Round 5, delivered late August

  1. soosim (talk · contribs) - ditto
  2. User:stephenwanjau. >3000 edits on English Wikipedia. I write about Kenya and Africa at large. I intend to continue this work, specifically writing about topics related to art, literature, cinema, poetry, culture and knowledge Uwanja Talk to Me. Email Me. 03:33, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  3. User:Rajasekhar1961: I have more than 30,000 edits in English Wikipedia and 50,000 edits in Telugu Wikipedia. I wrote mostly about Indian cinema, biographies, culture and biology related articles. I think the HighBeam is very useful for my wikipedia related work. Thank you.Dr. Rajasekhar A. 09:03, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  4. User:AgadaUrbanit Editor since 2008 with over 7,500 edits. I am adding content and references in a variety of areas. AgadaUrbanit (talk) 23:56, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  5. User:Dreadstar, 50,000 edits on the English WP over 6 1/2 years. Highbeam has so many helpful references and content, I really saw its value when I was expanding an article recently, and one of the other editors used Highbeam references to great advantage! Dreadstar ☥ 05:11, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  6. User:Spitzl, roughly 2,000 edits each on the English and German WP. I am adding content and references mostly in the field of economics (up until now) and philosophy (in the future) --spitzl (talk) 16:39, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  7. User:Ceradon I have been an active contributor for a while now. I've actively contributed to the creation and/or expansion of a number of articles. I have around 3200 edits. HighBeam will for sure be very helpful in my research and content work, as I'm planning on being more active over the coming weeks and months. --ceradon talkcontribs 02:31, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  8. User:Praveenp, Active in ml.wikipedia and Commons for 6 years. More than 10,000 edits in Malayalam Wikipedia and More than 3000 edits in Commons. Mainly contributing on Technology, Birds, History--Praveen:talk 04:56, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  9. CHUCAO: Editor in es:WP since July 2010. More than 22,000 edits. More than 300 articles. CHUCAO (talk) 21:29, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  10. User:FruitMonkey, Active in English WP since 2006 with around 45,000 edits. I mainly focus on Wales and Welsh related articles and Highbeam holds access to many local papers which I would find extremely helpful in accessing. FruitMonkey (talk) 11:03, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  11. User:Mohamed CJ, Active in English Wikipedia for just over a year with about 4,000 edits. I'm active in content creation of articles related to the Bahraini uprising. Getting access to more resources is definitely a good thing. Mohamed CJ (talk) 16:59, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    User:Fasttimes68, Active in English Wikipedia since 2007 with 1,500+ edits. Recently I've started researching regionally based businesses that have either expanded nationally, or have local cultural significance. Some of these businesses have either thrived, or have gone out of business entirely. I wish to use HighBeam to find sources which will allow me to add historical value to these (and other) articles. Fasttimes68 (talk) 15:27, 3 August 2012 (UTC) (Stricken, user is banned. Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:30, 18 August 2012 (UTC))[reply]
  12. SchroCat; active on English Wikipedia. Having put a number of Bond-related articles up to GA standard, I'm moving into other entertainment-related articles, bringing them up to GA level, with a very ocassional FA thrown in too. Registered editor since April 2011; 10k+ edits - SchroCat (^ • @) 15:43, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  13. User:secretlondon, Joined in 2003, 30,000+ edits. Researching Russia/USSR currently. I don't have access to this elsewhere. Secretlondon (talk) 20:36, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  14. User:Boson --Boson (talk) 20:59, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  15. User:Dementia13. Active on English Wikipedia for several years. Have made thousands of edits, written several GAs, and edited others' articles to FA status. Member of several WikiProjects and the Guild of Copy Editors, and in the inquiry stages of forming a WikiProject dedicated to MIDI technology. Dementia13 (talk) 21:33, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  16. User:Enric Naval +25,000 edits on English wikipedia over several years. I edit several kinds of articles. Many times I need access to old articles of regional newspapers. --Enric Naval (talk) 21:41, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  17. User:Peter cohen Number of edits in low five figures. I have created articles mainly related to opera and classical music but also one on psychology. Good and Featured content again falls mainly into classical music/opera but also mythology. I have exhausted my supply of programmes from first productions of operas and therefore need better online access to find good material.--Peter cohen (talk) 22:03, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Khazar2 (talk · contribs) Between my two accounts, I've made more than 60,000 edits in the past six years. I write extensively about human rights issues around the world, and access to archived newspapers and magazines would be invaluable. Khazar2 (talk) 02:56, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Diannaa (talk · contribs) I have made around 50,000 edits since 2009. Current editing interests are Nazi Germany and biographies of other historic figures. -- Dianna (talk) 04:00, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Ravenswing (talk · contribs · count) I have over 35,000 edits, and have been very active over the years in both AfD and article creation for hockey articles, both areas where access to old newspaper articles is vital. Ravenswing 05:44, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  21. ((user|LeadSongDog}} Over 24,000 edits, mostly in articlespace. Active in citegnoming and source verification on diverse topics.LeadSongDog come howl! 06:02, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  22. User:hchc2009 I have made around 26,000 edits in the last few years, primarily in content generation. A couple of test searches show items on history that would be useful on the HighBeam system. I don't have access to this elsewhere. Hchc2009 (talk) 06:44, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  23. User:Edgar181 I have made >100,000 edits and have been heavily involved in adding content related to chemistry and other science topics. I intend to continue adding such content. -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:33, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  24. User:Hack I have been active for seven years - I tend to focus on creating articles on historical sports figures. I don't have access to this facility elsewhere. Hack (talk) 15:42, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  25. User:Toa Nidhiki05 Active almost exclusively on the English Wikipedia for almost four years with 7,000+ edits, primarily related to music (mainly Contemporary Christian, Christian rock, and rock articles), sports (American football), and politics. Toa Nidhiki05 17:58, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  26. User:Rlendog - Active for several years with 45,000+ edits. Topics include tree of life, music and math where access to HighBeam could be useful. Rlendog (talk) 20:58, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  27. GregJackP (GregJackP) - 11,000 edits, on Wikipedia since 2006. I mainly edit in legal fields, primarily SCOTUS cases involving Native American (Indian tribes). I also edit some in Military History, and I am a participant in WikiProject: Articles for Creation. This would be very valuable to me in all of these areas. GregJackP Boomer! 22:13, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  28. User:The Blade of the Northern Lights; most of my article writing centers around the Emishi and Ainu of Japan, Japan's pre-World War II underworld, and the history of Burma; none of said topics are easy to references for. Access to HighBeam would be tremendously helpful, for my personal interests but far more importantly for my article research. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 01:46, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  29. User:Dolfrog I have been actively editing for a number of years, over 7000 edits primarily with articles related to a wide range of invisible disabilities and the related medical research. HighBeam could help find more detailed information to support an articles content. dolfrog (talk) 10:39, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  30. User:MrX With more than 8000 edits on enwiki, I am active in creating and editing articles on a variety of subjects including history, historical biographies, science, geography, photography, civil rights and music. My biggest impediment to contributing more substantially is lack of access to good research material. MrX 01:37, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  31. User:Torchiest With almost 13,000 total edits now, I have written seven Good Articles, one of which is on the cusp of becoming a Featured Article. I do most of my work on music and video games from the 1990s, for which sources are skimpy, and I have seen a lot of potentially great sources on Highbeam that would be a big help. —Torchiest talkedits 21:24, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  32. User:Ant_ie ant_ie (talk) 09:01, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  33. User:Mattlore. Active on the English Wikipedia. Create and Expand rugby league and other sport articles, especially biographies as well as New Zealand history. Mattlore (talk) 09:14, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  34. User:GermanJoe reviewing, occasional work on history or country related articles (1.2K edits). Please skip my application, if spots get rare for more active members.
  35. User:NealeFamily Creating, editing, and reviewing articles about New Zealand and automobiles are my primary interest, but these take me into other areas from time to time, which makes access to a wide range of reference material very useful NealeFamily (talk) 09:23, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  36. User:Gbawden Creating, reviewing and updating articles relating to South African military biographies mainly Gbawden (talk) 09:57, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  37. User:Jokestress I have created over 1,800 redlinked articles on a wide range of topics, with a focus on biographies. Jokestress (talk) 10:07, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Sesamevoila (talk) 10:38, 15 August 2012 (UTC) I have mainly been editing biographies and histories but I want to get more into creating articles which would require greater access to sources[reply]
  39. User:Qwfp. English Wikipedia. Creating, editing and verifying articles on statistics, cycling, British settlements and people. Qwfp (talk) 10:52, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  40. User:Two Hearted River I write rock music and ice hockey articles, etc., and review featured article candidates and good article nominations. Two Hearted River (paddle / fish) 11:11, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  41. User:Struway2. 30,000+ edits on en:wiki. Active in creating, improving and verifying football-related articles, both biographical and historical. Access to regional newspapers not online elsewhere would be particularly useful. Struway2 (talk) 11:15, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  42. User:Siawase. I have over 9000 edits on English Wikipedia and have contributed to 3 GAs. I work mainly at improving/expanding contemporary popular culture articles (children's culture and entertainer biographies.) I intend to continue this work, and as I have run into Highbeam previously when looking for sources, an account would be very useful. Siawase (talk) 12:11, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Wildthing61476 (talk) 12:18, 15 August 2012 (UTC) Editor for 6 years, close to 10,000 edits, mainly work in vandalism cleanup however I would like a good tool to use for verification of material added to article, and improving existing articles on Baltimore-related topics.[reply]
  44. User:Rrius. Nearly 40k edits (nearly 30k in Article space). I have been working on creating and expanding articles related to UK Shadow Cabinets, including Labour Party Shadow Cabinet elections, Shadow Cabinets of each Leader of the Opposition, and holders of various shadow roles. I have done the same to a limited extent with Canada and Australia. On numerous occasions, I have run into inaccessible HighBeam information, so I know it would help.
