Talk:City Link (company)
This article was nominated for deletion on 28 July 2008. The result of the discussion was keep. |
Removed Secton
"Criticisms
CityLink have been proven to lie to their consignees, and refuse to deliver packages."
Potenionally libelous so have removed this for now, if a person has a cite for this please put it back with the reference. Carpo1982 12:40, 11 April 2007 (UTC) To be fair they do lie, and they don't deliver.
A comment about frequent reports of poor service by Citylink has been added to the page. I have added three references totalling hundreds of reviews, which I believe fully supports the comment on their service.
- Again, not wanting to quote WP:RS, quoting the sites as below is not really considered to be a reliable source. I'm going to leave these on there, but would prefer to change these to better sources if available Carpo1982 22:01, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
Any particular reason why the link to reviews was removed? Given the fact that City Link has come in for a great deal of criticism from its victims - sorry, customers, erasing such a link is in itself a non-neutral point of view. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.201.12.122 (talk) 17:22, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Someone with too much time on their hands deleted my IMHO right on comments so I've taken their approach and deleted the bits lifted directly off their corporate site (which is of course in breech of copyright), besides they don't exactly deserver the publicity. IMHO, delete the whole article, its about as much use as the company itself (i.e. sod all).90.193.89.181 (talk)
Doubtful notability and original research
A quick look at this article only, but at first glance it seems consist of original research, and it has no citations that establish the notability of the subject, this article needs a rewrite, IMO Buffalo Bill talk to me 19:53, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
Notable? Notorious, more like
City Link is one of the major names in courier delivery in the UK: I would imagine it's known to anyone who buys though mail order or ecommerce on any kind of regular basis. It's also been in the news a lot lately as the cause of Rentokil Initial Plc's poor 2008 Q1 performance.
See e.g. http://www.forbes.com/markets/feeds/afx/2008/05/02/afx4962043.html
And yes, it richly deserves its vulgar nickname. 82.68.20.86 (talk) 15:52, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- I know CityLink very well, as I work in the courier trade. However, without some verifiable citations to establish the subject's notability, this article reads like an entry in a blog, rather than an encyclopedia. See Wikipedia Verifiability PolicyBuffalo Bill talk to me 13:40, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Personal;y I feel this article to be opinion based and no factual relevance. citations needed urgently —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.135.139.78 (talk) 23:00, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
I think in its current form there's nothing wrong with it. It's short and to-the-point, and the company is definitely notable; and I know they exist because I have had to negotiate their tortuous "phantom delivery -> phone call -> take next day off work -> wait for redelivery " process myself. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 18:55, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
File:City link van.PNG Nominated for Deletion
An image used in this article, File:City link van.PNG, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:City link van.PNG) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 23:45, 10 February 2012 (UTC) |
Removed Section
Removed "services" section since it was just advertising.Surlywombat (talk) 17:18, 24 April 2012 (UTC)