It isn't a long list. It's a list with only 11 items, and it won't grow because the series is over. Each item includes what appears to be unnecessary detail. It could be merged if heavily trimmed, with 11 one-line bullet points listing the characters and their principal features. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:01, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Social protest novel deletion of Talk page
Hi,
You commented on the deletion of the Talk page for the Social protest novel. I transferred this page (in an edited version) to the Social novel Talk page. I believe that I should not have deleted the page -- my fingers moved too quickly! I will restore this, if you can confirm that this is the correct way to handle my error. Thanks.Rwood128 (talk) 12:09, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I am writing to you in regards to the page "Westward Leaning" that I created. I am currently a student studying business at the University of San Francisco and thought that the company, Westward Leaning should have a wikipedia page. Please let me know why this page was deleted, or if we could un-delete it.
Were you going to finish the job you started at Adriana Molinari? The article is titled with one name but then the rest of it has Alex Taylor all over it. Some explanation as to why there are two names in the article would probably be good as well. Maybe work in that she had a stage name or something of that ilk. Dismas|(talk)03:37, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't start it. This was a move requested per WP:CSD#G6 by Kevin. I only deleted the Adriana Molinari page so that the other page could be moved there. Kevin will most likely do any required clean-up soon. INeverCry05:12, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Per an OTRS request, I'm trying to clean the page as much as possible to update it to her current name, since she sent me an e-mail using that name, but I think I am done, as I just finished completing it after seeing this. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 05:36, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, INeverCry -- I intend to publish an article about Billy St. John, whom I am sure you will find notable and worthy. I had just created the subject page, probably because of a link that popped up, and intended to finish it later. Maybe I thought it was in my personal space, where I could work on it at my own pace (my mistake!). It looks bad to have an article flagged and deleted, especially when it never existed in the first place. Is there any way we could just cancel or eliminate the scarlet damnation of deletion for this one and let me post it when I have actually written it? I promise I will learn how to draft better, and will probably write it on my computer and copy and paste when the time comes. You will not be disappointed with the subject. Thanks in advance for your understanding. Hairhorse (talk) 17:01, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I created the Babushkanism page. My friends and I believe in this religion and follow it strongly. We wear the Babushki outfits and believe in Mimishka. This is not a hoax page or a joke. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Babushkist (talk • contribs) 01:42, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You deleted that page under "(G6: Deleted to fix copy-and-paste page move". First question: where's the fixed page? I am the instructor for the students who are working on that topic. They told me that they improved the page, but it was deleted, and that their sandbox version doesn't have the fixes that were on the deleted page... Could you restore it so I could verify? If you want to preform a hist merge, then the sandbox for most of their edits is at User:GaHee Park/sandbox (just make sure to preserve/move the talk page). Cheers, --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here02:47, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Piotr. That page was tagged with G6 by User:Happysailor. The only other edit was a complete paste of the contents (12k) by User:HaeYoon. Do you need this page restored, or just the content put into userspace? Where did HaeYoon get that 12k of text from? INeverCry02:56, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I'm signing off for the night. I restored the article so that you can look at it and figure out what was done, what needs to be done, etc. INeverCry03:16, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I have worked on this article, and have made changes as per your suggestions and as per Wiki guidelines. This is the best I could come up with, with the available information on net. Request you to make it live as a stub. I will update it as and when I come across more information.
I had recently created an article which was deleted by you. It was a biography of Ayesha Thapar - http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Ayesha_Thapar&action=edit&redlink=1 .The reason mentioned by the user who put the 'speedy deletion' tag, was that the article appeared to be an advertisement. Since I'm new on Wikipedia, Iam not really sure what amounted to this conclusion. I had no such intent and only wanted to contribute. I did my own research and found out the possible glitches which I have mentioned below. Please let me know if fixing them would serve the purpose -
1- Put a link to the linkedin profile of Ayesha Thapar
2- Opinionated the article in one place
If there are more points to take care of ,then please let me know. It would be great if you could let the article go live and then help me develop it.