  45. SilkTork (talk · contribs · count) Good Article writer and reviewer. SilkTork ✔Tea time 12:32, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Dr.K. (talk · contribs · count) Applying for what could be a useful tool for a diverse range of articles. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 12:37, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Fayedizard (talk) 12:38, 15 August 2012 (UTC) would be great for the disability articles.[reply]
  48. User:Till I Go Home—I would love to have access to this as there are various sources about British pop music from English newspapers (such as The Indepdendent) that I would like to use for articles that I'm working on. I have made almost 8,000 edits to Wikipedia since joining in May 2009. Till I Go Home 12:57, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Moorlock (talk · contribs) Love to dig in the dusty stacks. Moorlock (talk) 13:06, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Thoughtfortheday (talk · contribs) I have 4000 edits on English Wikipedia. I like to refer to periodicals, and access to subscription only material would improve the quality of my contributions.--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 13:21, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  51. EEng (talk · contribs · count) Would like wider access to sources lending notability to topics. Plus my particular interest: bringing Phineas Gage to GA or higher. Modestly believe I have a clear understanding of use and citation of sources [11]. (Have verified I have no access via other routes.) EEng (talk) 13:36, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  52. User:Bagworm: I've made several thousand edits over the last few years to a wide range of topics including literature, geography and biography. As I live far from a library I find lack of access to reliable sources a major disadvantage. --gråb whåt you cån (talk) 13:47, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  53. User:Miniapolis: Registered editor since 2007; very active with content creation (two articles so far, and I hope to create more) and article improvement (over 9,000 edits, nearly all in main space and non-automated, since late 2010). My local library has inadequate access to research materials appropriate for Wikipedia.
  54. KathrynLybarger (talk · contribs) I have over 14000 edits on a wide variety of topics. More reliable sources for content verification would be most useful. -- KathrynLybarger (talk) 14:01, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Samar (talk · contribs) - 6 years, +1000 edits. Work on expanding and creating new articles. Samar Talk 14:10, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  56. benzband (talk · contribs) 1 year (19 August precisely) and over 10000 edits in many areas of Wikipedia and the mainspace. I don't live near any libraries, and if i did they are in french which isn't as useful on the *English* Wikipedia. I suspect this tool will be handy in finding usable (as in "reliable") sources. 14:43, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  57. tjarrett (talk · contribs) 6 years, > 2000 edits. Focus in English Wikipedia on articles related to the University of Virginia. There are many published research papers that are reliable sources that I'd like to be able to cite going forward. 15:23, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
  58. K8 fan (talk · contribs) English Wikipedia editor since October 2006 on a wide range of topics. I create new articles, improve existing ones and attempt to bring them to "Good" or even "Featured" status. Currently I use Google Books, and Highbeam would fill in the gaps. K8 fan (talk) 15:34, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Prolog (talk · contribs) - A wider range of sources would be helpful when working on articles related to historical sporting figures and events. Prolog (talk) 16:19, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  60. TheOldJacobite (talk · contribs) - Editor on English Wikipedia for nearly 5 years; 57,000+ edits; interested in doing research to improve articles in the areas of literary and artistic Modernism and the 20th century avant-garde; especially articles related to William S. Burroughs. ---The Old JacobiteThe '45 16:43, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Gyrofrog (talk · contribs). Editor since April 2004, >43,000 edits. Mainly active in WP:JAZZ, WP:ETHIOPIA and WP:SOMALIA topic areas. Thanks!
  62. Peter M. Brown (talk · contribs) 2 years, ~1500 edits, mainly concerned with zoological evolution. No academic affiliation. JSTOR is the only relevant service provided by my public library. Peter M. Brown (talk) 16:59, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Diego Grez (talk · contribs) I think this would help me with my work on Chilean topics. Diego Grez (talk) 17:09, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Savidan (talk · contribs) Editor since December 2005. >50,000 edits. I recently graduated from law school and thus no longer have access to all the free resources that I used to. Savidan 17:18, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  65. mercy11 (talk · contribs) Editor since 2009. Over 5,000 edits. I never add anything I cannot cite. This will be useful. Mercy11 (talk) 17:31, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  66. TopGun (talk · contribs) 5+ years, 15000+ edits: regular contributor. --lTopGunl (talk) 17:57, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  67. AllyD (talk · contribs), editor since 2005 with over 11,000 live edits. Active mainly around political philosophy, Scottish, music topics, and in new page patrolling, AfD etc. so access to referencing resuorces beyond Google would be useful. AllyD (talk) 18:01, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Rockfang (talk · contribs · count), I've been editing here for over 4 and a half years and I have over 20,000 live edits.--Rockfang (talk) 18:16, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  69. User:Darkness Shines First edit Jul 07, 2011, 9,559 as of this post. Focus on history articles as well as human rights abuses. Access to this resource would be beneficial for obtaining quality sources for the article I work on and create. Darkness Shines (talk) 18:18, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  70. INeverCry (talk · contribs), active since 2010, 32000 edits. I work primarily on Russian and Soviet writer articles where sources can be hard to find, so hopefully highbeam would provide me with more. INeverCry 18:24, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Slgrandson (talk · contribs · count) - 10,000+ permanent edits on EN WP since early 2005. Focusing on animated and children's media these days. Already registered on Highbeam (as "proudheartlover" since late 2005), but can't log in the right way again for some reason. --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 19:10, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  72. j8079s (talk · contribs) I need all the help I can get
  73. Wikipedical (talk · contribs) - Editor since 2005 (!), 7000+ edits on the English Wikipedia. Active in popular culture and politics. Would love to access HighBeam and its wonderful resources for references. -- Wikipedical (talk) 19:34, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  74. SarekOfVulcan (talk · contribs) - long-time editor, fair number of articles started from scratch, lots of articles with added references, love to be able to do that to more of them. :-) --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 19:46, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Droodkin (talk · contribs) - 1,200+ edits since 2011 as well as being a long time user of Wikipedia since 2006. I focus on WikiProject Bahrain articles (mostly to do with the History of Bahrain)and would really appreciate the resources. --Droodkin (talk) 20:23, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  76. User:Black Falcon. English Wikipedia w/ 50,000+ edits of which 15,000+ mainspace. My main areas of content creation are politics/politicians, history and Africa. I often write about topics for which publicly available online sources are hard to come by, so access to HighBeam would be a great help. -- Black Falcon (talk) 21:14, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  77. User:Yoninah. English Wikipedia editor since 2005 with over 18,000 edits (over 11,000 in mainspace). I work primarily in content generation, research, and verification of articles about Jewish rabbis and yeshivas, and come across HighBeam articles frequently, such as archived Jerusalem Post articles. Having access to these articles would improve my citations and verifiability. Yoninah (talk) 21:49, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  78. User:5 albert square. English Wikipedia sysop and editor, been a member since 2008 with over 39,000 edits. I work mainly referencing television related articles and BLPs. Some of the articles, particularly the older ones, have difficulty finding sources, I think Highbeam would be of great use.--5 albert square (talk) 22:07, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Dalahäst (talk · contribs) — been on Wikipedia for a few years; became more active as of late. Currently 3000-some edits. Would be useful in adding sources to newer articles, something I see a lot from recent changes / new page patrolling. I've often wanted access to something like this to either add sources to an unsourced article, or verify the accuracy of new material, and this looks like a great way to do that.  dalahäst (let's talk!) 22:34, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  80. User:Musdan77 - Editor for 3 1/2 years, with 4,000 edits; editing mostly in biblical, and biographical topics, especially in arts and entertainment. --Musdan77 (talk) 22:37, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  81. User:Moriori - Have been here just over 10 years (but with account since Oct 03). Irregular contributor, but that's about to change soon and I can spend more time editing en.Wiki. HighBeam would be of incalculable benefit to me. Moriori (talk) 22:52, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  82. User:emerson7 - i have over 40,000 edits since 2006. Highbeam is an invaluable source for validating claims, and crosschecking assertions in references given by editors. it would be great to have unfettered access. --emerson7 00:29, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Andrevan@ - admin since 2004, 12,000 edits since 2006. Andrevan@ 00:40, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Bertaut (talk) 00:41, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  85. FlugKerl 8000 edits on Aviation pages in last two years FlugKerl (talk) 00:54, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Zoupan (talk · contribs) - 2 years, 10,000+ edits, mostly in content such as history, geography and culture of the Balkans.