User talk:Lonecanine

cool users to me (continued) Lonecanine 14:25, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

howl here.

Blocked

I have blocked you under the belief, based on your edits so far as well as your user name, that you are User:Thewolfstar, a banned user. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 05:11, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

But, I am not thewolfstar Lonecanine

You are blocking me for a belief. Not for a fact. Lonecanine

Yes, nothing is sure in this world. Your editing so far is pretty darn strange in any case. Are you interested in writing an encyclopedia? —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 05:19, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Lonecanine

Could you explain the edits you've been making then? Adding "there's power in numbers" to a number of user talk pages is a curious way to begin one's Wikipedia career. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 05:23, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

He is User:Thewolfstar blocked indefinitely. Not banned. Lonecanine

And some things are sure in this world. Lonecanine

I don't know. It just sounded kind of cool. I studied math at one time. Some math and I liked it. Lonecanine

See WP:BLOCK#Users who exhaust the community's patience - Thewolfstar is one such case and as such is considered banned, not just blocked. Your reason doesn't make sense. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 05:28, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I followed what happened to the wolfstar and to some other people. I don't believe that's true that he exhausted the community's patience.

Well blocking me because you think that I'm him is totally unfair. How many people do you block on a whim or a suspician. On the Wikipedia home page is says "The encyclopedia that anyone can edit" Is this true? If it isn't true Wikipedia shouldn't say it. Lonecanine

right on brother! i think... Joeyramoney 05:36, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For sure. Lonecanine

Another guy that I saw that was not treated fairly was User:Lou_Franklin But I guess he exhausted the community's patience, too. Lonecanine

Hello there. Lonecanine