Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Music80 (talk | contribs) at 00:06, 11 June 2013 (User:Music80). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Rollback

(add requestview requests)


I am requesting rollback to help fight vandalism. I have access to STiki and have used it over 650 times without objections. I have 467 edits on article namespace. Surfer43 (talk) 03:15, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. -- Mentifisto 03:50, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Again, I would like to fight vandalism. I have more than 1120 main space edits and I have access to twinkle. iPhoneHurricane95 16:30, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Non-administrator comment) If I were you I would rack up some more reverts here and there before asking with such a vague reason for the privilege, but best let the admins decide. --PrabashWhat? 21:11, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Non-administrator comment) I support Prabash. You have asked recently for this right, and your request was declined. So you should wait. It'll break your image and make the reviewing admin a bit annoyed. So I'll say wait for more 2-4 weeks and ask again. Cheers.--Pratyya (Hello!) 13:35, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. I still see only a couple of dozen reverts. What we're looking for is a couple of hundred. Please do not apply again for another two months. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:55, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I've been reverting vandalism with Twinkle for few months now, through watchlist monitoring and manual RC patrolling. It was recently suggested on my talk page that I might want to apply for this right. In spite of my initial reluctance for a flag I didn't really need, I've done some additional reading and would like the opportunity to assist with (or at least try out) more potent tools such as Huggle and/or STiki. Thanks, --ElHef (Meep?) 05:43, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:01, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
To better combat vandals around the wiki; it would help my anti-vandalism work. Like ElHef above, I've been using Twinkle for a few months and would like to use the rollbacker tools to be able to combat vandalism more efficiently. I am active in WP:RCP and WP:NPP and aim to helpfully turn vandals into successful editors. smileguy91talk 15:29, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done INeverCry 02:13, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I'd like the rollback feature so I can use Huggle to deal with vandalism. At the moment, I use both STiki and Twinkle to revert vandalism.  Tentinator  19:35, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done INeverCry 19:40, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I've been an editor for more than two weeks now with more than 450 edits. I would like to fight vandalism easier, so it would be helpful if I had rollback (use things like STiki etc.). Thanks. Insulam Simia (talk/contribs) 20:31, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Want to revert edits in one check because I look at the page history and want to revert a couple edits. Music80 (talk) 21:57, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Non-administrator comment) At time of writing, Music80 has less than 20 edits on the main namespace. LlamaAl (talk) 22:40, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I change my mind. I will make more edits in the article name space. I will came back in a few mouths when I edit more articles. Music80 (talk) 00:06, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]