--Zoupan 00:28, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  87. User:GenQuest I am a history buff and like to correct the historically inaccurate entries rampant in new bio and historical articles. I've done a lot of library research on historical figures in the past, but a recent cross-country move has separated me from my sources. This would help! Thank you. GenQuest (talk) 01:22, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  88. User:LadyofShalott - have been on English Wikipedia since 2006 and have over 40k edits. Involved in content creation in a variety of subjects with 2 GAs. This resource would aid me in expanding and creating articles. LadyofShalott 02:09, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  89. User:Til Eulenspiegel - over 10K edits since 2007 and several articles created. I would love to use this resource for more research. Til Eulenspiegel (talk) 02:32, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Mathonius (talk) -- My edits on en.wikipedia (±5,500) mainly consist of reverting and reporting vandalism, but I often write articles on nl.wikipedia (57,000 edits since 2010) and would love to have access to this resource. Mathonius (talk) 02:52, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  91. User:Dcirovic - over 80K edits globaly in the last couple of years, mainly in the area of natural sciences. --Dcirovic (talk) 02:54, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  92. User:Clarityfiend - 75K edits. Films are my most frequent topic, but I'm also into biographies, history, whatever piques my interest. I have on occasion been unable to access hibeam sources. Clarityfiend (talk) 03:19, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  93. User:Jsayre64 - Wikipedian since 2010; 8,500+ edits. I could use this for articles on Oregon and its history to help with WP:ORE, my main editing interest. Jsayre64 (talk) 03:31, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  94. User:Torsodog - Editing on and off for almost 5 years, 11k+ edits. Subjects I stick with are usually Chicago, Japan and baseball. I strive to make the articles/lists I work on good enough for featured status. In the past I've had to abandon several featured article goals on niche subjects because I wasn't able to verify info that I knew was on highbeam. It was infuriating. --TorsodogTalk
  95. Eastlaw (talk · contribs · count) - active since March 2006, 73,000+ edits, mostly on law, politics, economics, history, and related subjects. Access to HighBeam would be very useful for me. --Eastlaw talk ⁄ contribs 04:14, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Peterdownunder (talk · contribs) - active on Simple English Wikipedia, with 21,000 edits over four years. --Peterdownunder (talk) 04:20, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Lilitik22 (talk · contribs) - I'm an active editor in Armenian Wikipedia with about 3000 edits over 1.5 year. --Lilitik22 (talk) 04:48, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  98. ManiacParisien (talk · contribs) - active on French Wikipedia with 2000 edits in two years. --ManiacParisien (talk) 05:23, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Camw (talk · contribs) - 25,000 edits and 7 years on en.wikipedia with over 100 articles created and 20+ DYKs. Would use the service for new articles as well as improving existing articles, mostly focused on wine and football areas. Thank you. Camw (talk) 05:34, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Vojtech.dostal (talk · contribs) - 26,518 edits in 5 years on Czech Wikipedia, ca. 1500 articles created, mostly Biology/Chemistry. Thank You! --Vojtech.dostal (talk) 05:52, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Retired electrician (talk · contribs) - barely over 1k edits on Russian wikipedia but 2 FAs and some GAs. Subjects: history of technology, biographies, random improvements of other FA/GA candidates. Retired electrician (talk) 06:07, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Thierry Caro (talk · contribs). I'm an admin on the French Wikipédia, that I have edited more than 140 000 times. Thierry Caro (talk) 06:28, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Vyom25 (talk · contribs)- Over 3000 edits in English Wikipedia and over 4000 edits globally. I mainly edit articles related to India and various Sports in general. Thank you.--Vyom25 (talk) 06:43, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  104. CarlesMartin (talk · contribs) - I'm active on Catalan Wikipedia, more than 60.000 edits, my subjects are chess and sports in general.
  105. Ylee (talk · contribs) - 15,000 edits over eight years. I never do just typos or punctuation fixes, but always seek to make meaningful contributions, large or small. Looking over my edit history I see articles on sports, military history, political science and history, biographies, film and TV shows, and universities; you name it, I've edited it.
  106. Florentyna (talk · contribs)- 60,000+ edits in de, en, commons. 6,000+ articles created. Mainly things related to sports, especially badminton. I often met HighBeam as source possible to be cited, but without an account the articles were only partially seen.
  107. --Yoavd (talk) 07:37, 16 August 2012 (UTC) I have 40000 edits in the Hebrew wikipedia.[reply]
  108. FocalPoint (talk · contribs) more active in elwiki, admin in el wiki, active since 2005, >42000 edits, indicative interests (but not limited) politics, history, literature
  109. OpenFuture (talk · contribs) - A user since 2008, I spend much of my time verifying claims, adding course and removing the unverifiable, for example at List of Knights Templar sites. --OpenFuture (talk) 08:13, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Hgetnet(talk|contribs) - I am mostly active in the Amharic Wikipedia with 12,423 edits in total. Hgetnet (talk) 09:06, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  111. மதனாஹரன்-1+ year, 6611 edits in Tamil Wikipedia. --மதனாஹரன் (talk) 10:13, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  112. Deinocheirus (talk · contribs) — more than 20,000 edits and 600 articles in Russian Wikipedia, more than 4 years of editing. --Deinocheirus (talk) 10:21, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Papacha (talk · contribs)- 5,000+ edits on English Wikipedia; mostly verification/custodial. Always looking to attribute biographical info/source edits & this'd help immensely. Papacha (talk) 10:28, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  114. User:Bharathiya - Active volunteer. 1400 edits. 6 years on Wiki. Bharathiya (talk) 10:30, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  115. V1adis1av (talk · contribs) Over 16,000 edits since 2005, mainly in ru.wikipedia + ru.wiktionary + en.wikipedia. --V1adis1av (talk) 10:38, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  116. Bill william compton (talk · contribs) – I've been editing English Wikipedia since 2010 and have over 20,000 edits (and 30,800+ global contributions). Besides English Wiki, I'm highly active on Hindi Wikipedia (where I'm also an admin). 5 GAs, 5 FLs and 33+ DYKs on English Wiki, 2 FAs and several DYKs on Hindi Wiki. — Bill william comptonTalk 10:41, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  117. I write mainly on world heritage sites in he.wiki, and find the lack of sources in Hebrew very frustrating. Broccolo (talk) 11:06, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  118. I've been involved in creating, editing, and reviewing articles about Singapore and business organisations on en.wikipedia since 2009. Access to a wide range of reference material would be useful during citation. ♠♠ BanëJ ♠♠ (Talk) 11:12, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  119. Mackensen (talk · contribs). English Wikipedia and Commons. I would use HighBeam to verify the opening dates for railway stations in the United States. HighBeam frequently appears on my search results.
  120. lentower (talk · contribs · count) Editing since 2006. 12000+ edits, plus those before I made an account. Be so much better than google.com.
  121. Epsilon0 (talk · contribs · count) 6+ years, 12000+ edits on the french wikipedia, especially in mathematical logic.
  122. User:Oleola. 12000+ edits on English and Polish wikipedia, working on football related articles.--Oleola (talk) 12:48, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  123. Hindustanilanguage (talk · contribs) Active Editor on English Wiki and Hindi Wiki, Contributor and Filemover on Wikimedia Commons, and also other Wikis with over 15000+ contributions in all (Since January 2011).
  124. Iselilja (talk · contribs) Signed up more than a year ago, mainly active the last months on Norwegian Wikipedia. 1000+ edits, mostly history, politics and society in general.
  125. Smallchief (talk · contribs) Active since 2010; 6,000 edits; created or made major contributions to more than 150 articles. Principal interest: history, esp. history and archaeology of North American Indians. Smallchief:(talk)
  126. Pras (Contrib — Statistic — Global) active mainly in Javanese Wikipedia since 2007 with >70k edits. Interested in political research as well as geography, biography, history and other related matters. Pras (talk) 14:41, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  127. SteveBaker (talk · contribs) Active since 2005, 24,000 edits. I WikiGnome on hundreds of articles - and having the ability to search this motherlode of references would be a boon to my work here. SteveBaker (talk) 14:59, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  128. எஸ்ஸார் (talk · contribs) Editor since 2008. 1060 edits in ta wiki. 480 edits in en wiki and few contributions on commons and other wikis. I need to expand articles related to Tamil Nadu history and Southern Indian history. A HighBeam account might be helpful on his.
  129. User:Ttzavaras Active since 11 Dec. 2007, 40,330 edits in el.Wikipedia (mostly WW II History, geography and biographies), some small activity in en.Wikipedia and fr.Wikipedia.