This was deleted under WP:CSD#G11, but it could just as easily have been deleted under WP:CSD#A7 as it is. It probably struck the speedy tagger as a promo for a non-notable person. I've restored it and placed it in your userspace for you to work on: User:Tushar Taliyan/Ayesha Thapar. I think more has to be done to establish her notability. What, if any, connection does she or her company/ies have with the Thapar Group or the Avantha Group? A mainspace article on her may have to wait until there's an article on atleast one of her companies. If the companies she runs aren't notable enough for their own articles, then she might not be notable at present. The Thapar family connection doesn't necessarily make any member of the family notable. INeverCry15:16, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sidewalk Tha Villain
I nominated a page for deletion based on notability yesterday, but the author just removed the template. Take a look at the article and see what you think. Thanks. --Mjrmtg (talk) 10:30, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I see it's been prodded. We'll see how that goes. If he can provide a reliable source or sources to his membership in the South Park Coalition, and his connection to notable acts, that might be enough to take A7 off the table. Depending on what kind of sourcing is provided, if any, this may have to go to AFD instead. INeverCry15:24, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You deleted Talk:@MAX SyncUp under WP:CSD#G8 after deleting @MAX SyncUp. However, you then restored the article page ("6 revisions restored: mistakenly deleted" in the log), but didn't restore the talk page. Can you do so please?
Thank you for helping clear the image deletion backlogs
The Deletionist's Barnstar
Dear user INeverCry: Thank you very much for all your hard work helping to reduce the image deletion backlogs! Your efforts are much appreciated . Dianna (talk) 20:47, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
OMG, you used the dreaded d word! Thanks Dianna! I know this particular barnstar probably isnt pc, but I like it, and of course that's what counts. Good luck finding someone else who wants one though, or who wouldn't hide it deep in an archive. That's where I first came accross one of these the other day. INeverCry01:19, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Well you aren't really a Deletionist, but you did help a lot with the deletions! And you did suggest handing out these bad boys! Best wishes, -- Dianna (talk) 02:05, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I'll start working on FFD, etc on a regular basis. I hope you're only temporarily burnt out on those yourself. If you need help with anything else, I'm always here (literally). INeverCry03:29, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Dennis. I wasn't sure if I wanted to see these "mentions", but I've turned it on. The folks who complain about me and my deletions on Commons usually don't know how to link my name, so hopefully they're low-tech here too. As for the beers, I'm diabetic, so a couple cups of decaf tea would be more to my liking. ;) INeverCry02:45, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, you deleted the page Worldwide Initiatives for Grantmaker Support (WINGS) for copyright violation - can you please tell me which sections reflect this violation so I can fix? Thx and best, Urbanmolecule
You deleted the Sara Jay article. Can you please tell me why? It's not advertising. It is a noteworthy person in adult. Nothing more. Nothing less. I don't understand.
Vickyvette (talk) 01:36, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This looks like a promo for a non-notable person. The first half is blatant promo, while the bottom half doesn't show me anything that would pass WP:PORNBIO. INeverCry01:48, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(stalking) I got a note on my talk page too, but the article has been deleted so I cannot help. My sense is that had I agreed it was a blatant advert (eg: "zomg Sarah Jay is the greatest human being ever to walk this earth!!!11!1one") I would have tagged it as CSD G11 in the first instance. IMHO if you delete stuff you need to give a good explanation why, otherwise people just get pissed. Ritchie333(talk)(cont)06:23, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't bite anyone, and I used 2 basic policy links. I told him why the page was deleted in a simple straight-forward way. I don't see anything wrong with it. We have large deletion backlogs here which I'm trying to help take care of, and so I don't have the time to give some long drawn-out explanation of every deletion someone asks me about. This is how I'm going to respond to these questions in future. If you have a problem with it, you're going to be pretty busy here stalking me. INeverCry16:21, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
At Rally of Poland, you indefinitely fully protected that redirect for edit warring and added {{pp-full}} which broke the redirect. However, there have been no edits to the redirect for almost a year, and no edits to the target for over a month, so I think a mistake might have been made. Ramaksoud2000(Talk to me)01:32, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for letting me know. I've removed the pp-full. There's a recent deleted edit which caused the protection. INeverCry01:48, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If a revision was deleted, the log in the revision history would only be hidden if it was oversighted, which should only be used if personal information was revealed. And you're not an oversighter so you wouldn't have that ability. Also, if it was a single edit, which was so bad that it had to be suppressed, why would the reason for protecting be edit warring/content dispute? Ramaksoud2000(Talk to me)02:24, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Take a look at the history now. I've restored the recent edit I referred to. It was the same edit from Alex that led to the last protection in 2011, and which was repeated again in July, 2012, and now in May, 2013. The time that ellapsed between these blankings/CSD taggings led me to indef protect it to prevent further repetition. INeverCry03:40, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
sources about the Dogo Sardesco found in many forums and websites were copied by the article of wikepedia started years ago and wrongly erased due to the absence of references and bibliography months ago. I wrote again the same article (cancelled months ago) adding bibliography and external sources, because i'm not able to restore cancelled articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.39.118.133 (talk) 03:33, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