  130. Secret of success (talk · contribs) Been here for nearly a year and a half. Primary subjects of interest include Indian cinema and other India-related articles. Secret of success (talk) 16:00, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  131. Shearonink Yes *please*, I would love to have access to the HighBeam database. 11,000+ edits, active since 2010. Shearonink (talk) 16:27, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  132. Themfromspace (talk · contribs)20000+ edits over 4+ years. ThemFromSpace 16:53, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  133. درفش کاویانی (talk · contribs) 14000+ edits over 4+ years. I Working in multilpe in Persian Wikipedia, such as Archaeology and Photography. Have made 4 Featured Articles. Darafsh Kaviyani (Talk)‍ 17:52, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  134. وحید قاسمیان (talk · contribs) 4500 edits over 1 year and 8 month in farsi wikipedia.--وحید قاسمیان (talk) 17:49, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  135. Pseudo-Richard (talk · contribs) 10,000+ edits to English Wikipedia over 6 years --Pseudo-Richard (talk) 17:57, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  136. Ladsgroup (talk · contribs · count) over six years and +38000 edits in fa.wp. I need for writing featured article (I already have six):)Ladsgroupبحث 18:17, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  137. sicaspi, 6 years , ~ 14 k edits on fa wiki (Here), working in multiple topics in Farsi wikipedia. --sicaspi (talk) 18:58, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  138. Faramarz (talk · contribs) +7000 edits in fa.wikipedia and +1000 edits in fa.wikinews with more than of 1 year activity in Persian Wikipedia and Persian Wikinews. --Faramarz♚♔♚ 19:05, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  139. CRGreathouse (talk · contribs) administrator with over 10,000 edits on the English Wikipedia since 2006. CRGreathouse (t | c) 19:17, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  140. disavian (talk · contribs) with 40,000+ edits, five FAs and two FLs since 2006. Disavian (talk) 19:29, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  141. Bamse (talk · contribs) 20,000+ edits on en.wikipedia, active since 2005. Mostly writing about culture and history topics particularly about Japan. I would like to continue writing in this field and think that HighBeam could be useful in this respect. bamse (talk) 19:40, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  142. Bbb23 (talk · contribs) administrator with over 32,000 edits.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:54, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  143. Mion (talk · contribs) 15000 edits since 2005. Content creation on technologies, verifying content and updating references in time. Mion (talk) 21:57, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  144. Ds13 (talk · contribs) WP editor since 2004. All subjects, 4,600 edits. Citation, citation, citation. :) --Ds13 (talk) 22:46, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  145. Glavkos (talk · contribs) 20.000+ global edits, mostly in el.wikipedia (6.000+ edits) and el.wikinews. My contributions in el.wikipedia are mostly about litrature, history, artists biographies and linguistics. I am also sysop on el.wikinews and quite active on translatewiki.net.Glavkos (talk) 23:11, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  146. Jojalozzo (talk · contribs) citation gnome, over 10k edits since 2007. Thank you. Jojalozzo 23:18, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  147. Curly Turkey (talk · contribs) doing mostly underserviced alternative comics and pre-WWII comic strips. CüRlyTüRkeyTalkContribs 23:23, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  148. Makecat (talk · contribs), active since 2010, over 24,000 edits on zhwiki (3 FAs, 1 FL, 2 GAs, 95 DYKs). And 4,500 edits on enwiki, with 90 articles created. I need access to sources to create and expand chemistry and astronomy articles. --MakecatTalk 01:25, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  149. The Determinator (talk · contribs · count)02:08, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  150. TenPoundHammer (talk · contribs), active since 2005, 180,000+ edits on en.wiki. I've found many articles on HighBeam that would be beneficial to creation of articles on shopping malls and retail in general — many times I can get the info I need from the preview, but quite often I find I need a little more. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 02:09, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  151. Tomwsulcer (talk · contribs), active since 2009, 9,634 edits, almost all on en.wiki. Perhaps tens of millions of readers. I continue to like to revamp articles -- here are many which I wrote substantial portions of; Highbeam would be great for my ability to contribute. Many times I've hunted for information only to come across the Highbeam paywall, and couldn't get it.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 02:16, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  152. My76Strat (talk · contribs), Joined in March 2010, +28000 edits. I am currently coordinating for WikiProject Record Production and can foresee significant benefit from the additional sources, especially the trade magazines. 76Strat String da Broke da (talk) 02:21, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  153. Huji (talk · contribs) 30000+ edits over 4 years. I have been mostly active on Persian Wikipedia and Simple English wikipedia. I am a current Admin and Bureaucrat in Persian Wikipedia, and I am interested to use HighBeam to find resources that can help me with expanding articles on IT related subjects, as well as those related to math and statistics. huji—TALK 02:40, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  154. Spyder_Monkey (talk · contribs) 21,000+ edits since 2006. Working on articles about the history of motorsport and of Alabama. Spyder_Monkey (Talk) 02:56, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  155. Kansas Bear 13K edits since 2006. I edit from England to the Indus River during the medieval period. Mainly adding references to typically unreferenced articles. --Defensor Ursa 04:39, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  156. Mspraveen (talk · contribs) 10k+ edits, multiple GAs and DYKs. This is wonderful! I've always found sources lacking for a lot of Indian articles. This will help a great deal to me! Mspraveen (talk) 04:44, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  157. Kafziel (talk · contribs) Editing since 2005, admin since 2007, 20,000+ edits. Always looking to improve article sources. Many thanks for the opportunity! Kafziel Complaint Department: Please take a number 05:09, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  158. Tenkasi Subramanian - 7000 edits in 1 year. --Tenkasi Subramanian (talk) 07:09, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  159. TheSpecialUser (talk · contribs) - An editor for long and have got 5 articles promoted to GA status and 1 DYK. Also, I've reviewed 23 GA nominations thus I feel that this can be really useful. TheSpecialUser TSU 07:27, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  160. AlleinStein (talk · contribs) - 5000+ edits since 2008 at vi.wiki. AlleinStein (talk) 08:56, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  161. پسر یاس (talk) 10:05, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  162. قلی زادگان (talk · contribs · count)3.5+ years,2500+ edits on the fa.wikipedia
  163. Aarash (talk · contribs) over 180000 edit and active from 2009 in persian wikipedia. i am an admin and Bureaucrat in fa.wikipedia (persian wikipedia) now and i wanna use "HighBeam", "Credo accounts" and "Questia" to find reliable resources to write historical article. fa:user:آرش is my main account. it's "Aarash" in Persian alphabet!
  164. Ashley_thomas80 (talk · contribs · count) Interested in history, science and society. Will be highly helpful, if provided. TIA
  165. Biblbroks (talk · contribs · count) 6 years active on en, sh, sr, en.wiktionary. 10.000+ edits. Interested in history and science. --biblbroks (talk) 14:30, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  166.  Buaidh  – 124,231 edits and counting – 14:55, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  167. Mike Cline, (Talk)) A godsend for serious editors --Mike Cline (talk) 15:19, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  168. Mareklug (talk · contribs · count) Mainly en and pl wiki, also commons. Lately sourcing poorly-sourced articles, across-the-board interests.
  169. Piledhigheranddeeper (talk · contribs · count) A maven of [citation needed]; would love to be able to insert more actual citations instead....
  170. Blackknight12 (talk · contribs · count) active in English Wikipedia with 12,500+ edits since 2008. I mostly work with Sri Lanka based topics and access to more reliable and larger group of work will allow for a much more reliable and tension disruptive free Wikiproject Sri Lanka.--Blackknight12 (talk) 18:37, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  171. Cryptic C62 (talk · contribs · count) content writer and peer reviewer with over 8000 edits since 2006.
  172. Mayooranathan Over 26,000 edits in Tamil Wikipedia since 2003 (Tamil Wikipedia User Page). I am an admin and Bureaucrat in the same. I contribute on topics related to Art, Architecture, language and History. It will be helpful if I get access to "HighBeam" account. -- Mayooranathan (talk) 18:50, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  173. Geni 28K edits since 2004. Would be useful for local history stuff and the like.©Geni 20:34, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  174. Hungda (talk · contribs) - 20K+ edits since 2009 at vi.wiki. Hungda (talk) 00:44, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  175. Bearian (talk · contribs · count) - admin and content editor with over 49,000 edits; additional research tools would be very useful to me to assist the project.
  176. Verman1 (talk · contribs) - 12K edits since 2010. Mostly active in Azerbaijani Wikipedia, also actively contribute in English and Russian Wikipedias. Mostly doing research on history, geography, mathematics, computing. I wanna use "HighBeam", "Credo accounts" and "Questia" in order to get better and more detailed sources for my contributions in future. --Verman1 (talk) 06:32, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  177. User:JamesMLane. English Wikipedia. I've created and edited articles in two main groups: American politics, and whatever book I happen to be reading at the moment. I've occasionally encountered HighBeam links without knowing much about the service and without wanting to pay to find out. If I had a free account I would definitely give it a fair shot just out of curiosity. JamesMLane t c 14:07, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  178. paddy2706 (talk · contribs · count). Mainly German wikipedia (10k+, 6+yrs), recently started contributing to english too.
  179. Camerafiend. 2500+ edits since 2005 on en-wp. Active content creator, especially on New Mexico-related topics; would benefit from access to a wider range of research materials. Camerafiend (talk) 19:25, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  180. bezik (talk · contribs · count), editor and administrator in Russian Wikipedia, 15k edits, Bezik (talk) 19:27, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  181. Truthsort (talk · contribs · count), Active since 2010 with 2,330+ edits. Truthsort (talk) 21:07, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  182. SreejithInfo (talk) 21:28, 18 August 2012 (UTC) : On Wikipedia since 2007, Reviewer since 2010, 3300+ edits[reply]
  183. User:SiameseTurtle, Active English Wikipedia user with 3500+ edits. I research longevity claims, which are heavily reliant on good access to newspaper articles SiameseTurtle (talk) 23:53, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  184. Scheinwerfermann (talk · contribs · count) • Nearly 10,000 edits since 2005. I tend to focus my efforts on articles about automotive-, lighting-, traffic-, and human sexuality-related topics and have frequently bumped my head against sources I'd like to see that are available only via HighBeam Research. —Scheinwerfermann T·C01:09, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  185. Ryoga Godai (talk). Been editing for about 3 years now and 18000+ edits. I wish to do some anime/manga/music articles in September. A HighBeam account would really be useful to me. Ryoga Godai (talk) 03:16, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  186. Cerevisae (talk) I have been editing Wikipedia since the year 2009 and with edits counts of over 1000. I'm especially interested in Sarawak political articles such as Sarawak_state_election,_1969 which I contributed significantly. Malaysian newspapers generally remove their news archives after a year or two, so I have to resort to HighBeam for archived local and international news dated back in the 1990s. I'm now interested to recreate Tawi Sli and expand Bruno Manser article in this one year period.Cerevisae (talk) 04:14, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  187. Peaceray (talk): I have been editing since the year 2010 & with count of over 3200 edits over 17 projects. I have already bumped into the Highbeam paywall several times & it would be useful for me to fully view Highbeam content. Peaceray (talk) 04:48, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  188. User:Manway. Active on the English Wikipedia as a vandal fighter and verification guru for others. Over 11,000 English Wikipedia edits in over 5 years of editing. Use for verification of claims by other editors.
  189. Medeis (talk · contribs) Reference desk editor, article creator and DYK and ITN contributor. μηδείς (talk) 05:24, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  190. User:ThatPeskyCommoner Been on English Wikipedia since 2006; 18,000+ edits. Pesky (talk) 05:25, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  191. Adavidb. Active editor of English Wikipedia since 2006, approaching 16,000 edits. Intend to use HighBeam access to find and cite reliable sources for article content, including verification of updates to over 600 watchlist articles, many related to American history. —ADavidB 06:02, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  192. User:Marokwitz. More than 14,000 edits on Wikipedia, active for over 6 years. Main research interests include terrorism, military history, history of the middle east. Marokwitz (talk) 10:15, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  193. Smkolins (talk) 11:39, 19 August 2012 (UTC) English Wikipedia though I've touched a few others. Primarily issues related to religion but also some on science especially astronomy and here and there on climate change.[reply]
  194. User:Froid. Froid 11:50, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  195. Totodu74 (talk) On French Wikipedia since 2008 ; 60 000+ edits ; admin. Mostly interested in biology (for ex zoology). Totodu74 (talk) 14:37, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  196. David Fuchs -- Editor since 2005 w/ >25,000 edits; natural sciences (esp. paleontology); media and new media; history. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs(talk) 15:54, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  197. olive: Editor since 2006, edit count 15,000+.(olive (talk) 16:17, 19 August 2012 (UTC))[reply]
  198. Egg Centric (talk · contribs · count) Egg Centric 17:17, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  199. Thom2002 (talk) 17:57, 19 August 2012 (UTC) 2000+ edits, 5+ years, this would be a great help with government and politics articles.[reply]
  200. Lobo512 Registered user for a year, 2800+ edits. My focus is on writing content so Highbeam access would be very useful. --Lobo (talk) 21:06, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  201. Matt Heard (talk · contribs) Registered user for many years with a focus on source mining, minor editing, and community support. 1000+ edits.
  202. Kaini (talk · contribs) Wikipedian since 2006 with 7000+ edits; lately I tend to focus on food- and music-related articles, supplying cites when I can find them, and general wikignoming (typos, punctuation, and grammar errors) when I come across something that needs fixing. Kaini (talk) 00:05, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  203. User:JohnCengiz77. I'm most active in the English Wikipedia, with 10,350 edits. I have contributed to a wide variety of articles over 2 years. I intend to further my work on biographical articles. John Cengiz talk 03:33, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  204. Strebe (talk · contribs) 2500+ scholarly edits since 2003. Strebe (talk) 04:01, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  205. User:JTSchreiber. I do a variety of work on English Wikipedia, including content generation and verification. I work on articles in various subject areas, with medicine, television and the environment being the most common. JTSchreiber (talk) 04:19, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  206. Yerpo (talk · contribs). Mostly active in Slovene Wikipedia with 62000+ edits, I write on all sorts of general topics outside my central interest (biology), including biographies, recent events, and history.
  207. Smsarmad (talk · contribs) I am on English Wikipedia since 2007 and have more than 20,000 edits. Most of my contributions are in Pakistan and Military History topic areas. Besides I am also expanding my contributions in Computer Science field recently. --SMS Talk 07:26, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  208.  pablo 08:13, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  209. Sidsahu (talk · contribs) Wikipedian since 2006 with 1477 edits and 71 articles created.I have contributed to Ancient Indian history, biographies of kings,film stars and hindu sages. Also covering hinduism related articles sids 08:22, 20 August 2012 (UTC)Talk[reply]
  210. Meetthefeebles (talk · contribs) Wikipedian for over two years with more than 2200 edits, including three stub-to-GA's and three more pending review. Access to resource would be very useful for my continued work on Geography articles. Meetthefeebles (talk) 08:27, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  211. Giuliopp (talk · contribs) English Wikipedia (occasionally Italian); +1000 edits; active mainly in the field of aviation and more generally science and technology. Intend to help clean up 'Citation needed' templates and expand existing articles.
  212. Ghirlandajo (talk · contribs). Editor for 8 years. 200 000+ contributions in Russian Wikipedia and here. --Ghirla-трёп- 12:11, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  213. OwenX (talk · contribs). Editor/admin for 7.5 years, 20,000+ edits. HighBeam access would help me in digging up citations, mostly for business/finance related articles. Owen× ☎ 13:27, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  214. Istvan (talk · contribs) Here for 7 years.István 15:48, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  215. Ghmyrtle (talk · contribs) Over 6 years experience, mainly content building, 43,000 edits, 540+ new articles mainly covering music biography and UK places. Ghmyrtle (talk) 19:40, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  216. Skeezix1000 (talk · contribs) Here for almost 7 years. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 20:14, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  217. Danmichaelo (talk · contribs) Active editor for ~ 14 months, primarily at Norwegian Wikipedia (17k edits), content creation work mainly (or so I believe) within international politics and politicians bios, geography, science and history of science. – Danmichaelo (talk) 21:06, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  218. TedPavlic (talk · contribs) 22:11, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  219. Laveol (talk · contribs) Active on history and Balkans-related articles. Articles on the Balkans are in need of reliable English-language sources and the account could prove helpful in this respect. I also make the occasional edit (mostly corrections) to other articles. More active in terms of content generation on the Bulgarian-language wikipedia. --Laveol T 23:18, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  220. Psalm84 (talk · contribs) Would use on a variety of subjects as I see a need. Psalm84 (talk) 00:59, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  221. Of (talk · contribs · count)
  222. AuthorityTam (talk · contribs · count) Since 2008 I have over 3,000 edits, mostly on religion and the Bible, but an eclectic mix of other stuff too. I often seek to add refs where warranted. --AuthorityTamtalk…contrib 03:46, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  223. Japf (talk · contribs · count) More than 6000 editions since 2006 in the portuguese wikipedia. Editions mainly templates or articles related to calendars, longevity or conversion between the brazilian and european versions of portuguese language.Japf (talk) 13:35, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  224. StoneProphet (talk · contribs) ~4000 edits on En-Wiki since 2009/2010; mostly history/milhist related StoneProphet (talk) 14:29, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  225. Gilabrand (talk · contribs) Have been editing Wikipedia for over six years with 40,043 eits to my credit. Highbeam access is critical for my work on articles in the realm of Israel, the Arab world and Judaism. --Geewhiz (talk) 14:39, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  226. GeorgeLouis I do research in 19th Century U.S. history, mostly in California and the West. I've written a TON of articles. Thank you. GeorgeLouis (talk) 17:03, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  227. Alfietucker I have been registered with Wikipedia since 2006 and have made over 2,650 edits. My main interest is Russian culture and music, and I intend to improve articles within that subject area, particularly concerning individuals and institutions active in the 20th and 21st centuries. Alfietucker (talk) 18:56, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  228. y (talk · contribs) - editor since 2007 on this username, sysop since before that, I work on biographies mostly, but I like to source all kinds of articles. -- Y not? 20:30, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  229. Carlstak (talk · contribs) Have been editing English Wikipedia since one year ago today. I've made over 2100 edits, created several articles, and added content to a couple hundred. I'm interested in an eclectic variety of subjects, especially history, most particularly that of Spain. Member of WikiProject Spain. Having access to HighBeam's resources would be very useful to my background reading, research, verification, and content writing. Carlstak (talk) 21:15, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  230. Fraggle81 (talk · contribs · count) I am an editor with over 5 years of experience and over 10000 edits. My main work is vandal fighting and verification of facts is of great importance for correctly identifying vandalism. I would also like to have the resources to create and expand articles. Fraggle81 (talk) 02:02, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  231. Taz Hi, I 'm editor of Hungarian wiki mostly, from 2008, and commons uploader of slovakian monuments. I have more than 9000 main edits. I would like to use the database for Archaeology, Slovakian villages and articles of other subjects. Thanks! Taz talk
  232. Belchfire (talk · contribs) Active contributor involved in article creation, clean-up and verification, also recently becoming involved in DYK. Belchfire-TALK 19:17, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  233. Cloudbound (talk · contribs) I have over 26,000 edits and have been going since 2005. This would really help with my work on aviation articles, as I've been looking for good sources to held with them. Cloudbound (talk) 21:16, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  234. Theopolisme (talk · contribs) I think the resource would be a great help in my content creation work... :) Theopolisme :) 21:35, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  235. Donner60 (talk · contribs) I applied for Questia on August 17. I see the request period for High Beam is nearing an end and 1,000 requests for all rounds together have not yet been made so I would like to add my request here also. If there are too many requests here, however, or if an editor can have only one of the accounts, I would opt for Questia. It does seem that High Beam also could be useful for my areas of interest and for DYK nomination review. I have been editing since July 2010. As of this posting, I have 4,016 edits on 949 pages; 74 new articles created; a few dozen existing pages substantially expanded or revised; 11 DYKs from articles created. I also occasionally review DYK nominations (22). I mainly work on history and biography, with a concentration on American history, especially American Civil War. Donner60 (talk) 07:03, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  236. TimidGuy (talk · contribs) Have been active in Wikipedia since 2006, with around 8,000 edits last time I checked. I'd like to have access to this. TimidGuy (talk) 10:54, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  237. Modernist - more than 75k edits...Modernist (talk) 14:57, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  238. Jojalozzo - citation gnome, around 15k edits. Jojalozzo 20:06, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  239. User:Keithbob - I meet all of the requirements (22,000 edits) and agree to the terms of usage. I would really like to have this subscription as my research for article revision and expansion is often blocked by requests for payment and/or subscription to High Beam in order to view a periodical as a source. Thanks.-- — Keithbob • Talk • 15:48, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  240. Mehran (talk · contribs) - Over six years activity and +11000 edits. Also sysop in fawiki. ●Mehran Debate● 16:55, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  241. DJ Nietzsche (talk · contribs) Active on Spanish Wikipedia; 14,000+ edits since 2007. I use to write articles about psychology (mainly memory processes and psychopathology) --DJ Nietzsche (talk) 21:57, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  242. Gotyear (talk · contribs) - I like to verify citation needed tags and replace online citations that have rotted, both small but important activities that a HighBeam subscription would help enormously. Gotyear (talk) 19:08, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  243. 2T (talk · contribs · count) - Have been active in TH WP since 2006, with 80,000+ edits 2T (talk) 08:15, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  244. Rohit Rawat - I am hyper active on Hindi Wikipedia with 12,000+ edits there and 10,000+ edits to Hindi Wiktionary and I'm an admin as well on both of these. I write all types of articles. I have edits to English Wikipedia as well and I fulfill all the requirements. My account is more close to three years old. I would very much like have access to this material. I hope I'll be given subscription and I thank for that. रोहित रावत (talk) 14:13, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  245. Dúnadan (talk · contribs) - 6774 edits in the English Wikipedia, and over 17,000 in the Catalan Wikipedia where I am an administrator since 2006. -- dúnadan : let's talk 14:39, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  246. SteveStrummer (talk · contribs) - Regular editor since 2008, 12k+ edits. I currently have no access to HighBeam. SteveStrummer (talk) 17:28, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  247. Mehdiabbasi (talk · contribs) I have enough requirements in fawiki with mehdiabbasi username. Mehdiabbasi (talk) 07:42, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DO NOT APPLY HERE APPLY IN ROUND 6 BELOW

Round 6

Delivery in January
  1. Tony Sidaway (talk · contribs). English Wikipedia member since 2004. I have made around 25,000 edits to articles along the way. I edit articles in areas such as current affairs, technology and science policy where a historical view is often lacking, and access to newspaper archives (which I don't currently have) would be helpful in maintaining a longer view. --TS 12:26, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Gombang (talk · contribs) Indonesian Wikipedia editor since 2006, sysop since 2008, with more than 9000 edits. Access will be helpful for me to expand and improve lots of articles in Indonesian Wikipedia. Gombang (talk) 12:40, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Bennylin (talk · contribs) more than 100.000 edits in Indonesian projects (Indonesian wp, Javanese wp, Indonesian wikt primarily). Particularly interested in documents for Wikisource (Indonesian, Javanese, Sundanese, and other languages of Indonesia)
  4. Sjones23 (talk · contribs) over 40,000 edits since 2006. I edit articles such as video games, music, television shows, films and anime. Access will be very helpful in expanding and improving articles to the highest degree possible. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 16:16, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Connormah (talk · contribs) - usually do research in finding biographical info, this could help a great deal with finding sources. – Connormah (talk) 23:14, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Rahmatdenas (talk · contribs) Today, I have over 4,000 edits on Indonesian Wikipedia since 2011. This would be very valuable to me in all of areas, has key resources not found elsewhere. Rahmatdenas (talk) 08:33, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  7. جواد (talk · contribs) Since 2009 , about 11,000 edits in fa@wiki Javad|Talk 16:41, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Mahan (talk · contribs) Over one years activity and +3000 edits in fa@wiki.--ماهان (talk) 09:58, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  9. So God created Manchester (talk · contribs) 6,915 edits. Would be helpful for writing articles on documentaries, especially when it comes to searching for past reviews.--SGCM (talk) 13:46, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Abebenjoe (talk · contribs). English Wikipedia member since 2006. Has made over 7000 edits, and helped edit two featured articles. I mostly focus on history, Canadian electoral districts, and Human Space Exploration. I have some access to newspapers via the Toronto Public Library, but it is limited in scope, and does not, to my knowledge, include papers included in High Beam. As I also verify and repair citations, having access to this service would be very helpful.--Abebenjoe (talk) 21:35, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Early morning person (talk · contribs). English Wikipedia member since 2009. 1900 edits. I mainly edit articles about sports figures (e.g. Wayne Gretzky), yoga, meditation. Intentions for future research: more of the same. Would be helpful in getting best refs for these articles, which have a contemporary slant.EMP (talk) 23:40, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  12. brianhe (talk · contribs). English Wikipedia editor since 2004. Created 100+ new articles, ~23,000 edits. Active member of Motorcycling WikiProject and New Pages Patrol. Would use account for new articles, verification of BLPs and other relevant research. Brianhe (talk) 18:29, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  13. User-multi error: no username detected (help).. English Wikipedia Editor for several years. 40,000 51,000 plus edits. Doing quite a bit of work on DYKs (we just had a 30 in 1 DYK, which set a record) and new articles. Can better research and document articles on myriad of subjects. User:7&6=thirteen User talk:7&6=thirteen7&6=thirteen (☎) 21:01, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Martinevans123 (talk · contribs). English Wikipedia editor since 2007. Created a few new articles, ~24,000 edits on a wide range of subjects, often related to music, poetry and history. Would find this a useful tool. I am considering retirement, but this might encourage me to stay. Martinevans123 (talk) 08:30, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  15. CaroleHenson (talk · contribs) - I do not have free access to HighBeam. I do have preferences set to receive emails. I have been on en.WP since 5 February 2011 . I have made more than 26K edits. I am active in content generation, research and verification. This would be incredible!!!--CaroleHenson (talk) 19:17, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  16. NearTheZoo (talk · contribs) - My first edit was March 2010, and I have 4700+ live edits. I am an autoreviewer and have created almost 60 pages. I have frequently paid for articles through sources like the New York Times, so High Beam would be a great help. My new articles have included pages about individuals, memorials, organizations, movies, and books, so I do a good amount of research to find good references to ensure wiki articles are well referenced and resourced. This High Beam access would be great for me.NearTheZoo (talk) 13:09, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Doc9871 (talk · contribs) - I would like access to this to explore and use their content for referencing. I usually rely on Google or books I have on hand to back up and cite content, and would find this resource helpful. Doc talk 06:13, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Zozo2kx (talk · contribs). English Wikipedia editor since 2008, with over 18,000 edits. I edit articles mostly about history/archaeology or geography with a focus on Syria and the Middle East. Yazan (talk) 17:34, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Tvoz (talk · contribs) - Editor since 2006, just shy of 24,000 edits. Edit interests include but not limited to political biographies; people and events of significance in the popular culture, particularly of the second half of the 20th century; jumping on suddenly high-traffic articles about such people who have recently died but their articles are not up to our standards -- detailed information often not available through the usual middle-of-the-night Google searches. I spend a lot of time doing research for these articles, and immediate access to newspapers, magazines, journals, etc. would be extremely helpful. Also do a lot of fact-checking and reference improving in BLPs that I don't regularly otherwise edit. Tvoz/talk 18:33, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Taranet (talk · contribs) Editor since 2006, a current Admin in Persian Wikipedia. --Taranet (talk) 17:23, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  21. NarSakSasLee (talk · contribs) I have around 3,000 edits and have been quite active when I do contribute to articles, often finishing them up to a good standard once started. I'd like to use this in order to start contributing more to science and mechanical engineering articles since that's what I'm studying at in Oxford. I haven't found much up to date information on specific engineering breakthroughs aside from the usual articles on news websites. They're not specific enough and only give surface details. Google books is terrible. The information is usually 1-2 years out and again they only give surface details. This would be a great asset in order for me to contribute more to core articles that may be useful for Wikipedia readers. NarSakSasLee (talk) 23:52, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  22. CMBJ (talk · contribs) I am an active contributor who has been with the English Wikipedia since 2004. My scope of research spans a wide array of disparate subjects, including many which are still poorly accessible to the general public. I intend to continue my contributions to the project in such areas indefinitely.   — C M B J   13:25, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Hex (talk · contribs): Editor on the English Wikipedia for ten years. Admin for five. Major interest in referencing and citation maintenance.
  24. Dedda71 (talk · contribs): editor on the italian wikipedia since 2005, sysop since 2008. I need this resource for research and verification. --Dedda71 (talk) 06:02, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Raoli (talk · contribs) Italian Wikipedia, Wikimedia Commons and particularly Italian Wikiquote In the Wikipedia project I dedicate myself to creation of articles about actuality, groups of people and emerging technologies recently introduced (like QRpedia). On Wikiquote I add quotations about different thematic areas. For these reasons I should sign up. Raoli (talk) 17:45, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Spacepotato (talk · contribs) I have 24K+ edits and have been an editor here since 2005. I have created and revised a number of astronomy articles and hope to continue working on this in the future. Spacepotato (talk) 09:23, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Dennis Brown (talk · contribs) 29k edits, 6 years, enwp admin that spends edit time tracking sources for other articles (gnoming) and fixing articles. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 11:30, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Tijfo098 (talk · contribs): I've made about 12K edits since 2010. Access to humanities journals and old newspapers is quite limited for me, but I edit articles which require that as well, e.g. modern history. Tijfo098 (talk) 13:40, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Rschen7754 (talk · contribs): Editor/admin since 2005, 75K edits, active in FA writing. --Rschen7754 21:04, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Corporate Minion (talk · contribs): 8,400 edits more than 3.5 years on the site. I edit mostly on business and marketing topics. Corporate 17:41, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Doc Taxon (talk · contribs): I am active in en:WP:REX and especially active in its German brother de:WP:BIBA or de:WP:BIBR. I am looking for articles and literature for all the users who need it, to build well researched articles in English, German and Wikipedia of other languages. Thank you, Doc Taxon (talk) 16:13, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Neo139 (talk · contribs): 5+years, 5000+ edits. Interested in public policy in general.--Neo139 (talk) 02:01, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Mennonot (talk · contribs): Editor on English wikipedia since 2004 with 1000+ edits. My editing is focused on faith and politics. mennonot (talk) 17:46, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  34. TRLIJC19 (talk · contribs): When you count the time on my previous account as well as my time on this account, I have 4+ years of service and 10,000+ edits. In addition, I have written 2 featured articles, 2 featured lists, 20 good articles, 3 DYKs, and 2 A-Class articles. Access to a research site would be very helpful with my content creation. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 00:04, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  35. TBrandley (talk · contribs): I meet all the requirements of the above criteria, having made over 17,000 contributions to the English Wikipedia through over a year now/. I have written or significantly contributed to 3 featured articles, 2 featured lists, 13 good articles, and 1 A-Class article. I'd appreciate access to this very good website for my Wikipedia work. Thank you. TBrandley 01:07, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  36. محک (talk · contribs): I have many edit in MZN & FA wikipedias.--محک (talk) 20:52, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  37. D4nnyw14 (talk · contribs): I meet the above requirements and have been editing on the English wikipedia for over 2 years and have made over 7000 edits. I usually edit fictional characters and BLP articles which Highbeam would be an extremely useful tool in doing so. D4nnyw14 (talk) 20:08, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  38. fajr18 (talk · contribs):3000 edits + over 1 years + one good Article in fawiki. I need for writing featured articles. Fajr18 (talk) 14:26, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  39. SudoGhost (talk · contribs) - Over 20,000 edits over 3 y;ears (active for the last 23 months). I've significantly contributed to articles such as Buford, Georgia and created others such as Foremost (software). I meet the requirements listed, and although I don't have the dozens of GAs or DYKs that other users have, HighBeam access would be a great help with verification on articles that I'm contributing to, and would help in content creation, which I'm currently focusing on. - SudoGhost 00:35, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Go Phightins! (talk · contribs) - I have amassed about 7200 edits in 21 months and meet the other criteria listed. I'm working on getting a few articles up to GA status and this would be helpful for searching for old news articles for athletes...Google News Archives doesn't always suffice. Go Phightins! 00:22, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Writ Keeper (talk · contribs) - I have 10k-ish edits in a year and a few months. Since becoming an admin, I've been doing a lot of admin work recently, but I'm trying to break into content creation more, and in my latest few attempts, I've found great sources on HighBeam that would be awesome to have; most recently about the National War Correspondents Monument, for which there were articles in the Washington Post that normal access doesn't cover. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 18:16, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Grolltech (talk · contribs) 1500+ edits, but my edits tend to be significant changes or overhauls to articles. Have authored several articles, and constantly get stymied by lack of access to subscriber-only content. Nearest libraries that offer JSTOR and others is over an hour away. Grollτech (talk) 00:49, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Rcsprinter123 (talk · contribs) with almost 30000 edits, I feel like I've made my impact on the encyclopaedia. I've made about 45 articles, some of which were deleted because of insufficient citations. Access to HighBeam would provide me with more sources to work with and hopefully, create and source more articles. As for promoted content, 7 DYKs (1 pending), 1 GA (3 pending), no FAs yet. Rcsprinter (deliver) No, I'm Santa Claus! @ 10:23, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  44. andrewman327 (talk · contribs): Access to this database would be very useful to both my content creation and my work at AFC. Andrew (talk) 19:00, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Wer900 (talk · contribs): Although I have relatively few (~2,500) edits on the encyclopedia, I have written ten articles and feel that my area of work could benefit substantially with the ability to access paid-only sources. 03:56, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Jfhutson (talk · contribs): On WP since Oct 2011, > 2,100 edits. Access would be useful for content creation in religious history articles. --JFHutson (talk) 16:13, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  47. EricEnfermero (talk · contribs): On English WP for just over a year, but ~5,000 edits. Baseball biographies, psychology and nursing are areas where I contribute. Major contributor to at least two GAs. I contribute less often to the Spanish WP, Simple English and Commons. EricEnfermero Howdy! 06:05, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Rosymonterrey (talk · contribs) Editor since 2009. I have more than 16,000 editions in the Spanish version, over 9,400 in article space. 457 articles created. My interest is mainly focused on biographies and cultural topics. In addition author or co-author in the Spanish Wikipedia in 6 FA an 21 GA. HighBeam access would be a great help to my work.--Rosymonterrey (talk) 11:24, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Jaontiveros (talk · contribs) Editor since 2008. I have more than 42,000 editions in Spanish Wikipedia. I have created more than 600 articles about history and biographies. If I can read better sources, then I can write better articles. Jaontiveros (talk) 04:49, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  50. ssriram_mt (talk · contribs) Editor since 2008 with 55,000 edits. Need the research account for writing GA class articles in Wiki project India. Ssriram mt (talk) 01:07, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

HighBeam 7

We're through the entire 1000 accounts. Should more become available, please leave your name to indicate you'd like one and also that there's continued interest!

Approved in round 6 but we ran out of accounts

  1. Tvoz (talk · contribs)
  2. Wer900 (talk · contribs)
  3. Writ Keeper (talk · contribs)
  4. Xanchester (talk · contribs)
  5. Zozo2kx (talk · contribs)
  6. محک (talk · contribs)
  7. جواد (talk · contribs)

Want an account whenever more become available

  1. User:Ddstretch. English Wikipedia, and a number of projects under that. Editing regularly since 2007, though my first edit was in 2005. Editing mainly in local UK history, but also occasional editing of Chinese-related articles. Administrator since 2008 (though with a break). I intend to continue to edit on local history issues in the UK, but also increase my editing of Chinese-related articles, both historical and current. I am particularly concerned about adequate referencing and sourcing of all material on wikipedia, both existing and new.  DDStretch  (talk) 08:54, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  2. User:Mkdw. I have been an editor of the English Wikipedia since 2006. I have approximately 14,500 edits. I largely work in sourcing articles and improving references. I often help new editors find sources for AfC via the #en-help IRC. I have majorly contributed to 3 FA's, 1 GA, and 1 FP. I would also like access to help improve and check AfD articles and New Page Patrolling where I am actively involved. Mkdwtalk 21:36, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  3. User:Ravensfire. Focus on improving existing articles on my watchlist and new "troublesome" articles I tend to get pulled into. Having access to a broader range of sources, especially past issues, will be extremely helpful. Ravensfire (talk) 16:16, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  4. User:Richwales. I have edited the English Wikipedia since 2005 and currently have about 11,000 edits. I work on articles dealing with US citizenship law, Eastern Europe, religion, and my alma mater (Stanford University). I also do gnoming work, including checking and improving sources. — Richwales (no relation to Jimbo) 07:14, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Storkk (talk · contribs): A HighBeam account would be extremely useful in reference verification tasks. Storkk (talk) 02:05, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Rosymonterrey (talk · contribs) Editor since 2009. I have more than 16,000 editions in the Spanish version of Wikipedia. 457 articles created. My interest is mainly focused on biographies and cultural topics and British history and culture too. In addition I am author or co-author in the Spanish Wikipedia in 6 FA an 21 GA. I contribute less often to the Enlish WP. HighBeam access would be a great help to my work.--Rosymonterrey (talk) 20:28, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Jaontiveros (talk · contribs) Editor since 2008. I have more than 42,800 editions in Spanish Wikipedia. I have created more than 615 articles about history and biographies. If I can read better sources, then I can write better articles, that is the reason HighBeam access will help me. Jaontiveros (talk) 01:12, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Tenebrae (talk · contribs) I am a longtime Wikipedia editor, with nearly eight years and more than 75,000 edits to my credit. I have created over 200 articles, including the popular List of African-American firsts. While much of my work has involved popular culture, I've also created articles on newspapers (such as The Daily Compass and Cleveland News), institutions (Lighthouse International), and historical figures (Takeo Ito).
  9. User:Logical Cowboy. More than 9000 edits. Very active in reference verification, particularly AfD and assessing sources on watchlist.
  10. فلورانس (talk · contribs) . hi my Dear wiki Friend i,m patroll,autopatrollers and Rollback in fa.wiki with More than 3416 edits in fa.wiki - i need to this accesse to Development my wiki edit , thanks Florence (talk) 00:14, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Pi.1415926535 (talk · contribs). Editor since 2006 (most active since 2010); 4500 edits. I work mostly in railroad history particularly involving the MBTA, and Highbeam would be very useful for digging up old journals and newspapers that Google News doesn't cover. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:24, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Reify-tech (talk · contribs) 3300+ edits. I work on a wide and eclectic range of topics, including science, technology, art, design, architecture, culture, history of technology, museums, transportation, and biographies of people related to these topics. Reify-tech (talk) 22:40, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Riana (talk · contribs) >33,000 edits on enwp, user since 2006. Finished university recently so no longer have access to HighBeam. Would be very useful for my areas of article-writing interest, mainly in the field of classical music. ~ Riana ⁂ 15:29, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Garamond Lethe (talk · contribs) Editor for just over a year, 4k edits, looking forward to using this for philosophy of science and philosophy of mathematics articles. Garamond Lethet
    c     07:37, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Fantr (talk · contribs) Editor since 2008, over 4,100 edits. Numerous literary wikipedia projects about authors not particularly well known but who warrant detailed articles. Have worked on a wide variety of articles, including economics, music, cinema and other areas to provide much-needed citations and remove faulty research especially where BLP issues exist. Have created many articles about people, books and films that have niche interest but meet notability standards. Have contributed to many GA and FL articles, most recently Bernard Lee on stage and screen. This particular list was and remains difficult to research. Google news and google books, though helpful, have obvious limitations and are time consuming when using 'snippet view'. Further, they have an American bias and I need more access to UK and European sources. I strive to properly reference and source articles where reliable source authorities aren't easy to locate. Further certain fields – the James Bond cult, for example – cite books containing dire research and hopeless scholarship. I like to see the original articles to ensure that RS are indeed correct. - Fantr (talk) 19:40, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Egeymi (talk · contribs) I am now one-year wiki old and I would use my access to enrich biographies and others. Egeymi (talk) 20:25, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Kurtis (talk · contribs) — I've been a registered editor since 2008 and have accumulated over 5,600 edits in that time, having been particularly active over the past year. I tend to edit articles pertaining to geopolitics, with a particularly strong interest in the Cold War, the Yugoslav Wars, the Middle East, and North Korea. I oftentimes use Google's search engine to look through decades-old news archives for adequate referencing, but some of the articles I come across are unavailable to me and require that I pay to register for an account. HighBeam would eliminate one of the biggest obstacles I tend to face as an editor. Kurtis (talk) 13:35, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Gareth E Kegg (talk · contribs) I've been editing Wikipedia since 2005, with over 30,000 edits to date. Access to HighBeam would help me greatly in my editing of BLPs and recent historical events that can't be found in the depths of Google Books and Google News. Sources on these sites are often Americancentric, and access to a wider scope would prevent me from haunting the British Library for occasional snippets. There is nothing better than committing a citation to a page, and access to HighBeam would be invaluable.
  19. Hillbillyholiday81 (talk · contribs) currently creating new articles weekly that cover a diverse range of subjects, this tool would be immensely useful in taking my research to the next level. Hillbillyholiday talk 03:39, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Pol430 (talk · contribs) I've been around for about 4 years and have around 20,000 edits. I'd like access to Highbeam because I have a pool of about a dozen articles I would like to expand, but I'm struggling to find reliable sources due to the fairly low profiles of the subject matter. Pol430 talk to me 19:12, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  21. User:dsouzaron. I have been an English Wikipedia editor since 2006. I have over 2800 edits spread over more than 600 pages. I am also a member of the Schools and Catholicism projects. My main contribution has been in the area of Catholicism in Pakistan and I intend to continue contributing to it. I also have modest contributions in Australia and East Timor.

Renewal account

  1. Carolmooredc (talk · contribs) Registered since 2006 with 22,990 edits. My first 1 year is running out and would love another year because very helpful in researching political and BLP histories and events. CarolMooreDC🗽 19:33, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Miyagawa (talk · contribs) I've been on the English Wiki since 2009 and have more than 36,000 edits. My first year has just run out and I would like to have a further subscription as I found it very useful in article expansions and used it numerous times. Miyagawa (talk) 12:57, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Wasted Time R (talk · contribs) My one-year account just ran out, arrgh! I've used it for a number of articles, including several that became GA or FA. I've been here since 2005, have 64,000 edits and many FA/GA/DYK articles to show for it, especially in politics, history, and popular music. Wasted Time R (talk) 01:01, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Arxiloxos (talk · contribs) I've been here since June 2008 and have 16,000 edits; I've been using HighBeam extensively for the last year to improve sourcing in articles. Discovered this morning to my dismay that my year has run out. --Arxiloxos (talk) 15:50, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  5. JayJasper (talk · contribs) Actively editing Wikipedia for over six years and have nearly 35,000 edits. My one-year account, which I utilized often and found to be an invaluable resource in my endeavors to improve WP, has expired. I am requesting a renewal of this account in order to continue using this valuable resource to aid in the improvement of the quality and credibility of Wikipedia's content, particularly in the areas of U.S. politics, history, literature, and BLP's.--JayJasper (talk) 18:33, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Collect (talk · contribs) Hit the one year wall like the others -- been using it and still have a slew of edits ... Collect (talk) 22:25, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Nikthestunned (talk · contribs) Current subscription expired per above... Have found it very useful indeed so far, hope it can be renewed! Nikthestunned 10:49, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Resolute (talk · contribs) As with others, subscription expired. It was quite useful to me in the production of FA and GAs. I suspect Highbeam would like for us to buy subscriptions (they are in business to make money, after all), but man, $200 a year... I'd be willing to pay if we could get a Wikipedia discount. Resolute 22:37, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Cloudz679 (talk · contribs) Had the year, found it very useful, and would like to continue when possible. C679 19:54, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk · contribs) since 2006 with 51K+ edits and found my one year Highbeam account to be invaluable resource and used it numerous times in various articles.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 18:32, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Viriditas (talk · contribs) editing since 2004 with 100K+ edits. Highbeam helps me write GA articles. Viriditas (talk) 04:33, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Markus Schulenburg (talk · contribs) HighBeam is a helpfull tool for checking articles for correctness. --Markus S. (talk) 15:49, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Crazypaco (talk · contribs) would like a renewal of my original expired HighBeam account, if possible. I have over 20K edits over six years. CrazyPaco (talk) 23:13, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Bruce1ee (talk · contribs) My one year subscription has expired. I found HighBeam very helpful and request that my account be renewed when possible. I've been on the English Wikipedia for 8 years with over 40,000 edits, including 76 DYK creation/expansion credits, 11 GA promotion credits, and many other content creations and expansions. —Bruce1eetalk 13:43, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Orlady (talk · contribs) also bumped up against the expiration date. I've not found HighBeam as helpful as I had hoped, but I've found it valuable -- particularly for verifying and/or correcting previously unsourced content. I'd like a renewal account, if available. --Orlady (talk) 14:02, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Joe Decker (talk · contribs) Expired, still have a use for the resource, more recently as much at AfC as AfD, and I still dabble in unreferenced BLP sorting as well. Around 40K edits, I think. This is the most effective premium resource for that sort of general source-finding that I've used. --j⚛e deckertalk 14:26, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  17. CennoxX (talk · contribs) Expired, I mainly use it for news-articles around films, it's very helpfull for magazines like the german film-dienst. I'm most active at the german Wikipedia, I've there about 13.000 edits, and I'm about 3 years active.--CennoxX (talk) 20:21, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Neatnik (talk · contribs) It appears that my account has expired. I've been editing for 2 years on fr.wp, about 2,200 edits, 75 % in the main namespace. I spend a good deal of my time searching for sources and Highbeam has been really helpful. There is a lot of good content, ranging from the folk magazine Sing Out! to The Washington Post. Neatnik (talk) 23:42, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Aschmidt (talk · contribs) I would like to renew my HighBeam account because I found it quite useful. I mostly used economics, legal, and education journals for adding references in German Wikipedia (some 27.000 edits on German Wikipedia, sysop on German Wikiversity).--Aschmidt (talk) 20:56, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  20. whpq (talk · contribs) - About44,000 edits. I use Highbeam in reviewing AFD for sourcing. A very useful resource as it contains material normally paywalled. -- Whpq (talk) 20:45, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Pigsonthewing (talk · contribs) Over 100,000 edits; Wikipedia in Residence at various museums and galleries. Wikipedia trainer. I'm already missing thus immeasurably useful tool. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:47, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Mandarax (talk · contribs) It's proved to be a valuable resource, so if renewals become available, it would be great if I could get one. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 20:55, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Sylenius (talk · contribs) Editor on fr.wp for 7 years. I've found Highbeam very useful on some occasions, especially on general or economic topics, as it contains material that you can't seem to find elsewhere, especially when you are outside the US. If available, I'd like a renewal account. Sylenius (talk) 20:59, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Alexander Doria (talk · contribs) 13,000 editions on the French Wikipedia since 2006. This has been quite useful to me, both in enhancing articles and checking accuracy of previously published content. Alexander Doria (talk) 22:13, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Critican.kane (talk · contribs) 13 editions on the german Wikipedia since 2010 (with over 600 own articles). I'm writing about american movies und biografies. I used the highbeam-account with nearly every new article (especially film critics and background-stuff) and got my first honored article (the german article to the Tv movie Stalin got an good article) - i really miss this good little highbeam-tool -- Critican.kane (talk) 23:05, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:HighBeam/Prior_applications&oldid=553416167"